Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Online Information on Treatments of Traumatic Dental Injuries

Year 2022, , 46 - 52, 27.04.2022

Alp Abidin Ateşçi , Kılınç Kılınç

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.814290

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Background: Traumatic dental injuries is a common public health issue all over the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality and readability of web based information regarding treatments of traumatic dental injuries.
Methods: An internet search was carried out using Google search engine with four different keywords (''treatment of broken teeth'', ''treatment of tooth trauma'', ''treatment of anterior tooth fractures in children'', ''fractured teeth treatments'') related to treatments of traumatic dental injuries. The duplicate websites, links to research studies, advertisements, discussion groups, videos and images were excluded from the evaluation. The quality of the written information regarding treatments of traumatic dental injuries in websites were analyzed with DISCERN toolkit. The readability of the written information was evaluated with Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE) and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook reading grade level (SMOG) index.
Results: A total of 120 webpages were identified but only 42 of them were remained after exclusion criterias. Among these websites, 25 (59.5%) of them were belonged to private dental clinics, 9 (21.4%) of them were belonged to informative pages about health and dentistry and 8 (19.1%) of them were belonged to professional organizations' websites. The average DISCERN score was 42.4 and ranged between 24 to 62. The average FKRE was 50.7 ± 14. which is equivalent to a reading level of 10th to 12nd grade. The average FKGL score for was 8.5 ± 2.8 and the average SMOG score was 7.3 ± 2.0 for all the websites.
Conclusions: The results of the present study showed that the quality of information on the investigated websites was fair according to the DISCERN toolkit and too difficult to read and interpret for the general population. Healthcare information providers should focus on improving the quality and readability of the information regarding treatment of traumatic dental injuries.

Keywords

dental trauma, online health, readability, DISCERN, Google

Supporting Institution

Yok

Thanks

YOK

Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Online Information on Treatments of Traumatic Dental Injuries

Abstract

Background: Traumatic dental injuries is a common public health issue all over the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality and readability of web based information regarding treatments of traumatic dental injuries. Methods: An internet search was carried out using Google search engine with four different keywords (''treatment of broken teeth'', ''treatment of tooth trauma'', ''treatment of anterior tooth fractures in children'', ''fractured teeth treatments'') related to treatments of traumatic dental injuries. The duplicate websites, links to research studies, advertisements, discussion groups, videos and images were excluded from the evaluation. The quality of the written information regarding treatments of traumatic dental injuries in websites were analyzed with DISCERN toolkit. The readability of the written information was evaluated with Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE) and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook reading grade level (SMOG) index. Results: A total of 120 webpages were identified but only 42 of them were remained after exclusion criterias. Among these websites, 25 (59.5%) of them were belonged to private dental clinics, 9 (21.4%) of them were belonged to informative pages about health and dentistry and 8 (19.1%) of them were belonged to professional organizations' websites. The average DISCERN score was 42.4 and ranged between 24 to 62. The average FKRE was 50.7 ± 14. which is equivalent to a reading level of 10th to 12nd grade. The average FKGL score for was 8.5 ± 2.8 and the average SMOG score was 7.3 ± 2.0 for all the websites. Conclusions: The results of the present study showed that the quality of information on the investigated websites was fair according to the DISCERN toolkit and too difficult to read and interpret for the general population. Healthcare information providers should focus on improving the quality and readability of the information regarding treatment of traumatic dental injuries.

Keywords

dental trauma, online health, readability

References

• 1. Andersson, L., Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries. Pediatr Dent, 2013. 35(2): p. 102-5.
• 2. Zaror, C., et al., Impact of traumatic dental injuries on quality of life in preschoolers and schoolchildren: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2018. 46(1): p. 88-101.
• 3. Lam, R., Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J, 2016. 61 Suppl 1: p. 4-20.
• 4. Basch, C.H., C.E. Basch, and I. Redlener, Coverage of the ebola virus disease epidemic in three widely circulated United States newspapers: implications for preparedness and prevention. Health Promot Perspect, 2014. 4(2): p. 247-51.
• 5. Edworthy, J., et al., Passing crisis and emergency risk communications: the effects of communication channel, information type, and repetition. Appl Ergon, 2015. 48: p. 252-62.
• 6. Knösel, M. and K. Jung, Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site. Angle Orthod, 2011. 81(3): p. 532-9.
• 7. Basch, C.H., et al., Public Health Communication in Time of Crisis: Readability of On-Line COVID-19 Information. Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 2020: p. 1-3.
• 8. Stinson, J.N., et al., Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet. J Rheumatol, 2009. 36(8): p. 1755-62.
• 9. Martins, E.N. and L.S. Morse, Evaluation of internet websites about retinopathy of prematurity patient education. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005. 89(5): p. 565-8.
• 10. Lau, L., et al., Childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in the Chinese language. Childs Nerv Syst, 2006. 22(4): p. 346-51.
• 11. Charnock, D., et al., DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1999. 53(2): p. 105-11.
• 12. Bavbek, N.C. and B.B. Tuncer, Information on the Internet Regarding Orthognathic Surgery in Turkey: Is It an Adequate Guide for Potential Patients? Turk J Orthod, 2017. 30(3): p. 78-83.
• 13. Abu-Ghazaleh, S., Y. Hassona, and S. Hattar, Dental trauma in social media-Analysis of Facebook content and public engagement. Dent Traumatol, 2018. 34(6): p. 394-400.
• 14. Szmuda, T., et al., Readability of Online Patient Education Material for the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Cross-sectional Health Literacy Study. Public Health, 2020.
• 15. McInnes, N. and B.J. Haglund, Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Inform Health Soc Care, 2011. 36(4): p. 173-89.
• 16. Anderson, J.G., M.R. Rainey, and G. Eysenbach, The impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician-patient relationship. J Med Syst, 2003. 27(1): p. 67-84.
• 17. McKenzie JF, Neiger BL, and T. R., Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer. 7th ed. 2017, New York: Pearson.
• 18. Fitzsimmons, P.R., et al., A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information. J R Coll Physicians Edinb, 2010. 40(4): p. 292-6.
• 19. Leira, Y., et al., Available patient-centered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it? Clin Oral Investig, 2019. 23(4): p. 1569-1574.
• 20. Verhoef, W.A., et al., Assessing the standards of online oral hygiene instructions for patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Am Dent Assoc, 2015. 146(5): p. 310-7.
• 21. Boles, C.D., Y. Liu, and D. November-Rider, Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures. J Dent Hyg, 2016. 90(1): p. 28-34.
• 22. McMorrow, S.M. and D.T. Millett, Adult Orthodontics: A Quality Assessment of Internet Information. Journal of Orthodontics, 2016. 43(3): p. 186-192.
• 23. Shital Kiran, D.P., et al., Evaluation of Health on the Net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2015. 7(Suppl 2): p. S481-5.
• 24. Olkun, H.K. and A.A. Demirkaya, Evaluation of Internet Information about Lingual Orthodontics Using DISCERN and JAMA Tools. Turk J Orthod, 2018. 31(2): p. 50-54.
• 25. Tahir, M., et al., Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on High Blood Pressure Using DISCERN and Flesch-Kincaid Tools. Applied Sciences, 2020. 10(9): p. 3214.
• 26. Heggie, C., S.L. McKernon, and L. Gartshore, Quality of available internet information regarding IV sedation for dental treatment. Br Dent J, 2020. 228(4): p. 279-282.