Küreselleşme, Hidroelektrik Enerji, Ekonomik Büyüme, CO2 Emisyonları ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisinin ABD İçin Analizi: Kesirli Fourier ADL Eşbütünleşme Yöntemi

Year 2024, , 249 - 267, 31.01.2024

Ahmet Kamacı

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.11

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Küresel iklim değişikliği ve küresel ısınma gibi çevresel sorunlar gelecek kuşaklar için büyük bir tehdit oluşturmaktadır. Bu tehdidi oluşturan ülkelerin başında da ekolojik ayak izi ve karbon emisyonu oldukça yüksek olan ABD gelmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, bu çalışmanın amacı, ABD’de küreselleşme, ekonomik büyüme ve hidroelektrik enerjinin karbon emisyonu ve ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisini Fourier ADL eşbütünleşme ve Fourier Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testleri ile araştırmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, hidroelektrik kaynaklardan elektrik üretimi ile CO2 emisyonları arasında negatif ilişki ve kişi başı GSYİH ile ekolojik ayak izi arasında pozitif ilişki bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca KOF’dan CO2’ye doğru ve hidroelektrik kaynaklardan elektrik üretiminden ve kişi başı GSYİH’dan ekolojik ayak izine doğru tek yönlü nedensellik tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Ekolojik Ayak İzi, CO2 Emisyonu, Küreselleşme, Hidroelektrik Enerji, Fourier ADL Eşbütünleşme Testi

The Analysis of Globalization, Hydroelectric Energy, Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Ecological Footprint Relationships for the USA: Fractional Fourier ADL Cointegration Method

Abstract

Environmental problems such as global climate change and global warming pose a great threat to future generations. The USA, which has a very high ecological footprint and carbon emissions, is at the forefront of the countries that pose this threat. In this direction, this study aims to investigate the effects of globalisation, economic growth and hydroelectric energy on carbon emission and ecological footprint in the USA with Fourier ADL cointegration and Fourier Toda-Yamamoto causality tests. According to the findings, there is a negative relationship between electricity generation from hydroelectric sources and CO2 emissions and a positive relationship between per capita GDP and ecological footprint. In addition, unidirectional causality from KOF to CO2, hydroelectric-powered electricity generation, and per capita GDP to ecological footprint are also determined.

Keywords

Ecological Footprint, CO2 Emissions, Globalization, Hydroelectric Energy, Fourier ADL Cointegration Test

