DONBAS ÇATIŞMALARINDA HUKUKI DURUM: YABANCI SAVAŞÇILAR, PARALI ASKERLER, AŞIRI SAĞ RADIKALLER

Abstract

6 Ocak 2021, eski Başkan Donald Trump’ın seçimi kaybetmesini kabullenemeyen yaklaşık iki bin kişilik silahlı bir grup ABD Kongre Binasını bastı. Kongre Baskını üzerine yeni bir makale kalem alan ve terörizm çalışmalarında dalga teorisi pek çok atıf alan David C. Rapoport aşırı-sağ eylemlerin birleşerek büyük hareketlere dönüştüğünde neler olabileceğini merak ettiğini söylemekteydi. 23 Şubat 2022, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Rusya ve Ukrayna arasında süregiden gerilimin çözümü için toplanmışken, Rusya Devlet Başkanı Vladimir Putin televizyon ekranlarından Rus Ordusu’nun Ukrayna’ya girişi için yetki vermiş. ‘özel operasyonun’ Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşmasının 51. maddesi uyarınca yapıldığını söylemiştir. 2014’ten beri süren Donbas Çatışmaları aşırı sağ radikallere tarihi bir fırsat sunmuş gibi gözükmektedir. Özel askeri kuvvetler, yabancı savaşçılar, aşırı sağ radikaller, terör örgütleri, devletler kuvvet/şiddet kullandılar. Çatışmalar, aşırı sağ radikallerin ilgisine mazhar oldu ve radikaller şiddet araçlarına erişim ve meşru kullanım için büyük bir alan buldular. Çalışmanın amacı Donbas Çatışmalarının aşırı sağ radikaller için yarattığı alanın hukuki çerçevesini sunmaktır. Bu amaçla öncelikle Çatışmalara uygulanabilir hukuki çerçeve çizilecek, bu hukuki çerçevede aktörlere tanınan hak ve yetkiler belirlenecek ve aşırı sağ radikallerin bu hukuki çerçeve içinde nasıl bir serbesti elde ettiği araştırılacaktır.

Keywords

• Aşırı Sağ Radikalizm
• Terörizm
• Donbas
• Ukrayna
• Hukuki Çerçeve

Legal Status in the Donbas Conflicts: Foreign Fighters, Mercenaries, Far-Right Radicals

Abstract

On January 6, 2021, an armed group of about two thousand people, who could not accept the loss of the election of former President Donald Trump, stormed the US Capitol. David C. Rapoport, who received many references to the wave theory of his in terrorism studies, penned an article on the Capitol Attack and said that he wondered what could happen when far-right actions coalesce into big movements. February 23, 2022, as the United Nations Security Council convened to resolve the ongoing tension between Russia and Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized the entry of the Russian Army into Ukraine on television screens. He said the 'special operation' was carried out under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The Donbas Conflict, which has been going on since 2014, seems to have presented a historic opportunity to the far-right radicals. Special military forces, foreign fighters, far-right radicals, terrorist organizations, states used force/violence. The conflicts attracted the attention of far-right radicals, and radicals found ample scope for legitimate use and access to the means of violence. The aim of the study is to present the legal framework of the space created by the Donbas Conflicts for far-right radicals. For this purpose, the legal framework applicable to the conflict will be drawn, the rights and authorities granted to the actors within this legal framework will be determined, and it will be investigated what kind of freedom the far-right radicals have achieved within this legal framework.

Keywords

• Far-Right Radicalism
• Terrorism
• Donbas
• Ukraine
• Legal Framework

References

1. Aleksandr K and Dimitri S, ‘Командующий самообороной Славянска Игорь Стрелков: Задержанные наблюдатели — кадровые разведчики’ Komsomolskaya Pravda (Online, 26 April 2014) accessed 25 August 2022
2. Anadolu Agency, ‘Around 400 US-Led Mercenaries Deployed to Ukraine’ Daily Sabah (12 May 2014) accessed 1 November 2022
3. Auger VA, ‘Right-Wing Terror: A Fifth Global Wave?’ (2020) 14 Perspectives on Terrorism 87-97
4. Baker-Beall C, ‘The Concept of the Foreign Terrorist Fighter: An Immanent Critique’ [2022] European Journal of International Security 1 accessed 25 November 2022
5. Balestrieri S, ‘Wagner Group: Russian Mercenaries Still Floundering in Africa’ (SOFREP, 19 April 2020) accessed 30 August 2022
6. Biloslavo F, ‘Far-Right Fighters from Europe Fight for Ukraine’ (Eurasianet, 8 June 2014) accessed 23 November 2022
7. Bukkvoll T, ‘Russian Special Operations Forces in Crimea and Donbas’ (2016) 46 The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters accessed 19 August 2022
8. Canada PS, ‘Listed Terrorist Entities: Currently Listed Entities’ (Public Safety Canada) accessed 30 November 2022

