Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently

Ayça Tulga

doi:10.22312/sdusbed.290849

Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and contrast the shear bond strength of a veneer composite resin bonded to cobalt-chromium (CoCr) dental alloys produced by different techniques.

Material-Method: Ninety cylindrical specimens (10mm in diameter, 8mm in height) made of CoCr dental alloys were prepared by casting (C), milling (M), LaserCUSING with and without annealing (CL+, CL), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) with and without annealing (EL+, EL). Veneer composite cylinders (5mm in diameter, 3mm in height) were built on metal specimens using a silicone jig. After storage in water for 24 hours, the specimens were assessed for bond strength with a shear force test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were statistically analyzed using the Kolmogorow-Smirnow test and Tukey-HSD multiple comparison test (α=.05).

Results: When the SBS values of the groups were compared, significant differences were found among the groups (P<.05). While statistically significant differences were found between the CL+ group (9.36∓2.62) and the M group (13.34∓2.53) (P<.05), there were no significant differences among the others (P>.05). The debonded surfaces of the specimens exhibited mostly mixed failure types.

Conclusions: The CoCr alloy fabrication technique has an effect on the SBSs between the veneer composite resin and the metal used. LaserCUSING casting, a new technology, seems to have the lowest metal-resin bond strength among all the techniques tested.

Keywords

Cobalt-chromium alloys,direct metal laser sintering,milling,shear bond strength

References

1. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63.
2. Noort RV. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
3. Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS. Rapid Prototyping. In: Kai C, Fai K, Sing C, editors. Powder-based rapid prototyping systems. 3th ed., Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. 2010. p.199-300.
4. Azari A, Sakineh N. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2009;15:216-25.
5. Sinirlioğlu MC. Rapid manufacturing of dental and medical parts via LaserCUSING technology using titanium and CoCr powder materials. Workshop on Rapid Technologies; 2009 Sept 24th; Turkey.
6. Ayyıldız S, Soylu EH, İde S, Kılıç S, Sipahi C, Pişkin B et all. Annealing of Co-Cr dental alloy: effects on nanostructure and Rockwell hardness. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:471-8.
7. Guo WH, Brantley WA, Li D, Clark WAT, Monaghan P, Heshmati RH. Annealing study of palladium–silver dental alloys: Vickers hardness measurements and SEM microstructural observations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:111-8.
8. Chen CL, Tatlock GJ, Jones AR. Effect of annealing temperatures on the secondary re‐crystallization of extruded PM2000 steel bar. J Microsc 2009;233:474-81.

9. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Brückner H, Handel G. Composite veneering of metal based fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:614-9.
10. Drago Carl, Lynn Gurney. Maintenance of implant hybrid prostheses: clinical and laboratory procedures.J Prosthodont 2013;22: 28-35.
11. Jandt KD, Bernd WS. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:1001-6.
12. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to a cobalt-chromium alloy. J Dent 1995;23:47-54.
13. Grover N, Nandlal B. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to the facial surface of primary anterior stainless steel crowns. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:119-25.
14. Sarafianou A, Seimenis I, Papadopoulos T. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:377-87.
15. Egoshi T, Taıra Y, Soeno K, Sawase T. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/ HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4. Dent Mater J 2013;32:219-27.
16. Patil SS, Kontham UR, Kamath A, Kontham R. Shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to preformed metal crowns for primary molars using a universal adhesive and two different surface treatments: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2016;17:377-80.
17. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal–resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193-7.
18. Muratomi R, Kamada K, Taira Y, Higuchi S, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Comparative study between laser sintering and casting for retention of resin composite veneers to cobalt-chromium alloy. Dent Mater J 2013;32:939-45.
19. Sunitha N, Ariga P, Jain AR, Philip JM. An in vitro evaluation of flexural bond strength of indirect composites fused to metal. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:122-7.
20. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
21. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
22. Petridis H, Hirayama H, Kugel G, Habib C, Garefis P. Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:608-14.
23. Gu D, Shen Y. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 2009;30:2903-10.
24. Al Jabbari YS, Koutsoukis T, Barmpagadaki X, Zinelis S. Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting. Dent Mater 2014;30:79-88.
25. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 184-9.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ayça Tulga
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 17, 2018

Submission Date

February 8, 2017

Acceptance Date

September 22, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 9 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA72XU65TY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tulga, A. (2018). Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849

AMA

1.Tulga A. Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;9(1):34-39. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.290849

Chicago

Tulga, Ayça. 2018. “Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 9 (1): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849.

EndNote

Tulga A (April 1, 2018) Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 9 1 34–39.

IEEE

[1]A. Tulga, “Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 34–39, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.22312/sdusbed.290849.

ISNAD

Tulga, Ayça. “Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 9/1 (April 1, 2018): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849.

JAMA

1.Tulga A. Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;9:34–39.

MLA

Tulga, Ayça. “Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2018, pp. 34-39, doi:10.22312/sdusbed.290849.

Vancouver

1.Ayça Tulga. Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018 Apr. 1;9(1):34-9. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.290849

Cited By

Adhesion between Biocomposites and Different Metallic Structures Additive Manufactured

Coatings

https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040483