Determination of Yield And Fruit Quality Characteristics of Some Beef Type Tomato Lines

Year 2024, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 55 - 62, 28.06.2024

Özlem Demir , Hüsnü Ünlü , Halime Ünlü

https://doi.org/10.54975/isubuzfd.1475691

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the yield and some quality characteristics of 20 beef tomato lines at the F6 stage. As a result, the total yield, average fruit weight, fruit length, and fruit width of the lines varied between 6.60-14.93 t/ha, 200.80-384.00 g, 53.68-75.05 mm, and 71.95-98.29 mm respectively. Furthermore, it was found that the fruit flesh firmness values of the tomato lines used in the study varied between 0.41-1.32 kg/cm2; brix values between 6.10-9.60%; vitamin C values between 20.03-25.57 mg/100 g; total phenolic contents between 13.28-30.72 mg/100 g; lycopene contents between 4.69-9.68 mg/100 g and beta-carotene contents between 0.83-2.17 mg/100 g.

Keywords

Tomato, yield, quality

Ethical Statement

As the authors of this study, we declare that we do not have any ethics committee approval.

Supporting Institution

Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination

Project Number

Project No: 2020-YL1-0053

Thanks

This study is derived from Özlem Demir’s master’s thesis and was financially supported by the Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project No: 2020-YL1-0053)

Bazı Beef Tipi Domates Hatlarının Verim Ve Meyve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma 20 adet F6 kademesindeki beef tipi domates hattının verim ve bazı kalite özelliklerinin ortaya konulması amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda hatların toplam verim, ortalama meyve ağırlığı, meyve boyu ve meyve eni değerlerinin sırasıyla; 6.60-14.93 ton/da, 200.80-384.00 g, 53.68-75.05 mm ve 71.95-98.29 mm arasında değişim gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan domates hatlarının meyve eti sertlik değerlerinin 0.41-1.32 kg/cm2, sçkm değerlerinin %6.10-9.60, vitamin C değerlerinin 20.03-25.57 mg/100 g, toplam fenolik madde miktarlarının 13.28-30.72 mg/100 g, likopen içeriklerinin 4.69-9.68 mg/100 g ve beta karoten içeriklerinin 0.83-2.17 mg/100 g arasında değişim gösterdikleri saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Domates, verim, kalite

