İMTİYAZLI ORTAKLIK SÖYLEMİNİ TÜRKİYE-AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ İLİŞKİLERİ ÜZERİNDEN ANLAMAK

Öz

Bu çalışma, özellikle Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinde sıkça kullanılan “İmtiyazlı Ortaklık” söylemini ele alacaktır. Başkalarına tanınmayan özel hak ve şart olarak tanımlanabilecek olan imtiyaz, pozitif bir anlam da taşımaktadır. Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinde de pozitif bir yanının olacağı düşünülen İmtiyazlı Ortaklık seçeneği Türkiye ile AB arasındaki ilişkilerde tam tersine negatif bir etkiye neden olmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Türkiye-AB ilişkilerde gündeme gelen İmtiyazlı Ortaklık seçeneği hem AB’nin üçüncü ülkelerle ilişkilerinde hem de Türkiye ile ilişkilerinde bütün detaylarıyla ele alınacaktır. Bu şekilde çalışma, öncelikli olarak İmtiyazlı Ortaklık kavramının tanımını örneklerle anlatmaya çalışacaktır. Daha sonra Avrupa Birliğinde bu tür bir ortaklık modelini, hukuki dayanağını, Avrupa Birliğinin üçüncü bir ülke ile bu tür bir ilişki kurup kurmadığını ele alacaktır. Daha sonra Türkiye-AB ilişkileri bağlamında İmtiyazlı Ortaklık söylemi ele alınacak ve iki taraf arasında böyle bir ortaklık olması durumunda Türkiye açısından muhtemelen negatif bir İmtiyazlı Ortaklık modelinin olacağı ileri sürülecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türkiye,Avrupa Birliği,İmtiyazlı Ortaklık,Üçüncü Ülke,ortaklık ilişkisi

UNDERSTANDING PRIVILEGED PARTNERSHIP DISCOURSE ON THE BASIS OF TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION RELATION

Abstract

This study elaborates on the discourse of “Privileged Partnership”, a concept which is frequently visited particularly in the relations between Turkey and the European Union. The word privilege may be defined as special rights and conditions not granted to everyone bearing positive repercussions in its meaning. Although this term is considered have a positive impact on the relations between Turkey and the EU, it is observed to cause a negative impact on the contrary. In this context, the option of Privileged Partnership brought to the agenda with the relations between Turkey and the EU will be tackled along with all its details pertaining to both the relations of the EU with third parties and Turkey. This study will explore the definition of the concept Privileged Partnership via various examples. Followed by this definition, this partnership model in the European Union and its legal basis will be explained while investigating whether the European Union has established such a relationship with a third country or not. In this regard, the discourse of Privileged Partnership will specifically be analyzed in the context of Turkey-EU relations, arguing that such a partnership between the two parties will lead to negative model of Privileged Partnership for Turkey

Keywords

• Turkey,European Union,Privileged Partnership,Third Country,Association Relation

References

1. Afacan, I. (2013). European Union and Turkey: Converging Interests Separate Paths?. Accessed date: 23.02.2019, http://www.turkishreview.org/tr/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=223321
2. Ahren, R. (2014). EU offers unprecedented aid to Israelis, Palestinians for peace deal. Accessed date: 25.02.2019, http://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-offers-unprecedented-aid-to-israelis-palestinians-for-peace-deal/.
3. Akdeniz, A. (2013). EU-Turkey Relations: Towards a Constructive Re-engagement?. Accessed date: 28.02.2019, http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EU_Turkey_Relations_Towards_A_Constructive_Re-engagement.pdf
4. Altıntaş, V. and Marchetti, A. (2005). The Tough Topics in Accession Negotiations, EU-Turkey Monitor, 1 (1), 1-8.
5. Atılgan, C. and Deborah K. (2006). EU Integration Models Beyond Full Membership, Working Paper, 158, 1-18.
6. Aybet, G. (2006). Tukey and the EU After the First Year of Negotiations: Reconciling Internal and External Policy Challenges, Security Dialogue, 37 (4), 529-549.
7. Barysch, K.. (2007). What Europeans Think About Turkey and Why, Centre for European Reform, 1392, 1-6.
8. Barysch, K.. (2011). Is Turkey Our Partner Now, Accessed date: 13.03.2019, http://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2011/turkey-our-partner-now

