Teleskop tutuculu hareketli bölümlü protezler

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 916 - 925, 31.12.2021

İrem Öztürk Kadriye Funda Akaltan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.799029

Abstract

Hareketli bölümlü protezlerde başarı ve sağkalım, destek dokuların korunması ile mümkündür. Destek diş-implant ve dişsiz kret arasında oluşan fonksiyonel kuvvetlerin dengeli dağılımı önem kazanmaktadır. Protetik tedavilerde uygun tutucu seçiminde ağız hijyeni, anatomik durum, tutuculuk ihtiyacının miktarı, hekim-teknisyenin deneyimi gibi birçok faktör değerlendirilmelidir. Teleskop tutucular, kısmi dişsiz hastalarda diş veya diş - implant destekli vakaların tedavisinde başarıyla uygulanan bir tutucu türüdür. Teleskop tutuculu protezlerde çift kron tasarımı, destek yapıya simante edilen alt yapı ve hareketli proteze rijit bağlı üst yapıdan oluşmaktadır. Teleskop tutucuların kullanımı ile sabit ve hareketli restorasyonların birçok avantajı elde edilebilmektedir. Bu derlemede teleskop tutucuların tipleri, avantaj-dezavantajları, üretim yöntemleri ve teleskop tutuculu protezlere ilişkin klinik değerlendirmelere yer verilecektir.