Project Number

Project No: 2020-YL1-0053

References

• Adeniji, O. T., Tenebe, A. V., Ishaka, A., Jandong, E., Adamu, J. T., Adekoya, M., Zamzam, M. A., & Aremu, C. A. (2020). Phenotypic variability for horticultural and fruit quality attributes in plastic house grown tomato. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 15(2), 136-146.
• Bai, Y., & Lindhout, P. (2007). Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of Botany, 100, 1085-1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm150.
• Balkaya, A. (2008). Sebzelerde çeşit geliştirme teknikleri. Tarım Türk Dergisi, 3(14), 16-21.
• Böhm, V. (2018). Lycopene, Tomatoes, and cardiovascular diseases. In Lycopene and Tomatoes in Human Nutrition and Health. (pp. 51-68)
• Caicedo, A., & Peralta, I. (2013). Basic information about tomatoes and the tomato group. In Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Tomato. (pp. 6-36)
• Causse, M., Duffe, P., Gomez, M. C., Buret, M., Damidaux, R., Zamir, D., Gur, A., Chevalier, C., Lemaire-Chamley, M., & Rothan, C. (2004). A genetic map of candidate genes and QTLs involved in tomato fruit size and composition. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(403), 1671-1685. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh207.
• Cemeroğlu, B. (2007). Gıda Analizleri. Gıda Teknolojileri Derneği Yayınları.
• Cemeroğlu, B. (2013). Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metotları. Biltav Yayınları.
• Coseteng, M. Y., & Lee, C. Y. (1987). Changes in apple polyphenoloxidase and polyphenol concentrations in relation to degree of browning. Journal of Food Science, 52(4), 985-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14257.x.
• Çelik, İ., & Kabaş, A. (2021). Domates Islahı. In Yazlık Sebze Islahı. (pp. 65-99)
• Dam, B. V., Goffau, M. D., Lidth de Jeude, J. V., & Naika, S. (2005). Cultivation of tomato: Production, processing and marketing. Agromisa, Netherlands.
• Dar, R. A., & Sharma, J. P. (2011). Genetic variability studies of yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 5(2), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.168.174.
• Dariva, F. D., Pessoa, H. P., Copati, M. G. F., Queiroz de Almeida, G., Filho, M. N. C., Picoli, E. A. T., França da Cunha, F., & Nick, C. (2021). Yield and fruit quality attributes of selected tomato introgression lines subjected to long-term deficit irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae, 289, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110426.
• Dhillon, N. S., Sharma, P., Kumar, P., & Sharma, V. (2019). Comparative performance of tomato genotypes for yield and quality characters under protected environment. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(3), 1678-1680. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28639.92322.
• Doğan, C. (2019). Erkenci Domates Hatlarında Bazı Biyokimyasal Özelliklerin Belirlenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü)
• Flores, P., Sánchez, E., Fenoll, J., & Hellín, P. (2017). Genotypic variability of carotenoids in traditional tomato cultivars. Food Research International, 100(3), 510-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.07.014.
• FAO (2024). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
• Francesca, S., Arena, C., Mele, B. H., Schettini, C., Ambrosino, P., Barone, A., & Rigano, M. M. (2020). The use of a plant-based biostimulant improves plant performances and fruit quality in tomato plants grown at elevated temperatures. Agronomy, 10(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030363.
• Gemechu, G. E., & Beyene, T. M. (2019). Evaluation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. mill) varieties for yield and fruit quality in ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management, 89, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.7176/FSQM.
• Gölükcü, M., Kabaş, A., Yeğin, A. B., Vuran, F. A., Yüksel, K., & Tanır, A. (2018). Domatesin bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal kalite özelliklerinin melezleme ile değişimi. Derim, 35(2), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.16882/derim.2018.427755.
• Hanson, P. M., Yang, R., Wu, J., Chen, J., Ledesma, D., Tsou, S. C. S., & Lee, T. C. (2004). Variation for antioxidant activity and antioxidants in tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129(5), 704-711. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.5.0704.
• Heuvelink, E., & Dorais, M. (2005). Crop growth and yield. In Tomatoes. (pp. 85-144)
• Junior, S. S., Casagrande, J. G., Toledo, C. A. L., Ponce, F. S., Ferreira, F. S., Zanuzo, M. R., Diamante, M. S., & Lima, P. P. (2022). Selection of thermotolerant Italian tomato cultivars with high fruit yield and nutritional quality for the consumer taste grown under protected cultivation. Scientia Horticulturae, 291, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110559.
• Kabaş, O., Kabaş, A., &Ünal, İ. (2018). Effects of maturity time on some mechanical properties of beef type tomato for transportation. Inmateh-Agrıcultural Engineering, 54(1), 33-38.
• Kandel, D. R., Marconi, T. M. G., Badillo-Vargas, I. E., Enciso, J., Zapata, S. D., Lazcano, C. A., Crosby, K., & Avila, C. A. (2020). Yield and fruit quality of high-tunnel tomato cultivars produced during the off-season in South Texas. Scientia Horticulturae, 272, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109582.
• Karaçalı, İ. (1993). Bahçe Ürünlerinin Muhafaza ve Pazarlanması. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:494, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Kavitha, P., Shivashankara, K. S., Rao, V. K., Sadashiva, A. T., Ravishankarc, K. V., & Sathishd, G. J. (2013). Genotypic variability for antioxidant and quality parameters among tomato cultivars, hybrids, cherry tomatoes and wild species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94, 993-999. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6359.
• Koç, H. (2002). Bitkilerle sağlıklı yaşam. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Tokat, Türkiye.
• Lekshmi, S. L., & Celine, V. A. (2017). Genetic variability studies of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under protected conditions of Kerala. Theasian Journal of Horticulture, 12(1), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJH/12.1/106-110.
• McGuire, R. G. (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27, 1254-1255.
• Murariu, O. C., Brezeanu, C., Jitareanu, C. D., Robu, T., Irimia, L. M., Trofin, A. E., Popa, L. D., Stoleru, V., Murariu, F., & Brezeanu, P. M. (2021). Functional quality of improved tomato genotypes grown in open field and in plastic tunnel under organic farming. Agriculture, 11(7), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture11070609
• Nagata, M., & Yamashita, I. (1992). Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and caretonoids in tomato fruit. Journal of Japan Food Indusrty Association, 39(10), 925-928. https://doi.org/10.136/nskkkl1962.39.925.
• Nour, V., Trandafir, I., &Ionica, M. E. (2013). Antioxidant compounds, mineral content and antioxidant activity of several tomato cultivars grown in southwestern Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horticulture Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 41, 136-142.
• Oluk, C. A., Akyıldız, A., Ağçam, E., Keles, D., & Ata, A. (2012). Farklı domates çesitlerinin bazı kalite özellikleri. Akademik Gıda, 10(3), 26-31.
• Prakash, E., Premalakshmi, V., Arumugam, T., & Thiruvengadam, V. (2019). Evaluation of indeterminate tomato hybrids (Solanum lycopersicum L) for fruit quality and biochemical traits under polyhouse condition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3), 4443-4446.
• Radzevicius, A., Karkleliene, R., Viskelis, P., Bobinas, C., Bobinaite, R., & Sakalauskiene, S. (2009). Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) fruit quality and physiological parameters at different ripening stages of lithuanian cultivars. Agronomy Research, 7, 712-718.
• Rouphael, Y., Collab, G., Giordanoa, M., El-Nakhela, C., Kyriacouc, M. C., & Pascalea, S. (2017). Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 226, 353-360.
• Sevgican, A. (1999). Örtüaltı Sebzeciliği Cilt 1. İzmir, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Sinha, A., Singh, P., Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, R. (2020). Evaluation of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes for morphological, qualitative and biochemical traits for protected cultivation. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(2), 105- 111. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i230503
• Şalk, A., Arın, L., Deveci, M., & Polat, S. (2008). Özel Sebzecilik. Tekirdağ, Sevil Cilt Evi ve Matbaası.
• Toksöz, T. (2019). Beef Tipi Domates Hatların Domates Sarı Yaprak Kıvırcıklık Virüsüne Dayanıklılığının Moleküler Markörler ile Belirlenmesi ve Morfolojik Olarak Tanımlanması. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü)
• Topçu, T., & Aktaş, H. (2020). Domateste kullanılan farklı anaçların bitki büyümesi, verim ve meyve kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 27-40.
• Ünal, A. (2021). Beef tipi domates hibritlerinin morfolojik ve agronomik karakterizasyonu. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü)
• Yanmaz, R., Balkaya, A., Akan, S., Kaymak, H. Ç., Sarıkamış, G., Önal Ulukapı, K., Karaağaç, O., Güvenç, İ., Kurtar, E. S., & Eryılmaz Açıkgöz, F. (2020). Sebzecilik Sektörü: Dünü, Bugünü ve Geleceği. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği IX. Teknik Kongresi. 13-17 Ocak, Ankara, 585-607.
• Zengin, S. (2010). Örtüaltına uygun domates (Solanum lycopersicum L.) saf hatların verim ve bazı kalite kriterleri bakımından genel uyum yeteneklerinin ve hibrit güçlerinin belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü)