COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION, COMPUTARIZED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL SUBSTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN INFRARENAL PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the findings of clinical examination, CT angiography and DSA in evaluation of infrarenal peripheric arterial disease. Materials and Methods This study was conducted in Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between January 2013-February 2014. 49 patients (7 female, 42 male) with lower extremity arterial symptoms between the ages of 41-93 (mean age; 63,83±12,75) were involved in the study. Lower extremity angiograms of the patient were performed by Digital Subtraction Anjiography (DSA ) and 128 multidedector BT angiography in average and these two methods were compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference between BT angiography and DSA in evaluation of infrarenal peripheric arterial disease (p 0.05). AB index and claudicasio measurements demonstrated significantly negative correlation with the stenosis percentage in BT angiography and DSA evaluation results Conclusion BT angiography can be thougt as an alternative imaging method of DSA in evaluation of infrarenal peripheric arterial disease of lower extremity.

Keywords

• Ankle Brakial Indeks
• Computed Tomography Anjiography
• Computed Tomography Anjiography
• Digital Subtraction Anjiography
• Infrarenal Peripheric Arterial Disease
• Claudicasio Intermittens

İNFRARENAL PERİFERİK ARTER HASTALIĞINDA KLİNİK MUAYENE, BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİK ANJİOGRAFİ VE DİGİTAL SUBTRACTİON ANJİOGRAFİ BULGULARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı İnfrarenal periferik arter hastalığının değerlendirilmesinde klinik muayene, BT Anjiografi ve DSA bulgularının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem Bu çalışma Ocak 2013-Şubat 2014 tarihleri arasında, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalında retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmaya yaşları 41-93 (ortalama yaş; 63,83±12,75) arasında değişen, alt ekstremite arteriyel semptomları olan 49 hasta (7 kadın, 42 erkek) dahil edildi. Hastalara Digital Subtraction Anjiografi ve 128 multidedektörlü BT anjiyografi ile alt ekstremite anjiyogramları çekildi ve bu iki yöntem karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular BT anjiyografi ve DSA sonuçlarında periferik arter hastalığının alt ekstremitede değerlendirilmesi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (p 0.05). DSA ve BT anjiografi görüntülerinde belirlenen darlık yüzdesi ile AB indeks ve kladikasyo ölçümleri arasında negatif yönde anlamlı korelasyon saptandı. Sonuç Periferik arter hastalığının alt ekstremitede değerlendirilmesinde BT angiografi, DSA’ya alternatif bir görüntüleme yöntemi olarak düşünülebilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Bacak kol İndeksi, Bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiyografi, Digital Substrakt Anjiografi, İnfrarenal periferik arteriyel hastalık, Kladikasyo intermittant

Keywords

• bacak kol indeksi
• bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiografi
• digital substrakt anjiografi
• infrarenal periferik arteriyel hastalık
• kladikasyo intermittant

References

1. Duran E. Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi. Cilt 1: Edirne:Çapa Tıp Kitapevi: 2004
2. Welten GM, Schouten O, Chonchol M, Hoeks SE, Bax JJ, Van Domburg RT, et al. Prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)2009;50:109-21
3. Gates J, Hartnell G. Optimized diagnostic angiography in high risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. RadioGraphics 2000;20:121-33
4. Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani M. Primer of Diagnostic Imaging 5th Edition: Elsevier 2011;700- 2
5. Willmann J, Baumert B, Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, Verdun F, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremiy arteries assessed with 16-dedektor row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2005;236:1083-93
6. Martin M, Tay K, Flak B, Fry P, Doyle D, Taylor D, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliak system and lower extremities; A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2003;180:1085-91
7. Liu J, Merton D, Mitchell D, Needleman L, Kurtz A, Goldberg B. Color Doppler imaging of the iliofemoral region. RadioGraphics 1990;10:403-12
8. Adriaensen M, Kock M, Stijnen T, Sambeek M, Urk H, Pattynama P, et al. Peripheral arterial disease; Therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital substraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations. Radiology 2004;233:385-91

9. A Mishra, N Jain, A Bhagwat. CT angiography of peripheral arterial disease by 256-slice scanner: accuracy, advantages and disadvantages compared to digital subtraction angiography. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2017;51(5):247-54
10. Schertler T, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H, Marincek B, Boehm T. Sixteen-dedector row CT angiography for lower leg arterial occlusive disease; Analysis of section width. Radiology 2005;237:649-56
11. Raptopoulos V, Rosen M, Kent K, Kuestner L, Sheiman R, Pearlman J. Sequential helical CT angiography of aortoiliac disease. AJR 1996;166:1347-54
12. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Bezzi M, Pediconi F, et al. İnfrarenal aortic and lower extremity arterial disease; Diagnostic performance of multidedector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004;231:555-63
13. HEA Al-rudaini, P Han, H Liang. Comparison between computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in critical lower limb ischemia. Current Medical Imaging 2019;15(5):496-503
14. R Pangeri, P Han, F Pan, LP Lamsal, Z Zhang, J Yu, et al. Assessment of occlusive disease of lower extremity arteries on the basis of anatomic region: Value of 128-slice multidetector CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography. JCMS Nepal 2016;12(4):179-86