Keywords

teleskop tutucu, Marburg çift kron sistemi, hareketli bölümlü protez

References

• 1. WENZ HJ, HERTRAMPF K, LEHMANN KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: Outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:207-13.
• 2. ÖZYEMİŞCİ, N. Sürtünme verniğinin altın iyon çökeltme uygulamalarının açılı teleskop kronların tutuculukları üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması. [Doktora tezi]. Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi;2010.
• 3. PASCIUTA M, GROSSMAN Y, FINGER IM. A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant-tissue-supported overdenture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:116-20.
• 4. TRAKAS T, MICHALAKIS K, KANG K, HIRAYAMA H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: A literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34.
• 5. LANGER A. Telescope retainers and their clinical application. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:516-22.
• 6. LANGER Y, LANGER A. Tooth-supported telescopic prosthesis in compromised dentitions: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:129-32.
• 7. WENZ HJ, LEHMANN KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
• 8. PREISKEL HW, TSOLKA P. Telescopic prostheses for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:352-7.
• 9. WAGNER B, KERN M. Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: Success rates, hygienic problems and technical failures. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:74–80.
• 10. LANGER A. Tooth-supported telescope restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45: 515–20.
• 11. FUKUDA M, TAKAHASHI T, NAGAI H (2004). Implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturators with milled bar attachments after maxillectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:799–805.
• 12. KRENNMAIR G, SUTO D, SEEMANN R, PIEHSLINGER E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: A 3- year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012;23:481–8.
• 13. WOSTMANN B, BALKENHOL M, WEBER A, FERGER P, REHMANN P. Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: Survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 2007;35:939-45.
• 14. ZAFIROPOULOS GG, HOFFMANN O. Five-year study of implant placement in regenerated bone and rehabilitation with telescopic crown retained dentures: A case report. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:303–9.
• 15. BEHR M, HOFMANN E, ROSENTRITT M, LANG R, HANDEL G. Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:87–90.
• 16. IGARASHI Y, GOTO T. Ten-year follow-up study of conical crown retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:149–55.
• 17. MINAGI S, NATSUAKI N, NISHIGAWA G, SATO T. New telescopic crown design for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:684‑8.
• 18. EITNER S, SCHLEGEL A, EMEKA N, HOLST S, WILL J, HAMEL J. Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implant-retained prosthetic reconstruction: A follow-up investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:530–7.
• 19. BAYER S, STARK H, MUES S, KEILIG L, SCHRADER A, ENKLING N. Retention force measurement of telescopic crowns. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14:607-11.
• 20. BEUER F, EDELHOFF D, GERNET W, NAUMANN M. Parameters affecting retentive force of electroformed double-crown systems. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:129–35.
• 21. ULUDAĞ B, ŞAHİN V, ÖZTÜRK O. Fabrication of zirconium primary copings to provide retention for a mandibular telescopic overdenture: A clinical report. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:509,510.
• 22. WEIGL P, HAHN L, LAUER HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:320-36.
• 23. VULT VON STEYERN P, CARLSON P, NILNER K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique: A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180–7.
• 24. ALSAYED H, NASSER M, JOHN A, MORTON D. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of an ectodermal dysplasia patient with implant telescopic crown attachments. J of Prosthodont 2017;26:622–7.
• 25. GÜNGÖR MA, ARTUNÇ C, SONUGELEN M. Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:271–7.
• 26. KÖRBER KH. Cone crowns - A physically defined telescopic system. Einführung in Klinik und Technik 1988;22:619-30.
• 27. BESIMO CH, GRABER G, FLUHLER M. Retention force changes in implant - supported titanium telescope crowns over long-term use in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:372–8.
• 28. PRAKASH V, PARKASH H, GUPTA R. Fixed removable prosthesis employing Marburg double crown system. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2008;8:59-62.
• 29. FRISCH E, ZIEBOLZ D, RATKA-KRUGER P, RINKE S. Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:22–31.
• 30. WENZ HJ, HERTRAMPF K, LEHMANN KM. Effects of the type and rigidity of the retainer and the number of abutting teeth on stress distribution of telescopic-retained removable partial dentures. J Dent Science 2012;7:7-13.
• 31. BECKER H. Retention mechanism of telescopic crowns. Zahnarztl Prax 1983;34:281–4.
• 32. BOTEGA DM, MESQUITA MF, HENRIQUES GE, VAZ LG. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:884–9.
• 33. STANCIC I, JELENKOVIC A. Retention of telescopic denture in elderly patients with maximum partially edentulous arch. Gerodontology 2008;25:162-7.
• 34. MOLIN M, BERGMAN B, ERIKSON A. A clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:251-6.
• 35. CISZEWSKI A, BARANIAK M, URBANEK M. Corrosion by galvanic coupling between amalgam and different chromium-based alloys. Dent Mater 2007;23:1256-61.
• 36. KAROV J, HINBERG I. Galvanic corrosion of selected dental alloys. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:212-9.
• 37. RINKE S, BUERGERS R, ZIEBOLZ D, ROEDIGER M. Clinical outcome of double crown-retained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:329-37.
• 38. ZAFIROPOULOS GG, REBBE J, THIELEN U, DELI G, BEAUMONT C, HOFFMANN O. Zirconia removable telescopic dentures retained on teeth or implants for maxilla rehabilitation: Three-year observation of three cases. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:455–65.
• 39. KURTZ S, DEVINE J. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic and spinal implants. Biomater 2007; 28: 4845-69.
• 40. SCHWITALLA AD, ABOU-EMARA M, SPINTIG T. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech 2015;48:1-7.
• 41. TOTH JM, WANG M, ESTES BT. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006;27:324-34.
• 42. ZOIDIS P, PAPATHANASIOU I, POLYZOIS G. The use of a modified poly-etherether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. Int J Prosthodont 2016;25:580-4.
• 43. TANNOUS F, STEINER M, SHAHIN R. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater 2012;28:273-8.
• 44. WAGNER C, STOCK V, MERK S, SCHMIDLIN PR, ROSS M, EICHBERGER M. Retention load of telescopic crowns with different taper angles between cobalt-chromium and polyetheretherketone made with three different manufacturing processes examined by pull-off test. J Prosthodont 2018;27:162-8.
• 45. ISAACSON GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:436-48.
• 46. PEZZOLI M, ROSSETTO M, CALDERALE PM. Evaluation of load transmission by distal-extension removable partial dentures by using reflection photoelasticity. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:329.
• 47. SAITO M, MIURA Y, NOTANI K, KAWASAKI T. Stress distribution of abutments and base displacement with precision attachment- and telescopic crown-retained removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:482-7.
• 48. HECKMANN SM, WINTER W, MEYER M, WEBER HP, WICHMANN MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denturebearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:640-7.
• 49. ŞAHİN V, AKALTAN F, PARNAS L. Effects of the type and rigidity of the retainer and the number of abutting teeth on stress distribution of telescopic-retained removable partial dentures. J Dent Science 2012;7:7-13.
• 50. KAZOKOĞLU Ş, AKALTAN F. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1416-24.
• 51. HENERS M, WALTHER W. Frequency and risk of abutment loss after insertion of conical crown-retained bridges [abstract]. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:452.
• 52. BESCHNIDT SM, CHITMONGKOLSUK S, PRULL R. Telescopic crown-retained removable partial dentures: Review and case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:927- 942.
• 53. RAMMELSBERG P, BERNHART G, LORENZO BERMEJO J, SCHMITTER M, SCHWARZ S. Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:813–8.
• 54. ISHIDA K, NOGAWA T, TAKAYAMA Y, SAITO M, YOKOYAMA A. Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: A retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:268-275.
• 55. ZOU D, WU Y, HUANG W, WANG F, WANG S, ZHANG Z. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar and locator attachments for removable four implant supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:566-73.
• 56. GOTFREDSEN K, HOLM B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: A randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125–30.
• 57. KRENNMAIR G, KRAINHOFNER M, WALDENBERGER O, PIEHSLINGER E. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant tooth supported telescopic crown retained maxillary dentures: A retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years. The Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:617-22.
• 58. HUG S, MANTOKOUDIS D, MERICSKE-STERN R. Clinical evaluation of 3 overdentures concept with tooth roots and implants: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19: 236–43.
• 59. LIAN M, ZHAO K, FENG Y, YAO Q. Prognosis of combining remaining teeth and implants in double crown–retained removable dental prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:281-97.
• 60. KRENNMAIR G, SEEMANN R, WEINLANDER M, PIEHSLINGER E. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:598–606.
• 61. TIMMERMAN R, STOKER GT, WISMEIJER D, OSTERVELD P, VERMEEREN JI, VAN WAAS MA. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83:630–3.
• 62. VAN KAMPEN F, CUNE M, VAN DER BILT A, BOSMAN F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: An in vivo comparison after 3 month of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720–6.
• 63. CORDANO L, ERCOLI C, ROSSNI C, TORSELLO F, FENG C. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:313–20.
• 64. BARON M, HAAS R, BARON W, MAILATH-POKORNY G. Peri-implant bone loss as a function of tooth-implant distance. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:427–33.
• 65. SCHLUMBERGER TL, BOWLEY JF, MAZE GI. Intrusion phenomenon in combination tooth-implant restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:199–203.
• 66. YUNUS N, SAUB R, ALI T, SALLEH N, BAIG M. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment–retained mandibular overdentures: A 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1149–56.