Feed Quality of Sweet Sorghum Grains

Year 2024, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 104 - 111, 30.04.2024

Seyithan Seydoşoğlu , Nizamettin Turan , Kağan Kökten , Selim Özdemir

Abstract

Sweet sorghum crop produces grains at its ear-head which can be utilised as food and feed, produces stalks for the production of syrup, bio-ethanol, bio-diesel, bagasse and green foliage for use as organic fertiliser and excellent animal fodder. Approximately 4000 sweet sorghum cultivars are spread over the globe, providing a broad and varied genetic foundation for the development of highly productive, region-specific cultivars. A study was conducted to assess the grains of selected 10 different sweet sorghum varieties for the feed quality characters. For this aim, ADF, NDF, ADL, DMD, DMI, TDN, RFV, DE and ME values of sweet sorghum grains were determined. As a result of the study, crude ash, CP, ADF, NDF, ADL, DMD, DMI, RFV, TDN, DE and ME values were determined as 0.19-3.74%; 9.03-11.05%; 10.0-24.6%; 24.3-38.0%; 1.07-9.13%; 69.69-81.09%; 3.16-4.94%; 170.5-309.5%; 63.85-74.84%; 3.25-3.74 MJ/kg and 9.85-11.78 Mcal/kg, respectively. Variety "Smith" stands out with its ADF, NDF and ADL characteristics. Gülşeker, USDA-Taiwan and Erdurmuş varieties were significant in terms of CP. Ulusoy variety stands out with DMI, TDN, RFV, DE and ME.

Keywords

Sweet sorghum, Sorghum bicolor, grain quality

References

• Abate F, Mekbib F, Dessalegn Y (2015). GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum Desf.) genotypes in North Western Ethiopia. American J. Exp. Agriculture, 8: 120-129.
• Almodares A, Hadi MR (2009). Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: A review. African journal of Agricultural Research, 4(9): 772-780.
• AOAC. (1990). Official method of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists 15th. Edition pp: 66-88. Azarfa A, Ghorbani G, Asadi Y, Almodares A (1998). Dry matter, organic matter and starch degrability in barley and three low, medium and high tannin sorghum varieties. Agric. Sci, 8: 56-60.
• Black JL (2001). Variation in nutritional value of cereal grains across live stock species. Proceeding of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 13: 22-29.
• Ebadi MR, Pour Reza J, Khorvash M, Nazer Adl K, Almodares A (1997). Nutrient composition and metabolizable energy values of 36 sorghum grain varieties and two types of corn. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 1(2): 67-76.
• Ebadia MR, Sedghib M, Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki R (2019). Accurate prediction of nutritional value of sorghum grain using image analysis. British Poultry Science, 60 (2): 154-160.
• Fahmy AA, Youssef KM, El Shaer HM (2010). Intake and nutritive value of some salt-tolerant fodder grasses for sheep under saline conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. Small Ruminant Research, 91(1): 110-115.
• Farshadfar E, Rashidi M, Jowkar MM, Zali H (2013). GGE Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea genotypes. Europ. J. Exp. Biology, 3(1):417-423.
• Fonnesbeck PV, Clark DH, Garret WN, Speth CF (1984). Predicting energy utilization from alfalfa hay from the Western Region. Proceeding of American Society of Animal Sciences (Western Section), 35: 305-308.
• Genstat (2009). Genstat for windows (12th edition) introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead.
• Issa S (2009). Nutritional value of sorghum for poultry feed in West Africa. Kansas State University, Department of Animal Sciences and Industry College of Agriculture, Doctor of Philosophy, Manhattan, Kansas.
• Ipekeşen S, Akyildiz MI, Aydın A (2023). Diyarbakır ili sulu koşullarında ileri kademe ekmeklik buğday hatlarının verim ve kalite özelliklerinin GGE biplot tekniği ile değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1): 107-123.
• Karaman M (2022). GGE biplot tekniği ve scatter plot matrixi ile ekmeklik buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) genotip, verim ve verim komponentlerinin yorumlanması. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1): 931-937.
• Kökten K, Kaplan M, Akçura M (2017). Farklı çevrelerde yetiştirilen silajlık mısır çeşitlerinin kuru ot verimi ile bazı kalite özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerinin çeşit özellik biplot analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 20: 46-51.
• Macedo WR, Araújo DK, Santos VM, De Camargo e Castro PR, Fernandes GM (2017). Plant growth regulators on sweet sorghum: physiological and nutritional value analysis. Comunicata Scientiae, 8(1): 170-175.
• Moore JE, Undersander DJ (2002). Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. In Proceedings 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium 32: 16-29.
• Murray SC, Sharma A, Rooney WL, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2008). Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Science, 48(6): 2165-2179.
• Mustafa EMA, Mariod AA, Shakak MA (2021). Impact of Monechma ciliatum seeds flour as food supplement on the chemical composition, nutritional value and sensory evaluation of sorghum Kisra. Egypt. J. Food. Sci., 49(1): 97-106.
• Ray RC, Behera S (2011). Bio-fuel agro-industrial production system in sweet sorghum. Sorghum: cultivation, varieties and uses. Edited by TD Pereira. Nova Science Publishers, New York 65-82.
• Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N (1978). Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science, 47: 747-759.
• Rooney LW, Serna-Saldivar SO (2000). In: Sorghum. 2nd Ed. K. Kulp and Ponte J. (ed). Hanbook of Cereal Sci. Tech. New York, NY 149-175.
• Rutto LK, Xu Y, Brandt M, Ren S, Kering MK (2013). Juice, ethanol, and grain yield potential of five sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) cultivars. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 3: 113-118. doi: 10.4236/jsbs.2013.32016.
• Singh S, Bhat BV, Shukla GP, Gaharana D, Anele UY (2017). Nutritional evaluation of different varieties of sorghum stovers in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 227: 42-51.
• Van Soest PJ (1963). The use of detergents in the analysis of fibre feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 46: 829-835.
• Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967). The use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 50: 50-55.
• Vila-Real1 C, Pimenta-Martins A, Maina N, Gomes A, Pinto E (2017). Nutritional value of African indigenous whole grain cereals millet and sorghum. Nutri. Food Sci. Int. J., 4(1): NFSIJ.MS.ID.555628.
• VSN International (2021). Genstat for Windows 21st Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Web page: Genstat.co.uk.
• Yan W, Tinker NA (2006). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(3): 623-645.
• Zhapayev RK, Toderich KN, Popova VV, Tautenov IA, Umirzakov SI, Bekzhanov S, Nurgaliev N, Nurzhanova ShJ, Tajekeeva AK, Iskandarova KA, Karabayev MK (2015). Forage production and nutritional value of sorghum and pearl millet on marginal lands on priaralie. Journal of Arid Land Studies, 25(3): 169.172.