NATO ÜYELİĞİNDEN ÖNCE VE SONRA SLOVAKYA'NIN GÜVENLİK VE SAVUNMA İKİLEMİ- CSDP (ORTAK GÜVENLİK VE SAVUNMA POLİTİKASI) KAPSAMINDA YENİ BİR KİMLİK NASIL İNŞA EDİLDİ?

Year 2024, , 405 - 430, 27.09.2024

Zahraa Ghazi Alhilmee

https://doi.org/10.58375/sde.1513203

Abstract

Soğuk Savaş Dönemi ardından Sovyetler Birliğinin dağılmasıyla, bu ülkeden ayrılan Doğu Avrupa ülkeleri büyük bir dönüşümü yaşamış ve güvenlik ve ekonomik kaygılarının bir sonucu olarak Avrupa Birliği ve NATO’ya üye olmak istemişlerdir. Bunun altında yatan ana neden böylece arzu ettikleri güven ve huzura bir an önce kavuşmak istemeleriydi. Ancak zaman içinde bu konuda hemen sonuç alamayacaklarını ve bu suretle endişelerini gidermelerinin mümkün olmadığını anlamakta gecikmediler. Ne NATO ne de Avrupa Birliği güvenlik endişelerini gidermediği gibi savunma harcamalarını daha da artırmak zorunda kaldıkları herkes tarafından görüldü. Bu ülkelerden birisi de şüphesiz Slovakya olmuştu.
Kimlik inşası; kimlikler üzerinden yaşanan, ötekileştirme, birleştirme, bütünleştirme, gelişme, ayrıştırma ya da çözülme gibi süreçleri açıklayan bir kavram olarak açıklanmaktadır. Kimlik inşası diğer yandan var olma süreçlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçasıdır ve kültürel birikimle şekillenen kimlik, benzeşmenin, kaynaşmanın veya çözülmenin alanı olarak hem bir araya getirici hem de ayrıştırıcı bir özelliğe sahiptir.
Bu makalede bir Doğu Avrupa ülkesi olan Slovakya’nın NATO üyeliği öncesi ve sonrasına odaklanılarak, Avrupa Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası kapsamında yeni bir kimlik inşasını nasıl inşa etmeye çalıştığı ve bu doğrultuda güvenlik ve savunma alanında yaşadığı güvenlik ikilemleri açık kaynaklardan elde edilen bilgiler ışığında incelenecek ve bu ülkelerin yaşadıkları sıkıntılara ve bir türlü ulaşamadıkları güvenlik ihtiyacına literatür taraması ile bilimsel bir açıklama getirilmeye çalışılacaktır.
Araştırma genel olarak Slovakya ve yakın çevresinde bir oranda da Vişegrad ülkeleri esas alınarak sürdürülmüştür. Şüphesiz aynı sıkıntının diğer Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinde de az ya da çok yaşandığı görülmektedir. Yapılan araştırma, aynı zamanda bu bölgelerde güvenlik ihtiyacının giderilmesine yönelik daha gerçekçi bir yapılanmanın nasıl olması gerektiği konusu üzerinde de bazı önerileri ortaya koyacaktır.

Keywords

Güvenlik, OGSP, Kimlik, Sosyal Yapılandırmacılık, Vişegrad Grubu

BEFORE AND AFTER EU-NATO ACCESSION SECURITY AND DEFENSE DİLEMMA OF SLOVAKIA – HOW A NEW IDENTİTY UNDER CSDP (THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY) HAS BEEN BUILD?

Abstract

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the post-Cold War era saw significant transformation in the Eastern European countries that emerged from Soviet influence. Driven by concerns related to security and economic stability, these nations sought to align themselves with Western institutions, ultimately aiming to gain membership in both the European Union and NATO.

The main reason underlying this was that they wanted to get the confidence and peace they wanted as soon as possible. However, they did not delay in realizing that they would not get immediate results on this issue over time and that it was not possible for them to resolve their concerns in this way. It was seen by everyone that neither NATO nor the European Union had addressed security concerns, and that they had to increase defense spending even more. One of these countries was undoubtedly Slovakia.
Identity construction: It is explained as a concept that explains processes such as marginalization, unification, integration, development, separation or dissolution experienced through identities. On the other hand, identity construction is an integral part of the processes of existence, and identity shaped by cultural accumulation has both a unifying and divisive feature as a field of similarity, fusion or dissolution.

