Dijital Renk Seçim Cihazlarının Doğruluğunun Karşılaştırılması

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 240 - 246, 22.08.2025

Nurşen Şahin , Taylan Sarı , Çağrı Ural , Necati Kaleli , Elif Nazlı Tekin

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1527859

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, yeni geliştirilen dijital renk seçim teknikleri kullanılarak üretilen estetik bölge kron restorasyonlarının renk seçimi başarısını değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Rastgele boyama yapılarak on farklı renkte kron üretildi ve hedef kron olarak belirlendi. Dört test grubu oluşturuldu: Grup V, görsel renk seçimi Vita 3D Master renk sistemi kullanılarak yapıldı (kontrol grubu); Grup OPT, yeni bir klinik kolorimetre cihazı kullanılarak hedef diş renginin ölçülmesiyle gerçekleştirildi; Grup SS, bir spektrofotometre kullanılarak hedef diş renginin ölçülmesiyle gerçekleştirildi; ve Grup IOS, renk seçimi intraoral tarama cihazı kullanılarak hedef kuronların taranmasıyla gerçekleştirildi. Farklı renk seçim teknikleri kullanılarak toplam 40 adet kron üretildi. Test örnekleri ve hedef kronların L, a* ve b* değerleri bir spektrofotometre kullanılarak ölçüldü. Renk farkı (ΔE) değerleri CIEDE2000 (2:1:1) formülüne göre hesaplandı. Toplanan veriler için uygun istatistiksel analiz yapıldı (α=0,05).
Bulgular: Grup V, OPT, SS ve IOS için ortalama ΔE testi değerleri sırasıyla 2,27, 1,11, 1,73 ve 3,03. Ortalama ΔE değerleri arasında anlamlı fark vardı (P>.05). Grup SS, V ve OPT arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmazken, üç grup ile Grup IOS arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı.
Sonuç: Görsel,spektrofotometre ve Optishade ile yapılan renk seçimleri ağız içi tarayıcı ile yapılan renk seçiminden daha başarılı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Estetik, Görsel, Kolorimetre

Keywords

Estetik , Görsel , Kolorimetre

Comparison of the Accuracy of Digital Dental Color Selection Devices

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of shade selection and matching for esthetic region crown restorations using newly developed digital color selection techniques.
Materials and Methods: Ten different crowns were fabricated with randomly selected colors and set as the target crowns. The test samples were randomly divided into four test groups: Group V, wherein the visual color selection was performed using the Vita 3D Master scala (control); Group OPT, wherein the color selection was performed by measuring the target tooth color using a novel clinical colorimeter device; Group SS, wherein the color selection was performed by measuring the target tooth color using a spectrophotometer; and Group IOS, wherein the color selection was performed by scanning the target crowns using intraoral scanning software. A total of 40 crowns were fabricated as test samples using the different shade selection techniques. The L, a*, and b* values of the samples and target crowns were measured using a spectrophotometer. The color difference(ΔE) values were calculated according to the CIEDE2000(2:1:1) formula. The collected data underwent appropriate statistical analysis (α=.05).
Results: For Groups V, OPT, SS, and IOS, the average ΔE test values were 2.27, 1.11, 1.73, and 3.03, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between these average ΔE values (P>.05).While there was no statistically significant difference between Groups S,V, and OPT there was a statistically significant difference between the three groups and Group IOS.
Conclusion: Color selection techniques using visual methods, spectrophotometer, and Optishade were found to be more successful than color selections made with the intraoral scanner.

