Three measurement tools contributing to value-based performance measurement: Performance measurement matrix, performance pyramid and Cambridge performance measurement framework

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 79 - 85, 31.12.2020

Hakan Cavlak

https://doi.org/10.47542/sauied.811449

Abstract

Business managers and stakeholders use the information obtained as a result of performance measurement as a reference point in the decisions they take regarding the business. Performance measurement that carries out its control function in business management has undergone many changes and developments from past to present. Initially, organizations used traditional performance measurement that was strictly measured, based only on financial data, providing historical information. In the following period, value-based performance measurement methods, which were developed in line with various factors such as the differentiation of stakeholders and social demands, technological development, including non-financial data and calculated more complex than traditional methods, began to be used. Many studies have been carried out within this framework. Value-based performance measurement methods that emerged as a result of these studies were applied by the businesses. In this study, Performance Measurement Matrix, Performance Pyramid and Cambridge Performance Measurement Framework, which are among the value-based performance measurement methods but not used in practice, have been examined. The common point of these methods is that they contribute intellectually to the value-based performance measurement methods created after them. These contributions; multidimensionality and balance in performance measurement matrix; in the performance pyramid, it presented a holistic perspective to measurement tools, and in the Cambridge performance measurement framework, it was realized as an evaluation of measurement methods. In this context, this study is expected to provide a general perspective to those concerned.

Keywords

Value-based Performance Measurement, Performance Measurement Matrix, Performance Pyramid, Cambridge Performance Measurement Framework

Değer bazlı performans ölçümüne katkı sunan üç ölçüm aracı: Performans ölçüm matrisi, performans piramidi ve Cambridge performans ölçüm çerçevesi

Abstract

İşletme yöneticileri ve paydaşları, işletme ile ilgili aldıkları kararlarda referans noktası olarak performans ölçümü sonucunda ortaya çıkan bilgileri kullanmaktadırlar. İşletme yönetiminde kontrol görevini yürüten performans ölçümü geçmişten günümüze kadar birçok değişim ve gelişim göstermiştir. İşletmeler, başlangıçta basit şekilde hesaplanan, sadece finansal verilere dayalı, geçmişe yönelik bilgiler sunan geleneksel performans ölçümünü kullandılar. Daha sonraki dönemde ise paydaşların ve toplumsal taleplerin farklılaşması, teknolojik gelişim gibi muhtelif etkenler doğrultusunda geliştirilen, finansal olmayan verileri de içeren ve geleneksel yöntemlere göre daha karmaşık şekilde hesaplanan çok boyutlu değer bazlı performans ölçüm yöntemleri kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çerçevede birçok çalışma gerçekleştirilmiş ve ortaya çıkan yöntemler uygulama alanı bulmuştur. Bu çalışmada, değer bazlı performans ölçüm yöntemleri içerisinde yer alan ancak fazla bir uygulama alanı bulamayan Performans Ölçüm Matrisi, Performans Piramidi ve Cambridge Performans Ölçüm Çerçevesi incelenmiştir. Bu yöntemlerin ortak noktası, kendinden sonra oluşturulan değer bazlı performans ölçüm yöntemlerine fikirsel olarak katkıda bulunmalarıdır. Bu katkılar; performans ölçüm matrisinde, çok boyutluluk ve denge; performans piramidinde, ölçüm araçlarına bütünsel bir bakış açısı sunması, Cambridge performans ölçüm çerçevesinde ise ölçüm yöntemlerinin değerlendirilmesi şeklinde gerçekleşmiştir. İlgili yöntemlerin en temel ortak noktası, bu yöntemlerin sunduğu anlayışa getirilen eleştirilerin kapsamlı olarak değerlendirilmesi ile farklı değer bazlı performans ölçüm yöntemlerinin ortaya çıkmış olmasıdır. Çalışmanın bu doğrultuda ilgililere konu hakkında genel bir bakış açısı sunması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Değer Bazlı Performans Ölçümü, Performans Ölçüm Matrisi, Performans Piramidi, Cambridge Performans Ölçüm Çerçevesi

