Yeni Kamu Yönetimi - Demokrasi İlişkisi

Year 2004, Issue: 52, 135 - 166, 01.01.2004

Mehmet Akif Özer

References

• Aberbach, J. D. 1989. Keeping a Watchful Eye. The Politics öf CongressionalOversight. Washington D.C.: Brookings İnstitution.
• Aberbach, J. D. and B. A. Rockman. 1999, The reinvention syndrome: politicsby other means? Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Mannheim, March 26—31.
• Aberbach, J. and B. A. Rockman. 2000. In the Web of Politics. Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
• Avcoin, P. 1990. Administrative Reform in Public Management: Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Goövernance, 3, 115—37.
• Bang, H. P. and E. Sorensen. 1999. “The Everyday Maker”: A New Challenge toDemocratic Gövernance. Administrative Theory and Practice, 21, 325— 41.
• Barberis, P. 1998. The New Public Management and A New Accountability. Public Administration, 76, 451—70.
• Behn, R. D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, D.C.: Brookines Ins.
• Blomgvist, P. and B. Rothstein. 2000. (The New Face of the Welfare State). Stockholm: Apora.
• Boston, J., J. Martın, J. Pallot and P. Walsh. 1991. Reshaping the State: New Zealand's Bureaucratıc Revolution. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
• Boston, |., J. Martın, J. Pallot and P. Walsh. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
• Bovens, M. 1998.The Ouest for Responsıbility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organızations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brunsson, N. and J. P. Olsen. 1993. The Reforming Organızatıon. London and New York.
• Campbell, C. and J. Halligan. 1992. Political Leadership in an Agpe of Constraint: The Expertence of Australia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Christensen, T. 1991. Bureaucratic Roles, Political Loyalty and . Professional Autonomy. Scandınavıan Political Studies, 14 (4): 303—20.
• Christensen, T. 1999. Administrative Reform—transforming the Relationship Between Political and Administrative Leaders? Paper Presented at the
• SOG Tokyo Conference— “The OÇuest for Gövemance: Reforms, Renovations, and Retrenchments in Gövernment for the 21st Century,” November 17—19.
• Christensen, T. and P. Legreid. 1999. New Publice Management—desipn, Resistance or Transformatıon? Public Productivity & Management Revtiew, 23 (2): 16993. Christensen, T. and P. Legreid. 200la. A Transformative Perspective on Administrative Reforms. İn T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. Christensen, T. and P. Legreid. 2001b. New Publie Management: Ündermining Political Control? In T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. Christensen, T. and P. Leegreid. 2001c. Coping with Modern Leadership Roles— the Problematıc Redefinition of Public Compantes. Paper Presented at the 2001 Meeting of the İPSA Section of the Structüre of Gövernance, University of Oklahoma, March 30—31. Christensen, T.and P. Legreid. 2001d. New Publiec Management: the Effects of Contractualism and Devolution on Political Control. Public Management, 3 (1), 73—94. Christensen, T. and B. G. Peters. 1999. Structure, Culture and Goövernance: A Comparative Analysıs of Norway and the Ünited States. Totowa, Md.: Rowman. Christensen, T. and K. A. Ravik. 1999. The Ambıiguity of Appropnateness. İn M. Egeberg and P. Legreid (eds), Organizing Political İnstitutions. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Chubb, J. E. and T. M. Moe. 1989. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington D.C.: Brookings İnstitution. Davıs, G. 1997. Toward a Hollow State? Managerialism and Its Critics. İn M. Considine and M. Painter (eds), Managerialism. The Great Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne Unı. Press. Day, P. and R. Klein. 1987. Accountability. Five Public Services. London: Tavistock. DeLeon, L. and R. B. Denhardt. 2000. The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Adminiıstration Review, 60 (2), 84—8. Domberger, S. and P. Jensen. 1997. Contracting Out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence, Prospects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13, 67—IT.
• Domberger, S. and S. Rimmer. 1994. Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1, 439—53. Egeberg, M. 1997. Verdier 1 Statsstyre og Noen Organısatoriske İmplikasjoner (State Values and Some Orşanizational Implications). İn T. Christensen and M. Egeberg (eds), Forvaltningskunnskap (Public Administration). Oslo: Tano Aschehouş. Eriksen, E. O. and |. Loftager, eds. 1996. The Ratıionality of the Welfare State. Oslo: Scandınavıan University Press. Evans, L. et al. 1996. Economic Reforms in New Zealand 1984 95. The Pursuit of Efficieney. Journal of Economic Literatüre, 34, 1856—1902. Ferlie, E. et al. 1996. The New Publie Management in Action. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Fountain, J. E. 2001. Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service. Gövernance, 14, 55—74. Franklın, M. N. 1996. Electoral Partıcıpation. İn L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks. Fredrickson, G. 1996. Comparing the Reinventing Movement with the New Public Adminıstration. Public Admınıstratıon Review, 56, 263—70. Fredrickson, G. 1997. The Spirit öf Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Goodin, R. E. 1999. Accountability —Elections as ÖOne Form. In R. Rose (ed.), The International Eneyclopedia of Elections. Washington, D.C.: Congressional COuarteriy. Görmley, W. T. Jr. 1989.Taming - the Bureaucracy. Muscles, Prayers, and Other Strategtes. Princeton, N.J. Gustafsson, L. and A. Svensson. 1999. Public Sector Reform in Sweden. Malmo: Liber Ekonomi. Green-Pedersen, C. 2001. Market-type reforms of the Danish and Swedish Service Welfare States: Different Party Strategtes and Different Outcomes. Paper Presented at the 2001 Meeting of the IPSA Section of the Structure of Gövernance, University of Oklahoma, March 30—31. Gregory, R. 1995. Accountability, Responsibility and Corruption: Managıng the Public Production Process. In J. Boston (ed.), The State under Contract. Wellington: Bridget Willams.
