DENTOFASİYAL ESTETİK ALGI ÜZERİNE SOSYAL MEDYADA TANINIRLIĞIN ETKİSİ

Year 2022, , 862 - 869, 26.12.2022

Elif Koçak , Nazlı Aydın

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1123016

Cited By: 1

Abstract

ÖZ
Amaç: Gülümseme, yüz estetiğinin değerlendirilmesinde ve bireylerin sosyal etkileşiminde önemli bir role sahiptir. Bir gülümsemenin estetik değerlendirmesinde kişilik özelliklerinin, etnik grupların ve mesleki deneyimlerin etkileri bugüne kadar araştırılan konular arasındadır. Günümüzde sosyal medyada tanınır olmanın da estetik algıyı etkileyebilecek faktörler arasında olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışma Çukurova Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran hastaların sosyal medyada tanınan ve tanınmayan modeller üzerinde estetik algılarını değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmanın örneklemini Çukurova Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi'ne başvuran 18-65 yaş arası 70 kadın, 60 erkek 130 hasta oluşturmuştur. Dental estetik normlarına uymayan gülüşlere sahip (Gummy smile, diastema, orta hat kayması, üst santral çapraşıklık, düz gülüş arkı) sosyal medya tanınırlığına sahip beş ünlü kişi ve aynı özelliklere sahip ünlü olmayan beş kişi seçildi. Katılımcılardan tüm yüz ve ağız gülümseme fotoğraflarını 5'li Likert ölçeğine göre değerlendirmeleri istendi. Verilen puanları karşılaştırmak için Ki-kare testi kullanıldı. Tüm sonuçlar p<0.05 olduğunda anlamlı kabul edildi.
Bulgular: Orta hat kayması (p=0.202), ve düz gülümseme arkı (p=0.061), açısından ünlülere ait fotoğraf değerlendirmelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki yokken ünlü olmayanlara ait fotoğraf değerlendirmelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki vardır (p<0.05). Gummy smile, diastema ve üst santral çapraşıklık içeren her iki gruba ait modellerin değerlendirmelerinde istatistiksel olarak benzer bir ilişki gözlendi.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sınırlamaları dahilinde sosyal medyada tanınmak Gummy smile, diastema ve üst santral çapraşıklık durumlarında estetik algıyı etkilemezken, orta hat kayması ve düz gülümseme arkı durumlarında etkilemiştir.

Keywords

Sosyal medya, Estetik algı, Estetik gülümseme.

Thanks

Katkılarından dolayı Mısra Holdur, İrem Yülek, Ayşe Nur Üredi’ ye teşekkür ederiz.

THE EFFECT OF BEING FAMOUS IN SOCIAL MEDIA ON DENTOFACIAL AESTHETIC PERCEPTION

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Purpose: Smile has an important role in evaluating facial aesthetics and the social interaction of individuals. In the aesthetic evaluation of a smile, the effects of personality traits, ethnic groups, and professional experiences are among the topics researched to date. Social media is important in terms of increasing visual interaction. This study aimed to evaluate the aesthetic awareness and perceptions of the patients admitted to the Faculty of Dentistry of Cukurova University on the models recognized and unrecognized by social media.
Material And Methods: The study sample consisted of 70 females; 60 males 130 patients aged 18-65 years who applied to the Cukurova University Faculty of Dentistry. Five famous persons on social media and five non-famous persons with the same features were selected, with smiles that do not comply with dental aesthetic norms (Gummy smile, diastema, midline shift, upper central crowding, straight smile arc). Participants were asked to evaluate all facial and mouth smile photos (of all models according to a 5-point Likert scale. A Chi-square test was used to compare the given scores. All results were considered significant when p<0.05.
Results: In terms of midline shift (p=0.202) and straight smile arc (p=0.061), there was no statistically significant relationship in the photographic evaluations of celebrities, while there was a statistically significant correlation in the photographic evaluations of non-celebrities (p<0.05). A statistically similar relationship was observed in the evaluations of the models belonging to both groups, which included gummy smiles, a diastema, and upper central crowding.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, being famous on social media did not affect the aesthetic perception in cases of gummy smile, a diastema, and upper central crowding but affected in cases of midline shift and straight smile arc.

