Türkiye’de Hane Halkları Elektrik Talebininin Belirleyicileri: Sıralı Logit Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de hane halklarının elektrik enerjisi tüketimini etkileyen faktörler araştırılmıştır. Hanenin anket ayındaki elektrik fatura giderinin, hane halkına ait konut özelliklerinin, hane halkı yapısının ve gelirinin elektrik talebini belirleyen etkenler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca bahsedilen bu etkenlerin marjinal etkileri hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada TUİK tarafından yayınlanan Türkiye Hane Halkı Bütçe Anketi 2008 verileri kullanılmış ve sıralı logit modeli uygulanmıştır.

Keywords

• Hane Halkı Tüketimi,Elektrik Talebi,Sıralı Logit Tahmini

Determinants of the Household Electricity Demand in Turkey: Ordered Logit Approach

Abstract

In this study, the factors effecting the electricity consumption of households in Turkey are examined. Monthly electricity cost of the household, characteristics of the house, the structure of the household and its income are identified to be the factors that determine the demand for the electricity. Moreover, marginal effects of those mentioned factors are calculated. In the study, Turkish Household Budget Survey 2008 data published by Turkish Statistics Institute are used, and ordered logit model is employed

Keywords

• Household Consumption,Electricity Demand,Ordered Logit Estimation

References

1. AKIN E(2010) Hanehalkları Elektrik Talebi Basılmmaış Yüksek Lisans
2. Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli. APERGIS N. ve PAYNE J.(2011) Edynamic panel study of economic development and the electricity,consumption-growth nexus, Energy Economics, 3, 770-781
3. ANDERSON, B.ve DAMSGAARD, N.; (1999), “Residential Electricity
4. Use-Demand Estimation Using Swedish Micro Data”, Paper Presented at the 22nd Annual İnternational Conference, Haziran , Roma. CIARRETA, A., ZARRAGA, A., 2010. Economic growth–electricity consumption causality in 12 European countries: a dynamic panel data approach. Energy Policy 38, 3790–3796
5. ERDOĞDU, E.; (2007), “Electricity Demand Analysis Using Cointegration and ARMA Modelling: A Case Study of Turkey”, Energy Policy, , ss. 1129-1146.
6. FILIPPINI, M. ve PACHAURI, S.; (2004), “Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households”, Energy Policy, No:32, pp.429–
7. FISHER, F. M., KAYSEN, C. A. (1962). A Study in Econometrics: The Demand for Electricity in United States, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
8. FU, V.; (1998), “Estimating Generalized Ordered Logit Models”, Stata

