Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Cerrahi Alan Enfeksiyonlarını Önlemede El Yıkama Tekniklerinin Yeri ve Önemi

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 520 - 527, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.685160

Abstract

Günümüzde sağlık bakım hizmeti ile ilişkili enfeksiyonların görülme oranı önemli ölçüde azalmış olsa da hala morbidite ve mortaliteyi arttıran önemli sağlık sorunlarından biridir. Cerrahi alan enfeksiyonları (CAE) sık görülen hastane kaynaklı enfeksiyonlardan olup sağlık bakım profesyonellerinin birçok sorunla başa çıkmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu nedenle CAE gelişmeden önce önlem alınması önem taşımaktadır. Alınacak önlemlerden en basit ve maliyeti en az olan uygulama ise cerrahi el antisepsisidir. Cerrahi el antisepsisinde temel olarak geleneksel yöntem cerrahi el yıkama ve alkol bazlı el antiseptiği ile ovalama tekniği olmak üzere iki yöntem kullanılmaktadır. Bu yöntemlerin birbirine göre avantaj ve dezavantajları bulunmakta olup bunların bilinmesi, etkin antisepsinin sağlanabilmesi için de yöntemin doğru şekilde uygulanması önem taşımaktadır. Bu derleme makalede cerrahi el antisepsisinde kanıt temelli yaklaşımlar ve kullanılan yöntemler ile ilgili karşılaştırmalı verilerin incelenmesi amaçlandı.

References

  • 1. HAI Data, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/index.html. (Erişim tarihi: 27.01.2020) 2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections: surgical site infections. In: ECDC Annual epidemiological report for 2016. Stockholm; 2018. 3. Surgical Site Infection, 2019. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/45/Surgical-Site-Infections. (Erişim tarihi:27.01.2020). 4. WHO. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2016. 5. Liu LQ, Mehigan S. The effects of surgical hand scrubbing protocols on skin integrity and surgical site infection rates: A systematic review. AORN J 2016;103(5):468–82. 6. Khan A, Nausheen S. Compliance of surgical hand washing before surgery: Role of remote video surveillance. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67(1):92–6. 7. WHO. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: a Summary. World Health Organization. 2009. 8. Paudel A, Bista B. Compliance of surgical hand scrub in operation theatre of teaching hospital, Chitwan. J Chitwan Med Coll 2019;9(1):36–40. 9. Chou PY, Doyle AJ, Arai S, Burke PJ, Bailey TR. Antibacterial Efficacy of Several Surgical Hand Preparation Products Used by Veterinary Students. Vet Surg 2016;45:515–22. 10. Widmer AF. Surgical hand hygiene: Scrub or rub? J Hosp Infect 2013;83(SUPPL. 1):S35–9. 11. Esen Ş, Ersöz G, Gürler B, Karabay O, Koçoğlu E, Metin D, et al. Dezenfeksiyon Antisepsi Sterilizasyon Rehberi. Perçin Renders D, Metin DY, editötler. İstanbul; 2019. 12. Goldberg JL. Guideline Implementation: Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2017;105(2):203–12. 13. Türk Hastane İnfeksiyonları ve Kontrolü Derneği. El Hijyeni Kılavuzu. Hastane İnfeksiyonları Derg 2008;12(1):1–30. 14. CDC. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Vol. 51;2002. p. 1–45. 15. Shen NJ, Pan SC, Sheng WH, Tien KL, Chen ML, Chang SC, et al. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand rub and conventional surgical scrub in a medical center. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2015;48:322–8. 16. Patrick M, Van Wicklin SA. Implementing AORN Recommended Practices for Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2012;95(4):492–507. 17. NICE. Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. 2019. 18. AORN. Guideline Summary: Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2017;105(2):213–7. 19. Tanner J, Dumville JC, Norman G, Fortnam M. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(1). 20. Kareem SA, Mahmood AA, Hussein ZR. Alcohol Based Handrub versus Traditional Hand Scrub as Surgical Hand Disinfection in a Tertiary Eye Teaching Hospital in Iraq. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;5(3):340. 21. Howard JD, Jowett C, Faoagali J, McKenzie B. New method for assessing hand disinfection shows that pre-operative alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as effective as a traditional surgical scrub. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:78–83. 22. Tsai JC, Lin YK, Huang YJ, Loh EW, Wen HY, Wang CH, et al. Antiseptic Effect of Conventional Povidone-Iodine Scrub, Chlorhexidine Scrub, and Waterless Hand Rub in a Surgical Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38(4):417–22.
Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 520 - 527, 15.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.685160

