Yaşlı Bireylerde Fonksiyonel Uygunluk ve Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyini Belirleyen Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi ile Yaşlılar için Fiziksel Uygunluk Testi Arasındaki Korelasyonu Değerlendiren Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı üç yönlüdür: Şırnak ilinde yaşayan yaşlı bireylerin fonksiyonel uygunluk (FU) ve fiziksel aktivite (FA) düzeylerini belirlemek, yaş gruplarına ve cinsiyete göre FU ve FA farklılıklarını incelemek ve Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi (UFAA) ile Yaşlılar için Fiziksel Uygunluk Testi (YFUT) arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Toplam 134 katılımcının (63 erkek; boy 168.98±15.28 cm, vücut ağırlığı (VA) 79.40±13.10 kg; 71 kadın; boy 158.20±6.43 cm, VA 76.01±13.55 kg) FA seviyeleri UFAA ile FU seviyeleri ise YFUT kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde Kruskal Wallis testi ve Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Kruskal Wallis testinde farklılık olması durumunda, farklılığın hangi gruptan kaynaklandığını belirlemek için Mann Whitney-U testi kullanılmıştır. Kadın katılımcıların yaş gruplarına göre karşılaştırılmasında sadece 2dk adım testinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur (p=.022). 60-64 yaş grubunda, sandalye otur ve kalk ve kol bükme testlerinde erkekler lehine anlamlı fark bulunurken, 75-80 yaş grubunda sırt kaşıma testinde kadınlar lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Sandalye otur ve kalk, kol bükme, 2dk adım ve 8 adım kalk ve yürü testlerinde cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<.05). Her iki cinsiyette de UFAA ile belirlenen enerji tüketiminin minimal düzeyde olduğu ve artan yaş ile birlikte azaldığı saptanmıştır. IPAQ (MET-wk) ile SFT (2min step test) arasında pozitif ve orta düzeyde ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. (r=.426; p<.001). Bu çalışma sonucunda, her iki cinsiyet için de yaşlanmayla birlikte FA ve FU'da anlamlı bir azalma olduğu ve bu durumun 70 yaşından sonra artarak devam ettiği görülmektedir. Kadın katılımcılarda yaşa bağlı azalma erkeklere göre daha fazladır.

Keywords

• Fiziksel aktivite
• Fonksiyonel uygunluk
• Yaşlanma
• Yaşlı birey

A Study Determining the Functional Fitness and Physical Activity Level and Assessing Correlation between IPAQ and SFT in Elderly People

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is threefold: To determine the FF and PA levels, examine the differences of FF and PA, determine the correlation between International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and Senior Fitness Test (SFT) of older-age people living in Şırnak. Total of 134 participants’ (63 were male; height 168.98±15.28cm; Body weight (BW) 79.40±13.10kg; 71 females; height 158.20±6.43cm; BW 76.01±13.55kg) level of physical activity (PA) was evaluated with IPAQ and functional fitness (FF) was estimated by using SFT. Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for the analysis of data. In case of difference in Kruskal Wallis test, Mann Whitney-U test was used to determine which group caused the difference. In the comparison of female participants according to age groups there was only in 2min step test statistically significant difference (p=.022). There was a significant difference between 60-64 age males and females chair stand and arm curl tests in favor of males, however in back scratch test was statistically significant difference in 75-80 ages in favor of females. Chair stand, arm curl, 2min step and 8 Ft up-and-go tests was significantly difference between genders (p<.05). IPAQ energy consumption in both gender was dominant on minimal active and it was decreasing with aging. It is seen that a positive and moderate level correlation between IPAQ (MET-min/wk) and SFT (2min step test) (r=.426; p<.001). This study found that there is a continuous decline in PA and FF with aging for both of the genders. This situation accelerates after the age of 70 and age-related decrease of females stand out compared to males.