• Gregory, R. 1998a. The Changing Face of the State in New Zealand: Rolling Back the Public Service? Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 3—6. Gregory, R. 1998b. Political Responsibility for Bureaucratic İncompetence: Tragedy at Cave Creek. Public Admınıstration, 76, 519—38. Gregory, R. 2001. Transforming Gövernmental Cultüure: A Sceptical View of Nevw Public Management. In T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformatiıon of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. Hague, M. S. 2001. The diminishing Publicness of Public Service ünder the Current Mode of Gövernance. Public Admınsitration Review, 61 (1): 65—2. Heady, F. 1996. Configurations of Civil Service Systems. İn H. A. G. M. Bekke, J. L. Perry and T. A, J. Toonen (eds), Civil Service Systems in Comparatıve Perspective. Bloominaton: İndiana Üniversity Press. Heniş, J. R. 1994. Rethinking School Choice. Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Hogwood, B. W. 1993. Restructuring Central Gövernment: the “Next Steps” Initiatıve. In J. Kooiman and K. Eliassen (eds), Managing Public Organızations, 2nd edn. London: Sapge. Hood, C. 1991. A Publie Management for All Seasons? Public Admınıstratıon, 69, 3—19. Hood, C. 1996. Exploring Variatıons in Public Management Reform of the 1980s.In H. A.G.M. Bekke, J. L. Perry and 'T. A.7. Toonen (eds), Civil Service Systems. Bloomington:Indiana Un. Press. Hood, C. 1998. The Art of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenssen, S. 2001. Transforming Politics: Towards New or Lesser Roles for Democratic İnstitutions? İn T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformatiıon of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. Katz, Richard S. and P. Mair, eds. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaption in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sapge. Kelsey, J. 1997. The New Zealand Experiment. 2nd edn. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
• Kettl, D. F. 1997. The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 44662. Krasner, S. 1988. Sovereignty: An TInstitutional Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 26, 66—96. Kvavık, R. B. 1976. Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics. Oslo: Scandınavian Uni.Press. Leazes, F. J. 1987. Accountability and the Business State. New York: Praeger. Leegreid, P. and J. P. Olsen. 1984. Top Civil Servants in Norway: Key Players on Different Teams. In E. N. Suleiman (ed.), Bureaucrats and Politecy Making. New York: Holmes & Meter. Leegreid, P. and P. G. Roness. 1999. Adminıstrative Reform as Organized Attention. İn M. Egeberg and P. Leegreid (eds), Organiızing Political İns. Oslo: Scandinavian Uni.Press. Leegreid, P. and P. G. Roness. 2000. Admınıstrative Reform Programs and Institutional Response in Norwegian Central Gövernment. İn J. 1. Hesse, C. Hood and B. G. Peters (eds), Paradoxes in Public Sector Reform. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Majone, G. 1996. The Rise of Statutory Regulation. In G. Majone (ed.), Regulatıng Europe-Routledge. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 1983. Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us About Gövemment. American Political Sctence Review, 77, 281—97. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Iİnstitutions: The Organızatıonal Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen. 1995. Democratiıc Gövernance. New York: Free Press. Martın, J. 1997. Changing Accountability Relatıons: Politics, Customers and the Market PUMA/PACOT)1. Paris: OECD. Nagel, J. H. 1997. Editor's introduction. Journal of Policy Analysıs and Management, 18, 357—81. Narud, H. M. and H. Valen. 1999. Decline of Electoral Turnout: The Case of Norway. In H.Narud and T.. Aalberg (eds), Challenges to Representatıve Democracy: — Parties, - Voters and. Public Opinion. — Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Niskanen, W. A, 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Gövernment. AldineAtherton.
