Sugar Beet Breeding II

Year 1997, Volume: 11 Issue: 14, 90 - 105, 31.12.1997

Mustafa Erdal

Abstract

Sugar beet varieties; They can be classified differently according to their production methods, ploidy levels, seed structure of the variety and production purposes. Here we will classify the varieties according to their production methods. These are generally divided into two: 1. Synthetic varieties, 2. Hybrid varieties. Although production methods have nothing to do with seed structure, synthetic varieties are generally multigerm and hybrid varieties are genetic monogerm. In Turkey, around 98% genetic monogerm, 2% technical monogerm and a very small amount of multigerm seeds are planted.

Keywords

Sugar Beet, Synthetic varieties, Hybrid varieties

Supporting Institution

SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Şeker Pancarı Islahı II

Abstract

Şeker pancarı çeşitleri; üretim şekilleri, ploidi kademeleri, çeşidin tohum yapısı ve üretim amaçlarına göre değişik şekilde tasnif edilebilirler. Biz burada çeşitleri üretim şekillerine göre sınıflandıracağız. Bunlar genel olarak ikiye ayrılırlar: 1. Sentetik çeşitler, 2. Hibrid çeşitler. Üretim metodlarının tohum yapısıyla bir ilgisi olmamakla birlikte genellikle, sentetik çeşitler multigerm, hibrid çeşitler ise genetik monogermdir. Türkiye'de % 98 civarında genetik monogerm, % 2 teknik monogerm ve çok az miktarda da multigerm tohum ekilmektedir.

Keywords

ŞEKER, PANCAR, ISLAH

Supporting Institution

SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

References

• Archimowitsch, A., 1948. Control of pollination in sugar beet. Bot. Rew., 15, 613-628.
• Artschwager, E., Starrett, R.C., 1933. The time factor in fertilization and embryo de- velopment in the sugar beet. J. Agric. Res., 47, 823-843.
• Atwod, S.S., 1972. Genetics of pseudo-self compatibilty and its relation to cross in- compatibility in Trifolium repens. J. Agric. Res., 64, 699-709.
• Bandlow, G., 1965. Untersuchungen uber Inzuchtlinien der Zuckerrube und ihre Konbinationseignung. Zuchter, 35, 239-250.
• Brocka, K.K., Geidel, H., 1982. Zur Anwendung von selektionsindizes, insbesondere bei zuckerruben Ber. ARGE Saatzuchtleiter Gumpenstein 33, 175-189.
• Brocka, K.H., 1985. Zucker-Und futterrüben In Hoffmann, W. et al., Lehrbuch der züchtung landwirtschaftlicher kulturpflanzen. Band 2, 245-287. Spezieller Teil. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin-Hamburg. Bordonos, M.G., 1960. Ways of creating monogerm beet (russe) (in plant breed. Abstr., 32, 1969).
• Bosemark, N.O., 1966. On the origin and consequences of aneuplidy in triploid and tetraploid sugar beet. I.I. R.B. Vol., 2, No 1, 10-34.
• Bosemark, N.O., 1967. The effect of aneuploidy on Yield in anisoploid sugar beet va- rieties. II. R. B. Vol. 2, No. 3, 146-161.
• Bosemark, N.O., 1971. Use of Mendelian male sterility in recurrent selection and hy- brid breeding in beets. Report Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section, 127-136.
• Bosemark, N.O., 1972. Studies f cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet Report of an I.I.R.B. Joint study., Vol 5, No. 4, 231-251.
• Bosemark, N.O., 1987. Genetics and Breeding Advanced course on sugar beet Hil- leshög sugar beet AB, Box 302, S-26123, Landskrona-Sweden.
• Bosemark, N.O., 1993. Genetics and breeding. In Cooke, O.A., et al., The Sugar Beet Crop. p: 67-119. Chapman & Hall.
• Brewbaker, H.E., Oldemeyer, R.K., Bush, H. L., 1960. Development of monogerm va- rieties of sugar beets by the backcross method. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Tec- nol., 4, 252-258. Bliss, F.A., Gabelman, WH, 1965. Inheritance of male-sterility in beets. Crop Sci., 5, 403-406.