14-16 Yaş Basketbol Oynayan Genç Sporcuların Tercih Ettikleri Antrenör Davranışları

Abstract

Antrenör; enerjisini, gücünü, dinamizmini, bilgilerini ve sosyal kapasitesini sporcusuna en etkili ve kalıcı bir şekilde aktarabilme yeteneğine sahip olan lider özellikli kimse, sporcuların fiziksel, fizyolojik, zihinsel, duygusal ve sosyal kapasitelerinin amaçlı davranışlarla geliştirilmesine yardımcı olan ve bunun için antrenmanın bilimsel amaçlarını yerine getiren özel eğitim ve öğretim almış kişidir. Antrenörlüğün önemli bileşenlerinden biri spora özgü becerileri öğretme yeteneğinin olmasıdır. Bu becerinin yanında başkalarıyla ilişkiler kurma ve sürdürme becerisi de ön plana çıkmakta ve antrenörün öğretme yeteneğini pekiştirmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, 14-16 yaş basketbol oynayan genç sporcuların tercih ettikleri antrenör davranışlarını belirlemek, bu yaklaşımların cinsiyet ve antrenör cinsiyet tercihi değişkenleriyle ilgili ilişkilerini tespit etmektir. Araştırmada tarama (betimsel) modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma grubunu, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemine göre seçilen, 2018-2019güz ve bahar döneminde, Ankara ilindeki, Hidayet Türkoğlu, Darüşşafaka ve Tofaş Basketbol Okullarında basketbol eğitim gören toplam 163 genç basketbolcu oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda genç basketbolcuların övgüde bulunan, ödül veren antrenörden ziyade, teknik bilgisi iyi olan, teknik hatalarını düzelten, adil davranan, teknik becerileri için eğitim veren ve gelişimlerini teşvik eden bir antrenörü tercih ettikleri görülmektedir.

Keywords

• Antrenör davranışı
• basketbol
• eğitim
• spor

Coach Behaviors That Young Sportsmen Aged 14-16 Playing Basketball Prefer

Abstract

Coach is the leader who has the ability to transfer his/her energy, strength, dynamism, knowledge and social capacity to his/her sportsperson in the most effective and permanent way, he/she is the person who helps to develop the physical, physiological, mental, emotional and social capacities of sportsperson through purposeful behavior and thus who had received special education and training fulfilling the scientific objectives of training. One of the key components of coaching is the ability to teach sports-specific skills. In addition to this skill, the ability to establish and maintain relationships with others also comes to the fore and reinforces the coach's teaching ability. The aim of the study is to determine the coach behaviors that young sportsmen aged 14-16 playing basketball prefer, and to determine the relationship of these approaches with gender and gender preference of coach variables. Screening (descriptive) model was used in the research. A total of 163 young basketball players who had basketball training in Hidayet Türkoğlu, Darüşşafaka and Tofaş Basketball Schools in Ankara during the fall and spring period of 2018-2019, selected according to the purposeful sampling method, constitute the research group. At the end of the research, it observed that young basketball players prefer a coach with good technical knowledge, correcting technical mistakes, acting fairly, training for technical skills and encouraging their development, rather than a praising, award-giving coach.

Keywords

• Coach behavior
• basketball
• education
• sports

References

1. Anılır, M. (2007). The Relationship Between the Meta Programs of Basketball Coaches and Their Leadership Qualities Perceived by Their Athletes. Health Sciences Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sports. Master Thesis. Istanbul: Marmara University.
2. Chelladurai, P. (1999). Human Resource Management in Sport And Recreation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
3. Chelladurai, P., Riemer, H. (1998). Measurement Of Leadership in Sport. In J.L. Duda (Ed.), Advancements in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pg. 227-253). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
4. Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in Sports: A review of relevant research. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 328-354.
5. Chelladurai, P., Saleh, S.D. (1980). Dimensions of Leader Behavior in Sports: Development of a Leadership Scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.2.1.34
6. Chelladurai, P., Carron, A. (1978). Leadership. Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation Sociology of Sport Monograph Series A. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary.
7. Côté, J., Gilbert, W. (2009). An Integrative Definition of Coaching Effectiveness and Expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795409789623892
8. Dale, J., Weinberg, R. S. (1989). The Relationship Between Coaches Leadership Style and Burnout. The Sport Psychologist, 3, 1-13.

9. Karasar, N. (2000). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Nobel Yayın.
10. Konter, E. (1996). Coach as a Leader. Istanbul: Alfa Publishing.
11. Martin S.B., Barnes K., Kravig S.D., Johnson, M.S. (2005). Coaching Behavior Preferences of Interscholastic and Intercollegiate Athletes. Manuscript under review. Denton: University of North Texas, College of Education.
12. Nater, S., Gallimore, R. (2006). You Haven’t Taught Until They Have Learned: John Wooden’s Teaching Principles And Practices. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
13. Smith, R.E., Smoll, F.L., Hunt, B., (1977). A System For The Behavioral Assessment of Athletic Coaches. The Research Quarterly, 48, 401-407.
14. Sunay, H. (1998). Important Of Physical Education Teacher And Coach in Sport Education Infrasutructure. Journal of Gazi University Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 3(2), 43-50.
15. Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th international ed. cover edn.). Thousand Oaks, NJ: Sage Publications.
16. Weinberg, R.S., Gould ,D. (1999). Goal Setting, Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Champaign, III.; Human Kinetics. Doi: 10.4025/reveducfis.v24.2.17524
17. Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Yukl, G. A., Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed. pp. 147-197). Chicago: Rand McNally.
19. Yurt O. (2009). Leadership Styles of Taekwondo Coaches. Health Sciences Institute, Department of Sports Management. Master Thesis. Konya: Selcuk University.