Transferability of barley and wheat EST-microsatellite markers in some Poaceae members
Abstract
The cross species transferability of barley and wheat microsatellite markers developed from expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries constructed under Fusarium infection conditions were detected among 17 species including 8 from Aegilops, 6 from Triticum, Zea mays, Avena sativa, Oryza sativa.
Transferability rates of barley microsatellite primer pairs ranged from 29% to 100%. A maximum of 100% cross-genera transferability noticed with Avena followed by Zea (92%), Triticum (83%), Aegilops (68%), and Oryza (8%). Primer pairs were highly transferable within species of Triticum (100% in T. turgidum durum durum, 92% in T. turgidum durum dicoccon and T. monococcum aegilopoides, 83% in T.timopheevii timopheevii and T. turgidum dicoccoides, 67% in T. timopheevii armeniacum). Only one primer pairs (contig624) showed 100 % cross-species/genera amplification in all materials studied.
Considering wheat microsatellites, the microsatellite primer pairs were highly transferable within species of Triticum (ranged from %100 to %70) and but low transferable in the allied cereals (15% in Avena, 50% in Oryza, 45% in Zea, 60% in Hordeum). Two primer pairs have shown transferability only in some Triticum species, while two others showed amplication only in species of Aegilops and Triticum. Only one primer pairs showed 100 % cross-species/genera amplification in all materials studied.
This higher cross-species transferability of EST microsatellite markers indicated a high level of conservation of DNA sequences belonging to the transcribed region of the genome and its suitability in comparative genome mapping, genetic diversity and phylogenetics analysis.
Keywords
References
- Badaeva ED, Dedkova OS, Gay G, Pukhalskyi VA, Zelenin AV,Bernard S, Bernard M, 2007. Chromosomal rearrangements in wheat: their types and distribution, Genome, 50: 907
- Bennetzen JL, Ma J, 2003. The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of genomic sequence analysis, Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol., 6: 128–133.
- Kalia KR, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK, 2010. Microsatellite markers: an over¬view of the recent progress in plants, Euphytica, 177: 309–334.
- Mardis ER, 2008. The impact of next–generation sequencing technology on genetics, Trends Genet., 24: 133–141.
- Eujayl I, Sorrells M, Baum M., Wolters P, Powel W, 2002. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat, Theor. Appl. Genet., 104: 399–407.
- Sharopova N, McMullen MD, Schultz L, Schroeder S, Sanchez-Villeda H, Gardiner J, Bergstrom D, Houchins K, Melia-Hancock S, Musket T, Duru N, Polacco M, Edwards K, Ruff T, Register JC, Brouwer C, Thompson R, Velasco R, Chin E, Lee M, Woodman-Clikeman W, Long MJ, Liscum E, Cone K, Davis G, Coe EH, 2002. Development and mapping of SSR markers for maize, Plant Mol. Biol., 48(5-6): 463-81.
- Varshney RK, Thiel T, Stein N, Langridge P, Graner A, 2002. In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species, Cell Mol Biol Lett., 7: 537–546.
- Chen H, Li L, Wei X, Li S, Lei T, Hu H, Wang H, Zhang X, 2005. Development, chromosome location and genetic mapping of EST-SSR markers in wheat, Chin. Sci. Bull., 20: 2328–2336.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
HÜLYA Sipahi
SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-7925-2766
Türkiye
Yeliz Aslan
This is me
SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye
Ayşen Yumurtacı
This is me
MARMARA UNIV
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 31, 2016
Submission Date
October 3, 2016
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 1 Number: 2