References

• Alfaro, J., Ortiz, A., & Poler, R. (2007). Performance measurement system for business processes. Production Planning & Control, 18(8), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280701599772
• Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
• Bititci, U. S. (2015). Managing Business Performance: The Science and the Art. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, Implementing and Updating Performance Measurement Systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7), 754–771.
• Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: A Literature Review. International Journal Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1–24.
• Burgess, T. F., Ong, T. S., & Shaw, N. E. (2007). Traditional or Contemporary? The Prevalence of Performance Measurement System Types. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(7), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710823633
• Çakır, S., & Perçin, S. (2013). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü. Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(4), 449–459.
• Cavlak, H. (2019). Geleneksel, değer bazlı ve alternatif performans ölçütlerinin uluslararası finansal raporlama standartları ile ilişkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da bir uygulama. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Cross, K. F., & Lynch, R. L. (1988). The “SMART” Way to Define and Sustain Success. National Productivity Review, 8(1), 23–33.
• Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
• Erasmus, P. (2008). Value Based Financial Performance Measures: An Evaluation of Relative and Incremental Information Content. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(1), 66–77.
• Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems: A Review of Their Consequences and a Framework for Research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001
• Ghalayini, A. M., & Noble, J. S. (1996). The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610125787
• Ghalayini, A. M., Noble, J. S., & Crowe, T. J. (1997). An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measurement System for Improving Manufacturing Competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, (48), 207–225.
• Işığıçok, E. (2008). Performans Ölçümü, Yönetimi ve İstatistiksel Analizi. Ekonometri ve İstatistik, (7), 1–23.
• Keegan, D. P., Eiler, R. G., & Jones, C. R. (1989). Are Your Performance Measures Obsolete? Management Accounting, 70(12), 45–50.
• Kippenberger, T. (1996). The Performance Pyramid. The Antidote, 1(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006389
• Koller, T. (1994). What is Value-based Management? The McKinsey Quarterly, (3), 87–101.
• Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1992). Measure Up! Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
• Martin, R. (1997). Do We Practise Quality Principles in the Performance Measurement of Critical Success Factors? Total Quality Management, 8(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412979433
• Mills, J., Platts, K., Bourne, M., & Richards, H. (2002). Strategy and Performance: Competing through Competences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mills, J., Platts, K., Neely, A., Richards, H., & Bourne, M. (2002). Strategy and Performance: Creating a Winning Business Formula. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Neely, A., Bourne, M., Mills, J., Platts, K., & Richards, H. (2002). Strategy and Performance: Getting the Measure of Your Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance Measurement System Design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
• Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M., & Kennerley, M. (2000). Performance Measurement System Design: Developing and Testing a Process‐based Approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(10), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708
• Nilsson, F., & Stockenstrand, A.-K. (2015). Financial Accounting and Management Control. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13782-7
• Otley, D. (2007). Accounting Performance Measurement: A Review of Its Purposes and Practices. içinde Business Performance Measurement: Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Parker, C. (2000). Performance Measurement. Work Study (MCB University Press), 49(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020010311197
• Pidun, T., & Felden, C. (2011). Limitations of Performance Measurement Systems based on Key Performance Indicators. içinde Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Detroit: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
• Pun, K. F., & White, A. S. (2005). A Performance Measurement Paradigm for Integrating Strategy Formulation: A Review of Systems and Frameworks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 49–71.
• Robson, I. (2004). From Process Measurement to Performance Improvement. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150410559199
• Striteska, M., & Spickova, M. (2012). Review and Comparison of Performance Measurement Systems. The Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.114900
• Tangen, S. (2004). Performance Measurement: From Philosophy to Practice. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(8), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410569134
• Taticchi, P., & Balachandran, K. R. (2008). Forward Performance Measurement and Management Integrated Frameworks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 16(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347640810913807
• van Veen-Dirks, P. (2010). Different Uses of Performance Measures: The Evaluation versus Reward of Production Managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.002
• Watts, T., & McNair‐Connolly, C. J. (2012). New Performance Measurement and Management Control Systems. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(3), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421211281308
• Whiting, E. (1986). A Guide to Business Performance Measurements. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07472-3
• Yadav, N., & Sagar, M. (2013). Performance Measurement and Management Frameworks. Business Process Management Journal, 19(6), 947–971. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2013-0003
• Yüreğir, O. H., & Nakıboğlu, G. (2007). Performans Ölçümü ve Ölçüm Sistemleri: Genel Bir Bakış. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 545–562.
• Zsido, K. E. (2015). Historical Overview of the Literature on Business Performance Measurement from the Beginning to the Present. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 9(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2015/3/6