Toprakta Fungistasisin Besinsel Yönden ve Kimyasal İnhibitörler Açısından İncelenmesi

Abstract

Fungistasis olarak da ifade edilen toprak mikostasis'i doğal topraklarda gerçekleşen dinamik bir olaydır. Mikostasis, normal topraklarda fungal progpagüllerin çimlenmesini ve misel gelişimini azaltan yaygın bir olaydır. Şu ana kadar yapılan çalışmalarda biyotik ve abiyotik faktörlerin bu olaya neden olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bazı araştırıcılar ise bu olayı yalnızca kimyasal inhibitörler bazıları ise besinsel açıdan incelemişlerdir. Fakat aynı zamanda her iki faktör de biyotik ve abiyotik orijinli olabilir. Bu makalede mikostasis, besinsel açıdan sporlarda karbona bağlılık, mikostasis'in ekzojen karbon ve azot üzerine etkisi. besin sömürülmesi ve kaybolması gibi başlıklar altında değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca şu ana kadar tespit edilmiş biyotik ve abiyotik orijinli kimyasal inhibitörlerin mikostatis açısından rolü ele alınmıştır.

Keywords

• Fungistasis
• besin. kimyasal inhibitör.

Supporting Institution

SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

A Review on The Soil Mycostasis for Nutritional Aspects and Chemical Inhibitors

Abstract

Soil mycostatis, olso called fungistatis is a dynamte phenomenon which suppresses germination of fungal propagules and miceltal growth in natural soils. In the studies conducted so far, it was established that biotic and abiotic factors were responsible for this phenomenon. Certain researchers only investigated mycostatis in view of chemical inhibitors while some others did in respect to nutrition. However, both factors can be biotic and abiotic origins. In this paper, reports regarding subject such as nutritional aspects of mycostasis, spors depend on carbon in view of nutrition, effects of mycostasts on the exogen and endogen carbon, the nutrient deprivation and sink were reviewed. In addition, it was reviewed the roles of chemical inhibitors in relation mycostasis.

Keywords

• Chemical Inhibitors
• Nutritional Aspects
• Mycostasis

Supporting Institution

SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

References

1. Allen, P.J., 1976. Spor germination and it's regulation. In. Physiological plant pathology. R. Heltefuss and P.H., Williams (Eds.). pp. 51-85, Springer verlag Berlin.
2. Ballis, C. and U., Kouyeas, 1979. Contribition of chemical inhibitors to soll mycostasis. In, Soil-borne plant pathogens, B. Schippers and W. Gams (Eds.). pp. 97-106, Academic press, New York.
3. Griffin, G.J. and D.A. Roth, 1979. Nutrional aspects of soil mycastasis. In. Soil bone plant pathogens, B. Schippers and W. Gams (Eds.), pp. 79 96, Academie press, New York.
4. Hora, T.S., R. Baker and G.J. Griffin, 1977. Experimental evaluation of hypoteses explaining the nature of soil fungistasis. Phytopathology, 67: 373-379. Ko, W.H. and J.K., Lockwood, 1967. Soil fungistatis relation to fungal spore nutrition. Phytopathology 57: 894-901.
5. Kasuge, T. and J.C., Dutra, 1963. Fixation of CO2 Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 53: 880. 14 by germinating conidia of
6. Lingappa, B.T. and J.L., Lockwood, 1962. Fungistoxicity of lignin monomer, model substances and decomposition products. Phytopathology 52: 295-299. Lockwood, J.L., 1964. Soil fungistasis. Ann. Rew. Phytopath. 2: 341-362.
7. Nash, S.M., T., Cchristou and W.C., Synder, 1961. Existence of Fusarium solani f.s. phaseoli as clamidospores in soil. Phytopathology 51: 308-312. Onoğur, E., 1990. Fungus fizyolojisi ders notları. E.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Bitki Koruma Böl.
8. Sezgin, E., A., Karcıoğlu ve Ü., Yemişcioğlu, 1982. Investigations on the effects of some cultural applications and antagonistic fungi on Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. and Verticillium dahlia Kleb. In the Aegean Region. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology 11: (1-2) 41-54.

9. Steiner, G.W. and J.L., Lockwood, 1969. Soll fungistasis: Sensitivity of spores in relation germination time and size. Phylopathology 59: 1084-92.