9. Carpenter M, ‘The Russian Federation’s Ongoing Aggression Against Ukraine’ (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Vienna, 23 June 2022) accessed 28 November 2022
10. Colborne M, From the Fires of War: Ukraine’s Azov Movement and the Global Far Right (Bethan Johnson and John Richardson eds, ibidem 2022)
11. Cousins B, ‘Legal Questions Abound for Canadians Volunteering to Fight in Ukraine’ CTVNews (Online, 24 March 2022) accessed 30 November 2022
12. Coynash H, ‘Russian Sentenced to 5 Years’ Imprisonment for Defending Ukraine’ (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, 16 June 2017) accessed 30 October 2022
13. Eboe-Osuji C and Dieng A, ‘International Law, Mercenary Activities and Conflict Prevention in Africa’ in Emmanuel Decaux, Adama Dieng and Malick Sow (eds), From Human Rights to International Criminal Law / Des droits de l’homme au droit international pénal (Brill | Nijhoff 2007) accessed 3 November 2022
14. ‘European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report’ (EUROPOL 2022) accessed 28 November 2022
15. Foreign Terrorist Fighters: Manual for Judicial Training Institutes - South-Eastern Europe (United Nations 2019) Fraleigh A, ‘The Algerian Revolution as a Case Study in International Law’, The International Law of Civil War (The Johns Hopkins 1971)
16. Giuliano E, ‘The Social Bases of Support for Self-Determination in East Ukraine’ (2015) 14 Ethnopolitics 513 accessed 17 November 2022
17. Hart A, ‘Right-Wing Waves: Applying the Four Waves Theory to Transnational and Transhistorical Right-Wing Threat Trends’ [2021] Terrorism and Political Violence 1 accessed 9 August 2022
18. Hauter J, ‘Delegated Interstate War: Introducing an Addition to Armed Conflict Typologies’ (2019) 12 Journal of Strategic Security 90 accessed 29 September 2022
19. Heinsch R, ‘Conflict Classification in Ukraine: The Return of the “Proxy War”?’ (2015) 91 International Law Studies 323 accessed 30 October 2022
20. IHL, ‘Customary Rules: 108. Mercenaries’, Customary Rules (ICRC 2023) accessed 15 October 2023
21. Ip J, ‘Reconceptualising the Legal Response to Foreign Fighters’ (2020) 69 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 103 accessed 27 November 2022
22. Karagiannis E, ‘Ukrainian Volunteer Fighters in the Eastern Front: Ideas, Political-Social Norms and Emotions as Mobilization Mechanisms’ (2016) 16 Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 139 accessed 30 November 2022
23. Katchanovski I, ‘The Separatist War in Donbas: A Violent Break-up of Ukraine?’ (2016) 17 European Politics and Society 473 accessed 22 August 2022
24. Kozhurin D, ‘Who Are The Neo-Nazis Fighting For Russia In Ukraine?’ Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (Web Sayfası, 27 May 2022) accessed 28 November 2022
25. Kraehenmann S, Foreign Fighters Under International Law (Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights 2014)
26. Kuzmenko O, ‘“Defend the White Race”: American Extremists Being Co-Opted by Ukraine’s Far-Right’ (bellingcat, 15 February 2019) accessed 5 August 2022
27. Leriche M, ‘Mercenaries Gone Legit: Private Security Professionals and Private Military Security Companies asTransnational Actors’ in David Malet and Miriam J Anderson (eds), Transnational actors in war and peace: militants, activists, and corporations in world politics (Georgetown University 2017)
28. ‘Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union’ (European Union General Court Sixth Chamber 2014) Case Report T 208/11, T 508/11 accessed 27 November 2022
29. Liedekerke AD, ‘The Paramilitary Phenomenon in Central and Eastern Europe’ (2016) 25 The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs 25-34
30. Limboto WR and Nurcahyawan T, ‘Pre-Emptive Self-Defence on Israel Hezbollah Armed Conflict Under International Law’ (2018) 1 Jurnal Hukum Adigama 686 accessed 7 August 2022
31. Lobel WN, ‘The Legality of the United States’ Involvement in Vietnam -- A Pragmatic Approach’ (1969) 23 University of Miami Law Review 792 accessed 7 August 2022
32. MacKenzie A and Kaunert C, ‘Radicalisation, Foreign Fighters and the Ukraine Conflict: A Playground for the Far-Right?’ (2021) 10 Social Sciences 116 accessed 1 August 2022 Major M-F, ‘Mercenaries and International Law’ (1992) 22 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 103-150
