The Adaptation Study of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) for Turkish Children

Abstract

This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) in Turkish children. The Turkish version of the TGMD-3 was administered to a total of 251 children, consisting of 129 girls and 122 boys aged 5 to 10 years. The instructions and skill assessment criteria of the TGMD-3 were translated into Turkish using the forward-backward translation method and an expert panel review. Subsequently, each skill in the test was demonstrated to each child by the researcher using the Turkish version of the TGMD-3 instructions, after which the child was asked to perform the skill. Each skill was performed twice by each child, and all performances were video recorded for scoring purposes. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interrater reliability of the TGMD-3 were found to be above .87. The construct validity of the test was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and acceptable fit index values were obtained for the 13-item two-factor model (χ2/df = 2.42, RMSEA = .07, TLI = .92, CFI = .94). Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficients were .79 for the locomotor skills subtest and .85 for the ball skills subtest. Additionally, the ICCs calculated for test-retest reliability were .87 for the locomotor skills substest and .91 for the ball skills subtest. In conclusion, the findings indicate that the Turkish version of the TGMD-3 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing fundamental movement skills.

Keywords

• Motor development
• Fundamental movement skills
• Motor competence
• Gross motor development
• Test of Gross Motor Development-3

Project Number

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK (SOBAG-121K484) ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi BAP (SHD-2022-20302) birimi tarafından desteklenen projeden üretilmiştir.

Büyük Kas Motor Gelişim Testi-3 (BKMGT-3)’ün Uyarlama Çalışması

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Büyük Kas Motor Gelişim Testi-3 (BKMGT-3)’ün Türk çocuklarında geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya 5-10 yaş arası 129 kız ve 122 erkek olmak üzere toplam 251 çocuk katılmıştır. BKMGT-3’ün yönergesi ve beceri değerlendirme ölçütlerinin Türkçe’ye çevrilmesi, çeviri-geri çeviri yöntemi ve uzman paneli kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. BKMGT-3 Türkçe sürümünün yönergesi kullanılarak testte bulunan her bir beceri, öncelikle araştırmacı tarafından çocuğa gösterilmiş ve sonrasında çocuğun beceriyi denemesi sağlanmıştır. Çocuk, her beceriyi iki kez uygulamıştır ve her uygulama daha sonra izlenerek puanlanabilmesi için video kamerayla kaydedilmiştir. BKMGT-3’ ün bağımsız puanlayıcıları arasındaki sınıf içi korelasyon katsayıları ,87'nin üzerinde bulunmuştur. Testin yapı geçerliği, Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) ile incelenmiş ve 13 maddeli iki faktörlü model için kabul edilebilir düzeyde uyum indeksi değerleri elde edilmiştir (χ2/sd= 2,42; RMSEA= ,07; TLI= ,92; CFI= ,94). Testin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları, yer değiştirme becerileri alt testi için ,79, top becerileri alt testi için ise ,85 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca BKMGT-3'ün test-tekrar test güvenirliği için hesaplanan sınıf içi korelasyon katsayıları, yer değiştirme becerileri alt testi için ,87, top becerileri alt testi için ise ,91 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak araştırma bulguları, BKMGT-3 Türkçe sürümünün temel hareket becerilerini ölçmek amacıyla kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Motor gelişim
• Temel hareket becerileri
• Motor yeterlik
• Büyük kas motor gelişim
• Büyük Kas Motor Gelişim Testi-3

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi BAP birimi.

Project Number

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK (SOBAG-121K484) ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi BAP (SHD-2022-20302) birimi tarafından desteklenen projeden üretilmiştir.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK (SOBAG-121K484) ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi BAP (SHD-2022-20302) birimi tarafından desteklenen projeden üretilmiştir.

