Arendt and Rancière: Freedom, Emancipation, and Struggle

Year 2025, Volume: 34 Issue: 2, 253 - 266, 09.10.2025

Seval Ünlü

https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2025.34.11610053

Abstract

Arendt’s and Rancière’s political views are apt to be treated as the opposite. Arendt believes that politics is separate from other human activities and autonomous from them. On the contrary, Rancière believes that politics has no specificity in terms of realm, issue, or subject. However, the tension between them points to some boundaries in contemporary political theory regarding expectations from politics and the quest to reappropriate it. Their conception of the social set limits political action in different ways. For Arendt, the meaning of politics is freedom, but she does not relate it to the struggle against the current inequalities. For Rancière, politics is a struggle for emancipation that verifies equality, but he separates it from new beginnings for the future. In this article, we analyze the positions of both theorists in contemporary political theory, which have similar boundaries despite the presence of some opposite themes. Thus, the purpose of this article is to examine, through a dialog between two thinkers, the connection between politics as freedom in Arendt and as emancipation in Rancière, focusing on the struggle to transform given unequal conditions.

Keywords

Plurality , Emancipation , Freedom , The social , Dissensus

References

• Arendt, H. (1962). The Origins of Totalitarianism . Cleveland, New York: Meridian Books. google scholar
• Arendt, H. (1966-67). Never-Before-Published Hannah Arendt on What Freedom and Revolution Really Mean. Haziran 2017 tarihinde Liter-ary Hub: http://lithub.com/never-before-published-hannah-arendt-on-what-freedom-and-revolution-really-mean/ adresinden alındı google scholar
• Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: A Harvest Book Harcourt Brace & Company. google scholar
• Arendt, H. (1990). On Revolution . London: Penguin Books. google scholar
• Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
• Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics. (J. Kohn, Dü.) New York: Schocken Books. google scholar
• Canovan, M. (1978). The Contradictions of Hannah Arendt's Political Thought. Political Theory, 6(1), 5-26. google scholar
• Dardot, P. (2014). Marx 1843: L'emancipation humaine et la question de la democratie. Çite (59 Marx politique), 19-32. google scholar
• d'Entreves, M. P. (1994). The Polltlcal Phllosophy of Hannah Arendt (1994). London, New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Fischbach, F. (2011). Les mesaventures de la critique. Reflexions â partir de Jacques Ranciere. Actuel Marx, 140-147. google scholar
• Fischbach, F. (2013). Comment penser philosophiquement le social ? Cahiers philosophiques(132), 7-20. google scholar
• Fischbach, F. (2015). Le sens du soclal: la pulssance de la cooperatlon. Montreal: Lux Editeur. google scholar
• Jay, M. (1992). "The Aesthetic Ideology" as Ideology; or, What Does It Mean to Aestheticize Politics? Cultural Critique(21), 41-61. google scholar
• Jay, M. (2005). Songs of Experlence: Modern Amerlcan and European Varlatlons on a Unlversal Theme . University of California Press. Marx, K. (2010). Marx & Engels Collected Works Volume 37- Capltal Volume III. (M. Selik, & E. Özalp, Çev.) Lawrence & Wishart Electric Book. Marx, K. (2010). On The Jewish Question. K. Marx, & F. Engels içinde, Marx & Engels Collected Works Volume 3 (s. 146-174). Lawrence & Wishart. 2019 tarihinde alındı google scholar
• Marx, K., & Friedrich, E. (2010). The German Ideology. K. Marx, & F. Engels içinde, Marx & Engels Collected Works Volume 5 (S. Belli , Çev., s. 19-661). Lawrence & Wishart Electric Book. 2019 tarihinde alındı google scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1998). The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Soclal. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
• Ranciere , J. (1998). Dls-agreement: Polltlcs and Phllosophy. (J. Rose, Çev.) Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
• Ranciere , J. (2016). The Method of Equality: Politics and Poetics. K. Genel, & J. P. Deranty (Dü) içinde, Recognltlon or Dlsagreement: A Crltlcal Encounter on the Polltlcs of Freedom, Equallty, and Identlty (s. 133-155). New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
• Ranciere , J. (2021). What Tlmes Are We Llvlng In? A Conversatlon wlth Erlc Hazan. (S. Corcoran, Çev.) Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (1995). La Mesentente: Polltlque et phllosophle. Paris: Galilee. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2001). Ten Theses on Politics. (L. Heron, Çev.) Theory&Event, 5(3), 1-16. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2004). Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man? South Atlantlc Quarterly, 103(2/3), 297-310. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2009). Moments polltlques. Interventlons 1977-2009. Paris, Montreal: La Fabrique et Lux. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2012). Proletarlan Nlghts: The Workers’ Dream ln Nlneteenth-Century France. (J. Drury, Çev.) London: Verso. google scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2021). On The Shores of Polltlcs. (L. Heron, Çev.) London, New York: Verso. google scholar