9. Birand, M. A. (2013). Merkel Should Either Explain or Give Up Privileged Partnership. Accessed date: 16.03.2019, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=merkel-should-either-explain-or-give-up-privileged-partnership-2009-07-16
10. Carey, M. (2013). We Hear You Knocking. Accessed date: 21.03.2019, http://www.paperjam.lu/article/fr/we-hear-you-knocking
11. Council of the EU. (2006). European Council 14-15th December 2006, Presidency Conclusions. Accessed date: 20.03.2019, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/92202.pdf
12. Eur-Lex. (2012). Treaty of European Union. Accessed date: 19.03.2019, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT
13. European Commission. (1993). European Council in Copenhagen Conclusions of the Presidency 21-22Haziran 1993. Accessed date: 17.03.2019, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72921.pdf
14. European Commission. (2012). Relations Tunisie-Union Europeenne: Un Partenariat Privilegie Plan D’Action 2013-2017. Accessed date: 15.03.2019, http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/tunisia/documents/press_corner/plan_action_tunisie_ue_2013_2017_fr.pdf
15. Füle, S. (2012). Privileged Partnership: Moving EU-Tunisia Cooperation to A Higher Level. Accessed date: 14.03.2019, http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/fule/headlines/news/2012/11/20121119_cs.htm
16. Gordon, P. and Taşpınar, O. (2004). Turkey’s European Quest: The EU’s Decision on Turkish Accession, U.S.-Europe Analysis Series, 6, 1-6.
17. Hillion, C. (2013). The EU Neighbourhood Competence Under Article 8 TEU, Notre Europe Policy Paper, 69, 1-7.
18. House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee. (2008). Keeping Door Wide Open: Turkey and EU Accession, Seventh Report of Session 2007-2008, 1, 1-20.
19. Hugg, P. R. (1999). The Republic of Turkey in Europe: Reconsidering the Luxembourg Exclusion, Fordham International Law Journal, 23 (3), 1-103.
20. Independent Commission on Turkey. (2004). Turkey in Europe: More than a promise. Report of the Independent Commission on Turkey. Accessed date: 12.03.2019, https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/english.pdf
21. Insel, A. (2002). Boosting Negotiations with Turkey: What Can France Do?, Global Turkey in Europe Policy Brief, 4, 1-5.
22. Karakaş, C. (2006). Gradual Integration: An Attractive Alternative Integration Process for Turkey and the EU, European Foreign Affairs Review, 11 (3), 311-331.
23. Kardaş, Ş. (2013). Merkel and Sarkozy Call for Privileged Partnership Angers Turkey. Accessed date: 10.03.2019, http://www.jamestowS.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=34983
24. Katcher, B. (2013). Moving Away From Privileged Partnership?. Accessed date: 08.03.2019, http://washingtonnote.com/moving_away_fro/
25. Köksal, A. (2011). A Comparative Approach to Privileged Partnership: Is Turkey Really Different?, Boğaziçi Journal, 25 (2). 27-57.
26. Kovacheva, R. (2013). Will Turkey enter Europe with an open face?. Accessed date: 07.03.2019, http://www.euinside.eu/en/analyses/european-face-of-turkey-role-or-necessity
27. Kösebalaban, H. (2007). The Permanent Other? Turkey and the Question of European Identity, Mediterranean Quarterly, 18 (4), 87-111.
28. Lindsey, D. (2013). The World from Berlin: Angela Merkel’s Privileged Provocation in Turkey. Accessed date: 04.03.2019, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-world-from-berlin-angela-merkel-s-privileged-provocation-in-turkey-a-686485.html
29. Mahlut, M. (2010). A Comparative Study of Capitulation Word with Concession Word in Terms of Historical Perspective at the Beginning of the 20th Century, History Studies, 2 (2), 401-413.
30. Maresceau, M. (2012). Turkey: A Candidate State for the Union. Niamh Nic Shuibhne and Laurence V. Gormley (eds.). From Single Market to Economic Union: Essays in Memory of John A. Usher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83-99.
31. Müftüler-Baç, M. (2007). Turkey’s Accession To The European Union: Does Culture and Identity Play A Role?, Ankara Review of European Studies, 6 (2), 31-50.
32. Offical Journal of the European Union. (1994). EEA Agreement. Accessed date: 03.03.2019 http://ec.europa.eu/world/agreements/downloadFile.do?fullText=yes&treatyTransId=448
33. Ozkırımlı, U. (2008). Milliyetçilik ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri. İstanbul: TESEV Yayınları.
34. Pamir, A. (2002). Kapitülasyon Kavramı ve Osmanlı Devletine Etkileri, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 51 (2), 79-119.
35. Polenz, R. (2010). Better for Both of Them: Turkey Ought to be ın the EU, Körber Policy Paper, 12, 1-25.
36. Pope, H. (2013). The EU-Turkey Cyprus Triangle. Accessed date: 01.03.2019, http://www.cfr.org/turkey/icg-eu-turkey-cyprus-triangle-turkey-armenia-vow-heal-past-wounds/p20189
37. Rahigh-Aghsan, A. (2011). Turkey’s EU Quest and Political Cleavages under JDP, Review of European Studies, 3 (1), 43-53.
38. Schmitt, H. (1987). The Privileged Partnership: Franco-German Relations in the European Community (1969-1984) by Haig Simonian, The Journal of Modern History, 59 (3), 564-566.