Subkutanöz konnektif dokuda çeşitli self adeziv rezin simanların biyouyumluluklarının değerlendirilmesi: In vivo çalışma

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 429 - 433, 21.08.2023

Anıl Gerçek Bilge Turhan Bal Emre Barış

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1185537

Abstract

Amaç: Bu calışmanın amacı üç farklı self adeziv rezin simana karşı gelişen subkutanöz doku reaksiyonunu incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: 63 adet polietilen tüp içine üç farklı self adeziv rezin siman yerleştirildi. ((Grup Z [Zirconite], Grup P [Panavia SA], and Grup H [High Q Bond]). 21 polietilen tüp boş bırakıldı ve kontrol grubu olarak kullanıldı (Grup C). Bütün tüpler 21 adet farenin subkutanöz dokusuna yerleştirildi. Her siman tipinden subkutan olarak yerleştirilmiş siman örnekleri, 7, 30, 90. günlerde çıkartıldı. İnflamatuar hücrelerinin sayısal değerlendirmesi her örneğin 5 farklı alanından yapıldı.
Bulgular: 2 fare dışında tüm hayvanlar takip periyodları boyunca canlı kaldı. 90. günde Grup C, H, P ve Z de enflamatuar hücrelerin ortalama değerleri sırasıyla 14 (±1.8), 15.1 (±3.5), 96 (±12.1), 16 (±2.1) şeklindedir. Panavya dışında tüm gruplarda fibröz kapsül kalınlığı zaman içinde anlamlı derecede azalmıştır.
Sonuç: Self adesiv rezin simanların biyouyumluluğu materyale bağlı olarak farklılık göstermektedir. 90. Günde High Q Bond ve Zirconite yeterli biyouyumluluk değeri gösterirken Panavya siman da orta derecede inflamatuar cevap gözlemlenmiştir.

Keywords

Biyouyumlu materyaller, enflamasyon, rezin simanlar

Evaluation of the biocompatibility of various self-adhesive resin cements on subcutaneous connective tissue: An in vivo study

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to examine the subcutaneous connective tissue reaction to three self-adhesive resin cements.
Methods: Sixty-three polyethylene tubes were filled with three different self-adhesive resin cements (Group Z [Zirconite], Group P [Panavia SA], and Group H [High Q Bond]). Twenty-one polyethylene tubes remained empty and were used as controls (Group C). All tubes were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of the 21 rats. Specimens from each cement type were obtained at 7, 30, and 90 days. Quantitative assessments of inflammatory cells were performed in 5 different areas of each specimen.
Results: All animals survive during the follow-up periods except two rats. The mean values of inflammatory cells at 90 days were 14 (±1.8), 15.1 (±3.5), 96 (±12.1), 16 (±2.1) in Groups C, H, P, and Z, respectively. The thicknesses of the fibrous capsule decreased significantly with time in all groups except Group P.
Conclusion: Biocompatibility of self-adhesive resin cements was material-dependent. High Q Bond and Zirconite exhibited satisfactory biocompatibility; however, Panavia demonstrated a moderate inflammatory response at 90 days.