33. Malet D, ‘Foreign Fighter Mobilization and Persistence in a Global Context’ (2015) 27 Terrorism and Political Violence 1 accessed 6 November 2022
34. Manemann von T, ‘Far-Right Terrorism: Attempt to Re-Form Atomwaffen Division in Europe’ (Belltower.News, 19 April 2021) accessed 16 August 2022
35. Marten K, ‘The GRU, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and Russia’s Wagner Group: Malign Russian Actors and Possible U.S. Responses’ (Hearing on Exposing and Demanding Accountability for Kremlin Crimes Abroad, Washington D.C., 20 July 2020) accessed 30 October 2022
36. Mehra T and Thorley A, ‘Foreign Fighters, Foreign Volunteers and Mercenaries in the Ukrainian Armed Conflict’ (International Center for Counter-Terrorism, 11 July 2022) accessed 30 July 2022
37. Melnyk O, ‘War Dead and (Inter)-Communal Ethics in the Russian-Ukrainian Borderlands: 2014–2018’ in David R Marples (ed), The war in Ukraine’s Donbas: origins, contexts, and the future (Central European University 2022)
38. Mikheieva O, ‘Motivations of Pro-Russian and Pro-Ukrainian Combatants in the Context of the Russian Military Intervention in the Donbas’ in David R Marples (ed), The war in Ukraine’s Donbas: origins, contexts, and the future (Central European University 2022)
39. Miller C and Rivas RC, ‘The Year in Hate and Extremism 2021’ (Southern Poverty Law Center 2022) Annual Muradov I, ‘The Donbas Conflict as a Form of Hybrid Warfare: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis’ (PhD, Middle East Technical University 2019)
40. Nebenzia V, ‘Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at UN Security Council Briefing’ (Web Page, 23 October 2022) accessed 30 November 2022
41. Özdemir Ş and Eminoğlu A, ‘Yeni Nesil Savaş: Rusya’nın Donbas’ta Uyguladığı Hibrit Savaş Yöntemi’ (2022) 15 Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 67 accessed 25 September 2022
42. Paulussen C, Cuyckens H and Fortin K, ‘The Prosecution of Foreign Fighters under International Humanitarian Law: Misconceptions and Opportunities’ (International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, 13 December 2019) accessed 4 December 2022
43. Paust JJ, ‘Use of Military Force in Syria by Turkey, NATO, and the United State’ (2012) 34 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 431-446
44. Pazarcı H, Uluslararası Hukuk (8th edn, Turhan 2009)
45. ‘Putin Expands Fast-Track Russian Citizenship to All of Ukraine’ Al Jazeera (Web Sayfası, 11 July 2022) accessed 4 December 2022
46. Putin V, ‘“No Other Option”: Excerpts of Putin’s Speech Declaring War’ (Al Jazeera, 24 February 2022) accessed 7 August 2022
47. Rapoport DC, ‘The Capitol Attack and the 5th Terrorism Wave’ (2021) 33 Terrorism and Political Violence 912 accessed 6 February 2022
48. --- ---, Waves of Global Terrorism: From 1880 to the Present (Columbia University Press 2022)
49. Rawlinson K, ‘Neo-Nazi Groups Recruit Britons to Fight in Ukraine’ The Guardian (2 March 2018) accessed 22 November 2022
50. Rekawek K, ‘Neither “NATO’s Foreign Legion” Nor the “Donbass International Brigades”’ (2015) 6 The Polish Institute of International Affairs 1-12
51. --- ---, ‘Career Break or a New Career? Extremist Foreign Fighters in Ukraine’ (Counter Extremism Project (CEP) 2020) Research Report accessed 2 August 2022
52. — —, ‘Looks Can Be Deceiving: Extremism Meets Paramilitarism in Central and Eastern Europe’ (Counter Extremism Project 2021) Research Report accessed 6 December 2022
53. ‘Russian Federation Announces “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine as Security Council Meets in Eleventh-Hour Effort to Avoid Full-Scale Conflict’ accessed 6 August 2022
54. Schmid AP, ‘Foreign (Terrorist) Fighter Estimates: Conceptual and Data Issues’ (International Centre for Counter-Terrorism 2015) accessed 10 August 2022
55. Singil N, ‘Uluslararası Hukukta Meşru Müdafaa Hakkına Yeni bir Yaklaşım: İsteksiz veya Aciz Devlet Doktrini’ (2021) 29 Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 2837 accessed 7 August 2022
56. Skibitskyion V, ‘Private Military Companies and Their Role in Modern Regional Conflicts’ (OSCE Forum 949, FSC.DEL/140/20, 17 June 2020) accessed 1 November 2022
