Yaşlı Çalışanların İkiz (Yeşil ve Dijital) Dönüşüme Adil Geçişi: Ters Mentorluk Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma

Öz

Son yıllarda ekonomide yaşanan dijitalleşme ve sürdürülebilirliğin bütünleştirici ve sinerjik etkisini vurgulayan yeni kurumsal değişimler “ikiz dönüşüm” olarak ifade edilmeye başlanmıştır. Ancak ikiz dönüşüm süreci birtakım yeni fırsatların yanı sıra, bazı ekonomik ve sosyal zorlukları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu anlamda, geçiş süreci iyi yönetilemezse, ürün piyasasında bazı işyerleri ve sektörler daha kırılgan hale gelebilir ve işgücü piyasasında sosyal eşitsizlikler daha da derinleştirebilir. Bu nedenle, ikiz dönüşüm süreci boyunca dezavantajlı gruplara, özellikle yeni teknolojilere uyum sağlamakta zorlanan yaşlı çalışanlara, yönelik adil geçiş politikaları ve stratejileri geliştirmek hayati önem taşımaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, Koleksiyon Mobilya AŞ’nin Tekirdağ fabrikasında çalışan 8 genç ve 10 yaşlı çalışanla gerçekleştirilen mülakatlardan toplanan verileri kullanarak, ikiz (dijital ve yeşil) dönüşümün yaşlı çalışanlar üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini azaltmada ters mentorluğun uygulanabilir bir adil geçiş stratejisi olup olamayacağını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları, ters mentorluk uygulamalarının yaşlı çalışanların ikiz dönüşüme adil geçişini kolaylaştıran iyi bir uygulama örneği olabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu süreçte adil geçiş stratejileri eylem planlarına ters mentorluk uygulamalarının dahil edilmesi, yeni teknolojilere uyum sürecinde ortaya çıkabilecek sosyal eşitsizlikleri önemli ölçüde azaltabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İkiz dönüşüm
• adil geçiş
• yaşlı istihdamı
• ters mentorluk

Just Transition of Older Employees to Twin (Green and Digital) Transformation: A Qualitative Study on Reverse Mentoring

Öz

Recently, a new institutional change highlighting the complementary and synergic effects of digitalisation and sustainability on the economy has begun to be called “the twin transformation”. However, the twin transformation process brings with it a number of new opportunities, as well as some economic and social challenges. In this sense, if the transition process is not managed well, some businesses and sectors in the goods market may become more vulnerable, and social inequalities in the labour market may deepen further. It is therefore essential to develop just transition policies and strategies aimed at disadvantaged groups—particularly older workers who struggle to adapt to new technologies—during the twin transition process. In this context, this study aims to examine whether reverse mentoring would be a viable fair transition strategy for mitigating the negative effects of the twin (digital and green) transition on older workers, using data collected from interviews with 8 young and 10 older workers at Koleksiyon Mobilya AŞ’s Tekirdağ factory. The results indicate that reverse mentoring practices can be a good practice facilitating the just transition of older workers towards the twin transformation. In this process, integrating reverse mentoring practices into just transition strategies and action plans can significantly reduce social inequalities which arise from technological adaptation challenges.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Twin transformation
• just transition
• older employment
• reverse mentoring