References

• Abid, A. et al. (2021), “Analyzing ecological footprint through the lens of globalization, financial development, natural resources, human capital and urbanization”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 15(4), 765-795.
• Adebayo, T.S. et al. (2022), “The influence of renewable energy usage on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT economies”, Heliyon, 8(2), e08941.
• Ahmed, Z. et al. (2021), “Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development”, Sustainable Development, 30, 595-605.
• Akın, C.S. (2014), “The impact of foreign trade, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(3), 465-475.
• Al-Mulali, U. & İ. Özturk (2015), “The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region”, Energy, 84, 382-389.
• Alnour, M. & H. Atik (2021), “The dynamic implications of globalization and renewable energy in Turkey: Are they vital for environmental sustainability? An Svar analysis”, Bilgi, 23(2), 288-314.
• Amri, F. (2018), “Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(33), 33691-33701.
• Anser, M.K. et al. (2021), “Does globalization affect the green economy and environment? The relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 51105-51118.
• Banerjee, P. et al. (2017), “Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from Crude Oil Market”, Econ. Modell, 67, 114-124.
• Barrett, S. (2000), “Trade and environment: local versus multilateral reforms. Environment and Development Economics”, 5(4), 349-359.
• Bashir, M.F. et al. (2020), “The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions with the roles of environmental technology and financial development”, Plos One, 15(11), e0242412.
• Baydoun, H. & M. Aga (2021), “The effect of energy consumption and economic growth on environmental sustainability in the GCC countries: does financial development matter?”, Energies, 14(8), 5897.
• Bazan, G. (1997), “Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth”, Electronic Green Journal, 1(7), doi: 10.5070/G31710273.
• Bernauer, T. & P.M. Kuhn (2010), “Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? Insights from water pollution in Europe”, European Journal of International Relations, 20(10), 1-26.
• Cao, H. et al. (2021), “Impact of globalization, institutional quality, economic growth, electricity and renewable energy consumption on carbon dioxide emission in OECD countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 24191-24202.
• Chebbi, H.E. et al. (2011), “Trade openness and CO2 emissions in Tunisia”, Middle East Development Journal, 3(1), 29-53.
• Chienwattanasook, K. et al. (2021), “The impact of economic growth, globalization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in ASEAN countries”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 1-14.
• Christopoulos, D.K. & M.A. Leon-Ledesma (2011), “International output convergence, breaks, and asymmetric adjustment”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1823.
• Cole, M.A. & E. Neumayer (2004), “Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution”, Population and Environment, 26(1), 5-21.
• Cole, M.A. et al. (1997), “The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis”, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401-416.
• Dauda, L. et al. (2021), “Innovation, Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions in Selected Countries in Africa”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143.
• Destek, M. & A. Sinha (2020), “Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries”, MPRA Paper No. 104246.
• Dinda, S. et al. (2000), “Air quality and economic growth: An empirical study”, Ecological Economics, 34, 409-423.
• Ertuğrul, H.M. et al. (2016), “The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries”, Ecological Indicators, 67, 543-555.
• Essandoh, O.K. et al. (2020), “Linking international trade and foreign direct ınvestment to CO2 emissions: any differences between developed and developing countries?”, Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136437.
• Farhani, S. et al. (2013), “Panel analysis of CO2 emissions, GDP, energy consumption, trade openness and urbanization for Mena countries”, MPRA Paper No. 49258.
• Global Footprint Network (2022), <https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/>, 28.12.2022.
• Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991), Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research, 3914.
• He, K. et al. (2021), “Does globalization moderate the effect of economic complexity on CO2 emissions? Evidence from the top 10 energy transition economies”, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 778088.
• İlkay, S.C. et al. (2021), “Technology spillovers and sustainable environment: Evidence from time-series analyses with Fourier extension”, Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 113033.
• Jena, P.R. & U. Grote (2008), “Growth-trade-environment nexus in India”, Economics Bulletin, 17(11), 1-11.
• Kalaycı, C. & P. Hayaloğlu (2018), “The impact of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: The case of NAFTA countries”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 356-360.
• Kasman, A. & Y.S. Duman (2015), “CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in New EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis”, Economic Modelling, 44, 97-103.
• Keleş, Ö. (2010), “Sürdürülebilir yaşam göstergesi: Ekolojik ayak izi”, Tabiat ve İnsan, 2(2), 3-10.
• Khan, M.K. et al. (2020), “The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan”, Financial Innovation, 6(1), 1-13.
• KOF (2022), KOF Globalisation Index, <https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-andindicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html>, 29.12.2022.
• Latif, Z. et al. (2018), “The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence”, Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 318-328.
• Li, S. et al. (2022), “The impact of green investment, technological innovation, and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from MINT countries”, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 868704.
• Lv, Z. & T. Xu (2019), “Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of Middle-income countries”, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(3), 317-330.
• Managi, S. et al. (2009), “Does trade openness improve environmental quality?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(3), 346-363.
• Nathaniel, S.P. (2021a), “Ecological footprint and human well-being nexus: accounting for broad-based financial development, globalization, and natural resources in the Next-11 countries”, Future Business Journal, 7(24), 1-18.
• Nathaniel, S.P. (2021b), “Natural resources, urbanisation, economic growth and the ecological footprint in South Africa: the moderating role of human capital”, Quaestiones Geographicae, 40(2), 63-76.
• Nazlıoğlu, S. et al. (2016), “Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs), Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis”, Energy Economics, 60, 168-175.
• Öcal, O. vd. (2020), “The effects of economic growth and energy consumption on ecological footprint and carbon emissions: evidence from Turkey”, Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 667-681.
• Öztürk, I. et al. (2016), “Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1916-1928.
• Pata, U.K. (2021), “Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective”, Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208.
• Perron, P. (1989), “The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
• Phong, L.H. et al. (2018), “The role of globalization on carbon dioxide emission in Vietnam incorporating industrialization, urbanization, gross domestic product per capita and energy use”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6), 275-283.
• Rehman, A. et al. (2021), “The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: Does environmental sustainability exist?”, Energies, 14, 5234.
• Sahu, N.C. & P. Kumar (2020), “Impact of globalization, financial development, energy consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in India: Evidence from ARDL approach”, Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 8(3), 241-245.
• Salahuddin, M. et al. (2019), “Urbanization-globalization-CO2 emissions nexus revisited: empirical evidence from South Africa”, Heliyon, 5, e01974.
• Salman, M. et al. (2019), “Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach”, Science of the Total Environment, 686, 1019-1029.
• Sasana, H. et al. (2018), “The impact of globalization against environmental condition in Indonesia”, E3S Web of Conferences 73, 02012, ICENIS 2018.
• Sbia, R. et al. (2014), “A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness,carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE”, Economic Modelling, 36, 191-197.
• Shafik, N. & S. Bandyopadhyay (1992), “Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-section evidence”, Background Paper for the 1992 World Development Report, Washington DC: The World Bank.
• Shahbaz, M. et al. (2011), “Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: evidence from panel data analysis”, MPRA Paper 32547.
• Shahbaz, M. et al. (2013), “The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa”, Energy Policy, 61, 1452-1459.
• Shahbaz, M. et al. (2017a), “Trade openness-carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels”, Energy Economics, 61, 221-232.
• Shahbaz, M. et al. (2017b), “The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China”, The Singapore Economic Review, 62(4), 929-957.
• Shahbaz, M. et al. (2019), “The technical decomposition of carbon emissions and the concerns about FDI and trade openness effects in the United States”, International Economics, 159, 56-73.
• Sharmin, M. & M. Tareque (2018), “Econometric analysis of the effect of economic globalization, energy intensity, urbanization, industrialization and growth on CO2 emissions of Bangladesh”, Managing Global Transitions, 16(4), 335-354.
• Stern, D.I. (2004), “The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve”, World Development, 32(8), 1419-1439.
• Toda, H.Y. & T. Yamamoto (1995), “Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes”, Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
• Vogel, D. (1995), Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy, Cambridge/MA.
• Wackernagel, M. & W. Rees (1996), Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth, Canada: New Society Publishers.
• Worldbank (2022), World Development Indicators, <https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators>, 29.12.2022.
• wwf (2022), World Wildlife-Kırmızı Alarm, <https://wwf.org.tr>, 29.12.2022.
• Zhang, S. et al. (2017), “Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries?”, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 24, 17616-17625.
• Zivot, E. & D.W.K. Andrews (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the OilPrice Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.