Seasonal Variation in Phytoplanktonic Organisms and Its Relationships with Certain Physicochemical Parameters of Şahin Stream (Ida Mountain, Balıkesir)

Year 2016, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 9 - 17, 31.12.2016

Kemal Çelik

Abstract

In 2012 phytoplankton samples collected seasonally from Şahin Stream at a station near Balıkesir-Çanakkale highway. A Total of 33 species were identified and the highest density. Bacillariophyta members were dominant throughout the year and they reached 816 individuals M-3 in the spring, 504 individuals M-3 in the winter, 450 individuals M-3 in the fall and 422 individuals M-3 in the summer. Chlorophyta reached 43 individuals M-3v in the spring, 21 individuals M-3 in the winter fall and 17 individuals M-3 in the summer. Cyanobacteria reached 37 in the spring, 14 individuals M-3 in the summer, 12 individuals M-3 in the fall and 2 individuals M-3 in the winter. Euglenophyta membes reached 13 individuals M-3 in the summer and 3 individuals M-3 in the spring The species of Bacillariophyta that were dominant throughout the year, Luticola cohnii, Nitzschia palea, Cymbella affinis, Stauroneis phoenicenteron and Scenedesmus quadrispina from Chlorophyta showed high correlation with total nitrogen (TN), Parlibellus cruciculus ve Epithemia sorex correlated to conductivity, Nitzschia recta, Nitzschia acicularis and Pinnularia major showed high correlation with silica (Si) and dissolved oxygen. The other dominant species did not show significant correlation with any measured physicochemical parameters.

Şahin Deresi (Kazdağı, Balıkesir) Fitoplanktonik Organizmalarının Mevsimsel Değişimi ve Bazı Fizikokimyasal Parametrelerle İlişkileri

Abstract

2012 yıllında Şahin Deresi Çanakkale Balıkesir Karayoluna
yakın bir noktadan mevsimsel olarak fitoplankton örnekleri alındı. Toplamda 45
tür tespit edilip fitoplankton yoğunluğu ilkbahar mevsiminde en yüksek seviyede
(596 birey M-3) ölçüldü. Bacillariophyta (diyatome) üyeleri yıl
boyunca baskınlık gösterip toplam yoğunluğun %94’ünü kışın, %87’sini sonbaharda,
%86’sını ilkbaharda ve %84’ünü yazın oluşturdu. Chlorophyta toplam yoğunluğun %7’sini
ilkbaharda ve sonbaharda oluşturdu. Cyanobacteria sonbahar döneminde toplam
yoğunluğun %6’sını yaz ve ilkbahar dönemlerinde ise %5’ini oluşturdu. Bacillariophytadan
yıl boyu baskınlık gösteren türlerden Luticola
cohnii, Nitzschia palea, Cymbella affinis, Stauroneis phoenicenteron ve
Chlorophytadan Scenedesmus quadrispina toplam
azot (TN) ile, Parlibellus cruciculus
ve Epithemia sorex iletkenlik ile, Nitzschia recta, Nitzschia acicularis ve Pinnularia major silisyum (Si) ve çözünmüş
oksijen ile yüksek korelasyon gösterdiler. Diğer baskın türler ölçülen herhangi
bir parametre ile önemli derecede korelasyon Göstermedi.

Keywords

Fitoplankton, Fizikokimyasal Parametreler, Şahin Deresi

References

• [1] Yıldız K, 1987. Diatoms of the Porsuk River, Turkey, Turk. J. Biol., 11: 162 -182.
• [2] Altuner Z, 1988. A Study of the Diatom Flora of the Aras River Turkey, Nowa Hedwigia, 46: 255-263.
• [3] Altuner Z, Gürbüz H, 1990. Karasu (Fırat) Nehri’nin Epilitik ve Epifitik Algleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, X. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi Botanik Bildirileri, 193-203. Erzurum.
• [4] Eloranta P, Kwandrans J, 2004. Indicator value of freshwater red algae in running waters for water quality assessment, International Journal of oceanography and Hydrobiology, 32: 47-54.
• [5] Barlas M, 1995. Akarsu Kirlenmesinin Biyolojik ve Kimyasal Yönden Değerlendirilmesi ve Kriterleri, Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi II. Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Haziran 1995, Erzurum.
• [6] Piirsoo K, Pall P, Tuvikene A, Viik M, Vilbaste S, 2010. Assessment of water quality in a large lowland river (Narva, Estonia/Russia) using a new Hungarian potamoplanktic method, Estonian Journal of Ecology, 59: 243-258
• [7] Henderson DM, Prentice H, 1969. Contributions to the bryophyte flora of Turkey, VIII, Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 29: 235-262.
• [8] Çelik K, Sevindik TO, 2012. Kazdağı Milli Parkı Dereleri Fitoplanktonu Üzerine Bir Çalışma, III. Ulusal Kazdağıları Sempozyumu. 24-26 Mayıs, Balıkesir.
• [9] Huber –Pestalozzi G, 1969. Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 4. Teil, Euglenophycean, Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller).
• [10] Huber–Pestalozzi G, 1982. Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 8. Teil, 1.Halffe Conjugatophyceae Zygnematales und Desmidiales (excl. Zygnemataceae), Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller).
• [11] John D M, Whitton BA, Brook AJ, 2003. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: An identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae, The Natural History Museum and The British Phycological Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [12] Sims PA, 1996. An Atlas of British Diatoms, Bristol: Biopress Ltd.
• [13] Komárek J, Anagnostidis K, 2008. Cyanoprokaryota, 2. Teil/Part 2: Oscillatoriales, Süswasser Flora von Mitteleuropa (Freshwater Flora of Central Europe), Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [14] Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG, 1990. The Diatoms: Morphology and Biology of the Genera, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [15] ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Section on permutation methods, Microcomputer Power.Ithaca, NY, USA, (2002).
• [16] Fuentes MS, Meseck SL, Wikfors GH, Khan-Bureau D, 2015. Silicon limitation induces colony formation in the benthic diatom Nitzschia cf. pusilla (Bacillariales, Bacillariophyceae), Diatom Research, 30: 87-92.
• [17] Bellinger BJ, Cocquyt C, O’Reilly CM, 2009. Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams, Hydrobiologia, 573: 75-87.
• [18] Paidere J, Gruberts D, Skute A, Druvietis I, 2007. Impact of two different flood pulses on planktonic communities of the largest floodplain lakes of the Daugava River (Latvia), Hydrobiologia, 592: 303314, (2007).
• [19] Besse-Lototskaya A, Verdonschota PFM, Coste M, Vijver BV, 20111. Evaluation of European diatom trophic indices, Ecological Indicators, 11: 456–467.