Hareketli Ağız İçi Sınıf III Apareylerin Dentofasiyal Yapılar Üzerindeki Terapötik Etkileri: Kapsamlı Bir Literatür Taraması

Year 2022, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 153 - 160, 11.04.2022

Mehmet Ali Yavan Gülcan Çetin Taşkıran Gökçenur Gökçe Nihal Hamamcı

https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1034563

Abstract

Bu kapsamlı derlemenin amacı, Sınıf III malokluzyona sahip büyüyen bireylerin tedavisinde kullanılan hareketli intraoral Sınıf III apareylere ve bunların dento iskeletsel etkilerine ışık tutmaktır. Maksiller retrüzyon kaynaklı Sınıf III maloklüzyon görülen gelişim çağındaki çocuklarda sıklıkla kullanılan yüz maskesi gibi ekstraoral apareylerin; büyük hacimli olmaları ve estetik görünmemeleri, hastaların kullanımda kooperasyon göstermemesi ve ankraj bölgesinde irritasyon yaratmaları gibi dezavantajları nedeniyle son zamanlarda intraoral Sınıf III apareylerin kullanımı gündeme gelmiştir. Bu amaçla, Sınıf II maloklüzyonların tedavisinde kullanılan apareyler Sınıf III maloklüzyonların tedavisi için modifiye edilmiştir. Bunlar arasında en bilineni Rolf Fränkel tarafından geliştirilen Fränkel III apareyi olmak üzere; Bionator III, Ters Twin Block ve Manyetik aparey III gibi apareyler vardır. Ayrıca literatürde Modifiye Tandem ve Double-plate apareyi de geçmektedir. Bu derlemede, literatürde bildirilen tüm apareylerin tasarımlarının yanı sıra maksilla ve mandibula üzerindeki iskelet ve dentoalveolar etkileri incelenmiştir.

Keywords

Sınıf III maloklüzyon, İntraoral aparey, Ortodonti

Therapeutic Effects of Removable İntraoral Class III Appliances on Dentofacial Structures: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Abstract

The aim of this comprehensive review was to shed light on removable intraoral Class III appliances and their dentoskeletal effects in growing Class III subjects. Recently, intraoral Class III appliances have been recommended in cases of Class III malocclusions arising from maxillary retrusion instead of the Facemask appliance, which is commonly used in children at development age, due to its disadvantages including large volume and non-esthetic design, lack of cooperation, and its contribution to the irritation in the anchorage site. For these reasons, the appliances used in the treatment of Class II malocclusions have been modified for the treatment of Class III malocclusions. Among these, Fränkel Appliance III, which was introduced by Rolf Fränkel, is the most well-known modified appliance and the other well-known examples include Bionator III, Reverse Twin Block, and Magnetic Appliance III. Additionally, the other removable intraoral appliances introduced in the literature include Modified Tandem and Double-plate Appliance. The present review examined the designs of these appliances reported in the literature as well as their skeletal and dentoalveolar effects on the maxilla and mandible.

Keywords

Class III malocclusion, Intraoral appliance, Orthodontics

References

• [[1] Guyer EC, Ellis III EE, McNamara Jr JA, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56(1):7-30.
• [2] Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(6):583-92.
• [3] Sung SJ, Baik HS. Assessment of skeletal and dental changes by maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(5):492-502.
• [4] Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after the correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116(1):13-24.
• [5] Rakosi III T. Treatment of Class III malocclusions. Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances US: CV Mosby. 1997:461-80.
• [6] Atalay Z, Tortop T. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(6):655-61.
• [7] Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, Dibiase AT. A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(1):96-101.
• [8] Baik HS, Jee SH, Lee KJ, Oh TK. Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(3):294-301.
• [9] Garattini G, Levrini L, Crozzoli P, Levrini A. Skeletal and dental modifications produced by the Bionator III appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(1):40-4.
• [10] Ucem TT, Ucuncu N, Yuksel S. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(6):672-9.
• [11] Tuncer C, Ũner O. Effects of a magnetic appliance in functional Class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):768-77.
• [12] Fränkel R, editor. Maxillary retrusion in Class 3 and treatment with the function corrector 3. Report of the congress European Orthodontic Society; 1970.
• [13] Ülgen M, Firatli S. The effects of the Fränkel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105(6):561-7.
• [14] Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances: Mosby Incorporated; 1997.
• [15] Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
• [16] McNamara Jr JA, Huge SA. The functional regulator [FR-3] of Fränkel. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(5):409-24.
• [17] Kohmura T, Tokuda N, Fukamachi H, Hara S, Yamaki M, Hanada K, et al. Effects of therapy using the function regulator (FR III) on cases with reversed occlusion. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai zasshi= The journal of Japan Orthodontic Society. 1986;45(4):693.
• [18] Biren S, Erverdi N. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with Fr-3 appliance. Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty. 1993;1(4):354-60.
• [19] Kalavritinos M, Papadopoulos MA, Nasiopoulos A. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for Class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66(2):135-47.
• [20] Levin AS, McNamara Jr JA, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Fränkel C. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):513-24.
• [21] Balters W. Eine Einführung in die Bionatorheilmethode: ausgewählte Schriften und Vorträge: Hölzer; 1973.
• [22] Demirel H. Agız içi çift plak uygulaması ile 3. Sınıf Anomalilerin tedavilerine yeni bir yaklasım [thesis] Ankara, Turkey: Gazi Universitesi. 1999.
• [23] Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR, Mulfer TP. Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance [FOMA] III—modus operandi. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(2):135-48.
• [24] Darendeliler MA. Early class III treatment with magnetic appliances. J Clin Orthod. 1993;27:563-9.
• [25] Klempner LS. Early orthopedic Class III treatment with a modified tandem appliance. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37(4):218-23.
• [26] Chun Y-S, Jeong S-G, Row J, Yang S-J. A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33(12):705.
• [27] Kidner G, DiBiase A, DiBiase D. Class III Twin Blocks: a case series. J Orthod. 2003;30(3):197-201.