Türkiye’de Yapay Zekâ Eğitiminin Mevcut Durumu: Lisans ve Ön Lisans Programları Üzerine Bir İnceleme
Abstract
Keywords
Yapay Zekâ, Yapay Zekâ Mühendisliği, Veri Mühendisliği, Makine Öğrenmesi
References
- Alajmi, Q., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Abuali, A. (2020). Smart learning gateways for Omani HEIs towards educational technology: Benefits, challenges and solutions. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 4(1), 12–17.
- Baker, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Bringing it all together. In OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain, and robotics (pp. 43–56). OECD Publishing.
- Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
- Copeland, B. J. (2025). History of artificial intelligence (AI). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-artificial-intelligence/Connectionism
- Cristianini, N. (2016). Intelligence reinvented. New Scientist, 232(3097), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(16)31992-3
- Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
- EdTech. (2020, January). Successful AI examples in higher education that can inspire our future. EdTech Magazine. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2020/01/successful-ai-examples-higher-education-can-inspire-our-future
- Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://insightassessment.com/unlock-resources/
- Frank, M. R. (2019, 1 October). The evolution of AI research and the study of its social implications. Medium. https://medium.com/mit-media-lab/the-evolution-of-ai-research-and-the-study-of-its-social-implications-4a9598b3d7db
- Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
