Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A REVIEW ON DIGITAL LEADERSHIP STUDIES

Year 2020, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 57 - 69, 31.01.2020

Abstract

Digitalization, defined as the 5th Kondaratieff Wave, which is the main factor of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, is one of the priorities discussed in practice and academic literature, exposing the business world to new competitive realities. At this point, it is accepted that the first role in adapting to digital transformation is the leader. As a result of the literature review conducted between 1990- 2019, it is understand that there is a paradigm shift in leadership. This study aims to reveal the typology of the studies in the literature on digital leadership studies. For this purpose, using key words, articles were scanned and 111 studies were selected for review. In this qualitative study, content analysis was utilized. In the studies examined, digitalization, the effects of digitalization on leadership and the skills and competencies that the leader should have are discussed and it is remarkable that most of these studies are conceptual. It has been concluded that the issue of digital leadership, which draws attention in practice and popular literature, should be dealt with in different academic aspects and new empirical studies designed to develop measurable models of digital leadership have been concluded.

References

  • BANKSA, G.C., DIONNEB, S.D., SAYAMAB, H. ve SCHMID, M., (2019). Mast Leadership in the Digital Era: Social Media, Big Data, Virtual Reality,Computational Methods, and Deep Learning Special Issue: Call for Papers Mast. The Leadership Quarterly 30. I-II
  • BARBERÀ, O., RODRIGUEZ-TERUEL, J., BARRIO, A. ve BARAS, M. (2014) ‘The selection of party leaders in Spain’, in The Selection of Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. A Comparative Study, eds J. B. Pilet & W. P. Cross, Routledge, London, pp. 108–123.
  • BASS, B.M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision, Organizational Dynamics, 18(3): 19-31.
  • BASS, B., ve AVOLIO, B. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17, 112-121.
  • BENNIS, W. (2013). Leadership in a Digital World: Embracing Transparency and Adaptive Capacity, MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 20. 635-637.
  • BHANAP, R. (2015). Who is Responsible for Digital Leadership in the Boardrom?. Computer Weekly. 7-13 July.18-20.
  • BOLDEN, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews 13: 251–69.
  • BOLDEN, R. ve O’REGAN, N. (2016). Digital Distruption and the Future of Leadership: An Interview with Rick Haythornthwaite, Chairman of Centrica and MasterCard. Journal of Management Inquiry. Vol. 25(4) 438-446.
  • BOUNFOUR, A., (2016). Digital Futures, Digital Transformation, Progress in IS. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
  • BURN, S. ve HOUSTON, J. (2015). Social Artistry: A Whole System Approach to Sustainable Analysis and Leadership Practice. In Sowcik et al. (Eds.) 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 225-239.
  • CLERKIN, C. (2015). Creative Leadership and Social Intelligence: The Keys to Leading in the Digital Age. In Sowcik et al. (Eds.) 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 175-187.
  • CHEW, E.K. (2013). Value Co-creation in the Organizations of the Future. Puslished in: Collin, J., Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J.J., Halén, M., Itälä, T., Helenius, M., others, 2015. IT Leadership in Transition-The Impact of Digitalization on Finnish Organizations.
  • COPELAND, M.K. (2016). The Impact of Authentic, Ethical, Transformational Leadership on Leader Effectiveness. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics 13.3, 79-97.
  • DINH, J.E., LORD, R.G., GARDNER, W.L., MEUSER, J.D., LIDEN, R.C. ve HU, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.
  • DU TOIT, A.J., VIVIERS, R., VE MAYER, C.H. (2016). Emotional intelligence and leadership in a South African financial service institution. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 40(2).
  • EL SAWY, O.A., KRÆMMERGAARD, P., AMSINCK, H. ve VİNTHER, A.L. (2016). “How LEGO Built the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive (15:2).
  • GRONN, P. (2000). Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership, Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.
  • HAMBRICK D.C. ve MASON P.A. (1984). Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review Management. 9(2):193-206.
  • HESSE, A. (2018). Digitalization and Leadership – How Experienced Leaders Interpret Daily Realities in a Digital World. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1853-1864).
  • JAKUBIK, M. ve BERAZHNY, I. (2017). Rethinking Leadership and Its Practices in the Digital Era. Management International Conference. 24-27 Mayıs.471-483
  • KANE, G.C., PALMER, D., NGUYEN PHILLIPS, A., KIRON, D. ve BUCKLEY, N. (2015). Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14.
  • KANE, G.C., PHILLIPS, A.N., COPULSKY, J. ve GARTH, A. (2019). How Digital Leadership Is(n’t) Different, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
  • KREMER, M. (1993). Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108:681–716.
  • LIPMAN-BLUMEN, J. (1996). Connective Leadership: Managing in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • MACK, T.C. (2015). Leadership in the Future. Sowcik vd. içinde 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 9-22.
  • MARTELL, R.F., LANE, D.M. ve EMRICH, C. (1996). Male–female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51:157−158.
  • MIHARDJO, L.W.W. ve SASMOKO, S. (2019), Digital Transformation: Digital Leadership Role in Developing Business Model Innovation Mediated by Co-Creation Strategy for Telecommunication Incumbent Firms, Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy, InTechopen, 1-18.
  • PEARL, Z. (2015). Digital master: Debunk the Myths of Enterprise Digital Maturity. Lulu Publishing Service.
  • PRENTICE, A.E. (2013). Leadership for the 21st Century. Libraries Unlimited
  • RAGHURAM, S., HILL, N.S., GİBBS, J.L. ve MARUPİNG, L.M. (2018). Virtual work: bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals.
  • SHAMIR, B. (1995). Social Distance and Charisma - Theoretical Notes and an Exploratory- Study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(1):19–47.
  • SHENINGER, E. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.
  • VOGELSANG, M. (2010). Digitalization in Open Economies: Theory and Policy Implications, Springer.
  • WALUMBWA, F.O., AVOLIO, B.J., GARDNER, W.L., WERNSING, T.S. ve PETERSON, S.J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†. Journal of Management, 34(1):89–126.
  • WESTERMAN, G., BONNET, D. ve McAFEE, A. (2014). The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3):1-6.
  • WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
  • www.weforum.org/focus/the-fourth-industrial-revolution Erişim: 27.01.2017