Keywords

• Aging
• Functional Fitness
• Older Adults
• Physical Activity

References

1. 1. Atalağ, O., Kurt, C., Solyomvari, E., Sands, J., ve Cline, C. (2020). Post-activation potentiation effects of back squat and barbell hip thrust exercise on vertical jump and sprinting performance. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness.
2. 2. Barbalho, M., Coswig, V., Souza, D., Serrao, J. C., Campos, M. H., ve Gentil, P. (2020). Back squat vs. hip thrust resistance-training programs in well-trained women. International journal of sports medicine, 41(05), 306-310.
3. 3. Bauer, P., Sansone, P., Mitter, B., Makivic, B., Seitz, L. B., ve Tschan, H. (2019). Acute effects of back squats on countermovement jump performance across multiple sets of a contrast training protocol in resistance-trained men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 33(4), 995-1000.
4. 4. Bevan, H. R., Cunningham, D. J., Tooley, E. P., Owen, N. J., Cook, C. J., ve Kilduff, L. P. (2010). Influence of postactivation potentiation on sprinting performance in professional rugby players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(3), 701-705.
5. 5. Blazevich, A. J., ve Babault, N. (2019). Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1359.
6. 6. Boullosa, D. A., Abreu, L., Beltrame, L. G., ve Behm, D. G. (2013). The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(8), 2059-2066.
7. 7. Caterisano, A., Moss, R. E., Pellinger, T. K., Woodruff, K., Lewis, V. C., Booth, W., ve Khadra, T. (2002). The effect of back squat depth on the EMG activity of 4 superficial hip and thigh muscles. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 16(3), 428-432.
8. 8. Chatzopoulos, D. E., Michailidis, C. J., Giannakos, A. K., Alexiou, K. C., Patikas, D. A., Antonopoulos, C. B., ve Kotzamanidis, C. M. (2007). Postactivation potentiation effects after heavy resistance exercise on running speed. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(4), 1278-1281.

9. 9. Crewther, B. T., Kilduff, L. P., Cook, C. J., Middleton, M. K., Bunce, P. J., ve Yang, G. Z. (2011). The acute potentiating effects of back squats on athlete performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 25(12), 3319-3325.
10. 10. Esformes, J. I., ve Bampouras, T. M. (2013). Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(11), 2997-3000.
11. 11. Gambetta, V. (2007). Sport specific game analysis. Athletic Development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, (pp. 56-58).
12. 12. Gheller, R. G., Dal Pupo, J., Ache-Dias, J., Detanico, D., Padulo, J., ve dos Santos, S. G. (2015). Effect of different knee starting angles on intersegmental coordination and performance in vertical jumps. Human movement science, 42, 71-80.
13. 13. González-García, J., Morencos, E., Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Cuéllar-Rayo, Á., ve Romero-Moraleda, B. (2019). Effects of 7-week hip thrust versus back squat resistance training on performance in adolescent female soccer players. Sports, 7(4), 80.
14. 14. Kilduff, L. P., Owen, N., Bevan, H., Bennett, M., Kingsley, M. I.,ve Cunningham, D. (2008). Influence of recovery time on post-activation potentiation in professional rugby players. Journal of sports sciences, 26(8), 795-802.
15. 15. Linder, E. E., Prins, J. H., Murata, N. M., Derenne, C., Morgan, C. F., ve Solomon, J. R. (2010). Effects of preload 4 repetition maximum on 100-m sprint times in collegiate women. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(5), 1184-1190.
16. 16. Matthews, M. J., Matthews, H. P., ve Snook, B. (2004). The acute effects of a resistance training warmup on sprint performance. Research in Sports Medicine, 12(2), 151-159.
17. 17. Okuno, N. M., Tricoli, V., Silva, S. B., Bertuzzi, R., Moreira, A., ve Kiss, M. A. (2013). Postactivation potentiation on repeated-sprint ability in elite handball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(3), 662-668.
18. 18. Pescatello, L. S., Riebe, D., ve Thompson, P. D. (Eds.). (2014). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (9th ed., pp. 96–99). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
19. 19. Prieske, O., Behrens, M., Chaabene, H., Granacher, U., ve Maffiuletti, N. A. (2020). Time to differentiate postactivation “potentiation” from “performance enhancement” in the strength and conditioning community. Sports Med, 50, 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01300-0
20. 20. Seitz, L.B., ve Haff, G.G. (2016). Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med, 46(2), 231-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0415-7
21. 21. Wassertheil, S., ve Cohen, J. (1970). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Biometrics, 26(3), 588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529115
22. 22. Wilson, J. M., Duncan, N. M., Marin, P. J., Brown, L. E., Loenneke, J. P., Wilson, S. M., ... ve Ugrinowitsch, C. (2013). Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(3), 854-859.
23. 23. Young, W. B. (2006). Transfer of strength and power training to sports performance. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 1(2), 74-83.