References

1. Berk, L. E. (2013). Bebekler ve çocuklar doğum öncesinden orta çocukluğa (N. Işıkoğlu Erdoğan, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Structural equations with latent variables (pp. 226–318). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
3. Boz, M., ve Aytar, A. (2012). Büyük Kas Motor Gelişim-2 (TGMD-2) testinin Türk çocuklarına uyarlama çalışması. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(12), 17–24.
4. Bozdemir, R., Çimen, Z., Kaya, M., ve Demir, O. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin beden eğitimi ve spor dersinde karşılaştıkları problemler (Tokat ili örneği). Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2015(5), 221-234.
5. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner ve J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). CA: Sage.
6. Burton, A. W., ve Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. United States: Human Kinetics.
7. Carballo-Fazanes, A., Rey, E., Valentini, N. C., Varela-Casal, C., ve Abelairas-Gómez, C. (2023). Interrater reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition following raters’ agreement on measurement criteria. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 11(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2022-0068
8. Cicchetti, D. V., ve Rourke, B. P. (Eds.). (2004). Methodological and biostatistical foundations of clinical neuropsychology and medical and health disciplines (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.

9. Clutterbuck, G. L., Ho, C., ve Dwyer, G. M. (2025). The Feasibility and Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) for Children with Disabilities in Regional Australia: A Pragmatic Pilot Study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2463350
10. Cools, W., De Martelaer, K., Samaey, C., ve Andries, C. (2009). Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 8(2), 154–168. PMID: 24149522
11. Coppens, E., Laureys, F., Mostaert, M., D’Hondt, E., Deconinck, F. J., ve Lenoir, M. (2021). Validation of a motor competence assessment tool for children and adolescents (KTK3+) with normative values for 6- to 19-year-olds. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 652952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.652952
12. Creswell, J. W., ve Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications
13. Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00117
14. Duncan, M. J., Martins, C., Ribeiro Bandeira, P. F., Issartel, J., Peers, C., Belton, S., O’Connor, N. E., ve Behan, S. (2022). TGMD-3 short version: Evidence of validity and associations with sex in Irish children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1978161
15. Eddy, L. H., Bingham, D. D., Crossley, K. L., Shahid, N. F., Ellingham-Khan, M., Otteslev, A., … Hill, L. J. (2020). The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0237919.
16. Epir, S., ve Yalaz, İ. (1984). Frankenburg Gelişimsel Tarama Testi’nin Türk çocuklarına uyarlanması. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi, 27(2), 80–84.
17. Estevan, I., Molina-García, J., Queralt, A., Álvarez, O., Castillo, I., ve Barnett, L. M. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0045
18. Fatemeh, B., Sakineh, R., ve Mohtasham, G. (2024). A methodological research for development and psychometric properties of a new measure to assess health literate organization (MAHLO-76) in hospital settings. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1642, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12130-5
19. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3rd ed). Los Angeles: Sage. Publications Inc.
20. Frankenburg, W. K., ve Dodds, J. B. (1967). The Denver Developmental Screening Test. Journal of Pediatrics, 71(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(67)80070-2
21. Gajewska, E., Surowińska, J., Chałupka, A., Moczko, J., Michalak, M., ve Sobieska, M. (2025). The qualitative motor assessment at three months allows a better prognosis than the traction test. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 15035,1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98118-5
22. Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., ve Goodway, J. D. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Gallahue, D.L., Ozmun, J.C., ve Goodway, J.D. (2014). Motor gelişimi anlamak. (D.S. Özer ve A. Aktop Çev. Ed.) (7. Basımdan çeviri). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
24. George, D., ve Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. (14th ed.). New York: Routledge.
25. Griffiths, A., Toovey, R., Morgan, P. E., ve Spittle, A. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 8(10), e021734, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734
26. Güvendir, M. A., ve Özkan, Y. Ö. (2022). Item removal strategies conducted in exploratory factor analysis: A comparative study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.827950
27. Haywood, K. M., ve Getchell, N. (2020). Life span motor development (7th ed.). Human Kinetics.
28. Herrmann, C., Bretz, K., Kühnis, J., Seelig, H., Keller, R., ve Ferrari, I. (2021). Connection between social relationships and basic motor competencies in early childhood. Children, 8(1), 53, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010053
29. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., ve Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
30. Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
