Perforasyon tamir materyallerinin sızıntı ve kalitesi: İntrakoronal ve retrograd tekniklerin karşılaştırılması

Year 2014, Volume: 1 Issue: 3, 92 - 100, 01.12.2014

Betül Özçopur Melek Akman Sema Hakkı Sema Belli

https://doi.org/10.15311/1441.272624

Abstract

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı,
perforasyon tamir materyallerinin, perforasyon
bölgesine ortograd ya da retrograd
yerleştirildiğinde, sızıntı ve kalitesini
değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çekilmiş insan molar
dişlerin mesial ve distal kök yüzeylerinde, dişin
uzun aksına 45 derecelik açıyla elmas bir frez ile
kasten perforasyonlar oluşturuldu. Mesial
perforasyonlar intrakoronal olarak şu
materyaller kullanılarak tamir edildi: IRM
(Dentsply), amalgam (Dentsply), Dyract
(Dentsply), SuperBond C&B (Sun Medical) and
MTA (Dentsply). Siman ile giriş kavitesi
doldurulduktan sonra distal perforasyonlar aynı
materyaller ile retrograd olarak tamir edildi.
Dişler %100 nemli ortamda 24 saat saklandı.
Perforasyon bölgeleri 24 saat %2’lik metilen
mavisinde bekletildi. Dişler kesilerek, 20x ve 40x
büyütme ile stereomikroskop altında incelendi
ve boya penetrasyonuna göre taşmış, yeterli ve
yetersiz olarak skorlandı.
Bulgular: Veriler Kruskal-Wallis ve MannWhitney
U-testleri ile analiz edildi. Restorasyon
teknikleri arasında önemli derecede fark
bulundu (p < 0.05). Tüm materyallerde retrograd
teknik kullanıldığı zaman daha az sızıntı
gözlendi (p < 0.05). Giriş kavitesi boyunca
perforasyonun tamiri, %86 taşmış ya da yetersiz
bulundu. Retrograd olarak uygulandığı zaman
IRM %80, MTA %60 oranında sızıntı olmadan
yeterli bulundu.
Sonuç: Retrograd teknik kullanarak
perforasyonların tamiri, kullanılan materyalin
etkisi olmaksızın yeterli restorasyonun sayısı
önemli derecede arttı. IRM retrograd
uygulandığı zaman MTA’yı takiben en iyi
kapamayı sağladı.

Keywords

MTA, perforasyon, sızıntı

Quality and leakage of perforation repair-materials: A comparison of intracoronal and retrograde techniques

Abstract

Background: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the quality and leakage of repair materials when perforation sites were challenged from an orthograde or retrograde direction.Methods: Intentional perforations were created on the mesial and distal root surfaces of the extracted human molar teeth (below the CEJ) using a diamond bur at a 45 degree angle to the long axis. Mesial perforations were repaired intracoronally using the following materials (n=15): IRM (Dentsply), amalgam (Dentsply), Dyract (Dentsply), SuperBond C&B (Sun Medical) and MTA (Dentsply). After filling the access cavities with cement, distal perforations were repaired retrogradely using the same materials. The teeth were kept at humid conditions (100%, 24hrs), the perforation sites were stained with 2%methylene blue (24hrs), sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope at 20x and 40x magnifications and scored as extruded, insufficient or adequate in combination with the dye penetration.Results: The data was statistically analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests). A significant difference was found among the restoration techniques (p < 0.05). All the materials showed less leakage when used retrogradely (p < 0.05). Repair of the perforation through the access cavity resulted in 86% extruded or insufficient restorations with leakage. IRM restoration showed 80% and MTA showed 60% adequate restoration without leakage when applied retrogradely.Conclusion: Repair of the perforations using the retrograde technique has significantly increased the number of the adequate restorations regardless the effect of the material factor. IRM showed the best sealing followed by MTA when applied retrogradely.

Keywords

Leakage, MTA, perforation

References

• Alhadainy H, Himel V, 1993. Comparative study of the sealing ability of light-cured versus chemically cured materials placed into furcation perforations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 76, 338-342.
• Balla R, LoMonaco CJ, Skribner J, Lin LM, 1991. Histological study of furcation perforatios treated with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxylapatite, amalgam and, a life. J Endod, 17, 234-238.
• Benenati F, Roane J, Biggs JT, Simon J, 1986. Recall evaluation of iatrogenic root perforations repaired with amalgam and gutta percha J Endod, 12, 161-166.
• Blaney T, Peters D, Scherstrom J, Bernier W, 1981. Marginal sealing quality of IRM and Cavit as assessed by microbial penetration. J Endod, 7, 453-457.
• Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH, 2003. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater, 19, 199-205.
• Coomaraswamy KS, Lumley PJ, Hofmann MP, 2007. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifier content on the material properties of an endodontic Portland cement-based (MTA-like) system. J Endod, 33, 295-298.
• De-Deus G, Reis C, Brandao C, Fidel S, Fidel RA, 2007. The ability of portland cement, MTA, MTA Bio to prevent through-and-through fluid movement in repaired furcal perforations. J Endod, 33, 1374-1377.
• Dorn SO, Gartner AH, 1990. Retrograde filling materials: a retrospective success-failure study of amalgam, EBA and IRM. J Endod, 16, 391-393.
• Ferraz CCR, Teixeira FB, Leite APP, Souza Filho FJ, 1999. In vitro assessment of the ability of four barrier materials to prevent coronal microleakage. J Endod, 18, 25-302.
• Frank A, Weine FS, 1973. Nonsurgical theraphy for the perforative defect of lateral resorption. J Am Dent Assoc, 87, 863-888.
• Frank LA, Glick DH, Patterson SS, Weine FS, 1992. Long term evaluation of surgically placed amalgam fillings. J Endod, 18, 391-398.
• Fuss Z, Trope M, 1996. Root perforations: classification and treatment choices based on prognostic factors. Endod Dent Travmatol, 12, 255-264.
• Gartner A H, Dorn S O, 1992. Advances in endodontic surgery. Dent Clin North Am, 36, 357-378.