Kaynakça

1. Al Hashimi, S. (2021). The Role of Empowering Mature and Older People’s Usage of Digital Media in Enhancing Intergenerational Communication and Family Relationships in Bahrain. Gerontechnology. 20(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.432.03.
2. Aloisi, A. (2025). Integrating the EU Twin (Green and Digital) Transition Synergies, Tensions and Pathways for the Future of Work. European Commission, Seville, JRC140964.
3. Arslan, E. (2022). Nitel Araştırmalarda Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 51. 395-407.
4. Balliester, T. and Elsheikhi, A. (2018). The Future of Work: A Literature Review. ILO Research Department, Working Paper No. 29.
5. Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 22. https://doi. org/10.1177/16094069231183620.
6. Bowen, A. (2012). ‘Green’ Growth, ‘Green’ Jobs and Labour Markets. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 88, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Working Paper No. 76.
7. Breck, B. M., Dennis, C. B. and Leedahl, S. N. (2018). Implementing Reverse Mentoring to Address Social Isolation Among Older Adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 61(5). 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1448030.
8. Breiter, K., Crome, C., Oberländer, A. M. and Schnaak, F. (2024). Dynamic Capabilities for the Twin Transformation Climb: A Capability Maturity Model. Information Systems Frontiers. 26. 2205–2226 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10520-y.

