BibTex RIS Cite

Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı

Year 2005, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, - , 01.12.2005

Abstract

Globalleşme sermaye hareketlerine artan ölçüde özgürlüğü içerir. Sermayenin serbest hareket olanağına kavuşması ve firmaların coğrafik olarak dağılımı için fırsatlar vergi otoriteleri için esaslı meydan okumalar oluşturmuştur. Yeni ekonomik ortamda, yüksek oranlı vergiler uygulamak neredeyse imkânsızdır. Bu durum özellikle sermaye üzerindeki vergiler için söz konusudur. Böyle bir uygulama karşısında sermaye hiç vergi olmayan ya da görece olarak daha düşük vergilemenin olduğu ülkelere yönelmektedir. Yani, sermayeyi yüksek vergileme sermaye kaçışına, dolayısıyla yurtiçi verimliliğin düşmesine ve vergi tabanının aşınmasına sebep olmaktadır. Artan sermaye kaçışı tehlikesi karşısında globalleşme teorisyenleri, sermayeyi ülkeye çekmek ve geri getirmek için en önemli rekabet stratejilerinden birinin bireyler ve kurumlar üzerindeki vergi yükünü düşürmek olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir. Sermaye kaçışı ve vergi tabanındaki aşınmanın önüne geçebilmek için vergileme alanında bir takım düzenlemeler yapmak kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Sonuç olarak, artan sermaye mobilitesi ulusal vergi politikalarını değişime uğratmıştır.

