Utilizing of Plant-Smoke Solution to Alleviate Drought Sensitivity on Forage Peas

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the sensitivity of forage pea to drought stress intensities and the contribution of smoke solutions in preventing this sensitivity. For the smoke solution, dried poppy harvest residues were prepared with a special mechanism. Within this scope, two different concentrations (1 and 10%) of poppy smoke solution were utilized in priming of two distinct forage pea varieties (Gap pembesi and Özkaynak). After priming, the seeds were sowing in pots and it was exposed to moderate and severe drought conditions after 21 days. Effects of smoke solutions and drought stress in varieties were assessed by physically (shoot length) and chemical parameters (crude protein, ADF. NDF, Ca, Mg, P and K). Both forage pea varieties have been observed that crude protein and mineral substance (except Ca) contents decrease significantly under drought stress, especially in severe drought. This loss was increased again by eliminating both doses (especially 10%) of smoke solutions. In fact, under normal growing conditions (control), 10% smoke solution application had the highest crude protein in both varieties. However, the effect of drought and the defense mechanism of smoke solution created differences in forage pea varieties based on parameters. In general, the Özkaynak was more resistant to drought and the response to smoke solution was stronger. In conclusion, by incorporating the poppy-smoke solution into the drought stress mitigation strategy, this approach not only curbed environmental losses but also mitigated the impacts of drought stress.

Keywords

• Smoke solution
• drought
• forage quality
• priming

Supporting Institution

No

Ethical Statement

No

Thanks

No

References

1. Başaran U, Doğrusöz MÇ, Gülümser E, Mut H (2019). Using smoke solutions in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) to improve germination and seedling growth and reduce toxic compound ODAP. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 43(6):518-526.
2. Castaneda R, Doan D, Newhouse DL, Nguyen M, Uematsu H, Azevedo JP (2016). Who are the poor in the developing world? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 7844.
3. Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Önder M, Ateş MK, Karadaş S, Topak R, Avcı MA (2012). Physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress of chickpea genotypes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 66: 383-388.
4. Chen W, Yao X., Cai K, Chen J (2011). Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biological Trace Element Research 142: 67-76.
5. Dixon KW, Merritt DJ, Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL (2009). Karrikinolide – a phytoreactive compound derived from smoke with applications in horticulture, Ecological Restoration and Agriculture. Acta Horticulturae 813: 155-170.
6. Dogrusoz MC (2022). Can plant derived smoke solutions support the plant growth and forage quality in the hydroponic system? International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 19(1): 299-306.
7. Doğrusöz MÇ, Başaran U, Ayan İ, Acar Z (2022). Plant-derived smoke solutions as a strategy to alleviate ODAP toxicity in hydroponic grass pea. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 10 (10): 1814-1820.
8. Ghebrehiwot HM, Kulkarni GM, Kirkman KP, Van Staden J (2009). Smoke solutions and temperature ınfluence the germination and seedling growth of South African mesic grassland species. Rangeland Ecology & Management 62(6): 572–578.

9. Gökmen E, Ceyhan E (2015). Effects of drought stress on growth parameters, enzyme activates and proline content in chickpea genotypes. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 44(2): 177-183.
10. Hu YC, Schmidhalter U (2005). Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168:541–549.
11. Jefferson LV, Pennacchio M, Havens K, Forsberg B, Sollenberger D (2008). Ault J Ex situ germination responses of Midwestern USA prairie species to plant-derived smoke. American Midland Naturalist 159:251-256.
12. Khaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, Maserti BE, Babalar M (2019). Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Entific Report 9, 19250.
13. Khan MHU, Khattak JZK, Jamil M, Malook I, Khan SU, Jan M, Din I, Saud S, Kamran M, Fahad S (2017). Bacillus safensis with plant-derived smoke stimulates rice growth under saline conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24:23850-23863. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0026-y
14. Kidambi SP, Matches AG, Karnezos TP, Keeling JW (1993). Mineral concentrations in forage sorghum grown under two harvest management systems. Agronomy Journal 85: 826-833.
15. Li W, Nguyen KH, Chu HD, Ha CV, Watanabe Y, Osakabe Y, Tran LSP (2017). The karrikin receptor KAI2 promotes drought resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 13(11): e1007076
16. NRC (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy of Sciences.
17. Pei Z F, Ming D F, Liu D, Wan G L, Geng XX, Gong H J, Zhou W J (2010). Silicon improves the tolerance to water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 29: 106-115.
18. Reinhardt K, Germino MJ, Kueppers LM, Domec JC, Mitton J (2015). Linking carbon and water relations to drought-induced mortality in Pinus flexilis seedlings. Tree Physiology 35: 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv045
19. Saha A, Sekharan S, Manna U (2020). Superabsorbent hydrogel (SAH) as a soil amendment for drought management: A review. Soil and Tillage Research 204:104736.
20. Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroğlu T, Abdul-Majid HH, Battaglia ML (2021). Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 10(2): 259. Shah AA, Khan WU, Yasin NA, Akram W, Ahmad A, Abbas M, Ali A, Safdar MN (2020). Butanolide alleviated cadmium stress by improving plant growth, photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant defense system of brassica oleracea. Chemosphere 261:127728.
21. Shah FA, Ni J, Yao Y, Hu H, Wei R, Wu L (2021). Overexpression of karrikins receptor gene Sapium sebiferum KAI2 promotes the cold stress tolerance via regulating the redox homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Science 657960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.657960.
22. Tang D, Chen M, Huang X, Zhang G, Zeng L, Zhang G, Wu S (2023). Wang Y. SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PLoS One 18(11): e0294236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294236. PMID: 37943830.
23. Tekin NB, Ceyhan E (2020). Effects of cold stress on enzyme activities in peas. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7(1): 170–177. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.680055
24. Yang T, Lian Y, Kang J, Bian Z, Xuan L, Gao Z, Wang X, Deng J, Wang C (2020). The SUPPRESSOR of MAX2 1 (SMAX1)-Like SMXL6, SMXL7 and SMXL8 act as negative regulators in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiology 61:1477–1492.
25. Yousfi N, Sihem N, Ramzi A, Abdelly C (2016). Growth, photosynthesis and water relations as affected by different drought regimes and subsequent recovery in Medicago laciniata (L.) populations. Journal of Plant Biology 59:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-016-0422-8
26. Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Devireddy AR, Sengupta S, Azad RK, Mittler R (2020). Systemic signaling during abiotic stress combination in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 117, pp. 13810-13820, 10.1073/pnas.2005077117.
27. Zhang Y, Ding J, Wang H, Su L, Zhao C (2020). Biochar addition alleviate the negative effects of drought and salinity stress on soybean productivity and water use efficiency. BMC Plant Biology 20: 1-11.
28. Zheng J, Hong K, Zeng L, Wang L, Kang S, Qu M, Dai J, Zou L, Zhu L, Tang Z (2020). Karrikin signaling acts parallel to and additively with strigolactone signaling to regulate rice mesocotyl elongation in darkness. Plant Cell 32: 2780–2805.