BÖLGESELLEŞEN GÜVENLİK ANLAYIŞINDA YENİ AÇILIMLAR VE TÜRKİYE’NİN GÜVENLİK ALGISINDA YAŞANAN DEĞİŞİMLER
Öz
BÖLGESELLEŞEN GÜVENLİK ANLAYIŞINDA YENİ AÇILIMLAR VE TÜRKİYE’NİN GÜVENLİK ALGISINDA YAŞANAN DEĞİŞİMLER Murat YORULMAZ Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü muratyorulmaz2288@hotmail.com In this study, both the new emerging initiative in security studies in the context of regionalized security understanding and also how these initiatives effect Turkish security policy and what the changes are on this issue have been analysed. In the first part of the stduy, the process and transformation terms of the traditional security studies in the period of Cold War have been discussed. After that, the main qualifications of ‘’new security’’ approach emerged after Cold War has been shortly analysed. While analysing this issue, it has been emphasized that the new security approach is not just an enlarged form of the ol done. In the first part, lastly, it has been tried to explain what the new security approach is not. In the second part of the study, while the main qualifications of the new security studies have been tried to present, Aberystwyth and Copenhagen schools contributed to the field of ‘’international security’’ will have been focused on. In the last part of the study, it has been focused on how the mutual evolution of international security approaches and practices has been analysed and in the context of this, how and in what ways Turkish security policies have changed
Anahtar Kelimeler
Security studies New security International security theories
Kaynakça
- Abraham, Itty, The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, New York, NY, Zed Books, 1994.
- Barkawi, Tarak & Laffey, Mark, ‘’The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’’, Review of International Studies, 32, 2006, 329-352.
- Bigo, Didier, ‘’Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’’ Alternatives, 27, 2002, 63-92.
- Booth, Ken, ‘’Security and Emancipation’’, Review of International Studies, 17, 1991, 313-326.
- Booth, Ken,‘’Human Wrongs and International Relations’’, International Affairs, 71, 1995, 103-126.
- Booth, Ken, ‘’Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist’’,in: Krause, K. &Williams, M. C. (Eds.) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1997, ss.83-119.
- Booth, Ken, Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005a.
- Booth, K. (Ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005b.
- Booth, Ken, Theory of World Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 200 Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver & J. De Wilde, Security : A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Pub., 1998.
- Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1992.
- Campbell, David, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
- Cox, Robert W., ‘’Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’’, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 1981, 126- 1
- Dillon, Michael, ‘’Sovereignty and Governmentality: From the Problematics of the ‘’New World Order’’ to the Ethical Problematic of the World Order’’, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 20, 1995, 323-368.
- Dillon, Michael & Reid, John, ‘’Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency’’, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 25, 2000, 117-143.
- Enloe, Cynthia, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.
- Guzzini, Stefano & Leander, Anna, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, London, Routledge, 2006.
- Huysmans, Jef, ‘’Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe’’, European Journal of International Relations, 4, 1998, 479-505.
- Huysmans, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity : Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, Routledge, 2006.
- Krause, Keith & Michael C. Williams, ‘’Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’’, International Studies Quarterly, 40, 1996, 229- 2
- Tickner, J. Ann, ‘’Re-Visioning Security’’, in: Booth, K. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press. 1995.
- Vale, Peter, Security and Politics in South Africa: The Regional Dimension, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Three Competing Europes: German, French, Russian’’, International Affairs, 66, 1990, 477.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Identity, Integration and Security’’, Journal of International Affairs,48, 1995a, 389.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Securitization and Desecuritization’’, in: Lipschutz, R. D. (Ed.) On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1995b, 46-86.
- Waever, Ole & Buzan, Barry, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
- Waever, Ole, Buzan, Barry & J. De Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.
- Walker, Rob B. J., ‘’Security, Sovereignty and the Challenge of World Politics’’, Alternatives, 15, 1990, 3-28.
- Wendt, Alexander, ‘’Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’’, International Organization, 46, 1992, 391-425.