Keywords

biocompatible materials, inflammation, resin cements

References

• 1. Burgess JO, Ghuman T, Cakir D. Self-adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22(6):412-9.
• 2. Pathak S, Shashibhushan KK, Poornima P, Reddy VS. In vitro evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and two new self-adhesive resin cements. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(3):197-200.
• 3. Saw TY, Cao T, Yap AU, Lee Ng MM. Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Toxicol in Vitro 2005;19(1):145-54.
• 4. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21(4): 441-52.
• 5. Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000;11(3):333-55.
• 6. Kurt A, Altintas SH, Kiziltas MV, Tekkeli SE, Guler EM, Kocyigit A, et al. Evaluation of residual monomer release and toxicity of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 2018;37(1): 40-8.
• 7. Monteiro GQ, Souza FB, Pedrosa RF, Sales GC, Castro CM, Fraga SN, et al. In vitro biological response to a self-adhesive resin cement under different curing strategies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;92(2):317-21.
• 8. Nalcaci A, Oztan MD, Yilmaz S. Cytotoxicity of composite resins polymerized with different curing methods. Int Endod J 2004;37(2):151-6.
• 9. Annunziata M, Aversa R, Apicella A, Annunziata A, Apicella D, Buonaiuto C, et al. In vitro biological response to a light-cured composite when used for cementation of composite inlays. Dent Mater 2006;22(12):1081-5.
• 10. Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41(3):474-80.
• 11. Quaranta A, Lim ZW, Tang J, Perrotti V, Leichter J. The Impact of residual subgingival cement on biological complications around dental implants: a systematic review. Implant Dent 2017;26(3):465-74. 12. Bal BT, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Karakoca S, Tokman B. Histopathologic study of rat connective tissue responses to maxillofacial silicone elastomers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20(9):1901-7. 13. Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(2):203-9. 14. John KR. Biocompatibility of dental materials. Dent Clin N Am 2007;51(3):747-60.
• 15. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Kokubu GA, Grana DR. Subcutaneous connective tissue reaction to methacrylate resin-based and zinc oxide and eugenol sealers. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1574-79.
• 16. Olsson B, Sliwkowski A, Langeland K. Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endod 1981;7(8):355-67.
• 17. Schmid-Schwap M, Franz A, Konig F, Bristela M, Lucas T, Piehslinger E, et al. Cytotoxicity of four categories of dental cements. Dent Mater 2009;25(3):360-8.
• 18. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. Fédération Dentaire International, Commission of Dental Materials, Instruments, Equipment and Therapeutics. Int Dent J 1980;30(2):140-88.
• 19. Bal BT, Yılmaz H, Aydın C, Karakoca S, Yılmaz S. In vitro cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: effect of accelerated aging. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;89(1):122-26.
• 20. Souza PP, Aranha AM, Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of contemporary resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22(9):838-44.
• 21. Syrjanen S, Hensten-Pettersen A, Kangasniemi K, Yli-Urpo A. In vitro and in vivo biological responses to some dental alloys tested separately and in combinations. Biomaterials 1985;6(3),169-76.
• 22. Kong N, Jiang T, Zhou Z, Fu J. Cytotoxicity of polymerized resin cements on human dental pulp cells in vitro. Dent Mater 2009;25(11):1371-5.
• 23. DAlpino PHP, Moura GEDD, Barbosa SCA, Marques LA, Eberlin MN, Nascimento FD, et al. Differential cytotoxic effects on odontoblastic cells induced by self-adhesive resin cements as a function of the activation protocol. Dent Mater 2017;33(12):1402-15.
• 24. De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23(4):358-68.
• 25. Sun F, Liu Y, Pan Y, Chen M, Meng X. Cytotoxicity of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts. Biomed Res Int 2018:7823467.
• 26. Guttuso J. Histopathologic study of rat connective tissue responses to endodontic materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963;16:713-27.
• 27. Shimada Y, Uzzaman MA, Tagami J, Tanaka T, Nakata T, Nakaoki Y, Sano H. Effect of curing method of a dual-cure resin cement on monkey pulpal reaction after bonding of tooth-colored inlay. Dent Mater J 2007;26(1):122-28.
• 28. Bezzon OL, Rivera DS, Silva RA, Oliveira DS, Silva-Herzog D, Nelson-Filho P, et al. Resin luting materials: Tissue response in dog's teeth. Microsc Res Tech 2015;78(12):1098-103.
• 29. Ozbas H, Yaltirik M, Bilgic B, Issever H. Reactions of connective tissue to compomers, composite and amalgam root-end filling materials. Int Endod J 2003;36(4):281-7.
• 30. Issa Y, Watts DC, Brunton PA, Waters CM, Duxbury AJ. Resin composite monomers alter MTT and LDH activity of human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Dent Mater 2004;20(1):12-20.
• 31. Kraus D, Wolfgarten M, Enkling N, Helfgen EH, Frentzen M, Probstmeier R, et al. In-vitro cytocompatibility of dental resin monomers on osteoblast-like cells. J Dent 2017;65:76-82.