Energy Market Regulations and Productivity: An Examination on OECD Countries between the Years of 1975-2007

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 27, 243 - 261, 22.01.2016

Işıl Selçuk Altuğ Köktaş

https://doi.org/10.17233/se.13369

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Regulations in energy markets that began in a number of countries in 1980s has become more widespread in many countries especially in 2000s. In this context, the fact that how the sectorial regulations affect the economy has become an important point in the name of policy implementers. Within the scope of this study, the effect of anti-competitive regulations in energy markets of OECD countries between the years of 1975 – 2007 on total factor productivity was examined. It is aimed to evaluate effects of sectorial anti-competitive regulation by the use of regulation impact indicator that has been taken from the data base of OECD. In econometric estimations, which were performed by using unbalanced panel data, Cobb-Douglas type of production function that includes energy was characterized and total factor productivity was calculated as residuals of production function in this direction. In consequence of the analysis, it is stated that in case when the regulations in energy market are anti-competitive, they affect total factor productivity in a negative direction.

Keywords

-

References

• Arnold, J. & G. Nicoletti & S. Scarpetta (2008), “Regulation, Allocative Efficiency and Productivity in OECD Countries: Industry and Firm-Level Evidence”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 616, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/241447806226.
• Arnold, J. & G. Nicoletti & S. Scarpetta (2011), “Does Anti-Competitive Regulation Matter for Productivity? Evidence from European Firms”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5511.
• Braila, C. & G. Rayp & S. Sanyal (2010), “Competition and Regulation, Belgium, 1997 to 2004”, Working Papers 1003, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
• Chang, Kuo-Ping (1994), “Capital-Energy Substitution and the Multi-Level CES Production Function”, Energy Economics, 16, 22– 26.
• Conway, P. & G.D. de Rosa & G. Nicoletti & F. Steiner (2006), “Product Market Regulation and Convergence”, OECD Economic Studies, No. 43, 2006/2, OECD, Paris.
• De Serres, A. & S. Kobayakawa & T. Sløk & V. Laura (2006), “Regulation of Financial Systems and Economic Growth”, OECD Working Paper, No. 506.
• Eberhardt, M. & C. Helmers & H. Strauss (2013), “Do Spillovers Matter When Estimating Private Returns to R&D?”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 95, 436-448.
• Feenstra, R., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. (2013). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. Groningen Growth and Development Center, University of Groningen.
• Grepperud, S. & J. Rasmussen (2004), “A General Equilibrium Assessment of Rebound Effects”, Energy Economics, 26, 261–282.
• Griliches, Z. (1979), “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth”, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.10, No:1, 92-116.
• Kümmel, R. & W. Strassl & A. Gossner & W. Eichhorn (1985), “Technical Progress and Energy Dependent Production Functions”, Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie / Journal of Economics, 45(3), 285-311.
• Kümmel, R. (2007), “The Productive Power of Energy and its Taxation”, 4th European Congress Economics and Management of Energy in Industry, Porto, Portugal, 27-30, November.
• Lecca, P. & K. Swales & K. Turner (2011), “An Investigation of Issues Relating to Where Energy Should Enter The Production Function”, Economic Modelling, Elsevier, 28(6), 2832-2841.
• Lindenberger, D. & R. Kümmel (2002), “Energy-Dependent Production Functions and the Optimization Model ‘PRISE’ of Price-Induced Sectoral Evolution”, International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics, 5(3), 101-107.
• Lindenberger, D. (2003), “Service Production Functions”, EWI Working Paper, No. 03.02, Institute of Energy Economics, University of Cologne (EWI).
• Maddala, G., & S. Wu (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data and A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004), “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No.0435, University of Cambridge.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2007), “A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pollitt, M.G. (2012), “The Role of Policy in Energy Transitions: Lessons from the Energy Liberalisation Era”, Energy Policy, doi:10.106/j.enpol.2012.03.04.
• Sorrell, S. (2008), “Energy-Capital Substitution and the Rebound Effect”, Paper for the 7th BIEE Academic Conference: The New Energy Challenge: Security and Sustainability, St. John’s College, Oxford, 24-25th September 2008.
• Tintner, G. & E. Deutsch & R. Rieder (1974), “A Production Function for Austria Emphasizing Energy”, De Economist, 125(1), 75-94.
• Thompson, H. (2006), “The Applied Theory of Energy Substitution in Production”, Energy Economics, Elsevier, July, 28(4), 410-425.
• Van der Werf, E. (2008), “Production Functions for Climate Policy Modeling: An Empirical Analysis”, Energy Economics, 30, 2964–2979.
• The World Bank, World Development Indicators (2014), Energy Use (kg of oil equivalent), Retrieved from <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE>.
• Zenginobuz, Ü. (2000), “Elektrik Sektöründe Özelleştirme, Rekabet ve Regülasyon (Privatization, Competition, and Regulation in Electricity Supply Industry)”, Rekabet Kurumu Perşembe Konferansları, 101-147, Ankara, 2000.