Kaynak Temelli Görüş ve Kaynak Bağımlılığı Kuramının Birlikte Kullanıldığı Çalışmalar Üzerine Sistematik Bir Literatür İncelemesi

Year 2023, , 261 - 296, 30.09.2023

Oğuzhan Öztürk , Mustafa Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1337660

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Kaynak Temelli Görüş (KTG) ve Kaynak Bağımlılığı Kuramının (KBK) birlikte kullanıldığı çalışmalara ilişkin genel durumu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, çalışma, iki yaklaşımın bir arada kullanıldığı çalışmalar üzerine yürütülen sistematik bir literatür incelemesi olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmada incelenmek üzere Scopus veri tabanından 97 çalışma belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmalar “sadece KTG ve KBK’nin kullanıldığı derleme çalışmalar”, “sadece KTG ve KBK’nın kullanıldığı ampirik çalışmalar”, “çoklu yaklaşımın kullanıldığı derleme çalışmalar” ve “çoklu yaklaşımın kullanıldığı ampirik çalışmalar” şeklindeki dört kategori altında incelenmiştir. İnceleme kapsamındaki çalışmalar, araştırmanın olgusu, bağlamı ve yöntemi (ve çoklu yaklaşım kullanan çalışmalarda ek olarak kullanılan teoriler) açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, sonuç ve tartışma bölümünde, yaklaşımların çalışmalardaki kullanılma biçimleri üzerine genel olarak şu tespitler yapılmıştır: Yaklaşımların, kendi ana kavram/olgularına odaklanmaktan ziyade, kendi açıklama çerçeveleri dışında kalan diğer kavram/olguların anlaşılması için kullanıldıkları görülmüştür. Diğer kavram/olgular üzerine olan çalışmalarda da, yaklaşımların argümanlarının ele alınan olgu ile ilgili hipotez ya da önermelerin geliştirilmesinde operasyonel olarak kullanılmasından ziyade çalışmaların teorik arkaplanlarının verildiği kısımlarda daha yardımcı bir rolde kullanıldıkları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, çalışmalarda yaklaşımların argümanlarının ele alınan olgunun açıklanması noktasında bağımsız/ayrıksı bir biçimde kullanıldıkları sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

kaynak temelli görüş, kaynak bağımlılığı kuramı, sistematik literatür incelemesi, stratejik yönetim, örgüt kuramı

A Systematic Literature Review on Studies Using Resource-Based View and Resource Dependence Theory

Abstract

This study aims to reveal how the Resource Based View (RBV) and Resource Dependence Theory (RDT) are used together. To this end, the study was designed as a systematic literature review on studies in which the two approaches are used together. A total of 97 studies were identified from the Scopus database for review in the study. These studies were analyzed under four categories as "review studies using only RBV and RDT", "empirical studies using only RBV and RDT", "review studies using multiple approaches" and "empirical studies using multiple approaches". The studies within the scope of the review were evaluated in terms of the phenomenon, context, and method of the research (and the theories used for the studies using multiple approaches). In addition, in the conclusion and discussion section, the following determinations were made on the way the approaches were used in the studies: It was seen that the approaches were used to understand other concepts/phenomena outside their explanatory framework. In the studies on other concepts/phenomena, it was determined that the arguments of the approaches are used in a more indirect/auxiliary role in the theoretical parts of the studies rather than being used operationally in the development of hypotheses or propositions related to the phenomena under consideration. In addition, it was concluded that the arguments of the approaches in the studies were used independently/individually to explain the phenomenon under consideration.

Keywords

resource-based view, resource dependence theory, systematic literatur review, strategic management, organization theory