DİJİTAL LİDERLİK ÇALIŞMALARINA BİR BAKIŞ

Year 2020, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 57 - 69, 31.01.2020

Abstract

Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi’nin temel faktörü olan ve 5. Kondaratieff Dalga olarak tanımlanan ‘dijitalleşme’, iş dünyasını yeni rekabetçi gerçeklerle karşı karşıya bırakarak, uygulamada ve akademik yazında tartışılan öncelikli konulardan biridir. Bu noktada dijital dönüşüme uyum sağlamada birinci rolün liderde olduğu kabul edilen bir gerçektir. 1990-2019 yıllarını kapsayan yazın taraması sonucunda liderlikte bir paradigma değişimi olduğu görülmektedir. Çalışma, dijital liderlik çalışmalarına ilişkin yazında yer alan çalışmaların tipolojisini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Amaca yönelik olarak anahtar sözcükler ile İngilizce süreli yayınlar taranmış ve 111 çalışma inceleme için seçilmiştir. Nitel olarak tasarlanan bu çalışmada içerik analizinden yararlanılmıştır. İncelenen çalışmalarda dijitalleşmenin ne olduğu, dijitalleşmenin liderlik üzerindeki etkileri ve liderin sahip olması gereken beceri ve yetkinlikler tartışılmış olup bu çalışmaların çoğunun kavramsal olduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Uygulamada ve popüler yazında dikkat çeken ‘dijital liderlik’ konusunun akademik açıdan da farklı boyutları ile ele alınması ve dijital liderliğe ilişkin ölçülebilir modeller geliştirmek üzere tasarlanmış yeni görgül çalışmaların gerçekleştirilmesinin gerekliliği sonucuna varılmıştır.

