Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory

Halil İbrahim Dönmez; Mehmet Onur Olgun; Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök

doi:10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312

Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory

Abstract

This study highlights the critical importance of polar regions for our planet and examines the responsibilities undertaken by stakeholders at both global and local scales from a game theory perspective for a sustainable future. Game theory, which is a valuable tool in analyzing interactions and strategic decisions among two or more players, is broadly applicable in economics, the environmental sciences, policy, and the natural sciences. In this study, game theory is used to determine optimal solutions that lead to maximum environmental sustainability in polar areas, using Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarcticus) as the case. An additional consideration is the game theory and its ability of management within complex systems, and the difficulty and complications involved in the multi-criteria decision-making process which this study also considers. Lastly, the study has implications for policy making both with regard to polar regions and for polar wildlife, and provides substantial guidance for future research on this topic.

Keywords

References

J. Martin, L. De Neve, J. A. Fargallo, V. Polo, M. Soler, “Factors affecting the escape behaviour of juvenile chinstrap penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica, in response to human disturbance”, Polar Biology, 27(12), 775-781, 2004.
A. Barbosa, J. Benzal, A. De León, J. Moreno, “Population decline of chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) on deception island, south Shetlands, Antarctica”, Polar Biology, 35(9), 1453-1457, 2012.
P. G. Brown, P. Timmerman Ed., “Ecological Economics for The Anthropocene: An Emerging Paradigm”, Columbia University Press, 408 pages, 2015.
R. J. Kemkes, J. Farley, C. J. Koliba, “Determining when payense are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision”, Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2069-2074, 2010.
R. Heede, “Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers”, 1854–2010, Climatic Change, 122(1), 229-241, 2014.
S. Xu, Y. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Ma, H. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Tao, “Do foreign direct investment and environmental regulation improve green technology innovation? An empirical analysis based on panel data from the Chinese manufacturing industry”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 55302 - 55314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14648-1, 2021.
Z. Dong, Y. He, H. Wang, L. Wang, “Is there a ripple effect in environmental regulation in China? – Evidence from the local-neighborhood green technology innovation perspective”, Ecological Indicators, 118, 106773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106773, 2020.
D. Krass, T. Nedorezov, A. Ovchinnikov, “Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology”, Production and Operations Management, 22, 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.12023, 2013.