References

• Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Frynas, J. G., & Scola, A. (2017). Integration of non‐market and market activities in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 629-648.
• Ahmed, M., & Pratap, S. (2022). Constraint absorption in emerging economies: The role of business groups. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1253-1270.
• Akingbola, K. (2013). A model of strategic nonprofit human resource management. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 214-240.
• Austen, A., & Frąckiewicz-Wronka, E. (2018). Stakeholders and resources in public hospitals. Towards an integrated view. Argumenta Oeconomıca, 1(40), 253-274.
• Bag, S., Choi, T. M., Rahman, M. S., Srivastava, G., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Examining collaborative buyer–supplier relationships and social sustainability in the “new normal” era: The moderating effects of justice and big data analytical intelligence. Annals of Operations Research, 1-46.
• Barca, M. (2005). Stratejik yönetim düşüncesinin evrimi: Bilimsel bir disiplinin oluşum hikâyesi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 7-38.
• Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2005). The resource‐based view: Origins and implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of strategic management, (pp. 123-182). Blackwell Publishing.
• Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Bold voices and new opportunities: An expanded research agenda for the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1677-1683.
• Barroso-Castro, C., Domínguez de la Concha Castañeda, M., & Rodríguez Serrano, M. D. L. Á. (2022a). Listed SMEs and innovation: the role of founding board members. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(2), 901-934.
• Barroso-Castro, C., Domínguez-CC, M., & Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Á. (2022b). SME growth speed: The relationship with board capital. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(2), 480-512.
• Blankenburg, K. (2018). Theoretical framework for intellectual capital reporting of NPOs. In K. Blankenburg (Ed.), Intellectual capital in German non-profit organisations: An empirical study (pp. 79-97). Springer.
• Block, J., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 70(3), 307-312.
• Callaway, S. K. (2008). International and product diversification: How e‐commerce may help financial services firms to diversify. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 18(1), 31-46.
• Chand, P., & Tarei, P. K. (2021). Do the barriers of multi-tier sustainable supply chain interact? A multi-sector examination using resource-based theory and resource-dependence theory. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27(5), 100722.
• Chang, T. Y., Shen, C. C., & Li, Z. W. (2019). Constructing a risk management indicator model for travel agencies: A resource integration perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(10), 1021-1033.
• Cheon, M. J., Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems. Journal of information Technology, 10(4), 209-219.
• Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2011). Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 86-100.
• Coşkun, R., & Öztürk, O. (2021). Örgüt kuramlarında bağımlılık olgusu ve kaynak bağımlılığı kuramı: Bir araştırma çerçevesi önerisi. Sakarya Yayıncılık.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Li, C. (2021). State ownership and internationalization: The advantage and disadvantage of stateness. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101112.
• Cullen, K., & Parker, D. W. (2015). Improving performance in project-based management: Synthesizing strategic theories. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(5), 608-624.
• Davis, G. F., & DeWitt, T. (2021). Organization theory and the resource-based view of the firm: The great divide. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1684-1697.
• Deman, R., Jorissen, A., & Laveren, E. (2018). Family control and innovativeness in private firms: the mediating role of board task performance. Management Decision, 56(2), 295-310.
• den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. G., & Doh, J. (2015). What prompts companies to collaboration with NGOs? Recent evidence from the Netherlands. Business & Society, 54(2), 187-228.
• Denicolai, S., Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2015). The dynamics of the outsourcing relationship. In R. V. Tulder, A. Verbeke, & R. Drogendijk (Eds.), The future of global organizing (Vol. 10, pp. 341-364), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Dias, J., & Magriço, V. M. (2011). The impact of resource conditions and environmental uncertainty on inter-firm alliance strategies. Applied Economics, 43(6), 757-765.
• Donada, C. (2001). Co-development partnerships: Consequences for car suppliers. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1(2-3), 183-195.
• Donelli, C. C., Rentschler, R., Fanelli, S., & Lee, B. (2023). Philanthropy patterns in major Australian performing arts organizations. Journal of Management and Governance, 1-30.
• Dourado Freire, C., Sacomano Neto, M., Moralles, H. F., & Rodrigues Antunes, L. G. (2022). Technology-based business incubators: The impacts on resources of startups in Brazil. International Journal of Emerging Markets, vol. ahead-of-print no. ahead-of-print.
• El Ebrashi, R., & El-Batawy, L. (2021). Dependence and resourcefulness: A typology of social impact scaling strategies. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-41.