Keywords

Social media, Aesthetic perception, Aesthetic smile

References

• Koidou VP, Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Celebrity smile esthetics assessment: Smile angulation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:636–41.
• Schabel BJ, McNamara JA, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;135:61–71.
• Hamamci N, Baaran G, Uysal E. Dental aesthetic index scores and perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:168–73.
• Parashar P, Paliwal A, Parekh V, Shingala A, Patel S, Shah J. A Complete analysis of quality of life measure and esthetic component in indore population. J Int Oral Heal 2015;7:77–81.
• Nayak UA, Winnier J, Rupesh S. The relationship of dental aesthetic index with dental appearance, smile and desire for orthodontic correction. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;2:6–12.
• Singh H, Maurya RK, Kapoor P, Sharma P, Srivastava D. Subjective and objective evaluation of frontal smile esthetics in patients with facial asymmetry-a comparative cross-sectional study. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2017;20: 8–20.
• Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008;133: 515–23.
• Çelik Ö, Karataş OH, Malkoç S. Görsel analog skala kullanılarak dişeti estetiğinin değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2016;3:56–62.
• Şahin Aydınyurt H, Bilgili E. Evaluation of the smile esthetic index of patients in Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry. Van Med J 2018;25:360–6.
• Rodrigues CD, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009;79:634-9.
• Armalaite J, Jarutiene M, Vasiliauskas A, Sidlauskas A, Svalkauskiene V, Sidlauskas M et al. Smile aesthetics as perceived by dental students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:1–7.
• Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Al-Mashraqi AA, Al-Homoud M, Wafi S, Zakari A, Mashali W. Perception of facial, dental, and smile esthetics by dental students. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:415–26.
• Talic N, Al Omar S, Al Maidhan A. Perception of Saudi dentists and lay people to altered smile esthetics. Saudi Dent J 2013;25:13–21.
• Fredani M. Esthetic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics, Esthetic Analysis: A systemic approach to prosthetic treatment. Quintessence Publishing, 2004. p. 34-59.
• Cruz GA, Varo AO, Luna FM, Jiménez-Castellanos E. Esthetic assessment of celebrity smiles. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:146–50.
• Ferreira JB, Silva LE, Caetano MTO, Motta AFJ, Cury-Saramago AA, Mucha JN. Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:51–7.
• Parrini S, Rossini G, Castroflorio T, Fortini A, Deregibus A, Debernardi C. Laypeople’s perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2016;150:740–50.
• Sharma PK, Sharma P. Dental smile esthetics: The Assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin Orthod 2012;18:193-201.
• Laus I, Pavicic DK, Brumini M, Perkovic V, Pavlic A, Spalj S. Effects of visual stimuli from media on the perception of dentofacial esthetics. Acta Stomatol Croat 2020;54:283–92.
• Theobald AH, Wong BKJ, Quick AN, Thomson WM. The impact of the popular media on cosmetic dentistry. N Z Dent J 2006;102:58–63.
• Akyazı A. Sosyal medya ve tüketim ilişkisi: Popüler ünlüleri̇n instagram hesapları üzeri̇ne bi̇r araştırma. Trak Üni Sosyal Bilim Derg 2019;21:93–108.
• McLeod C, Fields HW, Hechter F, Wiltshire W, Rody W, Christensen J. Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons. Angle Orthod 2011;81:198–205.
• Chen Y, Cheng Y, Cheng H, Yu H. Comparison of smile esthetics among celebrities, dentists, and dental students in a Han Chinese population. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:845–49.
• Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: Asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:141–51.
• Cotrim ER, Vasconcelos AV, Haddad ACSS, Reis SAB. Perception of adults’ smile esthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:40-4.
• Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:557–63.
• Arroyo-Cruz G, Orozco-Varo A, Vilches-Ahumada M, Jiménez-Castellanos E. Comparative analysis of smile aesthetics between top celebrity smile and a Southern European population. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May 19:S0022-3913(21)00167-0. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.019.
• Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, Christensen JC. Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011; 139, e91–e101.
• We Are Social & Hootsuite. Digital 2022: Global Overview Report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-global-overview-report.