References

  • Asher M.G. and Rajan R.S. (2001)., “Globalization and Tax Systems:Implications for Developing Countries with Particular Reference to Souhteast Asia”, Asean Economic Bulletin, April, 120-140.
  • Bjerksund P. and Schjelderup G. (1995), “Capital Controls and Capital Flight”, Finanzarchiv 52, 33-42.
  • Bjerksund P. and Schjelderup G. (1998), “The Political Economy of Capital Controls and Tax Policy in a Small Open Economy”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.14, 543-559.
  • Chang P.H.K., Claessens S. and Cumby R.E. (1997), “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Capital Flight”, Int. J. Fin.Econ., Vol.2, 101-119.
  • Cooper H.W. and Hard P.J. (2000), “Russian Capital Flight, Economic Reforms and U.S. Interest:An Analysis”, March 10, http://www.cnie.org/nle/inter-58.httm
  • Cuddigton T.J. (1986), “Macroeconomic Determinants of Capital Flight: An Econometric Investigation”, in D. R. Lessard, and J. Williamson (eds), Capital Flight and Third World Debt,. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1987, 85-96.
  • Cuddington T.J. (1987), “Capital Flight”, European Economic Review 31, 382-388.
  • Cumby, R., and Levich R. (1987), ‘Definitions and Magnitudes: On the Definition and Magnitude of Recent Capital Flight’, in D. R. Lessard, and J. Williamson (eds), Capital Flight and Third World Debt,. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1987, 27-67.
  • Dooley M.P. (1988), “Capital Flight-A Response to Differences in Finanfial Risks”, Economics and Social Review 19(4), July, 422-436.
  • Dooley M.P. and Kletzer K.M. (1994), “Capital Flight, External Debt and Domestic Policies”, NBER Working Paper No.4793, July, 30 p.
  • Eaton J. (1987), “Public Debt Guarantees and Private Capital Flight”, The World Bank Economic Review Vol.1, No.3, May, 377-394.
  • Eaton, J., and Gersovitz M. (1989), “Country Risk and the Organization of the International Capital Transfer”, in G. Calvo, R. Findlay, P. J. K. Kouri, and J. Braga de Macedo (eds), Debt Stabilization and Development: Essays in Memory of Carlos Diaz-Alejandro. Oxford: Blackwell, 109-129.
  • Edwards C. and Veronigue de R. (2002), “International Tax Competition A 21st-Century Restraint on Government”, Policy Analysis No.431, April 12, 43 p.
  • Engin İ. (2002) , “Vergi Rekabeti, AB ve Türkiye”, Avrupa Birliğine Geçiş Süreci ve Türk Kamu Maliyesinin Uyumu”, 17. Türkiye Maliye Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Mayıs-, 2002, TÜRMOB Yayınları-185, 180-208.
  • Esen O. (1990), Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerden Sermaye Kaçışı: Ölçülmesi, Nedenleri ve Sonuçları, Banka ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Mayıs, 39-48.
  • FitzGerald V. (2002), “International Tax Cooperation and Capital Mobility”, QEH-Universty of Oxford Working Paper Number 79, February, 1-21.
  • Fligsteing N. and Merand F. (2001), “Globalization or Europeanization? Evidence on the European Economy Since 1980”, Universty of California Berkeley, April 2001. This paper was prepared for conference ‘Shareholder Value-Capitalism and Globalization’ held in Hamburg, FRG, May 10-11, 42 p.
  • Frenkel J. Razin A. and Sadka E. (1993), “International Taxation in an Integrated World, Journal of Economics 57, 315-318.
  • Genschel P. (2001), “Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Viability of the Welfare State”, MPIfG Working Paper 01/1, May.
  • Gordon H.R. (1990), “Can Capital Income Taxes Survive in Open Economies?”, NBER Working Paper, No.3416, August, 30 p., Journal of Finance, Vol. 47,. No. 3, July 1992, 1159-1180.
  • Gordon D.B. and Levine R. (1988), “The Capital Flight ‘Problem’”, International Finance Discussion Papers, Number 320, April, 49 p.
  • Gulati S. (1987), “Capital Flight:Causes, Consequences and Cures”, Journal of International Affairs, 165-185.
  • Günaydın İ. ve Benk S. (2003), “Globalleşmenin Vergi Sistemlerinde Meydana Getirdiği Değişmeler”, Vergi Dünyası, Sayı 267, Kasım, 160-174.
  • Harrigan J. and at all, (2002), “On The Determinants of Capital Flight-a New Approach”, Journal of Asia Pacific Economy 7(2), 203-241.
  • Hermes N., Lensink R., and Murinde V. (2003), “Capital Flight: the key issues”, (In Handbook of International Banking, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 516-543.
  • Hermes N., Lensink R., and Murinde V. (1994), “The Magnitute and Determinants of Capital Flight in Eastern Europe”, 243-255.
  • Ize A. and Ortiz G. (1987), “Fiscal Rigities, Public Debt and Capital Flight”, IMF Staff Paper 34(2), 311-332.
  • Kant C. (2002), “What is Capital Flight?”, World Economy, 25(3), 2002, 341-358.
  • Khan S.M. and Ul Haque N. (1985),”Foreign Borrowing and Capital Flight: A Formal Analysis”, IMF Staff Papers, Vol.32, 606-628.
  • Lautenberg H.E.A. (2002), Taxation as a Policy Issue in a Changing European Enviroment, ISMA AGM and Conference, Basel, May 24, 12 p.
  • McDonald G.T. (1999), International Capital flows: An Evalatution Turkish Capital Flight, The City University of New York, (A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Economics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosopy)
  • Normann G. (2004), Taxation of Entrepreneurs Relative to Well Diversified Investors - A Swedish Perspective, The Research Institute of Insistrual Economics, No.632, 23 p.
  • Parelta S. and Ypersele van T. (2002), “Coordination of Capital Taxation among Asymmetric Countries”, Core Discussion Paper, May 2002/32, 19 p.
  • Pastor M.Jr. (1990), “Capital Flight from Latin America”, World Development, Vol.18, No.1, 1-18.
  • Petersen H.G. (2004), “Globalization, Capital Flight and Capital Income Taxation: A European Perspective, 1-15.
  • Razin A. and Sadka E. (1995), "The Status of Capital Income Taxation in the Open Economy", FinanzArchiv 52, No. 1, 21 –32.
  • Schelderup G. (1993), “Optimal Taxation, Capital Mobility and Tax Evasion”, Scand. J. of Economics 95 (3), 377-386.
  • Sorensen P.B. (2004), “International Tax Coordination: Regionalism versus Globalism”, Journal of Public Economics 88, 1187-1284.
  • Steinmo S. (2003), “The Evoluation of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Centruy”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol.5, No.2, May, 206-236.
  • Tanzi V. (1995), Taxation in an Integrating World, The Brookings Institution Washington DC. 168 p.
  • Tanzi V. (2000), “Globalization, Technological Developments and the Work of Fiscal Termites”, IMF Working Paper 181, November, 1-23.
  • Tanzi V. (2001), “Globalization and the Work of Fiscal Termites”, F&D, Vol.38, No.1, March, 34-37.
  • TOBB (2001), “Vergilemede Global Eğilimler- AB ve Türk Vergi Sistemi”, TOBB Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara-Mayıs.
  • Walter I. (1987), The Mechanisms of Capital Flight, 1987, 103-127; in Capital Flight and Third World Debt, (Ed. Donald R. Lessard and John Williamson), Institute for International Economics, Washington , DC., 1987.
  • Wachtel H.M. (2002), “Tax Distortion In The Global Economy”, Paper Presented at the Global Crisis Seminar, TNI, Amsterdam, 17-18 February, http://www.tni.org/archives/wachtel/distortion.htm#aa.
  • Williamson J. and Lessard D.R. (1987), Capital Flight: The Problem and Policy Responses, Washington DC., Institute for International Economics.

Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı

Year 2005, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, - , 01.12.2005

Abstract

Globalleşme sermaye hareketlerine artan ölçüde özgürlüğü içerir. Sermayenin serbest hareket olanağına kavuşması ve firmaların coğrafik olarak dağılımı için fırsatlar vergi otoriteleri için esaslı meydan okumalar oluşturmuştur. Yeni ekonomik ortamda, yüksek oranlı vergiler uygulamak neredeyse imkânsızdır. Bu durum özellikle sermaye üzerindeki vergiler için söz konusudur. Böyle bir uygulama karşısında sermaye hiç vergi olmayan ya da görece olarak daha düşük vergilemenin olduğu ülkelere yönelmektedir. Yani, sermayeyi yüksek vergileme sermaye kaçışına, dolayısıyla yurtiçi verimliliğin düşmesine ve vergi tabanının aşınmasına sebep olmaktadır. Artan sermaye kaçışı tehlikesi karşısında globalleşme teorisyenleri, sermayeyi ülkeye çekmek ve geri getirmek için en önemli rekabet stratejilerinden birinin bireyler ve kurumlar üzerindeki vergi yükünü düşürmek olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir. Sermaye kaçışı ve vergi tabanındaki aşınmanın önüne geçebilmek için vergileme alanında bir takım düzenlemeler yapmak kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Sonuç olarak, artan sermaye mobilitesi ulusal vergi politikalarını değişime uğratmıştır.