References

  • BANKSA, G.C., DIONNEB, S.D., SAYAMAB, H. ve SCHMID, M., (2019). Mast Leadership in the Digital Era: Social Media, Big Data, Virtual Reality,Computational Methods, and Deep Learning Special Issue: Call for Papers Mast. The Leadership Quarterly 30. I-II
  • BARBERÀ, O., RODRIGUEZ-TERUEL, J., BARRIO, A. ve BARAS, M. (2014) ‘The selection of party leaders in Spain’, in The Selection of Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. A Comparative Study, eds J. B. Pilet & W. P. Cross, Routledge, London, pp. 108–123.
  • BASS, B.M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision, Organizational Dynamics, 18(3): 19-31.
  • BASS, B., ve AVOLIO, B. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17, 112-121.
  • BENNIS, W. (2013). Leadership in a Digital World: Embracing Transparency and Adaptive Capacity, MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 20. 635-637.
  • BHANAP, R. (2015). Who is Responsible for Digital Leadership in the Boardrom?. Computer Weekly. 7-13 July.18-20.
  • BOLDEN, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews 13: 251–69.
  • BOLDEN, R. ve O’REGAN, N. (2016). Digital Distruption and the Future of Leadership: An Interview with Rick Haythornthwaite, Chairman of Centrica and MasterCard. Journal of Management Inquiry. Vol. 25(4) 438-446.
  • BOUNFOUR, A., (2016). Digital Futures, Digital Transformation, Progress in IS. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
  • BURN, S. ve HOUSTON, J. (2015). Social Artistry: A Whole System Approach to Sustainable Analysis and Leadership Practice. In Sowcik et al. (Eds.) 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 225-239.
  • CLERKIN, C. (2015). Creative Leadership and Social Intelligence: The Keys to Leading in the Digital Age. In Sowcik et al. (Eds.) 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 175-187.
  • CHEW, E.K. (2013). Value Co-creation in the Organizations of the Future. Puslished in: Collin, J., Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J.J., Halén, M., Itälä, T., Helenius, M., others, 2015. IT Leadership in Transition-The Impact of Digitalization on Finnish Organizations.
  • COPELAND, M.K. (2016). The Impact of Authentic, Ethical, Transformational Leadership on Leader Effectiveness. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics 13.3, 79-97.
  • DINH, J.E., LORD, R.G., GARDNER, W.L., MEUSER, J.D., LIDEN, R.C. ve HU, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.
  • DU TOIT, A.J., VIVIERS, R., VE MAYER, C.H. (2016). Emotional intelligence and leadership in a South African financial service institution. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 40(2).
  • EL SAWY, O.A., KRÆMMERGAARD, P., AMSINCK, H. ve VİNTHER, A.L. (2016). “How LEGO Built the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive (15:2).
  • GRONN, P. (2000). Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership, Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.
  • HAMBRICK D.C. ve MASON P.A. (1984). Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review Management. 9(2):193-206.
  • HESSE, A. (2018). Digitalization and Leadership – How Experienced Leaders Interpret Daily Realities in a Digital World. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1853-1864).
  • JAKUBIK, M. ve BERAZHNY, I. (2017). Rethinking Leadership and Its Practices in the Digital Era. Management International Conference. 24-27 Mayıs.471-483
  • KANE, G.C., PALMER, D., NGUYEN PHILLIPS, A., KIRON, D. ve BUCKLEY, N. (2015). Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14.
  • KANE, G.C., PHILLIPS, A.N., COPULSKY, J. ve GARTH, A. (2019). How Digital Leadership Is(n’t) Different, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
  • KREMER, M. (1993). Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108:681–716.
  • LIPMAN-BLUMEN, J. (1996). Connective Leadership: Managing in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • MACK, T.C. (2015). Leadership in the Future. Sowcik vd. içinde 2015. Leadership 2050. Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends. pp. 9-22.
  • MARTELL, R.F., LANE, D.M. ve EMRICH, C. (1996). Male–female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51:157−158.
  • MIHARDJO, L.W.W. ve SASMOKO, S. (2019), Digital Transformation: Digital Leadership Role in Developing Business Model Innovation Mediated by Co-Creation Strategy for Telecommunication Incumbent Firms, Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy, InTechopen, 1-18.
  • PEARL, Z. (2015). Digital master: Debunk the Myths of Enterprise Digital Maturity. Lulu Publishing Service.
  • PRENTICE, A.E. (2013). Leadership for the 21st Century. Libraries Unlimited
  • RAGHURAM, S., HILL, N.S., GİBBS, J.L. ve MARUPİNG, L.M. (2018). Virtual work: bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals.
  • SHAMIR, B. (1995). Social Distance and Charisma - Theoretical Notes and an Exploratory- Study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(1):19–47.
  • SHENINGER, E. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.
  • VOGELSANG, M. (2010). Digitalization in Open Economies: Theory and Policy Implications, Springer.
  • WALUMBWA, F.O., AVOLIO, B.J., GARDNER, W.L., WERNSING, T.S. ve PETERSON, S.J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†. Journal of Management, 34(1):89–126.
  • WESTERMAN, G., BONNET, D. ve McAFEE, A. (2014). The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3):1-6.
  • WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
  • www.weforum.org/focus/the-fourth-industrial-revolution Erişim: 27.01.2017
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ömür N. Özmen This is me 0000-0002-3379-317X

Engin Eriş This is me 0000-0002-0652-3975

Pınar Özer This is me 0000-0002-8297-2772

Publication Date January 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 25 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özmen, Ö. N., Eriş, E., & Özer, P. (2020). DİJİTAL LİDERLİK ÇALIŞMALARINA BİR BAKIŞ. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 57-69.