The Impact of Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict on Decision Quality

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 83 - 95, 29.06.2024

Emre Oruç

https://doi.org/10.47542/sauied.1484690

Abstract

This study has tested a theoretical model of the effect of task conflict on decision quality and the mediating role of relationship conflict in this effect. The participants were 205 academic, and administrative staff in a public university. Task and relationship conflict were measured through the scales developed by Jehn et al. (2008). Decision quality was measured through a scale by Visinescu and Sidorova (2017). The data were analyzed in PROCESS Macro. The results showed that task conflict affects relationship conflict positively and relationship conflict affects decision quality negatively. Besides, relationship conflict has a full mediation effect on the effect of task conflict on decision quality. However, contrary to the hypothesis that task conflict may have a positive effect on decision quality, the results have shown that task conflict has a negative effect on decision quality.

Keywords

Task Conflict, Relationship Conflict, Decision Quality

Görev ve ilişki çatışmasının karar kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, görev çatışmasının karar kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi ve ilişki çatışmasının bu etkideki rolüne ilişkin teorik bir model test edilmiştir. Görev ve ilişki çatışması Jehn ve diğerleri (2008) tarafından geliştirilen ölçekler aracılığıyla ölçülmüştür. Karar kalitesi ise Visinescu ve Sidorova (2017) tarafından geliştirilen ölçek ile ölçülmüştür. Veriler PROCESS Macro programında analiz edilmiştir. Katılımcılar, bir devlet üniversitesinde çalışan 205 akademik ve idari personelden oluşmaktadır. Sonuçlar, görev çatışmasının ilişki çatışmasına neden olduğunu ve ilişki çatışmasının da karar kalitesini düşürdüğünü göstermiştir.

Keywords

Görev Çatışması,, İlişki Çatışması, Karar Kalitesi

References

• Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. California: Pine Forge Press.
• Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management groups. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.
• Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 3, 239-253.
• Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 3, 363-375.
• Choi, K., & Cho, B. (2011). Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 8, 1106-1126.
• Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 4, 827-847.
• Cosier, R. A., & Rose, G. L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 378-391.
• Daft, R. L., Bettenhausen, K. R., & Tyler, B. B. (1993). Implications of top managers’ communication choices for strategic decisions, in: Huber, G. P./Glick, W. H. (Eds.): Organizational Change and Redesig, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 112-146.
• De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 4, 741-749.
• De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83–107.
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. London: Sage.
• De Wit F. R. C., Greer L. L., & Jehn K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360-390.
• De Wit F. R. C., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 2, 177-189.
• Dijkstra, M. T. M., Van Dierendonck, D., & Evers, A. (2005). Responding to conflict at work and individual well-being: The mediating role of flight behaviour and feelings of helplessness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 119 –135.
• Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does selfesteem make a difference? Academy of Management Journal, 43, 772–782.
• Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173–1180.
• Flores, H. R., Jiang, X., & Manz, C. C. (2018). Intra-team conflict: The moderating effect of emotional self-leadership. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29, 3, 424-444.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
• George, B., & Desmidt, S. (2018). Strategic-decision quality in public organizations: An information processing perspective. Administration and Society, 50(1), 131–156.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. N.J.: Pearson Education Limited.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Publications.
• Huang, J. (2010). Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict: The moderating role of team goal orientation and conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(3), 334-355.
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3-30.
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256‐82.
• Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflicts in work groups: increasing performance through value‐based intragroup conflict, in: De Dreu, C.K.W./ Van de Vliert, E. (Eds): Using conflict in organizations, CA: Sage, 87‐100.
• Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187-242.
• Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465-495.
• Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–783.
• McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2003). Organizational behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196-222.
• Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2007). The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive‐ and affect‐based trust in strategic decision‐making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1), 42-73.
• Parayitam, S., Olson, B. J., & Bao, Y. (2010). Task conflict, relationship conflict and agreement‐seeking behavior in Chinese top management teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(1), 94-116.
• Pondy, L. (1992). Reflections on organizational conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 257–261.
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, method, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
• Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managıng organızatıonal conflıct, in: International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206-235.
• Rose, R. C., Suppiah, W. R. R. V., Uli, J., & Othman, J. (2007). A face concern approach to conflict management–A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 121-126.
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745-772.
• Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
• Singleton, R., Toombs, L. A., Taneja, S., Larkin, C., & Pryor, M. (2011). Workplace conflict: A strategic leadership imperative. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 8, 149–163.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Visinescu, L. L., Jones, M. C., & Sidorova, A. (2017). Improving decision quality: The role of business intelligence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57, 1, 58-66.
• Zaiţ, A., & Bertea, P. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management and Marketing Journal, 9(2), 217–224.