References

  • Asher M.G. and Rajan R.S. (2001)., “Globalization and Tax Systems:Implications for Developing Countries with Particular Reference to Souhteast Asia”, Asean Economic Bulletin, April, 120-140.
  • Bjerksund P. and Schjelderup G. (1995), “Capital Controls and Capital Flight”, Finanzarchiv 52, 33-42.
  • Bjerksund P. and Schjelderup G. (1998), “The Political Economy of Capital Controls and Tax Policy in a Small Open Economy”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.14, 543-559.
  • Chang P.H.K., Claessens S. and Cumby R.E. (1997), “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Capital Flight”, Int. J. Fin.Econ., Vol.2, 101-119.
  • Cooper H.W. and Hard P.J. (2000), “Russian Capital Flight, Economic Reforms and U.S. Interest:An Analysis”, March 10, http://www.cnie.org/nle/inter-58.httm
  • Cuddigton T.J. (1986), “Macroeconomic Determinants of Capital Flight: An Econometric Investigation”, in D. R. Lessard, and J. Williamson (eds), Capital Flight and Third World Debt,. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1987, 85-96.
  • Cuddington T.J. (1987), “Capital Flight”, European Economic Review 31, 382-388.
  • Cumby, R., and Levich R. (1987), ‘Definitions and Magnitudes: On the Definition and Magnitude of Recent Capital Flight’, in D. R. Lessard, and J. Williamson (eds), Capital Flight and Third World Debt,. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1987, 27-67.
  • Dooley M.P. (1988), “Capital Flight-A Response to Differences in Finanfial Risks”, Economics and Social Review 19(4), July, 422-436.
  • Dooley M.P. and Kletzer K.M. (1994), “Capital Flight, External Debt and Domestic Policies”, NBER Working Paper No.4793, July, 30 p.
  • Eaton J. (1987), “Public Debt Guarantees and Private Capital Flight”, The World Bank Economic Review Vol.1, No.3, May, 377-394.
  • Eaton, J., and Gersovitz M. (1989), “Country Risk and the Organization of the International Capital Transfer”, in G. Calvo, R. Findlay, P. J. K. Kouri, and J. Braga de Macedo (eds), Debt Stabilization and Development: Essays in Memory of Carlos Diaz-Alejandro. Oxford: Blackwell, 109-129.
  • Edwards C. and Veronigue de R. (2002), “International Tax Competition A 21st-Century Restraint on Government”, Policy Analysis No.431, April 12, 43 p.
  • Engin İ. (2002) , “Vergi Rekabeti, AB ve Türkiye”, Avrupa Birliğine Geçiş Süreci ve Türk Kamu Maliyesinin Uyumu”, 17. Türkiye Maliye Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Mayıs-, 2002, TÜRMOB Yayınları-185, 180-208.
  • Esen O. (1990), Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerden Sermaye Kaçışı: Ölçülmesi, Nedenleri ve Sonuçları, Banka ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Mayıs, 39-48.
  • FitzGerald V. (2002), “International Tax Cooperation and Capital Mobility”, QEH-Universty of Oxford Working Paper Number 79, February, 1-21.
  • Fligsteing N. and Merand F. (2001), “Globalization or Europeanization? Evidence on the European Economy Since 1980”, Universty of California Berkeley, April 2001. This paper was prepared for conference ‘Shareholder Value-Capitalism and Globalization’ held in Hamburg, FRG, May 10-11, 42 p.
  • Frenkel J. Razin A. and Sadka E. (1993), “International Taxation in an Integrated World, Journal of Economics 57, 315-318.
  • Genschel P. (2001), “Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Viability of the Welfare State”, MPIfG Working Paper 01/1, May.
  • Gordon H.R. (1990), “Can Capital Income Taxes Survive in Open Economies?”, NBER Working Paper, No.3416, August, 30 p., Journal of Finance, Vol. 47,. No. 3, July 1992, 1159-1180.
  • Gordon D.B. and Levine R. (1988), “The Capital Flight ‘Problem’”, International Finance Discussion Papers, Number 320, April, 49 p.
  • Gulati S. (1987), “Capital Flight:Causes, Consequences and Cures”, Journal of International Affairs, 165-185.
  • Günaydın İ. ve Benk S. (2003), “Globalleşmenin Vergi Sistemlerinde Meydana Getirdiği Değişmeler”, Vergi Dünyası, Sayı 267, Kasım, 160-174.
  • Harrigan J. and at all, (2002), “On The Determinants of Capital Flight-a New Approach”, Journal of Asia Pacific Economy 7(2), 203-241.
  • Hermes N., Lensink R., and Murinde V. (2003), “Capital Flight: the key issues”, (In Handbook of International Banking, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 516-543.
