“İş Tatmini ve İş Performansının Yeni Öncülü: Temel Benlik Değerlendirmesi”

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 69 - 76, 01.06.2010

Sait Gürbüz Ahmet Erkuş Ünsal Sığrı

Abstract

Keywords

-

“İş Tatmini ve İş Performansının Yeni Öncülü: Temel Benlik Değerlendirmesi”

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; temel benlik değerlendirmenin, işgörenlerin iş tatmini ve iş performansı ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırmanın hipotezleri, Ankara’da bilişim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren büyük ölçekli üç ayrı işletmede çalışan toplam 112 beyaz yakalı işgören üzerinde test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, temel benlik değerlendirmesinin işgörenlerin iş tatmini ve iş performansını anlamlı derecede yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanında, temel benlik değerlendirmenin iş tatminini açıklama gücünün, iş performansına göre daha fazla olduğu bulunmuştur

Keywords

Temel benlik değerlemesi, İş performansı, İş tatmini

References

• Babin, B.J. ve Boles, J.S. “Employee Behavior In A Service Environment: A Model And Test of Potential Differences Between Men And Women”, Journal of Marketing, 62, 1998, 77–91.
• Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge: Cambridgem University Pres, 1995.
• Basım, H.N. ve Şeşen, H. “Kontrol Odağının Çalışanların Nezaket Ve Yardım Etme Davranışlarına Etkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisisi, 23, 2006, 159-168
• Best, R. G. “Are Self-Evaluations at the Core of Job Burnout?” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University, 2003.
• Bono, J. E., ve Judge, T. A. “Self-Concordance At Work: Toward Understanding the Motivational Effects of Transformational Leaders”. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 2003, 554–571.
• Coopersmith, S. The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco: Freeman,1967.
• Costa, P. T., Jr., ve Mccrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) And NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 1992.
• Diener, E., ve Diener. M. “Cross-Cultural Correlates of Life Satisfaction And Self-Esteem”. Personality Processes And Individual Differences, 68, 1995, 653–663.
• Eisenberg, A. P. “The Search For integrity: A Leadership Impact Study”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Depaul University, 2000.
• Erez, A., ve Judge, T. A. “Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations To Goal Setting, Motivation, And Performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 2001, 1270–1279.
• Gurbuz, S. ve Bingol, D. “Çeşitli Örgüt Yöneticilerinin Güç Mesafesi, Belirsizlikten Kaçınma, Eril-Dişil ve Bireyci-Toplulukçu Kültür Boyutlarına Yönelik Eğilimleri Üzerine Görgul Bir Araştırma”, KHO Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 6:2, 2007, 68-87
• Guven, L. “The Effect of Posıtıve Core Self and External Evaluatıons on Performance Appraısals”, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Mıddle East Technıcal Unıversıty, 2007.
• Hofstede, G. ‘Motivation, Leadership and Organizations: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?’, Organizational Dynamics, 9:1,1980, 42-63.
• Jöreskog, K. G., ve Sörbom, D. Lisrel 8: Users Reference Guide. Chicago:Scientific Software International, 2001
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., ve Locke, E. A. “Personality And Job Satisfaction: the Mediating Role of Job Characteristics”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 2000, 237–249.
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., ve Thoresen, C. J. “The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of A Measure. Personnel Psychology”, 56, 2003, 303–331.
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., ve Bono, J. E. “The Power of Being Positive: The Relation Between Positive Selfconcept and Job Performance”. Human Performance, 11, 1998, 167–187.
• Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., ve Durham, C. C. “The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction: A Core Evaluations Approach”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1997, 151–188.
• Judge, T. A., ve Bono, J. E. “Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations Traits—Self-Esteem, Generalized Selfefficacy, Locus of Control, And Emotional Stability—With Job Satisfaction And Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 2001, 80–92.
• Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C.C. ve Kluger, A.N “Dispositional Effects On Job And Life Satisfaction: the Role of Core Evaluations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 1998, 17-34.
• Kirkman, B.L. ve Rosen, B. “Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents And Consequences of Team Empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, :42, 1999. 58-74
• Kisbu, Y. “Influences of Regulatory Focus, Core Self-Evaluations And Age On Biases in Perception And Choice”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Koc University, 2006.
• Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., ve Suh, E. M. “Cross-Cultural Variations in Predictors of Life Satisfaction: Perspectives From Needs and Values”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1999, 980–990.
• Piccolo, R.F., Judge, T.A., Takahashi, K., Naotaka, W. ve Locke, E.A. “Core Self-Evaluations İn Japan: Relativeb Effects On Job Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction, And Happiness”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 2005, 965–984
• Rotter, J.B.“Generalized Expectancies For Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcements”. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1966,1-28.
• Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., ve Judge, T. A. “Dispositional Causes of Task Satisfaction: the Mediating Role of Chosen Level of Task Complexity”. Presentation aAt the Society For Industrial and Organizational Psychology Annual Meetings, Toronto, 2002.
• Watson, D. Mood and Temperament. New York: Guilford Press, 2000.