The Effects of Rootstock-Scion Relationships on Yield and Quality in Grapevine cv. Ekşi Kara (Vitis vinifera L.)

Year 2023, Volume: 37 Issue: 2, 248 - 257, 30.08.2023

Zeki Kara , Kevser Yazar , Osman Doğan , Sevde Pınar Sezer Akinci

Abstract

Vineyards are usually established by grafting onto vine rootstocks. Vine rootstocks affect the grafted varieties directly or by environmental factors and by changing the physiology of rootstock and scion varieties. There may be great differences in mineral nutrition of grape rootstocks and grape varieties in grafted and nongrafted combinations. The choice of grape variety and vine rootstock for vineyard ecology is vital for the sustainability of viticulture, as they affect the mineral nutrient balances, biotic and abiotic stress tolerances, yield and product quality of grape rootstocks and grafted varieties, and these change with edaphic factors. This study was carried out in ~20 years old vineyards established with vines on their own roots of Ekşi Kara grape variety (Pollinator is Gök Üzüm), which is most used in production in Konya province, and seedlings grafted onto 41B, 110R and Rupestris du Lot rootstocks. The effects of rootstock and scion nutrition were searched. Yield per vine, cluster weight, cluster number, cluster length and cluster width data showed the highest values from vines on their own roots, while the order of grafted combinations changed according to the trait measured. While the differences between °Brix and total acidity (TA) values of berry were significant (p<0.05), differences in pH and must yield were insignificant in grafted and nongrafted combinations. Nutrient contents of leaf and root samples were different compared to grafted and nongrafted combinations. Since our study area is infested with phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) and rootstock use is obligatory, the order of preference for grapevine rootstocks was 41 B, Rupestris du Lot and 110 R, considering yield and quality characteristics.

Keywords

Grapevine, Grafting, Mineral Nutrition, Own Rooted, Quality, Rootstock Choice, Yield

References

• Arrigo N, Arnold C (2007). Naturalised Vitis rootstocks in Europe and consequences to native wild grapevine. Plos one, 2 (6): e521.
• Bavaresco L, Giachino E, Pezzutto S (2003). Grapevine rootstock effects on lime‐induced chlorosis, nutrient uptake, and source–sink relationships. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26 (7): 1451-1465.
• Chou MY, Li KT (2014). Rootstock and seasonal variations affect anthocyanin accumulation and quality traits of ‘Kyoho’grape berries in subtropical double cropping system. Vitis, 53 (4): 193-199.
• Cirami R, Furkaliev J, Radford R (1994). Summer drought and vine rootstocks. Australian Grapegrower and Winemaker, 145-145.
• Cordeau J (1998). Creation of a vineyard. Grafting the vine and rootstocks. Virus disease elimination, (Editions Féret: Bordeux, France). Corso M, Bonghi C (2014). Grapevine rootstock effects on abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Science Today, 1 (3): 108-113.
• Csikász-Krizsics A, Diófási L (2008). Effects of rootstock-scion combinations on macro elements availability of the vines.Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9 (3): 495-504.
• Ferree D, Cahoon G, Ellis M, Scurlock D, Johns G (1996). Influence of eight rootstocks on the performance of 'White Riesling' and 'Cabernet Franc' over five years. Fruit varieties journal, (USA). 50 (2): 124-130.
• Garcia M, Daverède C, Veigas P P G, Ibrahim H (2001). Effect of the rootstocks on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Négrette, grow hydroponically, I: Potassium, calcium and magnesium nutrition. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 22 (2): 101-103.
• Gawel RR, Ewart AJW, Cirami R (2000). Effect of root stock on must and wine composition and the sensory properties of Cabernet Sauvignon grown at Langhorne Creek. EVISA 15: 67-73. Gregory PJ, Atkinson CJ, Bengough AG, Else MA, Fernández-Fernández F, Harrison RJ, Schmidt S (2013). Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64 (5): 1209-1222.
• Heuvel JEV, Proctor JT, Sullivan JA, Fisher KH (2004). Influence of training/trellising system and rootstock selection on productivity and fruit composition of Chardonnay and Cabernet franc grapevines in Ontario, Canada. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 (3): 253-264.
• Ibacache AG, Sierra CB (2009). Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four table grape varieties. Chilean Journal of Agricultural, 69 (4): 503-508.
• Jin ZX, Sun TY, Sun H, Yue QY, Yao YX (2016). Modifications of ‘Summer Black’grape berry quality as affected by the different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 210: 130-137.
• Koundouras S, Marinos V, Gkoulioti A, Kotseridis Y, van Leeuwen C (2006). Influence of vineyard location and vine water status on fruit maturation of nonirrigated cv. Agiorgitiko (Vitis vinifera L.). Effects on wine phenolic and aroma components. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54 (14): 5077-5086.
• Main, G, Morris J, Striegler K (2002). Rootstock effects on Chardonel productivity, fruit, and wine composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53 (1): 37-40.
• McCraw B, McGlynn W, Striegler RK (2005). Effect of rootstock on growth, yield and juice quality of vinifera, American and hybrid wine grapes in Oklahoma. Grapevine Rootstocks: Current Use, Research, and Application, 61-76.
• Meggio F, Prinsi B, Negri A, Simone Di Lorenzo G, Lucchini G, Pitacco A, Failla O, Scienza A, Cocucci M, Espen L (2014). Biochemical and physiological responses of two grapevine rootstock genotypes to drought and salt treatments. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 20 (2): 310-323.
• Miele A, Rizzon LA (2017). Rootstock-scion interaction: 1. Effect on the yield components of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 39 (1): e-820.
• Ollat N, Tandonnet JP, Lafontaine M, Schultz HR (2001), Short- and long-term effects of three rootstocks on Cabernet Sauvignon vine behaviour and wine quality. Workshop on Rootstocks Performance in Phylloxera Infested Vineyards 617: 95-99.
• Reynolds AG, Wardle DA (2001). Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia. HortTechnology, 11 (3): 419-427.
• Rizk-Alla M, Sabry G, Abd-El-Wahab M (2011). Influence of some rootstocks on the performance of red globe grape cultivar. Journal of American Science, 7 (4): 71-81.
• Ruhl E, Clingeleffer P, Nicholas P, Cirami R, McCarthy M, Whiting J (1988). Effect of rootstocks on berry weight and pH, mineral content and organic acid concentrations of grape juice of some wine varieties. Australian Journal Experimental Agriculture, 28 (1): 119-125.
• Satisha SJ, Somkuwar R, Sharma J, Upadhyay A, Adsule P (2010). Influence of rootstocks on growth yield and fruit composition of Thompson seedless grapes grown in the Pune region of India. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 31 (1): 1-8.
• Serra I, Strever A, Myburgh P, Deloire A (2014). The interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 20 (1): 1-14.
• Tandonnet JP, Cookson S, Vivin P, Ollat N (2010). Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16 (2): 290-300.
• Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR (2010). Impact of rootstock on yield and ion concentrations in petioles, juice and wine of Shiraz and Chardonnay in different viticultural environments with different irrigation water salinity. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16 (1): 243-257.
• Yue Y, Zhu Y, Fan X, Hou X, Zhao C, Zhang S, Wu J (2017). Generation of octoploid switchgrass in three cultivars by colchicine treatment. Industrial Crops and Products, 107: 20-21.