BibTex RIS Cite

Farklı yüzey hazırlama yöntemlerinin fissür örtücülerin bağlanma dayanımı üzerine olan etkisi

Year 2015, , 65 - 70, 01.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.15311/1441.272609

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacı kurutma ajanı/ kurutma
ajanı olmaksızın mine yüzeyinin hazırlanmasında
asitle pürüzlendirme ve Er:YAG lazerin (QSP ve
MSP mod) fissür örtücünün bağlanma dayanımı
üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek amaçlandı.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 30 adet
çürüksüz daimi diş kullanıldı. Dişler mine-sement
sınırının 2 mm üstünden kesildi ve kökler
uzaklaştırıldı. Dişler meziodistal olarak ikiye ayrıldı.
Elde edilen 60 yarım diş akrilik reçine içine
gömüldü. Mine yüzeyinde fissure örtücüler için 2
mm çapında alan oluşturuldu. Bütün gruplara
Ultraseal XT plus (Fissür örtücü:FÖ) uygulandı.
Örnekler randomize olarak 6 gruba ayrıldı (n:10);
G1:% 37 fosforik asit + Prima Dry + FÖ, G2:% 37
fosforik asit + FÖ, G3: Er: YAG (MSP modu) +
Prima Dry + FÖ; G4: Er: YAG (MSP modu) + FÖ;
G5: Er: YAG (QSP modu) + Prima Dry + FÖ; G6:
Er: YAG (QSP modu) + FÖ. Örnekler 24 saat distile
su içinde bekletildikten sonra bağlanma kuvvetleri,
üniversal test makinesi ile test edildi. Verileri
karşılaştırmak için Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney
U-testi kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Gruplara ait bağlanma dayanımları
şöyledir (MPa) G1: 11.33, G2: 9.76, G3: 8.65, G4:
7.72, G5: 4.49, G6: 2.73. Gruplar arasında
istatistiksel fark olduğu gözlendi (p < 0.05).
Sonuç: Mine yüzeyine asit uygulaması, Er:YAG
lazer QSP ve MSP moda göre daha iyi sonuçlar
verdiği görülmüştür. Fissür örtücü uygulanmadan
önce kurutma ajanı uygulanabilir.

References

  • Adams TJ, Frazier KB, Browning WD, 2000. Effect of drying agent use on sealant penetration. Journal of Dental Research, 79: 189 (Abstr. 363).
  • Apel C, Franzen R, Meister J, et al 2002. Influence of the pulse duration of an Er:YAG laser system on the ablation threshold of dental enamel. Lasers Med Sci 17(4):253–257.
  • Bevilacqua FM, Zezell DM, Magnani R, et al 2008. Fluoride uptake and acid resistance of enamel irradiated with Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 23(2):141–147.
  • Boksman L, Carson B, 1998. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and Fluorshield light cured pit and fissure sealants. General Dentistry 46, 184–187.
  • Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Ramos RP, Liporaci JL, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, 2004. Microleakage at sealant/ enamel interface of primary teeth: Effect of Er:YAG laser ablation of pit and fissures. J Dent Child (Chic), 71,143-7.
  • Buonocore MG, 1955. A simple method of Increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34, 849-53.
  • Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, et al 2006.Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 34(3):245–251

Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of fissure sealants

Year 2015, , 65 - 70, 01.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.15311/1441.272609

Abstract

Background: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of a fissure sealant to enamel treated with ER:YAG laser (MSP and QSP mode) and acid etching with /without drying agent.Methods: Thirty permanent human molars were used in this study. The roots sectioned 2 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction. The crowns were mesiodistally sectioned providing 60 halves that were embedded in acrylic resin. The enamel was flattened and a 2 mm diameter bonding area was demarcated. Ultraseal XT Plus fissure sealant (FS) was applied in all groups. Specimens were randomly assigned to six groups (n=10); G1: 37% phosphoric acid + Prima Dry + FS, G2: 37% phosphoric acid + FS, G3: Er:YAG (MSP mode) + Prima Dry + FS; G4: Er:YAG (MSP mode) + FS; G5: Er:YAG (QSP mode) + Prima Dry + FS; G6: Er:YAG (QSP mode) + FSFS. After 24 hours storage in distilled water, shear bond strength of samples were tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the respective groups.Results: The SBS results (MPa) were the following: G1: 11.33, G2: 9.76, G3: 8.65, G4: 7.72, G5: 4.49, G6: 2.73. There were significant differences amongs the groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion: The acid etching surface application showed better performance than laser surface treatment in both MSP and QSP mode. Drying agent may be used for enamel surface prior to sealant application.

References

  • Adams TJ, Frazier KB, Browning WD, 2000. Effect of drying agent use on sealant penetration. Journal of Dental Research, 79: 189 (Abstr. 363).
  • Apel C, Franzen R, Meister J, et al 2002. Influence of the pulse duration of an Er:YAG laser system on the ablation threshold of dental enamel. Lasers Med Sci 17(4):253–257.
  • Bevilacqua FM, Zezell DM, Magnani R, et al 2008. Fluoride uptake and acid resistance of enamel irradiated with Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 23(2):141–147.
  • Boksman L, Carson B, 1998. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and Fluorshield light cured pit and fissure sealants. General Dentistry 46, 184–187.
  • Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Ramos RP, Liporaci JL, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, 2004. Microleakage at sealant/ enamel interface of primary teeth: Effect of Er:YAG laser ablation of pit and fissures. J Dent Child (Chic), 71,143-7.
  • Buonocore MG, 1955. A simple method of Increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34, 849-53.
  • Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, et al 2006.Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 34(3):245–251
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA22VF54RH
Journal Section Research
Authors

Gül Tosun This is me

Halenur Onat Altan This is me

Zeynep Göztaş This is me

Kamil Kahraman This is me

Tuğrul Sarı This is me

Murat Selim Botsalı This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2015
Submission Date August 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015

Cite

Vancouver Tosun G, Onat Altan H, Göztaş Z, Kahraman K, Sarı T, Botsalı MS. Farklı yüzey hazırlama yöntemlerinin fissür örtücülerin bağlanma dayanımı üzerine olan etkisi. Selcuk Dent J. 2015;2(2):65-70.