9. Breque, M., De Nul, L. and Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0 – Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry. Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407.
10. Browne, I. (2021). Exploring Reverse Mentoring; “win-win” Relationships in the Multi-Generational Workplace. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 15. 246-259.
11. Burdett, J. (2014), Reverse Mentoring Becomes a Two-Way Street: Case Study of a Mentoring Project for IT Competence. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. 28(3). 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-01-2014-0001.
12. Chang, C-H., Xu, H. and Xie, B. (2023). Aging Workforce in the Context of Technological Advancements: Toward a Socio-Ecological Model Work. Aging and Retirement. 9(4). 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waad025.
13. Christmann, A. S., Crome, C., Graf-Drasch, V. and Oberländer, A. M. (2024). The Twin Transformation Butterfly. Business and Information Systems Engineering. 66. 489–505. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12599-023-00847-2.
14. Chun, H. K. (2024). Falling Through the Cracks?: Skilling, Reskilling and Upskilling for Job Transitions. Rethinking Economic Transformation for Sustainable and Inclusive Development: Turning a Corner? (Editörler: Elina Scheja ve Kee Beom Kim) Edward Elgar Publishing. (205-234).
15. Clarke, A. J., Burgess, A., Van Diggele, C. and Mellis, C. (2019). The Role of Reverse Mentoring in Medical Education: Current Insights. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 26(10). 693- 701. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S179303.
16. Çelik, H., Başer Baykal, N. ve Kılıç Memur, H. N. (2020). Nitel Veri Analizi ve Temel İlkeleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 8(1). 379-406. doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.16m.
17. Dantas, T. E. T., de-Souza, E. D., Destro, I. R. Hammes, G., Rodriguez, C. M. T. and Soares, S. R. (2021). How the Combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 Can Contribute Towards Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 26. 213- 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.005.
18. Elliott, L. and Setyowati, A. B. (2020). Toward a Socially Just Transition to Low Carbon Development: The Case of Indonesia. Asian Affairs. 51:4. 875-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068 374.2020.1835000.
19. Fasbender, U., Gerpott, F. H. and Rinker, L. (2023). Getting Ready for the Future, is it Worth it? A Dual Pathway Model of Age and Technology Acceptance at Work. Work, Aging and Retirement. 9(4). 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac035.
20. Ferguson, P. (2015). The Green Economy Agenda: Business as Usual or Transformational Discourse? Environmental Politics. (24). 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.919748.
21. Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A., Zrałek, M. and Ostrowska, S. (2023). Digital Exclusion of Seniors as a Barrier to Leading a Productive Life in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Optimum Economic Studies. 1(111). 55-67.
22. Frey, C. B. and Osborne, M. A. (2017). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 114. 254–280. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
23. Gonzalez Vazquez, I., Mariscal De Gante Martin, A., Hakansta, C., Strauss-Raats, P., Stahl, C., Ferm, L., Grande, R., Vallejo, A., Lind, R. and Lowstedt, L. (2025). Work in the Green and Digital Transition: Insights From Case Studies in Spain and Sweden. Seville: European Commission.
24. Görmüş, A. (2024). Yeşil Ekonomiye ‘Adil Geçiş’ İçin İstihdam Politikaları. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 19(42). 33-60. https://doi.org/10.56524/msydergi.1437738.
25. Görmüş, A. (2026). Teknoloji Odaklı Endüstri 4.0’dan İnsan Merkezli Endüstri 5.0’a Çalışmanın Geleceği. İzmir İktisat Dergisi. 41(1). 175-200. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1646027.
26. Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability Through Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review for Research Guidance. Journal of Business Research. 148: 456–471. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003.
27. Hammarén, M., Jarva, E., Mikkonen, K., Kääriäinen, M. and Kanste, O. (2022). Scoping Review of Intergenerational Learning Methods for Developing Digital Competence and Their Outcomes. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare. 14(4). 364-379.
28. Henner, T. (2009). An Intergenerational Approach to Internet Training: Student-Led Outreach to Promote Seniors’ Use of Internet Health Resources. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. 13(4). 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15398280903340822.
29. ILO and OECD (2012). Sustainable Development, Green Growth and Quality Employment. Guadalajara: Meeting of G20 Labour and Employment Ministers. 1-13.
30. Khattak, S. R., Rahman, S. U., Saleem, Z., Fayaz, M., Fayaz, M. and Iqbal, K. (2021). Reverse Mentoring: Improving Technological Skills of Older Peers: A Moderated Mediation Approach. Multicultural Education. 7(4). 248. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4718684.
31. Kişi, N. (2018). Yenilikçi Bir Mentorluk Yaklaşımı: Tersine Mentorluk. The Journal of International Scientific Researches. 3(3). 205-213.
32. Koleksiyon (2026). Koleksiyon. [https://www.koleksiyondesign.com/tr/hakkinda/]. (Erişim: 15 Mart 2026).
33. Leedahl, S. N., Brasher, M. S., Estus, E., Breck, B. M., Dennis, C. B. and Clark, S. C. (2018). Implementing an Interdisciplinary Intergenerational Program Using the Cyber Seniors Reverse Mentoring Model within Higher Education. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education. 71-89. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2018.1428574.
