Lepidoptera Species in Selçuk University Alaeddin Keykubat Campus Area

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Selçuk Üniversitesi Alaeddin Keykubat kampüs alanındaki Lepidoptera türlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla 2023 yılı nisan-eylül ayları arasında yürütülmüştür. Kelebek örneklerin toplanması amacıyla dört farklı yöntem kullanılmıştır. Bunlardan ilki, gündüz kelebeklerinin erginlerinin doğada aktif olarak uçtukları nisan-eylül ayları arasında uçarken veya bitki üzerinden yakalanmasını sağlayan atrap ile yakalama yöntemidir. Gece kelebeklerinin yakalanmasında ise 125 W’lık civa buharlı ampül ile çalışan Robinson tipi ışık tuzakları ikinci yöntem olarak kullanılmıştır. Üçüncü yöntemde, sebze tarlaları, asma ve elma bahçeleri gibi üretim alanlarında bu alanlara özgü lepidopter türlerinin varlığını belirlemek amacıyla türe özgü delta tipi eşeysel çekici feromon tuzakları ile kelebek yakalaması yapılmıştır. Sonuncu yöntem ise kelebeklerin ergin öncesi dönemlerine ait yumurta, larva ve pupalarının arazide gözlem esnasında toplanmasına dayanan kelebek yürümesi yöntemidir. Toplanan örnekler laboratuvarda tanı için hazırlanmış ve tür teşhisleri yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, Selçuk Üniversitesi Alaeddin Keykubat kampüs alanında Lepidoptera takımında bulunan 11 familyaya ait 37 tür tespit edilmiştir. Gündüz kelebeklerinde 5 familyaya bağlı, 16 cins ve 18 türün tanısı yapılmıştır. Bu familyalar arasında 7 tür ile Nymphalidae familyası en çok türü tespit edilen familya olmuştur. Gece kelebeklerinden 6 familyaya bağlı, 17 cins ve 19 türün tanısı yapılmıştır. Familyalar arasında 8 tür ile Noctuidae familyası en çok türü tespit edilen familya olmuştur.

Keywords

• Alaeddin Keykubat Kampüsü
• Kelebek
• Konya
• Lepidoptera
• Selçuk Üniversitesi

Lepidoptera Species in Selçuk University Alaeddin Keykubat Campus Area

Abstract

This study was conducted in April-September 2023 to determine the Lepidoptera species in the Selçuk University Alaeddin Keykubat campus area. Four different methods were used to collect butterfly specimens. The first of these methods is the sweep net method, which allows catching Rhopalocera adults in April-September when they fly actively in nature, or on plants. Robinson-type light traps powered by a 125 W mercury vapor bulb were used as the second method for catching Heterocera species. In the third method, the specimens were captured in production areas such as vegetable fields, vine and apple orchards with species-specific delta-type sexual attractant pheromone traps in order to determine the presence of lepidopteran species specific to these areas. The last method is the butterfly walk method, which is based on the collection of eggs, larvae and pupae of pre-adult butterflies during field observation. The collected specimens were prepared for diagnosis in the laboratory and species identifications were made. As a result of the study, 37 species belonging to 11 families in the order Lepidoptera were identified in the Selçuk University Alaeddin Keykubat campus area. In Rhopalocera, butterflies, 16 genera and 18 species belonging to 5 families were identified. Among these families, the family Nymphalidae with 7 species was the family having the most species detected. In Heterocera, moths, 17 genera and 19 species belonging to 6 families were identified. Among these families, Noctuidae, with 8 species, was the family having the most species detected.

Keywords

• Alaeddin Keykubat Campus
• Butterfly
• Konya
• Lepidoptera
• Selçuk University

References

1. Arslangündoğdu Z, Bacak E, İhsanoğlu MA (2018). İstanbul-rumelikavağı'nın gündüz kelebekleri. Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections, 2(1): 1-11.
2. Atay E, Yıldırım H, Tatlı M (2019). Bursa ili Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) faunası ve yeni kayıtlar. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 4(2): 70-75. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.539213
3. Bıçak G (2007). İstanbul Belgrad ormanı Lepidoptera faunası. Master Thesis, Istanbul University (Unpublished), Türkiye.
4. Birgücü AK, Erol AB (2021). Isparta ili elma bahçelerinde Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)’nın larva popülasyonun ve vuruklu meyve oranının belirlenmesi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2): 453-462.
5. Can F (2010). Evaluation of morphological characters and male genitalia features of emerald moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Geometrinae) from Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(9): 867-873.
6. Çelik P, Topsakal Y (2017). Butterfly watching in Turkey within the scope of alternative tourism. Innovation and Global Issues in Social Science, 27 - 29 Nisan 2017,Antalya, Türkiye, pp. 100-105.
7. Ghazanfar M, Malik MF, Hussain M, Iqbal R, Younas M (2016). Butterflies and their contribution in ecosystem: A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 4(2): 115-118.
8. Gibb TJ (2014). Contemporary insect diagnostics: the art and science of practical entomology. Academic Press, Oxford- England, p. 1-336.

