Forage Pea Pure Lines: Winter Hardiness, High Seed and Biological Yield

Abstract

Winter forage pea is a plant that grows in cold climates and is a valuable source of protein for animal feed. In this study, 13 pure forage pea lines (PS3057M1, PS3057M2, PS3073G1, PS3073G2, PS3073G3, PS4028H1, PS4028H2, PS4028H3, PS4028H4, PS4053M1, PS4053M2, PS4053M3 and PS4053M4) and Emirbey and Şahin varieties were used as material. The research was conducted at Selçuk University Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir AKCİN Research and Application Station in the trial fields during the 2020-21 and 2021-22 plant growth periods without irrigation. The trials were established in both years according to randomized block design with 3 replications. Meteorological data indicated that despite variations in the lowest temperatures between the two years, all pea lines remained undamaged. This highlighted the adaptability of forage pea lines to the region's winter conditions, which is consistent with previous studies. Statistically significant differences were determined between the two years of the study in terms of all traits analyzed in the research. Higher values were recorded in the second year for all traits. The main reason for these differences is the precipitation and temperatures in the spring months, which is the period when the plants grow actively. Again, significant statistical differences were determined between the lines in all the traits analyzed in the study. This shows us that genetic traits and environmental conditions are important in determining the traits analyzed in this study. The forage pea lines used in the study performed better than the standard varieties in terms of seed and biological yield. In conclusion, this research shows that newly developed winter forage pea lines can be successfully grown in the Konya region and these lines have important genetic and environmental effects on various yield parameters.

Keywords

• Seed yield
• pea
• biological yield
• winter hardiness

References

1. Açıkgöz E (2001). Yem Bitkileri. III. Baskı, U.Ü. Güçlendirme Vakfı Yay. No: 182, Bursa, Türkiye, p. 584.
2. Ates E (2012). The mineral, amino acid and fiber contents and forage yield of field pea (Pisum arvense L.), Fiddleneck (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) and their mixtures under dryland conditions in the Western Turkey. Romanian Agricultural Research 29: 237-244.
3. Ateş E, Tekeli AS (2017). The effect of different based fertilizer applications on herbage yield and quality of fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.). KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 20: 13–16. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksudobil.348886
4. Avcı MA, Ceyhan E (2013). Determination of some agricultural characters of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 12 (7): 798-802.
5. Ceyhan E, Avcı MA, Mcphee KE (2005). The determination of grain yield and some agronomical characters as winter cultivation of pea genotypes in Konya ecological conditions. The University of Selcuk Journal of Faculty of Agriculture 19 (37): 6-1.
6. Ceyhan E (2003). Determination of some agricultural characters and their heredity through line x tester method in pea parents and crosses. PhD Thesis, Selcuk University (Unpublished), Turkey.
7. Ceyhan, E (2006). Genetic analysis of cold hardiness in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Plant Sciences 1 (2): 138-143.
8. Ceyhan E, Avcı MA (2005). Combining ability and heterosis for grain yield and some yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 8 (10):1447-1452.

9. Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Ates MK, Karadaş S (2012). Stability analysis on seed yield and its components in peas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18 (6): 887-893.
10. Geren H, Alan Ö (2012). Farklı ekim zamanlarının iki bezelye (Pisum sativum L.) çeşidinde ot verimi ve diğer bazı özellikler üzerine etkileri. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 22 (2): 37-47.
11. Gençtan T 2012. Tarımsal Ekoloji. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Ders Kitabı. Genel Yayın: 6 Yayın No:3, Tekirdağ, Türkiye, p.264.
12. Kadıoğlu S, Tan M (2018). Erzurum şartlarında bazı yem bezelyesi hat ve çeşitlerinin tohum verimleri ile bazı özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 49 (2): 143-149.
13. Karadavut U, Sözen Ö (2020). Effect on planting frequencies on agronomic and physological properties of chickpea. Journal of Global Innovation Agriculture Science 8 (2): 71-77.
14. Karadaş S, Ceyhan E (2023). Determination of the effects of organic and chemical fertilization on grain yield and some agricultural characteristics of pea. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 37 (2): 419-429. https://doi.org/10. 15316/SJAFS.2023.040
15. Kavut YT, Çelen AE, Çıbık ŞE, Urtekin MA (2016). Ege Bölgesi koşullarında farklı sıra arası mesafelerinde yetiştirilen bazı yem bezelyesi (Pisum arvense L.) çeşitlerinin verim ve diğer bazı özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 25 (Özel sayı-2): 225-229.
16. Kavut YT, Çelen AE (2017). Kimi yem bezelyesi çeşitlerinde (Pisum arvense L.) sıra arası mesafelerinin tohum verimi ile bazı verim özelliklerine etkisi üzerinde bir araştırma. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 54 (1): 79-83.
17. Keskin B, Temel S, Eren B. (2021). Effects on yield components and seed yield of some feed pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) varieties at different sowing time. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 24 (6): 1315-1326. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.870115
18. Küçük M, Ceyhan E (2023). Determination of chemical fertilizer and various organic fertilizers on some agricultural characteristics of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 36 (3): 501-506. https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.065
19. Önder M, Ceyhan E (2001). Relations among seed yield and some morphological characteristics of pea cultivars sown in various sowing dates under Central Anatolian. The University of Selcuk Journal of Faculty of Agriculture 15 (25): 173-183.
20. Savur O, Ceyhan E (2011). Determination of some agricultural characters of edible pea (Pisum sativum l.) lines developed by crossing method. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 25 (2): 17-23.
21. Sözen Ö, Karadavut U (2017). Determination of direct and indirect relations between some yield characters of red lentil cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany 49 (6): 2339-2346.
22. Sözen Ö, Karadavut U (2018). Determination of genotype x environment interactions of some chickpea genotypes by using different stability methods. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 24 (4): 431-438.
23. Sözen Ö, Karadavut U (2020). Farklı lokasyonlarda yetiştirilen kuru fasulye genotiplerinin bazı kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 7 (4): 1205-1217.
24. Sözen Ö, Peker GN (2023). Determination of quality characteristics of advanced chickpea genotypes. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7 (3): 533-547.
25. Sözen Ö, Karadavut U, Akçura M (2018). A Study on the determination of the performance of some yield components in dry bean genotypes in different environments. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27 (12): 8677-8686.
26. Tan M, Koc A, Dumlu Gul Z (2012). Morphological characteristics and seed yield of East Anatolian local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 24-30.
27. Temel S, Keskin B, Çakmakçı S, Tosun R (2022). Determination of suitable forage pea varieties and winter sowing dates in terms of herbage yield and quality characteristics in Iğdır conditions. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 25 (4): 745-756. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.870379
28. TTSM (2023). Baklagil Yem Bitkileri Tarımsal Değerleri Ölçme Denemeleri Teknik Talimatı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Duyuru%20Belgeleri/2019/%C3%A7ay%C4%B1r%20mera/baklagil%20yem%20bitkileri.pdf, (Access date: 02.01.2023).
29. Uzun A, Gün H, Açıkgöz E (2012). Farklı gelişme dönemlerinde biçilen bazı yem bezelyesi çeşitlerinin ot, tohum ve ham protein verimlerinin belirlenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 26(1): 27-38.