31. Hulteen, R. M., Barnett, L. M., True, L., Lander, N. J., del Pozo Cruz, B., ve Lonsdale, C. (2020). Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(15), 1717–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1756674
32. İnan, M. (1996). 6-12 yaş grubu normal çocukların Lincoln-Oseretsky motor gelişim testine göre psikomotor yeteneklerinin araştırılması [Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
33. Kılıç, Z., Uyanık-Balat, G. ve Çağlak-Sarı, S. (2017). CHAMPS Motor Beceriler Protokolü’nün (CMSP) 4 ve 5 yaş çocuklarına yönelik Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 129-142.
34. Kula Kartal, S., ve Mor Dirlik, E. (2016). Geçerlik kavramının tarihsel gelişimi ve güvenirlikte en çok tercih edilen yöntem: Cronbach alfa katsayısı. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1865–1879.
35. Kim, S. Y., ve Cho, M. K. (2024). Testing the validity and reliability of the Korean nursing surveillance scale: a methodological study. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 709, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02378-x
36. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
37. Koo, T. K., ve Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
38. Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., ve Lucas, W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x
39. Maeng, H. J., Webster, E. K., Ulrich, D. A. (2016). Reliability for the Test of Gross Motor Development-third edition (TGMD-3), Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(S2), A38.
40. Magistro, D., Piumatti, G., Carlevaro, F., Sherar, L. B., Esliger, D. W., Bardaglio, G., Magno, F., Zecca, M., ve Musella, G. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development–Third Edition in a large sample of Italian children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 23(9), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.02.014
41. Maïano, C., Morin, A. J., April, J., Webster, E. K., Hue, O., Dugas, C., ve Ulrich, D. (2022). Psychometric properties of a French-Canadian version of the Test of Gross Motor Development–Third Edition (TGMD-3): A bifactor structural equation modeling approach. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 26(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1946541
42. Missiuna, C., Cairney, J., Pollock, N., Campbell, W., Russell, D. J., Macdonald, K., ve Cousins, M. (2014). Psychological distress in children with developmental coordination disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(5), 1198–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.007
43. Mohammadi, F., Bahram, A., Khalaji, H., ve Ghadiri, F. (2017). The Validity and Reliability of Test of Gross Motor Development – 3rd Edition among 3-10 Years Old Children in Ahvaz. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal, 16(4), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.22118/jsmj.2017.51022
44. Mohammadi, F., Bahram, A., Khalaji, H., Ulrich, D. A., ve Ghadiri, F. (2019). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Test of Gross Motor Development–Third Edition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 7(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0045
45. Munro, B. H., ve Visintainer, M. A. (1986). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
46. ⁠Mülazımoğlu Ballı, A., ve Gürsoy, F. (2012). Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Yeterlik Testinin beş-altı yaş grubu türk çocuklar için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23 (3), 104-118.
47. Naylor, J. M., Ko, V., Adie, S., Gaskin, C., Walker, R., Harris, I. A., ve Mittal, R. (2011). Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 77. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/77
48. Nunnally, J. C., ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. O’Brien-Smith, J., Tribolet, R., Smith, M. R., Bennett, K. J. M., Fransen, J., Pion, J., ve Lenoir, M. (2019). The use of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder in the talent pathway in youth athletes: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22(9), 1021-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.014
50. O’Callaghan, L., McGinlay, M., Gallagher, S., ve O’Boyle, J. (2024). Associations of physical activity dose and movement quality with executive functions in socioeconomically disadvantaged children aged 5–6 years. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70, 102546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102546
51. Pang, A. W. Y., ve Fong, D. T. P. (2009). Fundamental motor skill proficiency of Hong Kong children aged 6–9 years. Research in Sports Medicine, 17(3), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620902897516
52. Payne, V. G., ve Isaacs, L. D. (2012). Human motor development: A lifespan approach (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Pavletić Leutar, P., Krstulović, S., De Giorgio, A., ve Kuvačić, G. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Four Station Fundamental Motor Test (4-SFMT) for assessing motor skills in preschool children—a pilot study. Education Sciences, 13(3), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030306
54. Piek, J. P., Bradbury, G. S., Elsley, S. C., ve Tate, L. (2008). Motor coordination and social–emotional behaviour in preschool-aged children. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802033592
