Effect of Arrangement of Anterior Tooth Positions and Shapes on Personality Traits

Yıl 2023, , 52 - 63, 13.04.2023

İsmail Ünal , Süleyman Hakan Tuna

https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1112684

Öz

Purpose: Smile plays a big role in the perception of personality. The smile design concept used in a personalized smile is the most important part of the treatment approach in aesthetic dentistry. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of changes made on anterior tooth position and shape on the perception of personality.

Materials and Methods: In the present study, digital smile designs were made on the photographs taken from the model with Adobe Photoshop 2020 CC (California, USA) program. The questionnaire was prepared to include personality traits along with 14 smile designs. Dentists, dentistry students and laypersons were asked to rate the relationship between smile designs and personality traits under the photographs on the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scale, in the range of 0-100. The results were analyzed with the One Way ANOVA test in IBM SPSS (Chicago, USA).

Results: When different gender groups were examined; While women gave higher scores in masculine and stressful personality designs, men gave higher scores in warm-blooded personality designs (p0.05).

Conclusion: It is thought that personality perception is perceived at different levels in different genders and dental education levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Smile design, Dentogenic concept, Visagism, Personality and characterization

Anterior Diş Konum ve Şekillerinin Düzenlenmesinin Kişilik Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Gülümseme kişiliğin algısında büyük rol oynar. Kişiye özgü gülümsemede kullanılan gülüş tasarımı konsepti, estetik diş hekimliğinde tedavi yaklaşımının en önemli parçasıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; anterior diş konum ve şekilleri üzerinde yapılan değişikliklerin kişiliğin algısına etkisini incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, modelden alınan fotoğraflara Adobe Photoshop 2020 CC (Kaliforniya, ABD) programıyla dijital ortamda gülüş tasarımları yapıldı. On dört adet gülüş tasarımıyla beraber kişilik özellikleri de yer alacak şekilde bir anket formu hazırlandı. Diş hekimleri, diş hekimliği öğrencileri ve meslekten olmayan kişilerden oluşan katılımcılardan gülüş tasarımları ile fotoğrafların altında yer alan kişilik özellikleri ilişkisini VAS (Visual Analog Scale) skalasında 0-100 aralığında puanlamaları istendi. Sonuçlar IBM SPSS (Chicago, ABD) programında One Way ANOVA testi ile analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Farklı cinsiyet grupları incelendiğinde; maskulen ve stresli kişilik tasarımlarında kadınlar daha yüksek puan verirken sıcakkanlı kişilik tasarımında ise erkekler daha yüksek puan verdiler (p0,05).
Sonuç: Kişilik algısının, farklı cinsiyet ve dental eğitim seviyelerinde farklı seviyelerde algılandığı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gülüş tasarımı, Vizajizm, Dentojenik konsept, Kişilik ve karakterizasyon

Kaynakça

• [1] Lombardi RE. 1973. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 29(4), 358-382.
• [2] Rufenacht CR. 1990. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago: Quintessence, 263-8 p.
• [3] Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. 1994. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 64(2), 89-98.
• [4] Goldstein RE, Chu SJ, Lee EA, Stappert CF. 2018. Ronald E. Goldstein's Esthetics in Dentistry. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 246 p.
• [5] Broderson SP. 1978. Anterior guidance: The key to successful occlusal treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 39(4), 396-400.
• [6] House MM, Loop JL. 1939. Form and Color Harmony in the Dental Art. California: Monograph, 17 p.
• [7] Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. 1998. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 4(3), 146-152.
• [8] Frush J. 1971. Swissdent technique and procedure manual. Los Angeles, Swissdent Corp.
• [9] Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB. 1997. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55(8), 811-817.
• [10] Machado AW. 2014. 10 commandments of smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod. 19(4), 136-157.
• [11] Sharma PK, Sharma P, editors. 2012. Dental smile esthetics: the assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Seminars in orthodontics; Elsevier.
• [12] Hochman MN, Chu SJ, Tarnow DP. 2012. Maxillary anterior papilla display during smiling: a clinical study of the interdental smile line. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 32(4), 375-383.
• [13] Pugliese F, Hess R, Palomo L, editors. 2019. Black triangles: Preventing their occurrence, managing them when prevention is not practical. Seminars in Orthodontics; Elsevier. [14] Rayyan MR. 2019. Effect of the interproximal contact level on the perception of smile esthetics. Dent Med Probl. 56(3), 251-255.
• [15] Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. 2000. Dentists' preferences of anterior tooth proportion--a web- based study. J Prosthodont. 9(3), 123-136.
• [16] McLeod C, Fields HW, Hechter F, Wiltshire W, Rody W Jr, Christensen J. 2011. Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons. Angle Orthod. 81(2), 198-205.
• [17] Nomura S, Freitas KMS, Silva PPCD, et al. 2018. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod. 23(5), 47-57.
• [18] Frush JP, Fisher RD. 1959. Dentogenics: Its practical application. J Prosthet Dent. 9(6), 914-21.
• [19] Frush JP, Fisher RD. 1957. The age factor in dentogenics. J Prosthod Dent. 7(1), 5-13.
• [20] Paolucci B. 2009. Visagismo e odontologia. Visagismo integrado: identidade, estilo, beleza São Paulo: Senac, 243-50 p.
• [21] Schultz DP, Schultz SE. 2016. Theories of Personality. 11th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
• [22] Somer O, Korkmaz MS, Tatar A. 2002. Beş faktör kişilik envanteri'nin geliştirilmesi-I : Ölçek ve alt ölçeklerin oluşturulması. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi. 17, 21-33.
• [23] Van’t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, Creugers N. 2009. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont. 22(1), 35-42.
• [24] Bartlett DW, Lussi A, West N, Bouchard P, Sanz M, Bourgeois D. 2013. Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults. J Dent. 41(11), 1007-13.
• [25] Frush JP, Fisher RD. 1956. How dentogenics interprets the personality factor. J Prosthod Dent. 6(4), 441-9.
• [26] Frush JP, Fisher RD. 1956. How dentogenic restorations interpret the sex factor. J Prosthod Dent. 6(2), 160-72.
• [27] Anderson KM, Behrents RG, McKinney T, Buschang PH. 2005. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 128(4), 458-465.
• [28] Sharma A, Luthra R, Kaur P. 2015. A photographic study on Visagism-II. Indian J Oral Sci. 6(3).
• [29] Rambabu T, Gayatri C, Sajjan GS, Karteek Varma PV, Srikanth V. 2018. Correlation between Dentofacial Esthetics and Mental Temperament: A Clinical Photographic Analysis Using Visagism. Contemp Clin Dent.9(1), 83-87.
• [30] Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. 2006. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 130(2), 141- 151.
• [31] Huang Y, Xu Y, Liu F, Fan J, Li M, Lei Y. 2022. Perceptions of orthodontists, laypersons, and patients regarding buccal corridors and facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 161(1), 92-102.
• [32] Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. 1999. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 21(5), 517-522.
• [33] Geron S, Atalia W. 2005. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod. 75(5), 778-784.
• [34] Meerdink JE, Garbin CP, Leger DW. 1990. Cross-gender perceptions of facial attributes and their relation to attractiveness: do we see them differently than they see us? Percept Psychophys. 48(3), 227- 233.
• [35] Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. 2005. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 127(2), 208-261.
• [36] Matud, M. P. 2004. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences. 37(7), 1401-15.
• [37] Baum A, Grunberg NE. 1991. Gender, stress, and health. Health Psychol. 10(2), 80-85.