DENİZLİ İLİNDE YAŞAYAN ÇOCUKLARDA ÜST ÇENE YAN KESİCİ VE ÜST-ALT ÇENE KÜÇÜK AZI DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİ PREVALANSI

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 251 - 254, 23.12.2024

Hilal Özbey İpek

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1398984

Abstract

Amaç: Konjenital diş eksikliği, dental anomaliler arasında sıklıkla ortaya çıkan bir olgudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de bir populasyon grubunda konjenital diş eksikliği prevalansını değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma, xxxx Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi'ne 2015-2022 yılları arasında ağız diş sorunları nedeniyle başvuran 6 ve 7 yaşındaki çocukların arşivlenmiş panoramik radyografileri üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Konjenital olarak eksik olan üst çene yan kesici dişleri ve üst/alt çene küçük azı dişleri not edilmiştir, diğer eksik dişler değerlendirilmemiştir.
Bulgular: Toplam 1840 panoramik radyografi incelenmiştir ve üst çene yan kesici ve alt-üst çene küçük azı dişlerinin eksikliği %8,15 olarak bulunmuştur. Üst çene yan kesici diş eksikliği prevalansı %2,44 küçük azı diş eksikliği prevalansı %5,71 olarak bulunmuştur. Eksiklikten en çok etkilenen dişler, alt çene ikinci küçük azılardır. Kızlar erkeklerden daha fazla etkilenmiştir (%8,88 kızlar; %7,44 erkekler).
Sonuç: Diş eksikliğinin erken tanısı ideal ve konservatif tedaviyi sağlayacağından ve tedavi maliyetlerini azaltacağından, diş hekimlerinin erken tanı ve tedaviler hakkında bilgi sahibi olması oldukça önemlidir. Çalışmada, diş eksikliği prevalansının kadınlarda erkeklere göre daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İleride yapılacak olan genetik çalışmalar, kadınların neden hipodontiden erkeklere göre daha fazla etkilendiğini açıklayabilir. Daha fazla bireyle ve diğer diş eksikliklerini içeren kapsamlı çalışmalar yapılmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Agenez, hipodonti, prevalans.

Keywords

agenez, hipodonti, prevalans

PREVALENCE OF MAXILLARY LATERAL INCISOR AND MAXILLARY-MANDIBULAR PREMOLAR AGENESIS IN CHILDREN LIVING IN THE DENIZLI REGION

Abstract

Background: Tooth agenesis is a phenomenon that occurs commonly as a dental anomaly in humans. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of tooth agenesis in a population group in Turkey.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on -previously taken- panoramic radiographs of 6- and 7- year- old children, who had applied to xxx University Faculty of Dentistry between 2015 and 2022 for dental reasons. Maxillary lateral incisors and maxillary/mandibular premolars that were congenitally missed were noted, while other missing teeth were not evaluated.
Results: A total of 1840 panoramic radiographs were examined and the agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and maxillary/mandibular premolars frequency was found to be 8.15%. The prevalence of missing maxillary lateral incisors was found to be 2.44%, and the prevalence of missing premolar teeth was 5.71%. The teeth most affected by agenesis were the mandibular second premolars. Females were more affected than males (8.88% females; 7.44% males).
Conclusion: Since the early diagnosis of missing teeth can provide ideal and conservative treatment and reduce treatment costs, it is important for dentists to have information about early diagnosis and treatments. In this study, it was determined that the prevalence of missing teeth was higher in women than in men. Further genetic studies may elucidate why females are more affected by hypodontia than males. More comprehensive studies should be conducted in the future including the other permanent teeth and more individuals.
Keywords: Hypodontia, prevalence, tooth agenesis.