Abstract

References

  • 1. HAI Data, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/index.html. (Erişim tarihi: 27.01.2020) 2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections: surgical site infections. In: ECDC Annual epidemiological report for 2016. Stockholm; 2018. 3. Surgical Site Infection, 2019. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/45/Surgical-Site-Infections. (Erişim tarihi:27.01.2020). 4. WHO. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2016. 5. Liu LQ, Mehigan S. The effects of surgical hand scrubbing protocols on skin integrity and surgical site infection rates: A systematic review. AORN J 2016;103(5):468–82. 6. Khan A, Nausheen S. Compliance of surgical hand washing before surgery: Role of remote video surveillance. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67(1):92–6. 7. WHO. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: a Summary. World Health Organization. 2009. 8. Paudel A, Bista B. Compliance of surgical hand scrub in operation theatre of teaching hospital, Chitwan. J Chitwan Med Coll 2019;9(1):36–40. 9. Chou PY, Doyle AJ, Arai S, Burke PJ, Bailey TR. Antibacterial Efficacy of Several Surgical Hand Preparation Products Used by Veterinary Students. Vet Surg 2016;45:515–22. 10. Widmer AF. Surgical hand hygiene: Scrub or rub? J Hosp Infect 2013;83(SUPPL. 1):S35–9. 11. Esen Ş, Ersöz G, Gürler B, Karabay O, Koçoğlu E, Metin D, et al. Dezenfeksiyon Antisepsi Sterilizasyon Rehberi. Perçin Renders D, Metin DY, editötler. İstanbul; 2019. 12. Goldberg JL. Guideline Implementation: Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2017;105(2):203–12. 13. Türk Hastane İnfeksiyonları ve Kontrolü Derneği. El Hijyeni Kılavuzu. Hastane İnfeksiyonları Derg 2008;12(1):1–30. 14. CDC. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Vol. 51;2002. p. 1–45. 15. Shen NJ, Pan SC, Sheng WH, Tien KL, Chen ML, Chang SC, et al. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand rub and conventional surgical scrub in a medical center. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2015;48:322–8. 16. Patrick M, Van Wicklin SA. Implementing AORN Recommended Practices for Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2012;95(4):492–507. 17. NICE. Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. 2019. 18. AORN. Guideline Summary: Hand Hygiene. AORN J 2017;105(2):213–7. 19. Tanner J, Dumville JC, Norman G, Fortnam M. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(1). 20. Kareem SA, Mahmood AA, Hussein ZR. Alcohol Based Handrub versus Traditional Hand Scrub as Surgical Hand Disinfection in a Tertiary Eye Teaching Hospital in Iraq. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;5(3):340. 21. Howard JD, Jowett C, Faoagali J, McKenzie B. New method for assessing hand disinfection shows that pre-operative alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as effective as a traditional surgical scrub. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:78–83. 22. Tsai JC, Lin YK, Huang YJ, Loh EW, Wen HY, Wang CH, et al. Antiseptic Effect of Conventional Povidone-Iodine Scrub, Chlorhexidine Scrub, and Waterless Hand Rub in a Surgical Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38(4):417–22.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dilek Aygin 0000-0003-4620-3412

Özge Yaman 0000-0001-6154-7278

Publication Date September 15, 2020
Submission Date February 5, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Cite

AMA Aygin D, Yaman Ö. Cerrahi Alan Enfeksiyonlarını Önlemede El Yıkama Tekniklerinin Yeri ve Önemi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. September 2020;10(3):520-527. doi:10.31832/smj.685160

30703

The published articles in SMJ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.