55. Rey, E., Carballo-Fazanes, A., Varela-Casal, C., Abelairas-Gómez, C., ve ALFA-MOV Project collaborators (2020). Reliability of the test of gross motor development: A systematic review. PloS One, 15(7), 1-26, e0236070, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236070
56. Rigoli, D., Kane, R. T., Mancini, V., Thornton, A., Licari, M., Hands, B., McIntyr, F., ve Piek, J. (2016). The relationship between motor proficiency and mental health outcomes in young adults: A test of the environmental stress hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 53, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.09.004
57. Rigoli, D., Piek, J., ve Kane, R. (2012). Motor coordination and psychosocial correlates in a normative adolescent sample. Pediatrics, 129(4), e892–e900. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1237
58. Rintala, P. O., Sääkslahti, A. K., ve Iivonen, S. (2017). Reliability assessment of scores from video-recorded TGMD-3 performances. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0007
59. Robinson, L. E., Stodden, D. F., Barnett, L. M., Lopes, V. P., Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P., ve D’Hondt, E. (2015). Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Medicine, 45(9), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6
60. Roczniak, L., Jutras, M., Lévesque, C., ve Fortin, C. (2025). Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development Third Edition among children with developmental coordination disorder. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 45(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2024.2378050
61. Rose, E., Larkin, D., Parker, H., ve Hands, B. (2015). Does motor competence affect self-perceptions differently for adolescent males and females? SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015615922
62. Salaj, S., ve Masnjak, M. (2022). Correlation of motor competence and social-emotional wellbeing in preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1087007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846520
63. Sarışık, S., Akça, E., Karasu, C., ve Karabacak, K. (2023). İlkokullarda uygulanan beden eğitimi ve oyun dersinin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Göbeklitepe Eğitim ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 82-96.
64. Sevimay, D. (1986). Okul öncesi çağı çocuklarının motor performanslarının incelenmesi. [Basılmamış Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara].
65. Erol, N., Sezgin, N., ve Savaşır, I. (1993). Gelişim Tarama Envanteri ile ilgili geçerlik çalışmaları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 8(29), 16–22.
66. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
67. Scheuer, C., Herrmann, C., ve Bund, A. (2019). Motor tests for primary school-aged children: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(10), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1553489
68. Simons, J., ve Eyitayo, G. B. (2016). Aspects of reliability and validity of the TGMD-3 in 7-10 year old children with intellectual disability in Belgium. European Psychomotricity Journal, 8 (1), 3-16.
69. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
70. Tavakol, M., ve Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
71. Tavasoli, A., Azimi, P., ve Montazari, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales—for assessing motor development of low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatric Neurology, 51(4), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.06.010
72. Temel F., Ersoy Ö., Avcı N. ve Turla A. (2005). Gazi Erken Çocukluk Değerlendirme Aracı (GEÇDA). Ankara: Rekmay Limited Şirket.
73. Tompsett, C., Sanders, R., Taylor, C., ve Cobley, S. (2017). Pedagogical approaches to and effects of fundamental movement skill interventions on health outcomes: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(9), 1795–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0697-z
74. Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development (2nd ed.). Pro-Ed.
75. Ulrich, D. A. (2013). The Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3): Administration, scoring, and international norms. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 24(2), 27–33.
76. Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Introduction to the special section: Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0020
77. Valentini, N. C., Zanella, L. W., ve Webster, E. K. (2017). Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition: Establishing content and construct validity for Brazilian children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0002
78. Wagner, M. O., Webster, E. K., ve Ulrich, D. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development (German translation): Results of a pilot study. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0006
79. Webster, E. K., ve Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third edition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0003
80. Wilson, A., Piek, J. P., ve Kane, R. (2013). The mediating role of social skills in the relationship between motor ability and internalizing symptoms in pre-primary children. Infant and Child Development, 22(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1773
81. Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., ve Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωₕ: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
82. Ziegler, M. (2014). Comments on item selection procedures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000196