Evaluation of Students’ Diagnostic Accuracy Regarding the Current Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions

Abstract

Objective The current classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions introduces significant conceptual changes in comparison to the previous classification. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge level and case-based diagnostic consistency of fourth- and fifth-year students at the Faculty of Dentistry of Suleyman Demirel University regarding the current classification of periodontal diseases and conditions. Material and Method In this study, fourth- and fifth-year students from our faculty voluntarily participated by completing a questionnaire prepared via Google Forms. The questionnaire consisted of 10 theoretical questions designed to assess knowledge level and diagnostic approach regarding the current classification of periodontal diseases and conditions (4 definition questions, 2 comparative questions [previous vs. current classification], and 4 questions on periodontitis staging and grading diagnostic criteria), as well as 7 cases constructed using clinical and radiographic data from real patients. The cases were defined as follows: clinical gingival health on an intact periodontium, generalized Stage 3 Grade C periodontitis, generalized Stage 4 Grade C periodontitis, clinical gingival health on a reduced periodontium, gingivitis on an intact periodontium, gingivitis on a reduced periodontium, and localized Stage 2 Grade B periodontitis. Results A total of 151 students participated in this study. Definition questions related to the previous and current classification were correctly answered by 42-95% of the students, whereas questions comparing the current and previous classifications and those related to staging and grading criteria were correctly answered at rates ranging from 31% to 74%. The diagnostic accuracy rate based on case scenarios ranged between 53% and 76%. Conclusion In this study, the percentage of correct responses to case-based questions suggests the necessity of case-based educational approaches. Case-based education can help integrate the theoretical knowledge required for learning the classification and treatment of periodontal dis-eases with practical applications, thereby enhancing participants’ analytical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Keywords

• Classification
• Dentistry students
• Periodontal disease

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-forprofit sectors.

Ethical Statement

Ethical Approval The ethics committee approval of the study was obtained from Süleyman Demirel University (SDU) Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee with the approval decision dated 29.12.2023 and numbered 390. Participation in this study was voluntary, and the study was conducted within the framework of ethical rules in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to Participate and Publish Written informed consent to participate and publish was obtained from all individual participants or legal guardians included in the study.

References

1. 1. Tonetti MS, Jepsen S, Jin L, et al. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: a call for global action. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(5):456- 62. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12732.
2. 2. Eke PI, Borgnakke WS, Genco RJ. Recent epidemiologic trends in periodontitis in the USA. Periodontol 2000. 2020;82(1):257- 67. doi:10.1111/prd.12323.
3. 3. Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S149-61. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12945.
4. 4. Tonetti MS, Sanz M. Implementation of the new classification of periodontal diseases: decision-making algorithms for clinical practice and education. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(4):398- 405. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13104.
5. 5. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4(1):1-6. doi:10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1.
6. 6. Huynh AV, Latimer JM, Daubert DM, et al. Integration of a new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases through blended learning. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(1):51-6. doi:10.1002/jdd.12740.
7. 7. Bumm CV, Wölfle UC, Keßler A, et al. Influence of decision-making algorithms on the diagnostic accuracy using the current classification of periodontal diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(11):6589-96. doi:10.1007/ s00784-023-05264-z.
8. 8. Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions: introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S1-8. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12935.

9. 9. Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L, et al. A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ. 2006;40(9):867-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02544.x.
10. 10. Miflin BM, Campbell CB, Price DA. A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula. Med Educ. 2000;34(4):299- 306. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00564.x.
11. 11. Du GF, Li CZ, Shang SH, et al. Practising case-based learning in oral medicine for dental students in China. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013;17(4):225-8. doi:10.1111/eje.12042.
12. 12. Lanning SK, Pelok SD, Williams BC, et al. Variation in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among clinical instructors. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(3):325-37.
13. 13. Abou-Arraj RV, Kaur M, Alkhoury S, et al. The new periodontal disease classification: level of agreement on diagnoses and treatment planning at various dental education levels. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(10):1627-39. doi:10.1002/jdd.12636.
14. 14. Lane BA, Luepke P, Chaves E, et al. Assessment of the calibration of periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental students at three dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(1):16-24.
15. 15. Marlow AK, Hamada Y, Maupome G, et al. Periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among Indiana dental faculty, periodontists, and general practice dentists: a multi-group comparison. J Dent Educ. 2018;82(3):291-8. doi:10.21815/JDE.018.029.
16. 16. John V, Lee SJ, Prakasam S, et al. Consensus training: an effective tool to minimize variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental faculty and students. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(8):1022-32. doi:10.1002/j.0022- 0337.2013.77.8.tb05571.x.