Determination of transmigration among impacted canines

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of transmigrant canines among impacted canines and to evaluate transmigrant canines.

Methods: This study presents 121 patients (36 males and 85 females) who referred to Ankara University Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department for impacted canine diagnosis and treatment in 2012 were retrospectively analyzed and transmigrant canines among impacted canines were evaluated with the help of age, gender, position, localization, treatment protocols and classification statistically and an incidence rate were defined. 

Results: 4 patients were excluded becouse of data absence. Among 146 impacted canines 13 transmigrated canines in 13 patients (3 male 10 female) were found as unilaterally in mandible (2 male 8 female) and maxilla(1 male 2 female). The mean age was 32.38. Among mandibular transmigrants Class 1(%50) found as the most common position class. 8 tooth was extracted while 5 was followed up. Among impacted canines transmigration incidence were found as %8.90. Rate was found %2.52 and %37.03 in maxilla and mandible. 

Conclusions: The incidence of transmigration was significantly higher in the mandible than maxilla (p <0.05). Dentists must be aware of transmigration situations which can not be detected by only clinical examination and radiograpic examination doesn’t must be neglected.

Keywords: transmigration; impacted canines; mandible; maxilla

Keywords

• transmigration,impacted canines,maxilla,mandible

Gömülü kaninlerin transmigrasyon insidansının belirlenmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanı amacı gömülü kanin dişler arsında transmigrant kanin insidansının belirlenmesi ve transmigrant kanin dişlerinin değerlendirilmesidir. 

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada Ankara Üniversitesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalında 2012 yılında tarafımızdan gömülü kanin diş sebebiyle muayene ve tedavi edilmiş 121 hastaya ait (36 erkek, 85 kadın) klinik ve panoramik radyografi görüntüleri retrospektif olarak analiz edilmiş ve transmigrant kanin içeren vakalar yaş, cinsiyet, pozisyon, lokalizasyon,tedavi protokolleri ve sınıflama açısından istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiş ve görülme sıklığı belirlenmiştir. 

Bulgular: 4 hasta veri eksikliği nedeniyle çalışma dışı bırakılmıştır. 117 hastada 146 kanin dişinin içerisinde 3 ü üst çene (1 erkek, 2 kadın) 10’u alt çene(2 erkek, 8 kadın) de olmak üzere 13 (3 erkek,10 kadın) tek taraflı transmigrant kanin bulunmuştur. Ortalama yaş 32.38 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Alt çenede görülenlerde Sınıf 1(%50) en sık rastlanılan pozisyon olmuştur. 8 dişin tedavisi çekim ile yapılırken 5 dişin tedavisinde takipyapılması uygun görülmüştür.. Gömülü kaninler arasında transmigrasyon görülme insidansı %8.90 olup bu oran üst çenede %2.52 olarak bulunmuşken alt çenede %37.03 olarak belirlenmiştir.

Sonuçlar: Transmigrasyon görülme insidansı alt çenede üst çeneye oranla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksektir (p<0.05). Diş hekimlerinin yalnızca klinik muayene ile tespit edilemeyecek transmigrasyon ile karşılaşabileceklerinin farkında olmaları ve radyografik muayenelerini ihmal etmemeleri gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: transmigrasyon; gömülü kanin; alt çene; üst çene

Keywords

• transmigrasyon,gömülü kanin,alt çene,üst çene

References

1. 1. Ando S, Aizawa K, Nakashima T, Sanka Y, Shimbo K, Kiyokawa K. Transmigration process of the impacted mandibular cuspid. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1964;6(2):66-71.
2. 2. Javid B. Transmigration of impacted mandibular cuspids. Int J Oral Surg 1985;14(6):547-549.
3. 3. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intraosseous transmigration of mandibular canines-review of the literature and treatment options.Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16(10):1014-1017.
4. 4. Mazinis E, Zafeiriadis A, Karathanasis A, Lambrianidis T. Transmigration of impacted canines: prevalence, management and implications on tooth structure and pulp vitality of adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(2):625–632.
5. 5.Kamiloglu B, Kelahmet U. Prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in a Cypriote orthodontic population in the Northern Cyprus area BMC Research Notes 2014, 7:346-351.
6. 6. Özveri Koyuncu B, Çetingül E. Transmigration of impacted canines. Six case reports. J Hacettepe Uni Dent Fac 2010;34(1-2):23-29.
7. 7.Vuchkova J, Farah CS. Canine transmigration: comprehensive literature review and report of 4 new Australian cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(4):e46–53.
8. 8. Gruszka K, Różyło TK, Różyło-Kalinowska I, Denkiewicz K, Masłowska K. Transmigration of mandibular canine – case report. Pol J Radiol, 2014;79:20-23.

9. 9. Ryan FS, Batra P, Witherow H, Calveri M. Transmigration of a maxillary canine.A case report. Prim Dent Care 2005;12(2):70-72.
10. 10. Çelikoğlu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Investigation of Transmigrated and Impacted Maxillary and Mandibular Canine Teeth in an Orthodontic Patient Population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68(5):1001-1006.
11. 11. Mupparapu M. Patterns of intra-osseous transmigration and ectopic eruption of mandibular canines: review of literature and report of nine additional cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31(6):355–360.
12. 12.Aydin U, Yilmaz H. Transmigration of impacted canines. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32(3):198–200.
13. 13.Aras MH, Büyükkurt MC, Yolcu U, Ertas¸ U, Dayi E. Transmigrant maxillary canines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(3):e48-52.
14. 14.Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59(4):420–425.
15. 15.Aydin U, Yilmaz HH, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(3):164–169.
16. 16.Aktan AM, Kara S, Akgünlü F, Malkoç S. The incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulation. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(5):575–581.
17. 17. Dalessandri D, Parrini S, Rubiano R, Gallone D, Migliorati M. Impacted and transmigrant mandibular canines incidence, aetiology, and treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(2):161-169.
18. 18. Kumar S, Jayaswal P, Pentapati KC, Valiathan A, Kotak N. Investigation of the transmigrated canine in an orthodontic patient population. J Orthod. 2012;39(2):89-94.
19. 19. Çelebi F, Taşkan MM, Turkal M, Turkal H, Holoğlu F. Orta Karadeniz toplumunda dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığı. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2015;18(4):343-350.
20. 20. Auluck A, Nagpal A, Setty S, Pai KM, Sunny J. Transmigration of impacted mandibular canines-report of 4 cases. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72(3):249-52.
21. 21.Sharma G, Nagpal A. A Study of Transmigrated Canine in an Indian Population. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:756516. doi: 10.1155/2014/756516.
22. 22.Peck S. On the phenomenon of intraosseous migration of nonerupting teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(5):515-517.
23. 23.Joshi MR. Transmigrant mandibular canines: a record of 28 cases and a retrospective review of the literature. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(1):12-22.
24. 24.González-Sánchez MA, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Transmigrant impacted mandibular canines: a retrospective study of 15 cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(11):1450-1455.
25. 25. Rebellato J, Schabel B. Treatment of a patient with an impacted transmigrantmandibular canine and a palatally impacted maxillary canine. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(3):328-336.