The Effect of Barn Design on Animal Welfare: A Structural Assessment in Selçuklu District of Konya Province

Year 2025, Volume: 39 Issue: 3 , 667 - 676 , 27.12.2025

Ahmet Gökce , Nuh Uğurlu , Elif Şahin Suci

https://doi.org/10.15316/selcukjafsci.1736753

https://izlik.org/JA78DA93YL

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the structural characteristics of dairy cattle barns in Selçuklu District of Konya Province in terms of animal welfare. Within the scope of the research, 20 farms were selected through purposive sampling, and the barns were examined in terms of technical parameters such as orientation, dimensions, construction materials, ventilation, lighting, and thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of special compartments (for calves, calving, and sick animals) and auxiliary structures was assessed. The findings revealed that most farms lacked essential compartments and support units, and that critical structural elements-such as ventilation, natural lighting, and insulation-did not meet technical standards. Although the average feeding space per animal was found to be sufficient (1.34 m), the average thermal transmittance (U-value) of the barns was calculated as 1.889 kcal/m².°C·h, indicating inadequate insulation performance. In conclusion, the majority of the barns were found to have been built without proper planning or professional technical support, which negatively affects both animal welfare and production efficiency. The study highlights the need for structural improvement of dairy barns in compliance with technical standards and emphasizes the importance of professional guidance, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Keywords

dairy cattle housing , barn design , structural assessment , animal welfare , thermal insulation

Barınak Tasarımının Hayvan Refahı Üzerine Etkisi: Konya Selçuklu İlçesinde Yapısal Bir Değerlendirme

https://izlik.org/JA78DA93YL

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Konya ili Selçuklu ilçesindeki süt sığırı ahırlarının yapısal özelliklerini hayvan refahı açısından değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle 20 çiftlik seçilmiş ve ahırlar, yönelim, boyutlar, yapı malzemeleri, havalandırma, aydınlatma ve ısı yalıtımı gibi teknik parametreler açısından incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, özel bölmelerin (buzağılar, doğum yapan hayvanlar ve hasta hayvanlar için) ve yardımcı yapıların varlığı da değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, çoğu çiftlikte gerekli bölmelerin ve destek ünitelerinin eksik olduğunu ve havalandırma, doğal aydınlatma ve yalıtım gibi kritik yapısal unsurların teknik standartları karşılamadığını ortaya koymuştur. Hayvan başına ortalama yemleme alanı yeterli (1,34 m) bulunmasına rağmen, ahırların ortalama ısı geçirgenliği (U değeri) 1,889 kcal/m².°C·h olarak hesaplanmış ve yetersiz yalıtım performansına işaret etmiştir. Sonuç olarak, ahırların çoğunun uygun planlama veya profesyonel teknik destek olmadan inşa edildiği ve bunun hem hayvan refahını hem de üretim verimliliğini olumsuz etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, teknik standartlara uygun olarak süt çiftliklerinin yapısal olarak iyileştirilmesi ihtiyacını vurgulamakta ve özellikle küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler için profesyonel rehberliğin önemini belirtmektedir.

Keywords

süt sığırı barınakları , barınak tasarımı , yapısal değerlendirme , hayvan refahı , ısı yalıtımı

References

• Albright, L. D. (1990). Environment control for animals and plants (p. 453). Cornell University.
• Anonymous. (2023a). Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Briefing Report, Konya.p.60. https://konya.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/kitap/brifingocak2023_son.pdf (access date: 01.07.2025).
• Anonymous. (2023b). District Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Briefing Report, Selçuklu. http://www.selcuklu.gov.tr/tarim-ve-orman (access date: 15.06.2025).
• Anonymous. (2024a). Raw Milk Production Data. Turkish Statistical Institute, Publication No: 53542, Ankara. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cig-Sut-Uretim-Istatistikleri-2023-53542 (access date: 01.07.2025).
• Anonymous. (2024b). Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK), Livestock Production Data (access date: 01.07.2025).
• Balaban, A., & Şen, E. (1988). Agricultural structures. Publication No:1083, Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications.
• Bhatia, A. (2014). Heat loss calculations and principles. Continuing Education and Development, Course No: M05-003.
• Blowey, R. (1994). Dairy cow housing. In C. M. Wathes & D. R. Charles (Eds.), Livestock housing, pp. 305–337. Cambridge University Press.
• Carvill, J. (1993). Thermodynamics and heat transfer. In Mechanical engineer’s data handbook, pp. 102–145.
• Cook, N. B. (2019). Designing facilities for the adult dairy cow during the nonlactation and early lactation period. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 35(1), 125–138.
• Demir, Y. (1990). A research on the structural features of beef cattle farms in the central black sea region and development of climate-appropriate barn plans. PhD Thesis, Çukurova University, Turkey.
• Ekmekyapar, T. (1991). Regulation of environmental conditions in animal shelters. Publication No:306. Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Erzurum.
• Ekmekyapar, T. (2001). Livestock shelters. Publication No:204. Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Erzurum.
• Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T., & Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. (2009). The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5478–5484.
• Kendirli, B. (2016). Environmental control in agricultural structures [Lecture notes]. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation. p.89.
• Koçyiğit, R., Yanar, M., Aydın, R., Özdemir, V. F., Ergün, O. F., Bayram, B., Diler, A., & Şat, O. (2023). Relationships between structural characteristics of existing barns and farm size in dairy cattle enterprises in Aşkale District of Erzurum Province. Bahri Dağdaş Journal of Animal Research, 12(1), 38–49.
• Lindley, J. A., & Whitaker, J. H. (1996). Agricultural buildings and structures, pp. viii+636. Agricultural Engineering Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
• Musal, B. (2008). Lactation and milking. Adnan Menderes University, Directorate of Publishing and Printing, Aydın.
• Noton, H. (1982). Farm building. College of Estate Management White Knights, Reading, London.
• Olgun, M. (2011). Agricultural structures. Publication No:244, Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications.
• Phillips, C. (2008). Cattle behaviour and welfare. John Wiley & Sons. p.274. Stansfield, J. M. (1991). The Herdsman’s Book. Ipswich, UK: The Farming Press.
• Şahin, O., Kaygısız, A., & Yılmaz, İ. (2022). Breed preferences and their reasons among cattle breeders in Turkey. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, 8(1), 151–165.
• TEPGE. (2023). Milk and dairy products forecast report. Agricultural Economics and Policy Development Institute. https://www.scribd.com/document/805105904/Sut-ve-SuT-Urunleri-Durum-Tahmin-Raporu-2023-372-TEPGE, (access date: 01.07.2025).
• Uğurlu, N. (2021). Planning of Animal Shelters [Lecture notes]. Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Konya.
• Wilkinson, J. M., & Rinne, M. (2018). Highlights of progress in silage conservation and future perspectives. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1), 40–52.