57. Sommario E, ‘The Status of Foreign Fighters under International Humanitarian Law’ in Andrea de Guttry, Francesca Capone and Christophe Paulussen (eds), Foreign Fighters under International Law and Beyond (TMC Asser 2016)
58. Sonne P and Shishkin P, ‘Pro-Russian Commander in Eastern Ukraine Sheds Light on Origin of Militants’ Wall Street Journal (Online, 26 April 2014) accessed 25 August 2022
59. Stepaniuk N, ‘Limited Statehood, Collective Action, and Reconfiguration of Citizenship in Wartime: Volunteer Engagement Amidst the Donbas War’ in David R Marples (ed), The war in Ukraine’s Donbas: origins, contexts, and the future (Central European University 2022)
60. Sukhankin S, ‘Foreign Mercenaries, Irregulars and “Volunteers”: Non- Russians in Russia’s Wars’ (Jamestown Foundation 2019)
61. ——, ‘Russian Private Military Contractors in the Donbas: Rehearsing Future Voyages’ in David R Marples (ed), The War in Ukraine’s Donbas: Origins, Context, and Future (Central European University 2022)
62. Talmon SAG, ‘German Constitutional Court Considers Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors a Tenable Interpretation of Article 51 of the Un Charter’ [2019] SSRN Electronic Journal accessed 7 August 2022
63. Tayler L, ‘Foreign Terrorist Fighter Laws: Human Rights Rollbacks Under UN Security Council Resolution 2178’ (2016) 18 International Community Law Review 455 accessed 23 November 2022
64. ‘The Criminal Code of Ukraine’ (Official web-portal of the Parliament of Ukraine) accessed 27 October 2022
65. ‘The Montreux Document: On Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies during Armed Conflict’ accessed 20 September 2022
66. The Office of Prosecutor, ‘Report on Preliminary Examination Activities’ [2016] International Criminal Court Tsvetkova M, ‘Military Veterans to Kremlin: Come Clean about Syria Mission’ Reuters (5 July 2018)
67. accessed 30 October 2022
68. Tsymbaliuk Y, ‘On Russia’s Ongoing Aggression against Ukraine and Illegal Occupation of Crimea’ accessed 30 October 2022
69. Tüysüzoğlu G, ‘Rusya Dış Politikası’nın Etkin Silahı: Donmuş Çatışma Bölgeleri’ (2017) 13 Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi 185 accessed 25 September 2022
70. ‘Ukraine Institutes Proceedings against the Russian Federation and Requests the Court to Indicate Provisional Measures’ accessed 13 October 2023
71. Umland A, ‘Irregular Militias and Radical Nationalism in Post-Euromaydan Ukraine: The Prehistory and Emergence of the “Azov” Battalion in 2014’ (2019) 31 Terrorism and Political Violence 105-131 accessed 6 November 2022
72. UN Human Rights Council Working Group, ‘Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination’ (s 2015) l A/70/330 accessed 20 October 2022
73. UN Human Rights Counsil Working Group, ‘On the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination on Its Mission to Ukraine’ (UN General Assembly 2016) A/HRC/33/43/Add.3 accessed 30 October 2022
74. ‘United States Designates Russian Imperial Movement and Leaders as Global Terrorists’ (United States Department of State) accessed 30 November 2022
75. Uyanıker HB, ‘Kırım Sorunundan Donbas Savaşına Rusya Ukrayna Uzlaşmazlığı’ (2018) 15 Karadeniz Araştırmaları Van Poecke T, Verbruggen F and Yperman W, ‘Terrorist Offences and International Humanitarian Law: The Armed Conflict Exclusion Clause’ (2021) 103 International Review of the Red Cross 295 accessed 30 July 2022
76. Weiss M and others, ‘The Fallen Mercenaries in Russia’s Dark Army’ [2021] New Lines Magazine accessed 30 October 2022
77. ‘White Supremacy Extremism: The Transnational Rise of the Violent White Supremacist Movement’ (The Soufan Center 2019) accessed 31 August 2022
78. International Red Cross, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949 https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/assets/treaties/375-GC-III-EN.002.pdf
79. ——, Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
80. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. 1977
81. Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations 1970
82. Resolution 2178 2014
83. Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 2014 1088