- Wyn Jones, R., Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
BÖLGESELLEŞEN GÜVENLİK ANLAYIŞINDA YENİ AÇILIMLAR VE TÜRKİYE’NİN GÜVENLİK ALGISINDA YAŞANAN DEĞİŞİMLER
Öz
Bu çalışmada bölgeselleşen güvenlik anlayışı bağlamında güvenlik çalışmalarında ortaya çıkan yeni açılımlar ele alınırken, aynı zamanda bu açılımların Türkiye’nin güvenlik politikalarına nasıl etki ettiği ve bu husustaki değişimlerin neler olduğu üzerinde durulmaktadır. Birinci bölümde Soğuk Savaş yıllarında oluşan geleneksel güvenlik çalışmalarının zaman içindeki dönüşüm koşulları ve süreci incelenmektedir. Ardından Soğuk Savaş sonrasında ortaya çıkan “yeni güvenlik” yaklaşımının temel nitelikleri kısaca ele alınmaktadır. Bunu yaparken bu yeni yaklaşımın sadece eskisinin güvenlik anlayışının genişletilmesinden ibaret olmadığı vurgulanmaktadır. İlk bölümde son olarak “yeni güvenlik” yaklaşımının ne olmadığı açıklanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümünde yeni güvenlik çalışmalarının ana hatları ortaya konmaya çalışılırken bu hususta öncü katkıda bulunmuş olan Aberystwyth ve Kopenhag ekollerine odaklanılacaktır. En son olarak da yeni güvenlik çalışmalarının en önemli görülebilecek katkısının, güvenlik kuram ve uygulamalarının (theory/practice) karşılıklı evirilmesinin nasıl incelendiği ve bu bağlamda Türkiye’nin güvenlik politikalarının hangi açılardan ve nasıl değiştiği üzerinde durulacaktır
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abraham, Itty, The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, New York, NY, Zed Books, 1994.
- Barkawi, Tarak & Laffey, Mark, ‘’The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’’, Review of International Studies, 32, 2006, 329-352.
- Bigo, Didier, ‘’Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’’ Alternatives, 27, 2002, 63-92.
- Booth, Ken, ‘’Security and Emancipation’’, Review of International Studies, 17, 1991, 313-326.
- Booth, Ken,‘’Human Wrongs and International Relations’’, International Affairs, 71, 1995, 103-126.
- Booth, Ken, ‘’Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist’’,in: Krause, K. &Williams, M. C. (Eds.) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1997, ss.83-119.
- Booth, Ken, Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005a.
- Booth, K. (Ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005b.
- Booth, Ken, Theory of World Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 200 Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver & J. De Wilde, Security : A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Pub., 1998.
- Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1992.
- Campbell, David, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
- Cox, Robert W., ‘’Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’’, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 1981, 126- 1
- Dillon, Michael, ‘’Sovereignty and Governmentality: From the Problematics of the ‘’New World Order’’ to the Ethical Problematic of the World Order’’, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 20, 1995, 323-368.
- Dillon, Michael & Reid, John, ‘’Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency’’, Alternatives-Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 25, 2000, 117-143.
- Enloe, Cynthia, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.
- Guzzini, Stefano & Leander, Anna, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, London, Routledge, 2006.
- Huysmans, Jef, ‘’Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe’’, European Journal of International Relations, 4, 1998, 479-505.
- Huysmans, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity : Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, Routledge, 2006.
- Krause, Keith & Michael C. Williams, ‘’Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’’, International Studies Quarterly, 40, 1996, 229- 2
- Tickner, J. Ann, ‘’Re-Visioning Security’’, in: Booth, K. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press. 1995.
- Vale, Peter, Security and Politics in South Africa: The Regional Dimension, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Three Competing Europes: German, French, Russian’’, International Affairs, 66, 1990, 477.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Identity, Integration and Security’’, Journal of International Affairs,48, 1995a, 389.
- Waever, Ole, ‘’Securitization and Desecuritization’’, in: Lipschutz, R. D. (Ed.) On Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1995b, 46-86.
- Waever, Ole & Buzan, Barry, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
- Waever, Ole, Buzan, Barry & J. De Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.
- Walker, Rob B. J., ‘’Security, Sovereignty and the Challenge of World Politics’’, Alternatives, 15, 1990, 3-28.
- Wendt, Alexander, ‘’Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’’, International Organization, 46, 1992, 391-425.
- Wyn Jones, R., Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Aralık 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 |