Keywords

hypodontia, prevalence, tooth agenesis

References

• 1. Tan SP, van Wijk AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. Severe hypodontia: identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:150-4.
• 2. Demiriz L, Bodrumlu EH, Kokturk F. Patterns of incisor‐premolar agenesis combinations: A retrospective study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(1):51-5.
• 3. Swarnalatha C, Paruchuri U, Babu JS, et al. Prevalence of congenitally missing upper lateral incisors in an orthodontic adolescent population. J Orthod Sci. 2020;9:15.
• 4. van Wijk AJ, Tan SP. Numeric code for identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis: a new approach. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:97-101.
• 5. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th Ed. Chicago, London: Boca Raton: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.
• 6. Al-Ani AH, Antoun JS, Thomson WM, Merriman TR, Farella M. Hypodontia: An update on ıts etiology, classification, and clinical management. Biomed Res Int 2017;1-9.
• 7. Topkara A, Sari Z. Prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in a Turkish orthodontic patient population: Results from a large academic cohort. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011;12:123-7.
• 8. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:797-801.
• 9. Chung CJ, Han JH, Kim KH. The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Dis 2008;14:620-5.
• 10. Koch G, Poulsen S. Pediatric Dentistry, A Clinical Approach, 2nd edn. E book: Wiley- Blackwell, 2013.
• 11. Dallel I, Marwen W, Ben Abdallah S, Tobji S, Ben Amor A, Canal P. Agenesis of the upper lateral incisors: Study of an orthodontic population and clinical illustration. Int Orthod 2018;16:384-407.
• 12. Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, Amini N. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. J Oral Sci 2010;52:455-61.
• 13. Horowitz JM. Aplasia and malocclusion: A survey and appraisal. Am J Orthod 1966;52:440‑53.
• 14. Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod 1998;68:267‑74.
• 15. Helm S. Malocclusion in Danish children with adolescent dentition: An epidemiologic study. Am J Orthod 1968;54:352‑66.
• 16. Beltrami F, Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Prevalence, distribution, and age at clinical detection of missing permanent incisors. Eur J Orthod 2021;43(1):25-28.
• 17. Goldstein RE. Study of need for esthetics in dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1969;21:589-598.
• 18. Egil E. Premolar Agenesis Prevalence and Patterns in a Sample of Turkish Children. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 2021;11(4):809-814.
• 19. Wagner VP, Arrué T, Hilgert E, et al. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in a paediatric population based on panoramic radiographs analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):292-298.
• 20. Takeshita WM, Vessoni Iwaki LC, Da Silva MC, Tonin RH. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone loss. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:318-23.
• 21. Gökkaya B, Motro M, Kargül B. Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic hypodontia among Turkish orthodontic patient population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:170-5.
• 22. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1973;81:12-21.
• 23. Pinho T, Tavares P, Maciel P, Pollmann C. Developmental absence of maxillary lateral incisors in the Portuguese population. European Journal of Orthodontics 2005; 27:443-449.
• 24. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dentistry 2012;2012:837270.
• 25. Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 1970;81:101-107.
• 26. Araújo EA, Oliveira DD, Araújo MT. Diagnostic protocol in cases of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors. World Journal of Orthodontics 2006;7:376-388.
• 27. Bassiouny DS, Afify AR, Baeshen HA, Birkhed D, Zawawi KH. Prevalence of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and associated skeletal characteristics in an orthodontic patient population. Acta Odontol Scand 2016;74:456-9.
• 28. Castaldi CR, Bodnarchuk A, MacRee PD, Zacherl WA. Incidence of congenital anomalies in permanent teeth of a group of Canadian children aged 6-9. J Can Dent Assoc 1966;32:154-159.
• 29. Koc N, Ballikaya E, Cehreli ZC. Prevalence of premature eruption and agenesis of premolars in Turkish Children: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;45:58-62.
• 30. Gelgör İE, Şişman Y, Malkoç S. Daimi dentisyonda konjenital hipodontinin görülme sıklığı. Türkiye Klin Diş Hekim Bilim Derg 2005;11:43-48.
• 31. Sumer AP, Akça T, Köprülü H. Çocuklarda görülen dental anomaliler: panoramik radyografik değerlendirme. Ondokuz Mayis Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2004;5:81-84.
• 32. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:217-26.
• 33. Dzemidzic V, Nakas E, Gagula I, Kozadra J, Tiro A. The prevalence of hypodontia and hyperdontia in orthodontic patients. Acta Med Acad 2020;49:51-56.
• 34. Gokkaya B, Kargul B. Prevalence and Pattern of Non-Syndromic Hypodontia in a Group of Turkish Children. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016;50(1):58-64.
• 35. Badrov J, Gaspar G, Tadin A, Galic T, Govorko DK, Gavic L, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Congenitally Missing Permanent Teeth among Orthodontic Patients in Southern Croatia. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2017;51(4):290-9.
• 36. Acev DP, Gjorgova J. Prevalence of Hypodontia in the Permanent Dentition of Macedonian Population. Balk J Dent Med. 2014;18:93-8.
• 37. Soni HK, Joshi M, Desai H, Vasavada M. An orthopantomographic study of prevalence of hypodontia and hyperdontia in permanent dentition in Vadodara, Gujarat. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(4):529-33.
• 38. Sola RA, Sola PA, Pérez JC, Sánchez IN, Renovales ID. Prevalence of Hypodontia in a Sample of Spanish Dental Patients. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52(1):18-23.
• 39. Karadas M, Celikoglu M, Akdag MS. Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(3):337-41.
• 40. Gracco ALT, Zanatta S, Forin Valvecchi F, Bignotti D, Perri A, Baciliero F. Prevalence of dental agenesis in a sample of Italian orthodontic patients: an epidemiological study. Prog Orthod 2017;18(1):33.