Keywords: Colorimetry, Esthetics, Visual

Keywords

Keywords: Colorimetry , Esthetics , Visual

References

• 1. Gotfredsen K, Gram M, Ben Brahem E, Hosseini M, Petkov M & Sitorovic M. Effectiveness of shade measurements using a scanning and computer software system: a pilot study. Int J Oral Dent Health. 2015;1–2. https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5734/1510008.
• 2. Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater. 2009;25:276–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.006.
• 3. Kielbassa AM, Beheim-Schwarzbach NJ, Neumann K, Nat R, Zantner C. In vitro comparison of visual and computer-aided pre- and post-tooth shade determination using various home bleaching procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(09)60001-9.
• 4. Gómez-Polo C, Portillo Muñoz M, Lorenzo Luengo MC, Vicente P, Galindo P, Martín Casado AM. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.001.
• 5. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:642–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70049-6.
• 6. Derdilopoulou FV, Zantner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Evaluation of visual and spectrophotometric shade analyses: a clinical comparison of 3758 teeth. Int J Prosthodont.2007;20:414–16.
• 7. Kröger E, Matz S, Dekiff M, Tran BL, Figgener L, Dirksen D. In vitro comparison of instrumental and visual tooth shade determination under different illuminants. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:848–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.004.
• 8. Ristic I, Stankovic S, Paravina RD. Influence of Color Education and Training on Shade Matching Skills. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28:287–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12209.
• 9. Igiel C, Weyhrauch M, Wentaschek S, Scheller H, Lehmann KM. Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:63–69. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-006.
• 10. Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Keyvanloo S, Alavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:100–103. . https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1279.
• 11. Klinke T, Bratner S, Hannak W, Boening K, Jakstat H. Influence of viewing distance on visual color differentiation in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2022;35:219–24. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7115.
• 12. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent. 2014;42:48-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.001.
• 13. Vafaee F, Rakhshan V, Vafaei M, Khoshhal M. Accuracy of shade matching performed by colour blind and normal dental students using 3D Master and Vita Lumin shade guides. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2012;20:23–25.
• 14. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, et al. Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2022;15:468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020468.
• 15. Borse S, Chaware SH. Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20:131–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_399_19.
• 16. Revilla-León M, Methani MM, Özcan M. Impact of the ambient light illuminance conditions on the shade matching capabilities of an intraoral scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33:906–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12662.
• 17. Tabatabaian F, Namdari M, Mahshid M, Vora SR, Mirabbasi S. Accuracy and precision of intraoral scanners for shade matching: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;S0022–3913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.034.
• 18. Huang M, Wang Y, Sun Y, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Ye H. The accuracies of three intraoral scanners with regard to shade determination: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:111–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13571.
• 19. Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(12)60053-5.
• 20. Parameswaran V, Anilkumar S, Lylajam S, Rajesh C, Narayan V. Comparison of accuracies of an intraoral spectrophotometer and conventional visual method for shade matching using two shade guide systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16:352–58. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176537.
• 21. Zenthöfer A, Cabrera T, Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ. Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18:1473–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1118-9.
• 22. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dawson DV. Color stability of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.025.
• 23. Czigola A, Róth I, Vitai V, Fehér D, Hermann P, Borbély J. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33:1166–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12810.
• 24. Floriani F, Jurado CA, Abuhammoud S, et al. A Comparative Study of Shade-Matching Reproducibility Using an Intraoral Scanner and a Spectrophotometer. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(3):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030062
• 25. Cone MR, Choi J, Awdaljan M. Optimized digital shade calibration technology for the restoration of a single central incisor. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.027
• 26. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater. 2016; 32:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.015
• 27. International Organization of Standardization. ISO/TR 28642:2016(en). Guidance on colour measurement. Geneva: International Organization of Standardization 2016. p. 10.
• 28. Akl MA, Sim CPC, Nunn ME, Zeng LL, Hamza TA, Wee AG. Validation of two clinical color measuring instruments for use in dental research. J Dent. 2022;125:104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104223
• 29. Alsaleh S, Labban M, AlHariri M, Tashkandi E. Evaluation of self-shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means. J Dent. 2012;40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.009
• 30. Azer SS, Rosenstiel SF, Seghi RR, Johnston WM. Effect of substrate shades on the color of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 106:179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60117-0
• 31. Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99:361–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60083-9
• 32. Paravina RD, Ontiveros JC, Powers JM. Accelerated aging effects on color and translucency of bleaching-shade composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:117–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00018.x
• 33. Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010;38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008.
• 34. Ebeid K, Sabet A, Della Bona A. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33:844–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12687.
• 35. Browning WD, Chan DC, Blalock JS, Brackett MG. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer. Oper Dent. 2009;34:337–43. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-106.
• 36. Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J, Forner L. Reliability of two-shade match devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011;12:19–23. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1004.
• 37. Rutkūnas V, Dirsė J, Bilius V. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.020.
• 38. Saygılı S, Albayrak B, Sülün T. Effect of different instrumental techniques and clinical experience on shade matching. J Prosthodont. Published online June 13, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13894.
• 39. Rosenstiel, S. F., & Land, M. F. (Eds.). (2015). Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics-E-Book: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• 40. Pohlen B, Hawlina M, Šober K, Kopač I. Tooth Shade-Matching Ability Between Groups of Students with Different Color Knowledge. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(5):487-492. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4712.