This article examines Slovakia's journey before and after its NATO membership, highlighting how the country, as an Eastern European state, has been striving to develop a new identity within the framework of the European Common Security and Defense Policy. It also explores the security challenges Slovakia faces in the realms of defense and security, as derived from publicly available sources.
In general, the research was carried out on the basis of Slovakia and its immediate surroundings to a certain extent also the Visegrad countries. Undoubtedly, it is observed that the same problem is experienced more or less in other Eastern European countries. The research conducted will also reveal some suggestions on how a more realistic structure should be aimed at eliminating the need for security in these regions.

Keywords

Security, CSDP, Identity, Social Constructivism, Visegrad Group.

References

• Acar, Merve. (2018). “Yunan Milliyetçiliğinin Oluşumu ve Modern Yunanistan’da Milliyetçi Tarih Yazımı, Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, Cilt 6, Sayı:2.
• Arkonaç, Sibel. (2017). Eleştirel Psikoloji, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Alpar, Güray. (2021). Uluslararası İlişkilerde Stratejiyi ve Coğrafyayı Anlamak, Konya: Palet Yayınları.
• Alpar, Güray. (2023). Kültür İletişim ve Diplomasi, Konya: Palet Yayınları.
• Alpar, Güray. (2023a). From Geopolitic to Geostrategy, Konya: Palet Yayınları.
• Alpar, Güray. (2023b). Stratejik Öngörü ve Uyanma Zamanı, Konya: Palet Yayınları.
• Beblavy, Miroslav and Beblava, Emilia, (2014). The Changing Faces of Europeanisation: How Did the European Union Influence Corruption in Slovakia Before and After Accession? (May 5, 2014). Europe-Asia Studies, 66:4, 536-556, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.899767.
• Bútora, M., & Bútorová, Z. (1993). Slovakia: The Identity Challenges of the Newly Born State. Social Research, 60(4), pp.705–736. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971007Chovančík, Martin. (2008). Vývoj bezpečnostnej politiky Slovenskej republiky od roku 1998 [Development of Security Policy of the Slovak Republic since 1998] (Brno: Masarykova Univerzita, 2008), 13.
• Čižik, Tomáš. (2020). Security perception and security policy of the Slovak Republic, 1993–2018, Defense & Security Analysis. DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2020.1831228.
• Deborah L. Michaels & E. Doyle Stevick. (2009). Europeanization in the ‘other’ Europe: writing the nation into ‘Europe’ education in Slovakia and Estonia, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41:2, pp.225-245. DOI: 10.1080/00220270802515919.
• Eilertsen, R. H. (2020). Just a matter of power? Explaining EU Member States’ commitment to Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). Master thesis, Department of Comparative Politics University of Bergen.
• Foret, Francois. (2009). Religion: a Solution or a Problem for the Legitimisation of the European Union?, Religion, State & Society, 37:1-2, pp.37-50, DOI: 10.1080/09637490802693213.
• Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Geoffrey, Pridham. (2008). Status Quo Bias or Institutionalisation for Reversibility?: The EU's Political Conditio.nality, Post-Accession Tendencies and Democratic Consolidation in Slovakia, Europe-Asia Studies, 60:3, pp.423-454. DOI: 10.1080/09668130801948000. Garton Ash, T. 1999. The puzzle of central Europe. The New York Times Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1999/03/18/the-puzzle-of-centraleurope/ accessed from.
• Haughton, T. (2014). Exit, choice and legacy: explaining the patterns of party politics in post-communist Slovakia. East European Politics, 30(2), pp.210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.867255Darina Malová & Branislav Dolný. (2016). Economy and Democracy in Slovakia during the Crisis: From a Laggard to the EU Core, Problems of Post-Communism, 63:5-6, pp.300-312,. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2016.1200952.
• "History of the Visegrad Group’. (2017). http://www.visegradgroup.eu/about/history.
• Ivo, Samson, Ivo. Die Slowakei zwischen Annäherung an Moskau und Streben nach Westintegration [Slovakia between Rapprochement with Moscow and the Desire for Western Defense & Security Analysis 13 Integration] (Cologne: Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien).