9. Gillott C (2005). Entomology. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer Dordrecht. p. 1-832 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3183-1
10. Grimaldi D, Engel MS (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, USA. p. 1-755. Gullan PJ, Cranston PS (2014). The insects: an outline of entomology. Wiley-Blackwell, USA. p. 1-624.
11. Heppner JB (2008). Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). In: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 623-626 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_497
12. Horak M, Komai F (2006). Olethreutine Moths of Australia:(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Csiro Publishing, Australian. p. 1-521.
13. Hüseyinoğlu Y, Atay E (2017). A faunistic study of diurnal and nocturnal Lepidoptera in Darboğaz, Bolkar Mountains (Niğde, Turkey). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 90(1): 44-53.
14. Ilhamdi ML, Al Idrus A, Santoso D, Hadiprayitno G, Syazali M, Hariyadi I (2023). Abundance and diversity of butterfly in the Lombok Forest Park, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240205
15. Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Varela LG (2012). Grape berry moths in western European vineyards and their recent movement into the New World. Arthropod management in vineyards: pests, approaches, and future directions, 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4032-7_14
16. Isbill J A (2003). The continuing influence of René Lalique in jewelry design. California State University, Dominguez Hills, California, USA. p. 1-13.
17. Jackson RE, Bradley JR, Van Duyn J, Leonard BR, Allen KC, Luttrell R, Head G (2008). Regional assessment of Helicoverpa zea populations on cotton and non‐cotton crop hosts. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 126(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00653.x
18. Kansu IA (2000). Genel entomoloji (Dokuzuncu Baskı). Birlik Matbaacılık-Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye. p. 1-425.
19. Karlsson Green, K (2021). The effects of host plant species and larval density on immune function in the polyphagous moth Spodoptera littoralis. Ecology and Evolution, 11(15), 10090-10097. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7802
20. Khan MR, Rafi MA, Munir M (2007). Biodiversity of butterflies from districts Kotli, Mipur and Azad Kashmir. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 39, 27–34.
21. Koçak A, Kemal M (2012). Iğdır Kelebekleri, Centre for Entomological Studies, Ankara, Türkiye, p. 253
22. Mediouni Ben Jemâa J, Soltani A, Djebbi T, Mejri I, Kanyesigye D, Otim MH (2023). The maize caterpillar Mythimna (= Leucania) loreyi (Duponchel, 1827)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Identification, distribution, population density and damage in Tunisia. Insects, 14(10): 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100786
23. Ögür E, Çetin H (2018). Kentsel alanların biyoindikatörleri böcekler. Uluslararası Yeşil Başkentler Kongresi, 8-11 Mayıs 2018, Konya, Türkiye, pp. 884-896.
24. Padilla JJ, Collado JL, García CGG, Collado CJL (2021). Spatial and economic assessment of butterfly-based handicrafts as a tourism service provided by rural populations. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural= International journal of rural development, 18(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr18.seab
25. Parlak NN (2017). Istanbul-Büyükada’nın Lepidoptera türleri. Yüksek Lisans, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
26. Perveen F, Fazal F (2013). Biology and distribution of butterfly fauna of Hazara university, garden campus, Mansehra, Pakistan. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 3(2): 28-36. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2013.32A004
27. Rosenberg DM, Danks HV, Lehmkuhl DM (1986). Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Environmental management, 10: 773-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867730
28. Ribas-Marques E, Díaz-Calafat J, Boi M (2022). The role of adult noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and their food plants in a nocturnal pollen-transport network on a Mediterranean island. Journal of Insect Conservation, 26(2): 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00382-7
29. Rogers L (2013). All about professional butterfly farming. https://www.butterflyboutique.net/ebooks/11aapbf84612/en/All_About_Professional_Butterfly_Farming.pdf (access date: 4 February 2024).
30. Ruales JJJ, Demetillo MT, Along AA, Mohagan AB, Jumawan JH (2023). Diversity and status of true butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in two ecological parks of Butuan City, Agusan del Norte, Philippines with new locality record. Species, 24: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v24i73/e46s1539
31. Sebua CMD, Nuñeza OM (2020). Species diversity of Lepidoptera in Western Mindanao State University–experimental forest area, Zamboanga City, Philippines. Entomology and Applied Science Letters, 7(1): 33-43.
32. Serik T (2015). Moldova’nın gündüz kelebekleri (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) faunası. PhD Thesis, Istanbul University (Unpublished), Turkey Türkiye.
33. Seven E, Çakır A (2019). A Contribution to the moth fauna (lepidoptera, heterocera) of Elazığ Province, Turkey. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology, 9(1): 18-21.
34. Şengün A, Güneyi N (1968). İstanbul gündüz kelebekleri, Fen Fakültesi Basımevi, İstanbul, Türkiye, p.103. Ülger G (2022). Kahramanmaraş ili ve çevresinde yer alan Pterygota (Arthropoda Insecta) taksonları üzerine ekolojik ve faunistik araştırma. PhD Thesis, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University (Unpublished), Türkiye.
35. Venette RC, Davis EE, DaCosta M, Heisler H, Larson M (2003). Mini risk assessment grape berry moth, Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermuller)[Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]. USDA CAPS PRA, Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. p.129.
36. Zobar D, Genç H (2008). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Terzioğlu yerleşkesi gündüz kelebekleri (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3): 309-321.