• Farndale, E., Beamond, M., Corbett-Etchevers, I., & Xu, S. (2022). Accessing host country national talent in emerging economies: A resource perspective review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 57(1), 101256.
• Fındıkoğlu, N. M., Ranganathan, C., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2021). Partnering for prosperity: Small IT vendor partnership formation and the establishment of partner pools. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(2), 193-218.
• Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770.
• Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258-285.
• Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2005). Outside directors in SME boards: A call for theoretical reflections. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 1(1), 28-37.
• Garavan, T. N. (2012). Global talent management in science-based firms: An exploratory investigation of the pharmaceutical industry during the global downturn. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2428-2449.
• Garrett Jr, R. P., & Neubaum, D. O. (2013). Top management support and initial strategic assets: A dependency model for internal corporate venture performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 896-915.
• Greve, H. R. (2021). The resource-based view and learning theory: Overlaps, differences, and a shared future. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1720-1733.
• Hafiz, N., Latiff, A. S. A., Islam, M. A., Saif, A. N. M., & Wahab, S. A. (2022). Towards the underlying theories of small firm growth: A literature review. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 36-51.
• Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (hird Edition). Oxford University Press.
• Hessels, J., & Parker, S. C. (2013). Constraints, internationalization and growth: A cross-country analysis of European SMEs. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 137-148.
• Husted, B. W., Allen, D. B., & Kock, N. (2015). Value creation through social strategy. Business & Society, 54(2), 147-186.
• Idris, B., & Saridakis, G. (2020). Women directors and exporting activity: The moderating role of network advice. Economics and Business Letters, 9(2), 106-113.
• Jamehshooran, B. G., Shaharoun, A., & Haron, H. N. (2015). The moderating effect of web service on the relationship between business analytics and supply chain performance. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 76(1), 97-108.
• Jaw, B. S., & Liu, W. (2004). Towards an integrative framework of strategic international human resource control: The case of Taiwanese subsidiaries in the People's Republic of China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(4-5), 705-729.
• Ji, Z. (2020). Does factor market distortion affect industrial pollution intensity? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 122136.
• Jin, Y., & Shao, Y. F. (2022). Power-leveraging paradox and firm innovation: The influence of network power, knowledge integration and breakthrough innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 205-215.
• Kash, B. A., Spaulding, A., D. Gamm, L., & E. Johnson, C. (2014). Healthcare strategic management and the resource based view. Journal of Strategy and Management, 7(3), 251-264.
• Kembro, J., Selviaridis, K., & Näslund, D. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on information sharing in supply chains: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 609-625.
• Kern, T., Kreijger, J., & Willcocks, L. (2002). Exploring ASP as sourcing strategy: Theoretical perspectives, propositions for practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(2), 153-177.
• Khairuddin, S., Qureshi, Z. H., Wahid, R. A., Tehseen, S., Pathan, Z. H., & Khan, M. R. K. (2019). A conceptual study on contingent impact of external integration on innovation SME business success relationship. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 370.
• Kim, J., Woo, H. S., Balven, R., & Hoetker, G. (2023). A meta-analysis of cross-country context effects on the link between green product strategy and financial performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 56-75.
• Ko, S., Kim, W., & Lee, K. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting technology transfer in government-funded research institutes: The Korean case. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4), 228.
• Kumalaningrum, M. P., Ciptono, W. S., Indarti, N., & Purnomo, B. R. (2023). Ambidexterity in Indonesian SMEs: A systematic review and synthesis for future research. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2199490.
• Kumar, P. (2022). Internal flexibility in health-care organizations: a value-laden perspective on sustainability. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(3), 721-742.
• Kuo, F. I., Fang, W. T., & LePage, B. A. (2022). Proactive environmental strategies in the hotel industry: eco-innovation, green competitive advantage, and green core competence. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(6), 1240-1261.
• Lai, F., Li, X., & Lai, V. S. (2013). Transaction‐specific investments, relational norms, and ERP customer satisfaction: A mediation analysis. Decision Sciences, 44(4), 679-711.
• Lechner, C., Soppe, B., & Dowling, M. (2016). Vertical coopetition and the sales growth of young and small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 67-84.
• Lee, D., & Hung, C. (2022). Meta-analysis of collaboration and performance: Moderating tests of sectoral differences in collaborative performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 360-379.
• Li, W. J., Zhu, W., & Wang, B. (2023). The impact of creating shared value strategy on corporate sustainable development: From resources perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2362-2384.
• Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194.
• Liu, F. H., & Chen, L. J. (2018). The impacts of competence-based marketing capabilities: Relative attention, relationship learning and collaboration development. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(7), 896-910.
• Liu, W., Kwong, C. C., Kim, Y. A., & Liu, H. (2021). The more the better vs. less is more: Strategic alliances, bricolage and social performance in social enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 137, 128-142.
• Lu, L. H., & Huang, Y. F. (2019). Manufacturing strategy, organizational slack, and the formation of interfirm linkages. Chinese Management Studies, 13(1), 70-92.
• Magnusson, T., & Werner, V. (2023). Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 903-919.
• Mahapatra, S., Narasimhan, R., & Hult, G. T. M. (2020). Sourcing strategy across product life cycle stages: Relevance of multiple-mode governance. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 13(1), 1-27.
• Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., & Arosa, B. (2015). Impact of outsiders on firm performance over different generations of family‐owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1203-1218.
• Matthews, J., & Shulman, A. D. (2005). Competitive advantage in public-sector organizations: Explaining the public good/sustainable competitive advantage paradox. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 232-240.
• McAuley, J., Duberley, J., & Johnson, P. (2007). Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives. FT Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Limited.
• McCarthy‐Byrne, T. M., & Mentzer, J. T. (2011). Integrating supply chain infrastructure and process to create joint value. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(2), 135-161.
• Medcof, J. W. (2001). Resource‐based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 999-1012.
• Murphy, P. J., Wu, Z., Welsch, H., Heiser, D. R., Young, S. T., & Jiang, B. (2012). Small firm entrepreneurial outsourcing: Traditional problems, nontraditional solutions. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5(3), 248-275.
• Myloni, B., Harzing, A. W., & Mirza, H. (2007). The effect of corporate-level organizational factors on the transfer of human resource management practices: European and US MNCs and their Greek subsidiaries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(12), 2057-2074.
• Nag, U., Sharma, S. K., & Govindan, K. (2021). Investigating drivers of circular supply chain with product-service system in automotive firms of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128629.
• Nandi, S., Sarkis, J., Hervani, A., & Helms, M. (2021). Do blockchain and circular economy practices improve post COVID-19 supply chains? A resource-based and resource dependence perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(2), 333-363.
• Nofiani, D., Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Manik, H. F. G. G. (2021). The dynamics between balanced and combined ambidextrous strategies: A paradoxical affair about the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on SMEs’ performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1262-1286.
• Nordqvist, M., & Minichilli, A. (2008). What makes boards in small firms active? In M. Huse (Ed.), The value creating board: Corporate governance and organizational behaviour (pp. 402-415). Routledge.
• Ofori-Dankwa, J., & Julian, S. D. (2011). Utilizing an integrative multilens model: Explaining firm performance in double-void emerging economies. International Studies of Management & Organization, 41(2), 5-25.
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
• Özpolat, K., Ribbink, D., Hales, D. N., & Windle, R. J. (2015). Food aid procurement and transportation decision-making in governmental agencies: The United Nations/European Union versus the United States approach. Transportation Journal, 54(2), 159-185.
• Öztürk, O. (2021a). Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: An overview. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 525-552.
• Öztürk, O. (2021b). Bibliyometrik araştırmaların tasarımına ilişkin bir çerçeve. O. Öztürk, & G. Gürler (Eds.), Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz içinde (ss. 33-53), Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Pangarkar, N., & Wu, J. (2013). Alliance formation, partner diversity, and performance of Singapore startups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 791-807.
• Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: A base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32(3), 463-481.
• Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?. International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
• Perdana, Y. R., Ciptono, W. S., & Setiawan, K. (2019). Broad span of supply chain integration: Theory development. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(2), 186-201.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
• Pomegbe, W. W. K., Li, W., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Otoo, C. O. A. (2020). Enhancing the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises through network embeddedness. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(3), 156-171.
• Popp, A., Toms, S., & Wilson, J. (2006). Industrial districts as organizational environments: Resources, networks and structures. Management & Organizational History, 1(4), 349-370.
• Raziq, M. M., Benito, G. R., & Igoe, J. (2020). Subsidiary country managers and subsidiary development: Upper echelons and resource-based perspectives. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), 291-323.
• Romero-Castro, N., López-Cabarcos, M. A., & Piñeiro-Chousa, J. (2023). Finance, technology, and values: A configurational approach to the analysis of rural entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122444.
• Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 5-29.
• Santos, S., Rodrigues, L. L., & Branco, M. C. (2022). Corporate sustainability of Portuguese seaports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135067.
• Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1899-1933.
• Schmid, S., & Baldermann, S. (2021). CEOs’ international work experience and compensation. Management International Review, 61(3), 313-364.
• Sears, J. B. (2017). When are acquired technological capabilities complements rather than substitutes? A study on value creation. Journal of Business Research, 78, 33-42.
• Shi, X., & Liao, Z. (2013). The mediating effects of interfirm business process integration and joint teamwork on firm performance in supply chains. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 1243-1264.
• Strange, R. (2011). The outsourcing of primary activities: Theoretical analysis and propositions. Journal of Management & Governance, 15, 249-269.
• Street, C. T., & Cameron, A. F. (2007). External relationships and the small business: A review of small business alliance and network research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 239-266.
• Sun, S. L., & Lee, R. P. (2013). Enhancing innovation through international joint venture portfolios: From the emerging firm perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 21(3), 1-21.
• Tang, J., & Tang, Z. (2021). Does it pay to bribe? The influence of bribery on new venture disbanding in China. Journal of General Management, 46(3), 185-196.
• Tehseen, S., & Ramayah, T. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies and SMEs business success: The contingent role of external integration. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 50-61.
• Tehseen, S., & Sajilan, S. (2016). Network competence based on resource-based view and resource dependence theory. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 9(1), 60-82.
• Teng, J. T., Cheon, M. J., & Grover, V. (1995). Decisions to outsource information systems functions: Testing a strategy‐theoretic discrepancy model. Decision Sciences, 26(1), 75-103.
• Tran, Q., Nazir, S., Nguyen, T. H., Ho, N. K., Dinh, T. H., Nguyen, V. P., Nguyen, M. H., Phan, Q. K., & Kieu, T. S. (2020). Empirical examination of factors influencing the adoption of green building technologies: The perspective of construction developers in developing economies. Sustainability, 12(19), 8067.
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
• Tseng, M. L., Bui, T. D., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Resource utilization model for sustainable solid waste management in Vietnam: A crisis response hierarchical structure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 171, 105632.
• Wei, T., & Clegg, J. (2017). Exploring sources of value destruction in international acquisitions: A synthesized theoretical lens. International Business Review, 26(5), 927-941.
• Wigger, K. A., & Lauvås, T. A. (2022). Collective resources in entrepreneurship: A reconceptualisation of resource mobilisation. In B. Callegari, & B. A. Misganaw (Eds.), Rethinking the social in innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 67-88). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal Of Management, 18(2), 295-320.
• Xiong, M., Whetsell, T. A., Zhao, J., & Cheng, S. (2021). Centrally administered state-owned enterprises’ engagement in China’s public–private partnerships: A social network analysis. Area Development and Policy, 6(3), 296-318.
• Yin, W., & Ran, W. (2021). Theoretical exploration of supply chain viability utilizing blockchain technology. Sustainability, 13(15), 8231.
• Zacharia, Z., Plasch, M., Mohan, U., & Gerschberger, M. (2019). The emerging role of coopetition within inter-firm relationships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 414-437.
• Zhang, C., Zeng, Q., Chen, C., Sindakis, S., Aggarwal, S., & Dhaulta, N. (2023). The strategic resources and competitive performance of family-owned and non-family-owned firms in the retail business of Los Angeles. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 327-355.
• Zhang, X., Xu, Y., & Ma, L. (2022). Research on successful factors and influencing mechanism of the digital transformation in SMEs. Sustainability, 14(5), 2549.
• Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2015). Barriers to promoting eco‐industrial parks development in China: Perspectives from senior officials at national industrial parks. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(3), 457-467.
• Zhuang, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Examining antecedents, consequences, and contingencies of proactive environmental strategy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1475-1490.