EN
Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse
Abstract
Bacterial canker of tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis produces considerable economic losses in many countries because effective control measures are lacking. In this study, the effectiveness of some chemicals, a plant growth regulator (Prohexadione-Ca (PC)), two plant activators (hydrogen peroxide (HP)) and harpin protein (Hrp), fungicides, maneb+copper (MC), copper compounds (copper sulfate pentahydrate (CSP) copper hydroxide (CH) and copper oxychloride (CO)) and an antibiotic, streptomycin sulphate on the pathogen were assessed in vitro and in vivo on two tomato cultivars, Newton and Orient. In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection. The activities of POX, GPX and PAL enzymes were determined at 5th day as markers of resistance and applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues. Only PC treatments have decreased plant heights and the effectiveness of PC in reduction of plant heigths was up to 40%. Among copper compounds, CSP and CO combination with Maneb were the most effective on the disease severity (about 50%). In addition, CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro and they showed considerable effects on the disease symptoms compared with CSP alone. We conclude that Hrp, HP and PC may be useful in controlling external symptoms of this disease in greenhouses, and is environmentally friendly, reducing the amount of copper applied to crops.
Keywords
References
- Anonymous (1996). Standard pesticide experiment methods to fire blight disease [E. amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al.] on pears, quinces and apples. Standard Pesticide Experiment Methods for Agricultural Control. Vol. 2, Plant Diseases. TAGEM, Ankara. 261 p.
- Anonymous (2000). Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the community. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Consolidated Text, pp. 1–39.
- Bastas K K, Maden S (2004). Control of Fire Blight (Erwinia amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al.) by Prohexadione-Ca (BAS 125 10 W) and Benzothiadiazole + Metalaxyl (BION MX 44 WG). Selcuk University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 18 (33): 49 – 58.
- Bastas K K, Maden S, Katırcioglu YZ, BoyrazN (2010). Determining of Application Time for Chemical Control of Fire Blight Disease in Pear Varieties, Journal of Agricultural Sciences Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture 16 (3), 150-161.
- Baysal O, Gursoy YZ, Ornek H, Duru A (2005). Induction of oxidants in tomato leaves treated with DL-b-Amino butyric acid (BABA) and infected with Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. Michiganensis. European Journal of Plant Pathology 112: 361–369.
- Bestwick CS, Brown IR, Mansfield JW (1998). Localized changes in peroxidase activity accompany hydrogen peroxide generation during the development of a non-host hypersensitive reaction inlettuce. Plant Physiol 118:1067 – 1078.
- Boudyach EH, Fatmi M, Akhayat O, Benizri E, Ait Ben Aoumar A (2001). Selection of antagonistic bacteria of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and evaluation of their efficiency against bacterial canker of tomato. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 11, 141–149.
- Bradford M (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
September 15, 2015
Submission Date
August 26, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2014 Volume: 28 Number: 1
APA
Baştaş, K. (2015). Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 28(1), 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG
AMA
1.Baştaş K. Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse. Selcuk J Agr Food Sci. 2015;28(1):1-10. https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG
Chicago
Baştaş, Kubilay. 2015. “Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse”. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 28 (1): 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG.
EndNote
Baştaş K (September 1, 2015) Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 28 1 1–10.
IEEE
[1]K. Baştaş, “Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse”, Selcuk J Agr Food Sci, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Sept. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG
ISNAD
Baştaş, Kubilay. “Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse”. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 28/1 (September 1, 2015): 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG.
JAMA
1.Baştaş K. Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse. Selcuk J Agr Food Sci. 2015;28:1–10.
MLA
Baştaş, Kubilay. “Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse”. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, Sept. 2015, pp. 1-10, https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG.
Vancouver
1.Kubilay Baştaş. Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse. Selcuk J Agr Food Sci [Internet]. 2015 Sep. 1;28(1):1-10. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA22TU98UG