• Niskanen, W. A. 1991. A reflection öon “Bureaucracy and Representative Government.” In Andre Blais and Stephane Dion (eds), The BudpgetMaximizing Bureaucrat. Appraisals and Evidence. Pittsburgh: Üniversity of Pittsburgh Press. Nordby, T. 2000. T politikkens sentrum. Variasjoner 1 Stortingets makt 1814— 2000 (In the Core of Politics. Varniatıons in the Power of the Storting 1814-2000). Oslo: Scandınavian University Press. Olsen, J. P. 1978. Folkestyre, byra'krati og korporativisme (Democracy, bureacucracy, and corporatism). Iİn J. P. Olsen (ed), Politisk organisering (Political Organizing). Bergen: Scandinavian University Press. Olsen, J. P. 1983. The Dilemmas of Organızatıonal İntepration in Gövernment. In J. P. Olsen, Organized Democracy. Political İnstitutions in a Welfare State—the Case of Norway. Bergen: The Scandinavian University Press. Olsen, J. P. 1984. Representatıvitet ög Politisk Organısering (Representatıvity and Political Organizing). Iİn O. Berg and A. Ünderdal (eds), (From Election to Decision). Oslo: Aschehouşg. Olsen, J. P. 1988. Administrative Reform and Theories öf Organization. İn C. Campbell and B.G. Peters (eds),Organizing Goövernance: Göverning Organızatıons. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Olsen, J. P. 1990. Demokratı pa Svenska (Democracy in Sweden). Stockholm: Carlssons. Olsen, J. P. 1992. Analyzing instituttonal dynamics.Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxıs, 2,247—71. Olsen, J. P. 1996. Norway: slow learner—or another triumph of the tortoise? İn J. P.Olsen and B. G. Peters (eds), Lessons from Expertence. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Olsen, J. P. 1997. Institutional design in a democratic context.Journal of Political Philosophy, 5, 203—29. Osborne, D. and E. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Gövernment. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. Peters, B. G. 1996.The Future of Goöverning. Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Peters, B. G. 1998. Admınıstration in the year 2000: Serving the Cltent. Iİnternational Journal of Public Admınıstration, 21, 1759—76.
• Peters, B. G. 1999. Is democraey a substitute for ethics? Administrative reform and accountability in post-reform gövernment. Unpublished . paper. Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh. Peters, B. G. and |. Pierre. 1998. Gövernance without gövernment? Rethinking publie administration. Journal of Public Admınıstration Research and Theory, 8, 223—43. Peters, B. G. and V. Wright. 1996. Publie policy and admınıstratıon, old and new. İn R. E. Goodin and H-D. Kliıngemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Sctence ÖOxford: Oxford Uni. Press. Petersson, O. 1999. Political instituttons and democratic citizenship. İn M. Egeberg and P. Legreid (eds), Organızing Political İnstitutions. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Pitkin, H. F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: Unı.of California Press. Pollitt, C. 1995. Tustification by works or by faith. Evaluation, 1, 133—54. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2000. Publie Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pollitt, C., X. Girre, J. Lonsdale, R. Mu, H. Summa and M. Weerness. 1999, Performance ©or Compliance? Performance Audit and. Public Management in Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford Üniversity Press. Pollitt, C., J. Birchall and K. Putnam. 1998. Decentralising Public Service Management. London: Macmillan. Power, M. 1994. The Audit Explosion. London: Demos. Rhodes, R. A. W 1997. Ünderstanding Gövernance. Buckingham: Open University Press. Rokkan, S. 1966. Norway: Numerical Democracy and Corporate Pluralısm. In R. A. Dahl (ed.),Political - Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Romzek, B. S. 1998. Where the buck stops. Accountability in reformed public organızatıons. İn P. İngraham et al., Transforming Gövernment. San Francisco: Jossey. Romzek, B. S. 2000. Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform. İnternational Review of Admınistrative Sciences, 66 (1), 21—44. Roness, P. G. (2001). Transforming State Employees” Untons. In T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformatıon of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. Secharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
• Seharpf, F. W. 1999. Legitimacy in the multı-actor european polity. İn M. Egeberg and P. Leegreid (eds), Organızing Political Tnstitutions. Oslo: Scandinavian Üniversity Press. Sehmitter, P. C. 1974. Still the century of corporatism? İn F. B. Pike and T. Striteh (eds),The New Corporatism. University of Notre Dame. Self, P. 2000. Rolling Back the State. Economic Dogma & Political Choice. New York: St.Martın's Press. Strom, K. 1990.Minority Gövernment and Majority Rüle.Cambridge: Cambridge Unı.Press. Thomas, P. G. 1998. The changing nature of accountability. İn B. G. Peters and D. J.Savote (eds),Taking Stock. Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: Canadian Centre for Management Development. Thompson, D. F. 1980. Moral responsibility of public officials: the problem of many hands. American Political Sctence Review, 74, 905—16. Thompson, D. F. 1987. Political Ethics and Publie Office. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Uni.Press. Thompson, F. J. and N. M. Riccucci. 1998. Reinventing Gövernment. Annual Review of Political Sctence, 1, 231—57. Weaver, B. K. and B. A. Rockman. 1993, Assessing the Effects of Institutions. In R. K. Weaver and B. A. Rockman (eds), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the Ünited States and Abroad. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution. Yeatman, A. 1997. The reforms of public management: an överview. İn M. Considine and M. Painter (eds), Managerialism: The Great Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. Zuna, H. R. 2001. The Effects of Corporatısation on Political Control. In T. Christensen and P. Legreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformatıon of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.