K. Du, J. Li, “Towards a green world: How do green technology in-novations affect total-factor carbon productivity”, Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2019.04.033, 2019.
E. Jafarnejad, A. Makui, A. Hafezalkotob, A. Aghsami, “Governance intervention policies in the production competition of biofuels and fossil fuels: a pathway to sustainable development”, Operations Management Research, 1-23, 2024.
H. Y. Leong, C. K. Chang, K. S. Khoo, K. W. Chew, S. R. Chia, J. W. Lim, ..., P. L. Show, “Waste biorefinery towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy: a solution to global issues”, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14, 1-15, 2021.
E. Jafarnejad, A. Makui, A. Hafezalkotob, D. Mohammaditabar, “A robust approach for cooperation and coopetition of bio-refineries under government interventions by considering sustainability factors”, IEEE Access, 8, 155873-155890, 2020.
K. R. Kerry, G. Hempel Ed., “Antarctic Ecosystems: Ecological Change and Conservation”, Springer Science & Business Media, 439 pages, 2012.
B. Stonehouse, “Monitoring shipborne visitors in Antarctica: a preliminary field study”, Polar Record, 28(166), 213-218, 1992.
D. J. Enzenbacher, “Tourists in Antarctica: numbers and trends”, Tourism Management, 14(2), 142-146, 1993.
P. Yorio, P. D. Boersma, “The effects of human disturbance on Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus behaviour and breeding success”, Bird Conservation International, 2(3), 161–173. doi:10.1017/S0959270900002410, 1992.
E. J. Woehler, R. L. Penney, S. M. Creet, H. R. Burton, “Impacts of human visitors on breeding success and long-term population trends in Adélie penguins at Casey, Antarctica”, Polar Biology, 14(4), 269-274, 1994.
M. Giese, “Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success”, Biological Conservation, 75(2), 157-164, 1996.
A. Frid, L. Dill, “Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk”, Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 2002.
G. Carroll, E. Turner, P. Dann, R. Harcourt, “Prior exposure to capture heightens the corticosterone and behavioural responses of little penguins (Eudyptula minor) to acute stress”, Conservation Physiology, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2016, cov061, https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cov061, 2016.
V. A. Viblanc, A. D. Smith, Gineste, B., & Groscolas, R., “Coping with continuous human disturbance in the wild: insights from penguin heart rate response to various stressors”, BMC Ecology, 12, 1-12, 2012.
C. Marciau, T. Raclot, S. Bestley, C. Barbraud, K. Delord, M. A. Hindell, F. Angelier, “Body condition and corticosterone stress response, as markers to investigate effects of human activities on Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae)”, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1099028, 2023.
M. A. Lynch, C. Youngflesh, N. H. Agha, M. A. Ottinger, H. J. Lynch, “Tourism and stress hormone measures in Gentoo Penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula”, Polar Biology, 42, 1299-1306, 2019.
H. Karabacak, “Yeni Başlayanlar için Oyun Teorisi”, Seçkin Yayınları, 328 pages, 2018.
E. Yılmaz, “Oyun Teorisi”, Literatür Yayıncılık, 384 pages, 2022.
L. S. Shapley, “A value for n-person games,” in Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 2, Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 28, Editors: H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 307–317, 1953.
I. Curiel, “Cooperative Game Theory and Applications”, Springer-Verlag, 202 pages, 1997.
S. H. Tijs, “Introduction to Game Theory”, India: SIAM Hindustan Book Agency, 184 pages, 2003.
R. Branzei, D. Dimitrov, S. Tijs, “Models in Cooperative Game Theory”, Springer-Verlag, 204 pages, 2008.
P. D. Taylor, L. B. Jonker, “Evolutionary stable strategies and game Dynamics”, Mathematical Biosciences, 40(1-2), 145-156, 1978.
J. von Neumann, O. Morgenstern, “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior”, Princeton University Press, 704 pages, 1944.
R. Dalio, The Great Powers Index: 2024. How the leading 24 countries are doing and their prospects for the next 10 years. [Online]. Available: https://economicprinciples.org/downloads/DalioRay_Power_Index_Appendix.pdf, Accessed: EXACT DATE (ie. 10.10.2024)
N. Hanley, H. Folmer, “Game theory and the environment”, Edward Elgar Publishing, 448 pages, 1998.
A. Endres, “Game theory and global environmental policy”, Poiesis Prax 3, 123–139, 2004.
I. Parrachino, A. Dinar, F. Patrone, “Cooperative Game Theory and its Application to Natural, Environmental, and Water Resource Issues : 3. Application to Water Resources”. Policy Research Working Paper, 4074, 2006.
M. McGinty, “International environmental agreements among asymmetric nations”, Oxford Economic Papers, 59(1), 45-62, 2007.
A. Dinar, J. Albiac, & J. Sánchez-Soriano, “Game Theory and Policy Making in Natural Resources and the Environment (1st ed.)”, London: Routledge, 2008.
P. K. Dutta, R. Radner, R., “A strategic analysis of global warming: Theory and some numbers”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 187-209, 2009.
M. McGinty, “International environmental agreements as evolutionary games” Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 251-269, 2010.
E. Cerdá-Tena, “International Environmental Agreements and Game Theory”, In Modern Mathematical Tools and Techniques in Capturing Complexity (pp. 287-300). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
J. Eyckmans, "Review of Applications of Game Theory to Global Climate Agreements," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 57(2), pages 122-144, 2012.
Y. Pavlova, A. de Zeeuw, “Asymmetries in international environmental agreements”, Environment and Development Economics,18(1), 2013.
S. Cole, S. Izmalkov, & E. Sjöberg, “Games in the Arctic: applying game theory insights to Arctic challenges” Polar research, 33(1), 23357, 2014.
A. de Zeeuw, “International environmental agreements”, Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 7(1), 151-168, 2015.
A. Bond, J. Pope, A. Morrison-Saunders, & F. Retief, “A game theory perspective on environmental assessment: What games are played and what does this tell us about decision making rationality and legitimacy?”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 187-194, 2016.
H. Tulkens, “Economics, Game Theory and International Environmental Agreements: The Ca'Foscari Lectures”, World Scientific, 2019.
D. Karaś, “Geopolityczne uwarunkowania rywalizacji o zasoby Arktyki” Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, (64), 278-290, 2020.
T. Distefano, S. D’Alessandro, “A new two-nested-game approach: linking micro- and macro-scales in international environmental agreements”, Int Environ Agreements 21, 493–516, 2021.
M. Luqman, U. Soytas, Y. Li, & N. Ahmad, “Rewards and penalties in an evolutionary game theoretic model of international environmental agreements” Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 602-621, 2022.
M. Song, Y. Lai, Y. Zhang, L. Li, & E. Wang, “From Neighbors to Partners: A quantum game model for analyzing collaborative environmental governance in China”, Expert Systems with Applications, 210, 118248, 2022.
Q. Gu, L. Hang, & S. Sun, “Behavioral game theory model in pollution control with additional supervision”, Algorithms, 15(5), 137, 2022.
Q. Wang, & C. Mao, “Evolutionary game analysis of ecological governance strategies in the Yangtze River Delta region”, China. Land, 13(2), 212, 2024.
E. R. Sadik-Zada, A. Gatto, L. Aldieri, G. Bimonte, L. Senatore, & C. P. Vinci, “Game Theory Applications to Socio-Environmental Studies, Development Economics, and Sustainability Research”, Games, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/g15010005, 2024.
A. Sacco, “Altruistic behavior and international environmental agreements: a differential game approach”, Decisions Econ Finan, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-024-00461-1, 2024.
G. Araujo, “An evolutionary game theory for event-driven ecological population dynamics”, Theory in Biosciences, 1-11, 2025.
N. H. Aranzamendi, Stressed penguins. Penguins International. [Online]. Available: https://www.penguinsinternational.org/stressed-penguins/, Accessed: EXACT DATE (ie. 07.10.2024).
U. Ellenberg, A. N. Setiawan, A. Cree, D. M. Houston, P. J. Seddon, “Elevated hormonal stress response and reduced reproductive output in Yellow-eyed penguins exposed to unregulated tourism”, General and Comparative Endocrinology, 152(1), 54-63, 2007.
J. Martín, L. De Neve, J. A. Fargallo, V. Polo, M. Soler, “Factors affecting the escape behaviour of juvenile chinstrap penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica, in response to human disturbance”, Polar Biology, 27, 775-781, 2004.
E. Dröge, S. Creel, M. S. Becker, J. M’soka, “Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour”, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(8), 1123-1128, 2017.
P. Blanchard, C. Lauzeral, S. Chamaillé-Jammes, C. Brunet, A. Lec’hvien, G. Péron, D. Pontier, “Coping with change in predation risk across space and time through complementary behavioral responses”, BMC Ecology, 18, 1-10, 2018.
A. Grenier-Potvin, J. Clermont, G. Gauthier, D. Berteaux, “Prey and habitat distribution are not enough to explain redatör habitat selection: addressing intraspecific interactions, behavioural state and time”, Movement Ecology, 9, 1-13, 2021.
J. F. Nash Jr, “Equilibrium points in n-person games”, Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48-49, 1950.
A. W. Hanley, J. E. Bettmann, C. E. Kendrick, A. Deringer, C. L. Norton, “Dispositional mindfulness is associated with greater nature connectedness and self-reported ecological behavior”, Ecopsychology, 12(1), 54-63, 2020.
K. Sigmund, “The Calculus of Selfishness”, Princeton University Press, 184 pages, 2010.
W. A. Brock, M. S. Taylor, “Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics”, Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 1749-1821, 2005.
S. A. Levin, “Games, Groups, and The Global Good”, pp. 88-129, London, UK: Springer, 299 pages, 2009.
S. Barrett, “Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making”, Oxford University Press, 446 pages, 2003.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Operations Research İn Mathematics, Applied Mathematics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Halil İbrahim Dönmez
0000-0002-2110-738X
Türkiye