• Ixchel Pérez-Durán & Carlos Bravo-Laguna. (2019). Representative bureaucracy in European Union agencies, Journal of European Integration, 41:8, pp.971-992, DOI:10.1080/07036337.2019.1611803.
• Jan, Winiecki. (1994). East‐Central Europe: A regional survey—The Czech Republic, Hungary. Poland and Slovakia in 1993. Europe-Asia Studies, 46:5. 709-734. DOI: 10.1080/09668139408412197.
• Kazharski, Aliaksei. (2017). The End of ‘Central Europe’? The Rise of the Radical Right and the Contestation of Identities in Slovakia and the Visegrad Four, Geopolitics. 23(4), pp.754–780. DOI:10.1080/14650045.2017.1389720.
• Kundera, M. (1984). The tragedy of central Europe. The New York Review of Books. New York, NY: The New York Review of Books.
• Martin Chovančík, Vývoj bezpečnostnej politiky Slovenskej republiky od roku 1998 [Development of Security Policy of the Slovak Republic since 1998] (Brno: Masarykova Univerzita, 2008), 13.
• Massrali. Nabila. (2008, Mayıs 6) Ukraine: High Representative Josep Borrell visited Ukraine to reconfirm EU’s support against external threats. The Diplomatic Service of the European Union (EEAS). 06 Ocak 2022 https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ukraine-high-representative-josep-borrell-visited-ukraine-reconfirm- eu%E2%80%99s-support-against_en
• Merket, H. (2012). European external action service and the nexus between cfsp/csdp and development cooperation, European Foreign Affairs Review, 17(4), pp.625-652.
• Muzikarova, Sona, Muzikarova. (2022, May 19). Europe’s energy security asymmetry. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-energy-security-asymmetry/ adresinden erişildi.
• Miroslav, Beblavý & Emília, Sičáková-Beblavá. (2014). The Changing Faces of Europeanisation: How Did the European Union Influence Corruption in Slovakia Before and After Accession?, Europe-Asia Studies, 66:4, pp.536-556. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.899767
• Ondrejcsak, Robert. (2006). Security Policies of the Slovak Republic and Hungary – the ‘Limited Differentiation’ in Central Europe. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs Vol. 15, No. 3-4. SLOVAKIA AND HUNGARY CONVERGENCIES VS. DIVERGENCIES (2006), pp. 76-90.
• Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), https://www.pesco.europa.eu/about/
• Peter, Vermeersch. (2002). Ethnic mobilisation and the political conditionality of European Union accession: The case of the Roma in Slovakia, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28:1, 83-101. DOI: 10.1080/13691830120103949.
• Security Strategy of the Slovak Republic, 2021, security-strategy-of-the-slovak-republic.pdf (mzv.sk) Stojarova, Vera. (2018). Populist, Radical and Extremist Political Parties in Visegrad countries vis à vis the migration crisis. In the name of the people and the nation in Central Europe. journal Open Political Science, 1, pp.32-45. https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0001
• Tarasovič, Vladimir. (2013). Reformy ozbrojených síl Slovenskej republiky nielen ako podmienka integrácie do NATO [Reforms of the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic not only as a condition for integration into NATO] (Bratislava: Center for European and North Atlantic Affairs, 2013), 3.
• Theys, Sarina. (2018). Introducing Constructivism in International Relations Theory, https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-constructivism-in-international-relations-theory/
• Török, Marian. (2014). ‘Tri obdobia dvoch desaťročí zahraničnej politiky Slovenskej republiky’ [Three Periods of Two Decade of the Foreign Policy of the Slovak Republic], Politické vedy 17, no. 3,pp. 112-151.
• Türkyılmaz, Ümran. (2021). Amin Maalouf’un Penceresinden Göç ve Kimlik, Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
• Veljanovska, Katerina. (2015). “The Changing Nature of Security in Europe: the Triangle between Russia’s New Foreign Policy, the CSDP and NATO”, ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.
• Vladimír Tarasovič, Reformy ozbrojených síl Slovenskej republiky nielen ako podmienka integrácie do NATO [Reforms of the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic not only as a condition for integration into NATO] (Bratislava: Center for European and North Atlantic Affairs, 2013), 3.