Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Maksiller molar dişlerde kanal duvarı kalınlığının dental volümetrik tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 462 - 465, 27.12.2020

Erinc Önem Güniz Baksi Şen R. Irmak Turhal Bilge Hakan Şen

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.738781

Abstract

Öz
Amaç
Bu çalışmanın amacı, maksiller 1. ve 2. molar dişlerde kanalların interradiküler bölgeye olan uzaklığını dental volümetrik tomografi (DVT) ile ölçmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler
100 adet maksiller 1. ve 2. molar dişe ait DVT görüntüleri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Aksiyel kesitlerde bifurkasyon seviyesinin 2 mm altından, tüm kanalların sınırından interradiküler bölgeye olan en kısa mesafe ölçülerek kaydedildi. Diş grupları arasındaki farklar R-kare testi; kanalların ölçümleri arası farklar ise Tukey HSD testi ile değerlendirildi (p=0.05).
Bulgular
Maksiller 1. ve 2. molar dişlere ait ölçümler grup olarak değerlendirildiğinde aralarında istatistiksel bir fark olmadığı gözlendi (p>0,05). Bununla beraber, kanalların trifurkasyona uzaklıkları birbirleriyle ikili olarak karşılaştırıldığında, hepsinin arasında istatistiksel fark olduğu saptandı (p=0,00).
Sonuç
Bulgular klinik açıdan değerlendirildiğinde, maksiller molar dişlerin distobukkal veya palatinal kanallarında güvenli mesafe mevcuttur. Ancak, özellikle MB2. kanallarında strip perforasyon ve vertikal çatlak gibi komplikasyonlara neden olmamak için dikkatli olmak gerekir.

Keywords

dental volumetrik tomografi kök kanalı maksiller molar strip perforasyon

References

  • 1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 3-29.
  • 2. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L.Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 28: 419-25.
  • 3. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 2006; 32: 813-21.
  • 4. N Pattanshetti , M Gaidhane, A M Al Kandari. Root and Canal Morphology of the Mesiobuccal and Distal Roots of Permanent First Molars in a Kuwait Population--A Clinical Study. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 755-62.
  • 5. Degerness RA, Bowles WR. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars. J Endod 2010; 36: 985-9.
  • 6. Shahravan A, Rekabi A, Shahabi H, Ashuri R, Mirzazadeh A, Rad M, Haghani J. A digital stereomicroscopic study of the furcation wall thickness of mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first and second molars. Iranian Endod J 2010; 5: 88-92.
  • 7. Ordinola-Zapata R, Martins JNR, Versiani MA, Bramante CM. Micro-CT analysis of danger zone thickness in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 524-529.
  • 8. Vesal Azimi, Iman Samadi, Anahita Saffarzadeh, Reza Motaghi, Nima Hatami, Arash Shahravan. Comparison of dentinal wall thickness in the furcation area (danger zone) in the first and second mesiobuccal canals in the maxillary first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur Endod J 2020 (basımda).
  • 9. Borna Z, Khoshroua MM, Mirzaeib H, Jabbari G. Evaluation of dentin thickness around second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molar using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci 2020; 2:1–5.
  • 10. Zhou G, Leng D, Li M, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Sun C, Wu D. Root dentine thickness of danger zone in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20: 43.
  • 11. Abou-Rass M, Jann JM, Jobe D, Tsutsui F. Preparation of space for posting: Effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 104: 834-7.
  • 12. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1983; 9: 439-47.
  • 13. Zadik Y, Sandler V, Bechor R, Salehrabi R. Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 31-35.
  • 14. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
  • 15. Lim SS, Stock CJ. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J 1987; 20: 33-9.
  • 16. Nelson SJ, Ash Jr MM. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 9th ed. Saunders Elsevier, Missouri, ABD, 2010, s. 190, s. 200.
  • 17. Duarte MA, Bernardes RA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM, Moraes IG. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 28-31.
  • 18. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 5: 792-4.

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 462 - 465, 27.12.2020

Erinc Önem Güniz Baksi Şen R. Irmak Turhal Bilge Hakan Şen

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.738781

Abstract

References

  • 1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 3-29.
  • 2. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L.Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 28: 419-25.
  • 3. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 2006; 32: 813-21.
  • 4. N Pattanshetti , M Gaidhane, A M Al Kandari. Root and Canal Morphology of the Mesiobuccal and Distal Roots of Permanent First Molars in a Kuwait Population--A Clinical Study. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 755-62.
  • 5. Degerness RA, Bowles WR. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars. J Endod 2010; 36: 985-9.
  • 6. Shahravan A, Rekabi A, Shahabi H, Ashuri R, Mirzazadeh A, Rad M, Haghani J. A digital stereomicroscopic study of the furcation wall thickness of mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first and second molars. Iranian Endod J 2010; 5: 88-92.
  • 7. Ordinola-Zapata R, Martins JNR, Versiani MA, Bramante CM. Micro-CT analysis of danger zone thickness in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 524-529.
  • 8. Vesal Azimi, Iman Samadi, Anahita Saffarzadeh, Reza Motaghi, Nima Hatami, Arash Shahravan. Comparison of dentinal wall thickness in the furcation area (danger zone) in the first and second mesiobuccal canals in the maxillary first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur Endod J 2020 (basımda).
  • 9. Borna Z, Khoshroua MM, Mirzaeib H, Jabbari G. Evaluation of dentin thickness around second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molar using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci 2020; 2:1–5.
  • 10. Zhou G, Leng D, Li M, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Sun C, Wu D. Root dentine thickness of danger zone in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20: 43.
  • 11. Abou-Rass M, Jann JM, Jobe D, Tsutsui F. Preparation of space for posting: Effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 104: 834-7.
  • 12. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1983; 9: 439-47.
  • 13. Zadik Y, Sandler V, Bechor R, Salehrabi R. Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 31-35.
  • 14. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
  • 15. Lim SS, Stock CJ. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J 1987; 20: 33-9.
  • 16. Nelson SJ, Ash Jr MM. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 9th ed. Saunders Elsevier, Missouri, ABD, 2010, s. 190, s. 200.
  • 17. Duarte MA, Bernardes RA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM, Moraes IG. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 28-31.
  • 18. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 5: 792-4.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Research
Authors

Erinc Önem

Güniz Baksi Şen

R. Irmak Turhal

Bilge Hakan Şen 0000-0003-1173-909X

Publication Date December 27, 2020
Submission Date May 20, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Önem E, Baksi Şen G, Turhal RI, Şen BH. Maksiller molar dişlerde kanal duvarı kalınlığının dental volümetrik tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2020;7(3):462-5.

Selcuk Dental Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).