Mehmet Onur Olgun ^*
0000-0002-7568-3235
Türkiye

Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök
0000-0001-9435-0527
Türkiye

Publication Date

November 26, 2025

Submission Date

January 10, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 23, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 20 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA77ZU68ES

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Dönmez, H. İ., Olgun, M. O., & Alparslan Gök, S. Z. (2025). Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science, 20(2), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312

AMA

1.Dönmez Hİ, Olgun MO, Alparslan Gök SZ. Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science. 2025;20(2):126-142. doi:10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312

Chicago

Dönmez, Halil İbrahim, Mehmet Onur Olgun, and Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök. 2025. “Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory”. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science 20 (2): 126-42. https://doi.org/10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312.

EndNote

Dönmez Hİ, Olgun MO, Alparslan Gök SZ (November 1, 2025) Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science 20 2 126–142.

IEEE

[1]H. İ. Dönmez, M. O. Olgun, and S. Z. Alparslan Gök, “Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory”, Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 126–142, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312.

ISNAD

Dönmez, Halil İbrahim - Olgun, Mehmet Onur - Alparslan Gök, Sırma Zeynep. “Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory”. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science 20/2 (November 1, 2025): 126-142. https://doi.org/10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312.

JAMA

1.Dönmez Hİ, Olgun MO, Alparslan Gök SZ. Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science. 2025;20:126–142.

MLA

Dönmez, Halil İbrahim, et al. “Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory”. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science, vol. 20, no. 2, Nov. 2025, pp. 126-42, doi:10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312.

Vancouver

1.Halil İbrahim Dönmez, Mehmet Onur Olgun, Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök. Evaluation of Environmental Strategies and Human-Penguin Interactions through Game Theory. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Science Journal of Science. 2025 Nov. 1;20(2):126-42. doi:10.29233/sdufeffd.1617312