  • Hermes N., Lensink R., and Murinde V. (1994), “The Magnitute and Determinants of Capital Flight in Eastern Europe”, 243-255.
  • Ize A. and Ortiz G. (1987), “Fiscal Rigities, Public Debt and Capital Flight”, IMF Staff Paper 34(2), 311-332.
  • Kant C. (2002), “What is Capital Flight?”, World Economy, 25(3), 2002, 341-358.
  • Khan S.M. and Ul Haque N. (1985),”Foreign Borrowing and Capital Flight: A Formal Analysis”, IMF Staff Papers, Vol.32, 606-628.
  • Lautenberg H.E.A. (2002), Taxation as a Policy Issue in a Changing European Enviroment, ISMA AGM and Conference, Basel, May 24, 12 p.
  • McDonald G.T. (1999), International Capital flows: An Evalatution Turkish Capital Flight, The City University of New York, (A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Economics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosopy)
  • Normann G. (2004), Taxation of Entrepreneurs Relative to Well Diversified Investors - A Swedish Perspective, The Research Institute of Insistrual Economics, No.632, 23 p.
  • Parelta S. and Ypersele van T. (2002), “Coordination of Capital Taxation among Asymmetric Countries”, Core Discussion Paper, May 2002/32, 19 p.
  • Pastor M.Jr. (1990), “Capital Flight from Latin America”, World Development, Vol.18, No.1, 1-18.
  • Petersen H.G. (2004), “Globalization, Capital Flight and Capital Income Taxation: A European Perspective, 1-15.
  • Razin A. and Sadka E. (1995), "The Status of Capital Income Taxation in the Open Economy", FinanzArchiv 52, No. 1, 21 –32.
  • Schelderup G. (1993), “Optimal Taxation, Capital Mobility and Tax Evasion”, Scand. J. of Economics 95 (3), 377-386.
  • Sorensen P.B. (2004), “International Tax Coordination: Regionalism versus Globalism”, Journal of Public Economics 88, 1187-1284.
  • Steinmo S. (2003), “The Evoluation of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Centruy”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol.5, No.2, May, 206-236.
  • Tanzi V. (1995), Taxation in an Integrating World, The Brookings Institution Washington DC. 168 p.
  • Tanzi V. (2000), “Globalization, Technological Developments and the Work of Fiscal Termites”, IMF Working Paper 181, November, 1-23.
  • Tanzi V. (2001), “Globalization and the Work of Fiscal Termites”, F&D, Vol.38, No.1, March, 34-37.
  • TOBB (2001), “Vergilemede Global Eğilimler- AB ve Türk Vergi Sistemi”, TOBB Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara-Mayıs.
  • Walter I. (1987), The Mechanisms of Capital Flight, 1987, 103-127; in Capital Flight and Third World Debt, (Ed. Donald R. Lessard and John Williamson), Institute for International Economics, Washington , DC., 1987.
  • Wachtel H.M. (2002), “Tax Distortion In The Global Economy”, Paper Presented at the Global Crisis Seminar, TNI, Amsterdam, 17-18 February, http://www.tni.org/archives/wachtel/distortion.htm#aa.
  • Williamson J. and Lessard D.R. (1987), Capital Flight: The Problem and Policy Responses, Washington DC., Institute for International Economics.
There are 46 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Birol Karakurt

Publication Date December 1, 2005
Submission Date December 12, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karakurt, B. (2005). Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı. Sosyoekonomi, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17233/se.90846
AMA Karakurt B. Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı. Sosyoekonomi. December 2005;2(2). doi:10.17233/se.90846
Chicago Karakurt, Birol. “Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı”. Sosyoekonomi 2, no. 2 (December 2005). https://doi.org/10.17233/se.90846.
EndNote Karakurt B (December 1, 2005) Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı. Sosyoekonomi 2 2
IEEE B. Karakurt, “Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı”, Sosyoekonomi, vol. 2, no. 2, 2005, doi: 10.17233/se.90846.
ISNAD Karakurt, Birol. “Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı”. Sosyoekonomi 2/2 (December 2005). https://doi.org/10.17233/se.90846.
JAMA Karakurt B. Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı. Sosyoekonomi. 2005;2. doi:10.17233/se.90846.
MLA Karakurt, Birol. “Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı”. Sosyoekonomi, vol. 2, no. 2, 2005, doi:10.17233/se.90846.
Vancouver Karakurt B. Sermaye Kaçışı Problemi Karşısında Değişen Vergileme Anlayışı. Sosyoekonomi. 2005;2(2).