34. Leek, J., and Rojek, M. (2021). ICT Tools in Breaking Down Social Polarization and Supporting Intergenerational Learning: Cases of Youth and Senior Citizens. Interactive Learning Environments. 31(6). 3682–3697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1940214.
35. Lo Buono, D. L., Leedahl, S. N. and Maiocco, E. (2020). Teaching Technology to Older Adults: Modalities Used by Student Mentors and Reasons for Continued Program Participation. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 46(1). 14-20. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20191118-02.
36. McCauley, D. and Heffron, R. (2018). Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice. Energy Policy. 119. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.
37. Merino-Saum, A., Clement, J., Wyss, R. and Baldi, M. G. (2020). Unpacking the Green Economy Concept: a Quantitative Analysis of 140 Definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242. 118339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118339.
38. Murphy, W. M. (2012). Reverse Mentoring at Work: Fostering Cross-Generational Learning and Developing Millennial Leaders. Human Resources Management. 51: 549-573. https://doi. org/10.1002/hrm.21489.
39. OECD (2025). OECD Employment Outlook 2025: Can We Get Through the Demographic Crunch? Paris: OECD Publishing.
40. Oh, E. and Reeves, T. C. (2013). Generational Differences and the Integration of Technology in Learning, Instruction and Performance. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, (Editörler: J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jan Elen and M.J Bishop. (819- 828). New York: Springer.
41. O’Neill, K. and Gibbs, D. (2016). Rethinking Green Entrepreneurship – Fluid Narratives of the Green Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 48(9). 1727-1749. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X16650453.
42. Özen, S. ve Özbek, Ç. (2017). Çalışma Yaşamında Yaşlılık: Yaşlı Çalışanlar ve İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları. Çalışma ve Toplum. 547-572. https://izlik.org/JA77UF37ZT.
43. Perovic, B. (2016). Defining Youth in Contemporary National Legal and Policy Frameworks Across Europe: Analytical Paper. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
44. Ragins, B. R., Miller, J. S. and Kotton, J. L. (2017). Marginal Mentoring: The Effects of Type of Mentor, Quality of Relationship and Program Design on Work and Career Attitudes. Academy of Management Journal. 1177-1194. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556344.
45. Robert Kaše, T. S. (2019). Skill Development in Reverse Mentoring: Motivational Processes of Mentors and Learners. Human Resource Management. 58. 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21932.
46. Sargent, T. (2023). Twin Transitions and Inclusiveness. OECD Global Forum on Productivity. Santiago, Chile. [https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/global-forum-onproductivity/events/chile-2023/Day-2-Session-5-Twin-transitions-and-inclusiveness-Sargent.pdf]. (Erişim: 20 Mayıs 2026).
47. Seguí, F. L., de San Pedro, M., Verges, E. A., Algado, S. S. and Cuyàs, F. G. (2019). An Intergenerational Information and Communications Technology Learning Project to Improve Digital Skills: User Satisfaction Evaluation. JMIR Aging. 9;2(2):e13939. https://doi.org/10.2196/13939.
48. Srivastava, S. and Shyam K. C. (2022). Reverse Mentoring as Digital Pathway to Growth: A Frameworkbased Approach. Indian Journal of Training and Development. 52(1). 69-76.
49. Solem, P. E., Hauge, L., Hellevik, T. and Herlofson, K. (2023). Older Workers and Work Exit Preferences in a Digitalized Working Life. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. 14(S12). 71-86. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.140206.
50. Şoitu, D., Krekula, C. and Lakomý, M. (2026). Ageing and Digitalisation of the Working Life: An Introduction. Older Workers in a Digital Era (Editörler: Clary Krekula, Daniela Şoitu, Martin Lakomý). (3-23) International Perspectives on Aging. vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-032-19034-5_1.
51. Şoitu, D., Görgényi, I.M., Ferenczi, A. and Flynn, M. (2026). The Mirrors of Digital Gender Working Balance. İçinde: Older Workers in a Digital Era (Editörler: Clary Krekula, Daniela Şoitu, Martin Lakomý) (47-69) International Perspectives on Aging. Vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-032-19034-5_3.
52. Taneva, S. K., Arnold, J. and Nicolson, R. (2016). The Experience of Being an Older Worker in an Organization: A Qualitative Analysis. Work, Aging and Retirement. 2(4). 396–414. https://doi. org/10.1093/workar/waw011.
53. Trivedi A. and Juyal S. A. (2025). Reverse Mentoring in the AI Era: How Gen Z Can Reshape Leadership Learning in Digitally Evolving Organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi. org/10.1108/DLO-06-2025-0209.
54. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2025). 2024 Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi Mikro Verisi. Ankara.
55. UNEP, ILO, IOE and ITUC (2008). Green Jobs: Towards Decent Work in a Sustainable, LowCarbon World Report. (Washington DC.: Worldwatch Institute).
56. Uyanık, Y. (2017). Yaşlılık, Yaşlanan Nüfus ve Sosyal Politika. İş ve Hayat. 3(5). 67-100. [https:// izlik.org/JA24PH23WD].
57. Wang, X. and Lo, K. (2021). Just Transition: A Conceptual Review. Energy Research and Social Science. 82(3). 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291.
58. Wanka, A., Urbaniak, A., Oswald, F. and Kolland, F. (2023). Digital Transformations in Ageing Societies. Z Gerontol Geriat. 56(3). 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-023-02186-z.
59. Yıldırım, Y. Z. ve Atay, E. (2021). Türkiye’de Yaşlanan İşgücü ve İşgücü Piyasasında Karşılaştığı Sorunlar. Değişen Dünyada Sosyal Politika (Editörler: Eyüp Sabri Kala, Tuncay Güloğlu). 165-186. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi