Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: Residual instability may persist after isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Anterolateral ligament (ALL) augmentation has been suggested to enhance stability, though its clinical utility remains uncertain.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients: 30 underwent isolated ACL reconstruction and 30 underwent combined ACL+ALL reconstruction. Outcomes included clinical stability, functional scores (IKDC, Lysholm), return-to-sport parameters, satisfaction, and complications with a mid-term follow-up of ≥12 months. The study was approved by the institutional non-interventional ethics committee.
Results: Baseline demographic and perioperative characteristics were comparable between groups. Postoperatively, the ACL+ALL group showed lower pivot-shift positivity (7% vs. 27%, p=0.04), higher IKDC and Lysholm scores at 12 months (p<0.05), and shorter return-to-sport time (7.2 vs. 8.1 months, p=0.04). Patient satisfaction was higher (p=0.02), and the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the ACL+ALL group (10% vs. 33%, p=0.04).
Conclusions: Combined ACL+ALL reconstruction yielded superior stability, functional recovery, and a more favorable complication profile compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. Given the retrospective design and limited sample size, results should be interpreted cautiously. Larger prospective trials are needed.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- Carter HM, Littlewood C, Webster KE, Smith BE. The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Oct 3 2020;21(1):647. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6.
- Kumar K, Rao V, Panda AK, Joshi D. Peroneus longus tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthop J Sports Med. Sep 2025;13(9):23259671251374313. doi:10.1177/23259671251374313.
- Abulhasan JF, Grey MJ. Anatomy and physiology of knee stability. J. Funct. Morphol. 2017;2(4):34. doi:10.3390/jfmk2040034.
- Runer A, Keeling L, Wagala N, Nugraha H, Özbek EA, Hughes JD, et al. Current trends in graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part I: anatomy, biomechanics, graft incorporation and fixation. J Exp Orthop. Apr 1 2023;10(1):37. doi:10.1186/s40634-023-00600-4.
- Bosco F, Rovere G, Giustra F, et al. Advancements in anterior cruciate ligament repair—Current state of the art. Surgeries. 2024;5(2):234-47. doi:10.3390/surgeries 5020022.
- Pontoh LA. Residual rotatory instability after ACL reconstruction surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(10_suppl3):2325967124S2325900370. doi:10.1177/2325967124S00370.
- Ayati Firoozabadi M, Milad Seyedtabaei SM. Approach to residual anterolateral rotatory knee instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JB JS Open Access. 2025;10(2):e25.00002 doi:10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00002.
- Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard JM, Thaunat M. The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop. Feb 2013;37(2):181-6. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1759-3.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
March 13, 2026
Publication Date
March 28, 2026
Submission Date
October 8, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 17, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 16 Number: 1