9. Technical Bulletin 44, 27-30, İn Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, Vol.8, 160-164, Stata Press, Collage Station, TX. FUKS, M. ve SALAZAR, E.; (2008), “Applying models for ordinal logistic regression to the analysis of household electricity consumption classes in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil”, Energy Economics, Vol.30, pp. 1692, Science Direct.
10. FUNG, A., AYDINALP, M. ve UĞURSAL, V.; (1999), “Econometric models for Major Residential Energy and Uses”, Working Paper, CREEDAC- Nisan 1999.
11. HALICIOĞLU, F.; (2007), “Residential Electricity Demand Dynamics in
12. Turkey”, Energy Economics, 2 (29), ss.199-210. HALVORSEN, B. ve LARSEN, B.; (1999), “Factors Determining the Growth in Residential Electricity Consumption”, Economic Survey, p.3.
13. HAWDON, D.; (1992), “Energy Demand-Evidence and Expectations”
14. Surrey University Press, London. HOLTEDAHL, P., JOUTZ, F.L. (2004). Residential electricity demand in
15. Taiwan, EnergyEconomics, No:26, pp. 201–224. HOUTHAKKER (1951) Some Calculations of Electricity Consumption in
16. GreatBritain, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 114, Part III, pp.249-270. JUNG, T.Y.; (1993), “Ordered Logit for residential electricity demand in
17. Korea”, Energy Economics 15 (3), 205-209. KARAGÖL E. , ERBAYKAL E. VE ERTUĞRUL H. M. (2007) Türkiye’de
18. Ekonomik Büyüme İle Elektrik Tüketimi İlişkisi: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 8, 72-80. LEE, R.S., SINGH, N. (1994). Patterns in Residential Gas and Electricity
19. Consumption:An Econometric Analysis, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 12, No.2, pp.233-241, American Statistical Association. LENZEN, M., DEY, C. ve FORAN, B.; (2004), “Energy requirements of
20. Sydney households”, Ecological Economics, No:49, pp.375– 399. LIU, I. ve AGRESTI, A.; (2005), “The Analysis of Ordered Categorical
21. Data: An Overview and A Survey of Recent Devolopments”, TEST (1), 1-73. LOUW, K., CONRADIE, B., HOWELLS M., DEKENAH, M. (2008).
22. Determinants of electricity income African households, Energy Policy No:36, pp.2812-2818. demand for newly electrified low
23. MCCULLAGH, P.; (1980), “Regression Models for Ordinal Data (with discussion)”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 42 (2), 109-142.
24. NESBAKKEN, R.; (1999), “Price sensitivity of Residential Energy
25. Consumption in Norway”, Energy Economics, No.21 (6), pp. 493- ÖZER, H.; (2004), Nitel Değişkenli Ekonometrik Modeller: Teori ve Bir
26. Uygulama, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara. PETERSON, B. ve HARREL, Jr. F.R.; (1990), “Partial Proportional Odds
27. Models for Ordinal Responce Variables”, Applied Statistics 39 (2), 217. VAAGE, N.; (2000), “Heating Technology and Energy Use: A Discrete
28. Continious Choice Approach to Norwegian Household Energy Demand”, Energy Economics, No.22, pp.649-666. WESTLEY, G.D.; (1992), “New Directions of Econometric Modelling of
29. Energy Demand: With Applications to Latin America”, İnter- American Devolopment Bank, Aralık, Washington. WILLIAMS, R.; (2006a), “Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional
30. Odds Models For Ordinal Dependent Variables”, The Stata Journal, Vol.6(1), 58-82. WILLIAMS, R.; (2006b), “Review of Regressions for Categorical
31. Dependent Variables Using Stata”, Second Ed., by Long and Freese in Stata Journal, vol.6, No:2, 273-278. YOO, H. S.; (2005), “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth
32. Evidence from Korea”, Energy Policy, No.33, pp.1627-1632.
33. YOO, H.S., LEE, J.S. ve KWAK J.S.; (2007), “Estimation of residential electricity demand function in Seoul by correction for sample selection bias”, Energy Policy, No:35, pp.5702–5707.
34. Ek-2 : Sınıf 1 x 2-4 için PPOM Modeli STATA Çıktısı Elektrik Tüketimi Coef. Prob rgelir 2460906 KON_ALAN 1756351 000 KONUTTIP MULKIYET 2075436 HHB 1705788 000 KIRKNTKD 4617754 YAS 0320065 004 OTUR_SUR .1502913 006 DOG_GAZ 1640883 065 SAUNA 333048 018 SICAKSU 2360211 002 BILGISAY TELEVIZ LCDTELE UYDUANT 13073 BUZDOLAB DERINDON BULASIK M_FIRIN 2637473 CAMASIR 3136055 KLIMA _cons 2.515531
35. Ek 3. Sınıf 1-2 x 3-4 için PPOM Modeli STATA Çıktısı elektrik Coef. P>z rgelir 15261 000 KON_ALAN 1756351 000 KONUTTIP 1394829 026 MULKIYET 2075436 000 HHB 1705788 KIRKNTKD 4617754 000 YAS 0320065 004 OTUR_SUR .1502913 DOG_GAZ .2109745 004 SAUNA 333048 SICAKSU 2360211 002 BILGISAY 4187124 TELEVIZ 0970148 021 LCDTELE 3382304 001 UYDUANT 13073 005 BUZDOLAB 4796257 005 DERINDON 5442754 000 BULASIK 3353438 000 M_FIRIN 2637473 CAMASIR 3136055 006 KLIMA _cons 4.500163
36. Ek 4. Sınıf 1-3 x 4 için PPOM Modeli STATA Çıktısı elektrik Coef. P>z rgelir KON_ALAN KONUTTIP MULKIYET 2075436 HHB KIRKNTKD YAS OTUR_SUR .1502913 DOG_GAZ .9103203 SAUNA SICAKSU 2360211 BILGISAY 0949597 383 TELEVIZ 0970148 021 LCDTELE 3382304 001 UYDUANT 13073 005 BUZDOLAB 4796257 005 DERINDON 5442754 000 BULASIK 3353438 000 M_FIRIN 2637473 002 CAMASIR 3136055 006 KLIMA 4334744 _cons 6.61258 000